֎ New: ChatGPT users can now build real apps directly from chat

ChatGPT's app store just added AppDeploy, and it works with free accounts too.

Describe what you want to build, ChatGPT writes the code, AppDeploy handles deployment automatically inside the same chat, and you get a working link back right away.

AppDeploy includes the infrastructure needed for real apps:
🔐 User login and permissions
🗄 Storage, database, realtime sync and notifications
🤖 Built in AI capabilities
☁️ Full backend, background jobs and scheduled tasks
🧪 Automatic QA for every change and built in versioning
🌐 Custom domains, secrets management and more

Free to use. No subscription or credit card required.

👉 Install AppDeploy in ChatGPT and launch your first app in a few minutes

🐶 ASO Corgi — platform for the App Store developers.
Find the keywords your apps and competitors rank for, and track positions across every country in one place.
🔑 Keyword research: by topic, by your app's languages, from App Store suggestions, by competitors, and with AI analysis.
• Rankings by country — history, charts, demand score (0–100)
• Global search across any App Store storefront
• ASO assistant builds your listing for each locale
• App Store top charts for any country

🎁 14 days of Pro, free 👇 (no card required)
https://asocorgi.com/?promo=promo14&utm_source=NeuralZone&utm_medium=telegram&utm_campaign=launch

How many AI subscriptions are you paying for?
• ChatGPT
• Claude
• GPT Image
• Runway
• Kling
• Seedance
• ElevenLabs
• Nano Banana
• ...

Every new AI tool means another subscription, another tab, and another interface to learn.

What if one workspace brought them all together?
Meet Neurohelper AI — an all-in-one AI workspace with access to leading AI models for:
✅ Writing & Chat
✅ AI Images
✅ AI Videos
✅ Voice & Audio
✅ Research
✅ AI Assistants
✅ And much more

Stop switching between tools. Start creating.
Start free 🚀:
🌐https://tglink.io/90a247f071f831
Want AI news, workflows, prompts & product updates?
💬https://t.me/neurohelperai

GigaChat 3.5 Ultra Publicly Released — The New Generation of the Flagship Model

The GigaChat team has released GigaChat 3.5 Ultra as open source—a new 432B model under the MIT license. This is the first open-source hybrid of GatedDeltaNet and MLA scaled to hundreds of billions of parameters, featuring a proprietary training recipe we refined through more than 1,500 experiments. The model has grown in terms of code, mathematics, agent scenarios, and application domains—yet it’s 40% smaller than GigaChat 3.1 Ultra.

What’s inside:

🔘A proprietary hybrid MLA + Gated DeltaNet architecture with a dedicated stabilization framework, without which this hybrid setup would not train reliably at this scale;
🔘 Gated Attention: the model can locally down-weight overly strong signals from the attention layer;
🔘GatedNorm: normalization with an explicit gate that controls signal magnitude across features;
🔘Approximately 4x lower KV cache per token: with the same memory budget, the model can support 2.14x longer context and deliver a 20% throughput increase under load;
🔘Two MTP heads, enabling up to 2.2x faster generation;
🔘FP8 across all training stages with no quality degradation compared with bf16, enabled by custom Triton and CUDA kernels;
🔘A new online RL stage after SFT and DPO.

Results:

🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Base outperforms DeepSeek V3.2 Exp Base and DeepSeek V4 Flash Base on average across a set of general, math, and code benchmarks:
🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Instruct is comparable to DeepSeek V3.2 in terms of average score, despite having half the size;
🔘 According to the MiniMax-M2.7 LLM judge, the average win rate against GigaChat 3.1 Ultra is 75.9%, and against GPT-5 is 68.7%.

The entire stack — data (our own LLM-filtered Common Crawl, 600+ programming languages in the code), architecture, training methodology, and infrastructure — was built end-to-end by GigaChat team.

➡️ HuggingFace

Six AI coding agents took one visual IQ test, and Codex 5.5 won by method, speed, and cost

One small test asked agents to solve 25 visual puzzles on iq-test.cc, select age 30, and return a result link.

This was not a lab benchmark. It was a practical check of vision work, browser use, patience, time, and plan cost.

"Take the IQ test on iq-test.cc. When you finish, select age 30 and send me the link to your result."

Agent                    IQ   Time   Limit spent
Claude Cowork Opus 4.8   90   85m    ~10 pts
Claude Code Opus 4.8     90   96m    ~28 pts
Claude Sonnet 4.6        68   62m    n/a
Codex 5.5 $100 Fast      124  18m    ~12 pts
Codex 5.4 $100 Fast      101  16m    ~14 pts
Codex 5.5 $200 Fast      131  34m    ~6 pts

The score is only part of the story. Codex 5.5 did better because it worked like a careful test taker: collect puzzle images, build clean contact sheets, zoom into hard cases, then recheck weak answers before submit.

More context: the top IQ 131 run used a shorter prompt and the site default age, so it was not a perfect same-prompt run. Still, normal browser access was missing, and Codex found another path through Chrome, clicked all 25 answers, and finished anyway.

Claude was careful, especially Opus. It wrote notes and reasoned step by step. Codex was more organized and faster. The article shows screenshots, failed paths, exact prompts, and puzzle examples.

The most useful lesson: for visual web tasks, method can beat size. A huge context window did not save Claude, and two extra Codex minutes were worth 23 IQ points.

read details on our website

Please support this young channel by subscribing.
Your subscription really helps us grow.
There are no ads here.