Forwarded from π΄πππππ
IMG_20250419_163801.jpg
9.3 MB
Forwarded from Adam J. | theVakhovske
IMG20250419163731.jpg
9.6 MB
Forwarded from Adam J. | theVakhovske
π1
19.04; TL;DR to the contents above:
Short review of OnePlus OV64B:
- it sometimes screws up focus on midrange subjects (very rare, but when it does, it's painful)
- Luma is correct, unlike iQOO in most cases
- dehasing and ISO gain is excellent + expomeasure isn't lacklusting
- sometimes kicks in 2Q binning (visible by squiggles)
- minimal oversharpening, rather slightly aggressive denoising
Few notes:
- Honor starts to show it's work under the hood, after few updates it no longer aggressively lacks to iQOO
- iQOO sometimes kicks in too much portrait face/text detailing (Vivo issue in general)
- software portraits are BEST HANDS DOWN on Honor, Harcourt + actual cloud processing is an excellent idea, and highly suggested to other OEMs to implement.
- iQOO skintones are dull and muted in "Natural mode". Absolutely dull and more closer to greyscale on histogram
What things could be improved?
OnePlus:
- Forced ISZ on lesser range on tele
- 50/50 of both sharpening and denoising
iQOO/Vivo in general:
- Some sort of dehazing would be welcome
- Stop focusing on just faces and spline textures to be improved via AI, rather use whole scene
- Frame stacking for anything in ISZ range would be pleasantly welcomed, instead of relying on heavy sharpening
Honor:
- To stop relying on solely hardware binning, and introduce frame stacking for higher dynamic scenes
- To stop aggressively oversharpening images to the point, where photo starts to look like an oil painting
- To stop overcompensating for expomeasure fuck-ups with excess HDR
Overall, I'd say:
In common cases:
Honor/OnePlus (Whichever processing you'd prefer) > iQOO
Close-range portraits:
OnePlus > Honor > iQOO
Low-lights:
OnePlus > iQOO > Honor
Daytime macro:
Honor > iQOO > OnePlus
WB accuracy:
OnePlus > iQOO > Honor
Additional remarks:
iQOO was using "Natural" mode
Honor was in "Bright/Vivid" mode
OnePlus wasn't using any of the Hasselblad modes
@neps_pubsec
Short review of OnePlus OV64B:
- it sometimes screws up focus on midrange subjects (very rare, but when it does, it's painful)
- Luma is correct, unlike iQOO in most cases
- dehasing and ISO gain is excellent + expomeasure isn't lacklusting
- sometimes kicks in 2Q binning (visible by squiggles)
- minimal oversharpening, rather slightly aggressive denoising
Few notes:
- Honor starts to show it's work under the hood, after few updates it no longer aggressively lacks to iQOO
- iQOO sometimes kicks in too much portrait face/text detailing (Vivo issue in general)
- software portraits are BEST HANDS DOWN on Honor, Harcourt + actual cloud processing is an excellent idea, and highly suggested to other OEMs to implement.
- iQOO skintones are dull and muted in "Natural mode". Absolutely dull and more closer to greyscale on histogram
What things could be improved?
OnePlus:
- Forced ISZ on lesser range on tele
- 50/50 of both sharpening and denoising
iQOO/Vivo in general:
- Some sort of dehazing would be welcome
- Stop focusing on just faces and spline textures to be improved via AI, rather use whole scene
- Frame stacking for anything in ISZ range would be pleasantly welcomed, instead of relying on heavy sharpening
Honor:
- To stop relying on solely hardware binning, and introduce frame stacking for higher dynamic scenes
- To stop aggressively oversharpening images to the point, where photo starts to look like an oil painting
- To stop overcompensating for expomeasure fuck-ups with excess HDR
Overall, I'd say:
In common cases:
Honor/OnePlus (Whichever processing you'd prefer) > iQOO
Close-range portraits:
OnePlus > Honor > iQOO
Low-lights:
OnePlus > iQOO > Honor
Daytime macro:
Honor > iQOO > OnePlus
WB accuracy:
OnePlus > iQOO > Honor
Additional remarks:
iQOO was using "Natural" mode
Honor was in "Bright/Vivid" mode
OnePlus wasn't using any of the Hasselblad modes
@neps_pubsec
π₯1
Jane Doe's Xtreme Imagination
OnePlus 12, Magic 7 Pro (1x), iQOO 12 Pro
Judging by provided pictures in these sample reel. Which device you prefer the most?
Anonymous Poll
47%
HONOR Magic 7 Pro
11%
vivo iQOO 12 Pro
42%
OnePlus 12
Jane Doe's Xtreme Imagination
19.04; TL;DR to the contents above: Short review of OnePlus OV64B: - it sometimes screws up focus on midrange subjects (very rare, but when it does, it's painful) - Luma is correct, unlike iQOO in most cases - dehasing and ISO gain is excellent + expomeasureβ¦
Honorable mention of shame:
Sony Xperia PRO-I
Sony Xperia PRO-I
Forwarded from ΠΠ½Π΄ΡΡΠΈΠ½
π1
Jane Doe's Xtreme Imagination
19.04; TL;DR to the contents above: Short review of OnePlus OV64B: - it sometimes screws up focus on midrange subjects (very rare, but when it does, it's painful) - Luma is correct, unlike iQOO in most cases - dehasing and ISO gain is excellent + expomeasureβ¦
Updated the summary after careful, and considerate post-excitement haze review of images. The crops on which the judgement was made will be uploaded below.
π₯1