🇮🇳🇬🇧 India's second most circulated newspaper Dainik Jagran celebrates that the UK is "now in the hands of an Indian" on its homepage, after Rishi Sunak was announced as the country's new PM:

— "Rishi Sunak became the Prime Minister of Britain, command of the country that subjugated India for years is now in the hands of an Indian."

🌍 @European_Insider | 🕊 Retweet

Makes a change from concerts, trains and buses.

How did he know

Whenever I meet women studying "marketing", I imagine them making adverts like this, for Jews.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nGnubO8pl1E

Winston Churchill's grandson Rupert Soames (Serco CEO) is organising the great replacement of Brits by subsidising landlords to take illegal immigrants.

This is what your grandfathers firebombed German cities for.

It's the jews.

All were highly Jewish in their own way. Perverts, merchants, radicals and a thief.

The thief that robbed my friends of £20,000 had a billionaire uncle and spent it all on hookers.

https://t.me/TheTrUKShow/1267

A transhuman, a libertarian and an obese homosexual pervert.

This is what passes for "right wing" now. No wonder we're ruled by Jews and Pajeets.

An important context for the rise of Curtis Yarvin (Mencius Moldbug) and neoreaction/'NRx' which not enough people discuss is that Moldbug's blog dropped and got boosted just as the Ron Paul '08 presidential campaign was gathering momentum. Those with populist sentiments were waking up in large quantities at the time to Zionist power, the jewish role in 9/11 and jewish overrepresentation in the financial elite. This all coalesced into a right-wing coded populism emerging in rejection of the neoconservatism of the Bush years as it was becoming clear the Iraq War was a shitshow and the global recession was screwing everyone whilst the bankers received trillions in bailouts.

The NRx critique of libertarianism obviously had an element of truth to it, that trying to limit state power while the opponent tries to actually use it (against you) guarantees losing. But what came bootstrapped to NRx was an admixture of ZOG denial and an affirmation of liberal ends, what was critiqued was only its means. NRx was Machiavellian Liberalism, a way to use state power to secure social and economic liberties. The ideology unsurprisingly attracted techno-utopian and transhumanist types who saw in the left's social agenda hard obstacles to American technological potential, this is why a libertarian tech billionaire homosexual transhumanist like Peter Thiel was attracted to NRx and became so enamored that he made Yarvin his court jew.

Often in our circles people view this type of stuff as an 'op' to suppress genuine nativist and counter-semitic forces from politically mobilizing, but its important to recognize that other groups have concrete ideological goals of their own. Thiel has aligned himself with the West Coast Straussians at the Claremont Institute and Yoram Hazony's National Conservatism because he fears that without a Machiavellian update to right-liberalism the US will unacceptably degrade as a bastion of liberty and technological domination. As Thiel said himself in 2009, "I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible."

For these guys the surge of populist sentiment that swept Trump to power in 2016 presented a opportunity to ideologically redesign the American Right, and of course jews are at the center of this redesign in a leading role because they need to reconstruct the position they held on the American Right during the dominance of neoconservatism. The Machiavellian Liberal paradigm laid down by NRx and the attempt at a neofusionism between it and National Conservatism is good for Jews because the modern Anglo-American tradition has a track record of creating social conditions where Jews have thrived better than under any other system, especially when it's framed in Judeo-Christian Straussian terms and aligned with Zionism. And its good for technofuturist imperialists like Thiel because it offers the potential for more pragmatic governance that tones down the excesses of the left's social agenda in favour of a more realist pursuit of American geopolitical and technological domination.

These people oppose us because we represent the alternative interpretation of what the upswell of populist sentiments across the Anglosphere in rejection of neoconservatism signified - ethnic consciousness, real nationalism, the rejection of ZOG, the restoration of Christian morality - all this however would get in the way of supporting an empire which doesn't serve our interests, social libertarianism and jewish power.

100 Years Today

New article on Substack

Because many of you may not be familiar with György Budaházy, I thought it was important to share his epic and moving story:

Budaházy: A National Hero's Glorious Tragedy

https://nullus.substack.com/p/budahazy-a-national-heros-glorious

When you're about to make another $3m insider trading but Antonio breaks in

Russia formally accuses the Eternal Anglo of blowing up Nord Stream

I didn't realise the Pakidemic Agent had actually declared his sell out price.

Why anyone is interested in this low life is beyond me.

Currently enjoying a BASED & RED PILLED, candle lit bath 🛁

How can that be based and red pilled you might wonder?

Well, my dear friend, that is because my candle is a Celtic Moon candle, known as 'White Christmas' and on top of that, my shampoo and soap are both produced by the wonderful Claire at Clean & Pure.

The soap being, 'Lemongrass & Ginger,' and the shampoo being, 'Lime Cooler Bar.'

Luv me citrus! 🍋

Video review coming soon! (Don't get too excited ladies.)

Thank you for contributing to the Nationalist Economy @BarkleyWalshChannel

Concoda's substack presents what I think is one of many misunderstandings when it comes to CBDCs and their intent. The knee-jerk reaction is to see it motivated as the state needing another surveillance tool. But agencies like the IRS & DEA are already readily capable of monitoring cash transactions.

If you read the early (pre-2019) literature on what at the time were called "virtual fiat currencies," you'll notice that they are all linked to executing monetary policy more efficiently and are always administered by the central bank instead of the national government. Why is that?

It's because advancing mass surveillance objectives, something totally outside the purview (let alone the interest) of the central bank, was not an original motive. In reality, they're purposed to have programmable interest rates and direct access to accounts for "helicopter money drops".

This will totally change the meaning of (and limit on) QE and QT. Not only would central planners be able to tighten their balance sheet more surgically — adding or dropping interest rates on select products, in certain regions, and for select accounts — but also to inject money into "stress points" as they see fit. The idea of "rate hikes/drops" would change from sweeping target rates issued by all creditors/lenders, to select rates based on a spending profile.

Central planners were therefore able to justify endless QE because the only models which they wanted to look at suggested that insane changes in the money supply could be managed with "surgical" interest rate hikes/drops and money injections to stress points.

Needless to say, the resulting economic dislocations will be a nightmare.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss

Nigel Farage agrees with 'The TrUK Show' about THE GREAT REPLACEMENT - 2.5 years after 'Dodgy' Dan Hannan denied that demographic change was occurring!

Please share this video around as much as possible, it took me a long time to edit!

Thank you for subbing.

@TheTrUKShow