Forwarded from Patriotic Alternative Official
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Our lovely segment on Newsnight. Don’t think that could’ve gone any better! 😄👍🏻
🔥38👍8
I have little preference for the profession of my sons, so long as they're a master of their craft and a servant of their people.
🔥40👍7
So it looks like the UK deep state conspired to take down Russell Brand
https://x.com/profnfenton/status/1704793453396218048?s=20
https://x.com/profnfenton/status/1704793453396218048?s=20
X (formerly Twitter)
Prof Norman Fenton on X
Wow. This explains a lot. Caroline Dineage’s husband was Deputy Commander of the 77th brigade who’ve spent the last 4 years spying on and censoring anybody challenging the ‘official’ Covid narrative online
😁29👍1
Forwarded from Keith Woods
A great day spent canvassing alongside National Party leader James Reynolds at this year's National Ploughing Championship
https://nationalparty.ie/join/
https://nationalparty.ie/join/
😁32👍22🔥8🤔1
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
⚠️⚠️ Urgent action and attention to the following
Whilst The Online Safety Bill is bad enough you should be aware of something more nefarious coming down the line.
The government is looking to update the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (unaffectionately called the snoopers’ charter).
On 5 June 2023, the Home Office opened an eight-week consultation as regards this.
The act in its current form gives the government the ability to ‘snoop’ on our emails, calls, texts, internet history, and location data – whether or not we are suspected of any wrongdoing.
It also requires web and phone companies to retain customers’ information for 12 months – and provide security services, official agencies, and the police with unprecedented access to this data.
Further, it enables government agencies to hack into the British public’s personal devices – their phones, computers, and tablets – without any criminal intent suspected. On top of this, the hacking is not necessarily performed in a targeted way that singles out specific offenders, but in bulk – applied to huge numbers of UK residents, at any given time.
The consultation is now closed but sought comments on bringing the Acts powers in line with technology advancements. In short the proposed updates are a bid to extend the Acts already far-reaching remit because the intention is to demand that companies offering messaging services seek government approval around the messaging tools’ security features.
The proposed updates would come into force immediately, if approved, and would allow the Home Office to block or disable messaging apps’ security features – without having to let us know. Once a messaging app receives a demand from the Home Office, it would need to be actioned immediately, without allowing time for review or appeal.
The proposed changes would also enable Ofcom to force messaging companies to scan messages.
The consultation ended on 31 July 2023 and we cannot find any update - yet. But we believe it's coming and we should therefore gear up to oppose the changes that the government are attempting to bring in.
These changes, along with The Online Safety Bill represent a massive threat and encroachment to our right to privacy, and march us ever closer to a digital gulag.
For further info you may wish to read this consultation response from the Internet Society of England.
https://isoc-e.org/the-revised-ipa-2016-consultation-response/
Whilst The Online Safety Bill is bad enough you should be aware of something more nefarious coming down the line.
The government is looking to update the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (unaffectionately called the snoopers’ charter).
On 5 June 2023, the Home Office opened an eight-week consultation as regards this.
The act in its current form gives the government the ability to ‘snoop’ on our emails, calls, texts, internet history, and location data – whether or not we are suspected of any wrongdoing.
It also requires web and phone companies to retain customers’ information for 12 months – and provide security services, official agencies, and the police with unprecedented access to this data.
Further, it enables government agencies to hack into the British public’s personal devices – their phones, computers, and tablets – without any criminal intent suspected. On top of this, the hacking is not necessarily performed in a targeted way that singles out specific offenders, but in bulk – applied to huge numbers of UK residents, at any given time.
The consultation is now closed but sought comments on bringing the Acts powers in line with technology advancements. In short the proposed updates are a bid to extend the Acts already far-reaching remit because the intention is to demand that companies offering messaging services seek government approval around the messaging tools’ security features.
The proposed updates would come into force immediately, if approved, and would allow the Home Office to block or disable messaging apps’ security features – without having to let us know. Once a messaging app receives a demand from the Home Office, it would need to be actioned immediately, without allowing time for review or appeal.
The proposed changes would also enable Ofcom to force messaging companies to scan messages.
The consultation ended on 31 July 2023 and we cannot find any update - yet. But we believe it's coming and we should therefore gear up to oppose the changes that the government are attempting to bring in.
These changes, along with The Online Safety Bill represent a massive threat and encroachment to our right to privacy, and march us ever closer to a digital gulag.
For further info you may wish to read this consultation response from the Internet Society of England.
https://isoc-e.org/the-revised-ipa-2016-consultation-response/
GOV.UK
Revised Investigatory Powers Act notices regimes consultation
Consultation on possible outcomes for revised Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) notices regimes intended to improve the effectiveness of the current regimes.
🤔17
Forwarded from Full⛄️Haus
The British judge who sentenced our pal Ash to 8 years is the “Master” of a gay legal society called “The Inner Temple.” Which is some sort of double entendre squared, and further explains why he was soft on a pedo but so harsh on an upright family man.
Https://www.innertemple.org.uk/who-we-are/how-we-operate/equality-diversity-and-inclusivity/lgbtq-society/
Https://www.innertemple.org.uk/who-we-are/how-we-operate/equality-diversity-and-inclusivity/lgbtq-society/
🔥35🤔9👍3😁1
Forwarded from Polish Connection
X (formerly Twitter)
Polish Connection on X
Dear Anglo friends and brothers,
If any of you have a chance to ask Polish MP Tarczyński a question, please ask
"Would you be willing to have a conversation about your government's legal migration policy with someone from @KONFEDERACJA_ ?
If any of you have a chance to ask Polish MP Tarczyński a question, please ask
"Would you be willing to have a conversation about your government's legal migration policy with someone from @KONFEDERACJA_ ?
🔥22
Forwarded from Tupi Report 🇧🇷 • #FreeVenezuela
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚩🇨🇱🇺🇳 — The Chilean communist activist Valentina Muñoz threatens those who refuse to yield to the Agenda 2030: "This is no longer a negotiation. That's why it's called an agenda and not a wish list."
😁42👍2
Forwarded from Joel Davis (censored)
Antifa seething that I was interviewed on SBS news lol
https://vxtwitter.com/AltMediaWatch/status/1705539417946165255
https://vxtwitter.com/AltMediaWatch/status/1705539417946165255
vxTwitter
Alternate Media Watchers (@AltMediaWatch)
The state of news media in Australia is worrying when @SBSNews are not checking who they are platforming and putting Neo-Nazi Joel Davis on the 6:30 News so he can talk about the "aboriginal agenda".
💖 98
💖 98
😁41👍4