"Свободная наука" по Баумгартену — это
Anonymous Quiz
2%
Познание добра
11%
Наука о законах рассудка
15%
Божественное познание актуального мира
6%
Божественное познание мира до его творения
3%
Познание законо устроения жизни
6%
Юриспруденция
6%
Математика
11%
Божественное познание будущих состояний мира
25%
Эстетика
15%
Человеческое самопознание
👍4
Сущностные границы человеческого рассудка — сущностная часть человека. Потому было бы нелепо говорить, что рассудок человеческой души Христа не имел никаких границ
Anonymous Quiz
16%
Декарт
10%
Локк
11%
Кант
8%
Юм
2%
Майер
3%
Руссо
10%
Гердер
17%
Мендельсон
11%
Беркли
13%
Кондильяк
👍3
Метафизика должна быть не только основательной, но и прекрасной ... ведь наш дух обладает не только рассудком
Anonymous Quiz
25%
Баумгартен
4%
Хатченсон
7%
Берк
14%
Лессинг
8%
Кант
25%
Гердер
4%
Вольтер
7%
Кондильяк
4%
Юм
1%
Кондорсе
Кант: "Человек может изучить философию, но при этом не мочь философствовать. Кто хочет быть философом, тот должен свободно пользоваться своим разумом..."
Anonymous Poll
86%
База
14%
Кринж
👍3
Феминистская критика А. Баумгартена...
In this chapter, I intend to reconsider Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten’s account of the “happy aesthetician” (felix aestheticus) using Sara Ahmed’s critique of happiness and the character of the feminist killjoy. Ultimately, I intend to perform a killjoy reading of Baumgarten’s texts by illustrating the ways that Baumgarten fails to define or thematize happiness—so much so that we must read the “happiness” of the happy aesthetician as a subversive character, perhaps even against Baumgarten’s own reliance on harmony and agreement in the happy aesthetician’s beautiful thinking
In this chapter, I intend to reconsider Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten’s account of the “happy aesthetician” (felix aestheticus) using Sara Ahmed’s critique of happiness and the character of the feminist killjoy. Ultimately, I intend to perform a killjoy reading of Baumgarten’s texts by illustrating the ways that Baumgarten fails to define or thematize happiness—so much so that we must read the “happiness” of the happy aesthetician as a subversive character, perhaps even against Baumgarten’s own reliance on harmony and agreement in the happy aesthetician’s beautiful thinking
🔥3😁1
"One way of pursuing metaphysics is the refore to study the general structu re of our language. <...> it has been practised by philosophers <...> as Plato, Aristotle, Hume, Kant, Russell, Frege, Wittgenstein, Carnap, Quine, and Strawson." Кто лишний?
Anonymous Poll
21%
Платон
6%
Аристотель
17%
Юм
13%
Кант
3%
Рассел
6%
Фреге
12%
Витгенштейн
5%
Карнап
9%
Куайн
8%
Стросон
Дэвидсон о своем студенчестве:
From my point of view, Harvard was simply marvelous. When I was an undergraduate, I got really on very friendly terms with a lot of top-notch professors; the philosopher A. N. Whitehead took me under his wing; he would invite me to his apartment for afternoon tea all the time. I knew most of the people in the philosophy department: C. I. Lewis, Whitehead, later on Quine, Demos. I knew all the people in the classics department; I knew the chairman of the English department. I don’t, for the most part, spend nearly as much time with my students as my teachers spent with me. It’s just not in general done these days. I think it’s partly because we all do so much traveling; and also so much time is taken up with correspondence. But back then these people actually invited me into their homes, regularly.
From my point of view, Harvard was simply marvelous. When I was an undergraduate, I got really on very friendly terms with a lot of top-notch professors; the philosopher A. N. Whitehead took me under his wing; he would invite me to his apartment for afternoon tea all the time. I knew most of the people in the philosophy department: C. I. Lewis, Whitehead, later on Quine, Demos. I knew all the people in the classics department; I knew the chairman of the English department. I don’t, for the most part, spend nearly as much time with my students as my teachers spent with me. It’s just not in general done these days. I think it’s partly because we all do so much traveling; and also so much time is taken up with correspondence. But back then these people actually invited me into their homes, regularly.
👍8
И еще:
In fact I was spreading myself out through all this stuff. I also audited all the courses that there were on Greek art and architecture; and also on Romanesque architecture, and so in Greek I had a kind of advantage over others who were just classicists because I knew Greek philosophy, history, Greek art, and Greek architecture. I read all of Greek drama. I remember my senior year I persuaded Harvard to let me put on Aristophanes’ The Birds in Greek. I played the lead, Peisthetairos, which meant memorizing 700 lines of Greek. Leonard Bernstein, who was also a senior in the class of 1938–39 and a friend (we used to play four-hand piano together), wrote an original score for the production and conducted it. Some of the music he wrote for that score, resurfaced in his ballet, Fancy Free. I also had a great interest in music. I audited advanced seminars on Beethoven. Yes, it was a wonderful education, absolutely marvelous.
In fact I was spreading myself out through all this stuff. I also audited all the courses that there were on Greek art and architecture; and also on Romanesque architecture, and so in Greek I had a kind of advantage over others who were just classicists because I knew Greek philosophy, history, Greek art, and Greek architecture. I read all of Greek drama. I remember my senior year I persuaded Harvard to let me put on Aristophanes’ The Birds in Greek. I played the lead, Peisthetairos, which meant memorizing 700 lines of Greek. Leonard Bernstein, who was also a senior in the class of 1938–39 and a friend (we used to play four-hand piano together), wrote an original score for the production and conducted it. Some of the music he wrote for that score, resurfaced in his ballet, Fancy Free. I also had a great interest in music. I audited advanced seminars on Beethoven. Yes, it was a wonderful education, absolutely marvelous.
👍7❤2
Forwarded from словарик
пишут что на сигме вышел в переводе текст одорно 1968 года "переосмысляющий отношения теории и практики"
по такому случаю цитирую листовку берлинских студентов 1967 года, переосмысляющую отношения с адорно:
по такому случаю цитирую листовку берлинских студентов 1967 года, переосмысляющую отношения с адорно:
Зачем нам дед Адорно со своей теорией? Она нам противна, потому что ничего не сообщает о том, как лучше всего поджечь этот сраный университет
🔥10😁1
McDowell: "Kant should still have a central place in our discussion of the way thought bears on reality"
Anonymous Poll
58%
Should
42%
Should not