According to Grok AI, there are hundreds of hours of footage, hundred thousand hours of radio / audio recordings, and over 20,000 photos during the Apollo 1 to 17 Moon missions.

Faking all this evidence, yet not showing a single major inconsistency or flaw (that I have seen) makes it near impossible to fake.

Obviously, we aren't being told the full truth of the Moon Landings, but the central claim of landing and walking on the Moon is overwhelming.

One claim about Moon Landing fakery was made by THE Andrew Johnson, whom says the famous Charlie Duke family photo would've crumbled up on the hot surface of the Moon.

This is not necessarily the case since the Moon has no atmosphere to effectively transfer heat, hence no oxygen for burning via combustion. The dust also acts as an insulator and does not transfer heat that well. The paper was also likely in heat-resistant plastic, further preventing any significant heat transfer.

While I couldn't find a direct comparison of heating paper in a vacuum chamber, this video illustrates how paper does not burn even when a high-powered laser is shined on it while inside a vacuum.

Nonetheless this is a much better illustration than Andrew Johnson's oven experiment, which has a photo directly on metal with no plastic covering and no vacuum.

Interestingly, the actual Charlie Duke photo does look a tiny bit warped as well.

The WEF interim chairman is Peter Brabeck-Letmathe...

I definitely think he has a nose 👃 and an eye 👁 for the job!! 🙌 mes.fm/eyes

Neighbor's house under construction looking like the 9/11 Twin Towers with exterior columns at ground level 🤯🤯🤯