MES Links
MES Livestream 50: Boston 9/11 Truth Recap https://youtube.com/live/yXXeQsjRHiI Join me as I recap on my "debate" with Richard Gage, David Chandler, and other 9/11 Truth influencers during last week's Boston 9/11 Truth Zoom call. #911Truth #conspiracy #DEW…
According to (disinfo agent) Aidan Monaghan from the Boston 9/11 Truth presentation, he stated that the number of GPS and WAAS satellites visible on September 11, 2001 were the highest during the first 2 "plane" strikes. The satellites were also positioned to have the lowest Geometric Dilution of Precision (GDOP or DOP). 🛰👀
👀1
Forwarded from 9/11 Revisionist
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Epic co-lab version 2 🫡 - @MathEasySolutions @TLBNAWKIwilliam and The Pirate Truth Podcast - Interview
👍1👀1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
110 stories at ground level and yet there are no people to be seen in the rubble on 9/11... 🤯🤯🤯
MES Links
Video
Also during the Boston 9/11 Truth Zoom call, disinfo agent David Chandler said the "planes" were able to pick up so much speed because they were in a "dive for a long time".
This is very misleading because the radar data shows the "planes" dive at mostly constant speed until a final acceleration shortly before impact.
The radar data shows the 2nd "plane" was at 2500 ft altitude before it accelerated from 470 to 515 knots (541 to 593 mph), which is an acceleration of 42 mph in just 10-15 seconds! 🤯
The 1st "plane" was at 2800 ft before it accelerated from 330 to 430 knots (380 to 495 mph), which is an acceleration of 115 mph in just 14 seconds! 🤯🤯🤯
This is quite literally impossible for a Boeing 767, especially to maintain any sort of control while banking at 20 degrees and rolling at 18 degrees in 2 seconds! - ChatGPT
This is very misleading because the radar data shows the "planes" dive at mostly constant speed until a final acceleration shortly before impact.
The radar data shows the 2nd "plane" was at 2500 ft altitude before it accelerated from 470 to 515 knots (541 to 593 mph), which is an acceleration of 42 mph in just 10-15 seconds! 🤯
The 1st "plane" was at 2800 ft before it accelerated from 330 to 430 knots (380 to 495 mph), which is an acceleration of 115 mph in just 14 seconds! 🤯🤯🤯
This is quite literally impossible for a Boeing 767, especially to maintain any sort of control while banking at 20 degrees and rolling at 18 degrees in 2 seconds! - ChatGPT
🔥4👏1
Forwarded from EyesIsWatchin
I usually take notes on word pad and organize everything to get ready for the podcast. After getting a blue screen of death indicating "memory management" issues, my computer restarted. When I opened word pad back up all of my notes were gone. No previous saves available to open either. This is the first time this has ever happened. Everything else works fine on my computer except this one thing? my notes for the next podcast completely gone as the file has been corrupted. How is this possible? I can highlight all my work showing how much was written but no words show. I've tried everything and nothing works. It will take days for me to rewrite everything again off of just memory. Now the podcast wont be released till either Monday or Tuesday. Sorry for the delay but this is beyond frustrating!
🤯1😢1
MES Links
I'm TOTALLY not robbing a house
Not sure if I'm going to a wedding party or robbing a bank 🤵🏻🏦
🔥3👍1😁1
The NIST NCSTAR 1-2 report on the 9/11 "plane" impact physics is laughable. A fuel filled aluminum wing will NOT glide through steel building QUIETLY like a hologram without crumbling up or deceleration followed by a delayed explosion like a bunker buster missile.
👍2
Also on the Boston 9/11 Truth Zoom call, disinfo agent Richard Gage said (lied) that the "plane" wings didn't cut through steel but rather "shredded around it like an egg through an egg slicer". This is NOT the case as both the WTC 1 impact hole and WTC 2 impact hole clearly show the "wings" slice through the steel.
Even the NIST NCSTAR 1-2 report shows the sliced steel columns and connecting spandrels panels.
Interestingly, there doesn't appear to be much if any inwards denting steel columns, some are even bending OUTWARDS... 🧐😮
Even the NIST NCSTAR 1-2 report shows the sliced steel columns and connecting spandrels panels.
Interestingly, there doesn't appear to be much if any inwards denting steel columns, some are even bending OUTWARDS... 🧐😮
🔥2