America’s Frontline Doctors, the courageous group of doctors who spoke out against the government’s irresponsible and damaging COVID responses, had their website taken down by Amazon.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/amazon-deletes-americas-frontline-doctors-website-internet-doctors-scramble-salvage-site

#Astroturfing - Fake Grassroots

Ban the grassroots, boost the astroturf; such is the Big Tech way.

💀Globalist technocrats, intel officials, and Fake News Media execs to hold Bilderberg-style secret meeting in Idaho this week.

“Every July since 1983, a small group of media moguls, tech titans, investors, politicians, and intelligence agency insiders, all gather in the small town of Sun Valley, Idaho, for a week of meetings to develop the consensus regarding policies for Mainstream media, social media, and emerging communications technology.”

https://nationalfile.com/globalist-technocrats-to-hold-bilderberg-style-secret-meeting-in-idaho-this-week

Wikipedia Co-founder: "The articles are so biased, in fact, that it is fair to call them “propaganda.”"

"Wikipedia does not just mirror the biases found in the mainstream news media, because some of it is conservative or contrarian. A lot of mainstream news stories are broken only in Fox News, the Daily Mail, and the New York Post—all of which are banned from use as sources by Wikipedia. Beyond that, many mainstream sources of conservative, libertarian, or contrarian opinion are banned from Wikipedia as well, including Quillette, The Federalist, and the Daily Caller. Those might be contrarian or conservative, but they are hardly “radical”; they are still mainstream. So, how on earth can such viewpoints ever be given an airing on Wikipedia? Answer: often, they cannot, not if there are no “reliable sources” available to report about them."

"In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources—and sources friendly to globalist progressivism—are permitted."

#Wikipedia

https://larrysanger.org/2021/06/wikipedia-is-more-one-sided-than-ever

"Wikipedia, like many other deeply biased institutions of our brave new digital world, has made itself into a kind of thought police that has de facto shackled conservative viewpoints with which they disagree. Democracy cannot thrive under such conditions: I maintain that Wikipedia has become an opponent of vigorous democracy. Democracy requires that voters be given the full range of views on controversial issues, so that they can make up their minds for themselves. If society’s main information sources march in ideological lockstep, they make a mockery of democracy. Then the wealthy and powerful need only gain control of the few approved organs of acceptable thought; then they will be able to manipulate and ultimately control all important political dialogue."

Co-founder of #Wikipedia, Larry Sanger

If you’ve watched my video on Wikipedia you already know some of this, but it’s worth expanding upon: Wikipedia, the MSM, and US intelligence agencies all work hand in hand. The process goes like this:

1) US intelligence agencies put out interviews and reports that the MSM wants to hear, such as:

- “Antifa is an idea, not a group”
- “White nationalism is the biggest national security threat”
- “Everything that criticizes globalism is a conspiracy theory with no factual basis”
- Etc.

2) The MSM then reports this, giving ‘official’ weight to the narratives they’re already feeding the public.

3) Because MSM sources are the only “reliable sources” Wikipedia allows, editors copy paste them onto the website as fact. Counter-narratives from non-MSM sources are indiscriminately removed, regardless of their verifiability and factual accuracy.

The MSM is well aware of this Wikipedia process, which is why they don’t report critical details that could hurt the narratives being crafted on the website. For example, not a single MSM outlet reported on the recently exposed fact that BLM icon Ahmad Arbery had a history of lying about being a jogger. Only independent outlets like The Post Millennial reported on it. Thus, because the MSM didn’t touch it, Wikipedia doesn’t allow the fact to be added to the website - and continues to state as fact on Arbery’s page that he was “shot while jogging”.

This is just one example of thousands. It’s a devilish system they’ve created.

👀 How Wikipedia Lies To You

Exploring the instrumental role played by the fake encyclopedia in crafting "the first draft of history". Official Narrative Enforcement Engine, Wikipedia and the Big Tech Oligarchy.

Everything you see presented in the media has been hijacked by a sophisticated, hostile intelligence operation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYBBEaoJT-s

This is a narrative science operation, they push something as ridiculous as this to gauge the public reaction, then have some astroturfed controlled public discussions about it with weak dissent, then roll it back to just once every 6 months and people will think that's progress. Most of the "scientists" behind this entire thing aren't virologists, immunologists, or epidemiologists, they're social psychology and behavioural scientists. All these strange interacting headlines are the product of their sick machinations, part of a larger grooming operation to normalise the world they're trying to build and normalise the level of control they want over our lives.

Only the people who unfailingly believe the official government and corporate media narrative on any issue are the real thinkers. If you believe people conspire to make things happen, you are dumb. Just repeat everything The Regime broadcasts - it couldn't be simpler!

The institutional narrative is: "the more we vaccinate, the less the virus can replicate, the lower the risk of variants of concern arising." and while it is true that restricting the mutational space the virus can explore by reducing transmission will lead to fewer mutations occurring, a vaccine that reduces symptoms but does not prevent transmission significantly impacts the direction the virus will mutate in.

Within the narrative framework provided by our institutions, how do they explain away the current situation, and these all too frequent "rare" breakthrough cases?

It is becoming increasingly obvious their narratives are collapsing and the reality of the leaky vaccine and its implications is becoming undeniable.