This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1988: Shirley Temple talks about Hollywood pedophiles
'Behind the Scenes' view of Greta's staged arrest
Media Tricks Exposed ✨
The Associated Press writes a propaganda piece which is then reprinted by all the other news outlets, and they blast it out to millions. Everyone gets the same narrative no matter where they go. Imagine how much you could rig things if you had even one percent…
The Associated Press propaganda distribution network. The word of the day: bizarre
Forwarded from 𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Klaus Schwab and his people are amused at the idea of independent media. Has this man ever faced an adversarial press?
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jimmy Fallon, who gets paid $16 Million per year.
Think about how many gifted comedians would have done his job for $1 million, or $500,000, and probably pulled in the same or better ratings, since nobody is a “Fallon Fan.”
Yet Fallon gets the contract renewals despite only 1.3 million viewers. He is obviously entirely controllable and will happily push their propaganda masquerading as comedy. None of this is funny.
Think about how many gifted comedians would have done his job for $1 million, or $500,000, and probably pulled in the same or better ratings, since nobody is a “Fallon Fan.”
Yet Fallon gets the contract renewals despite only 1.3 million viewers. He is obviously entirely controllable and will happily push their propaganda masquerading as comedy. None of this is funny.
Forwarded from Millennial Woes
Looks like Stephen King has lapsed back into GenX/Boomer liberal mode, repeating something he once said a long time ago, when it was fashionable, but which is incompatible with contemporary mores.
Except, of course, that they have their fake "banned books" - the stuff which is given prominence in mainstream book stores because some crusty conservative once complained about it many decades ago. Buying such books fulfils the need to feel edgy.
Meantime, actual banned books will be reviled, precisely by the likes of Stephen King.
Except, of course, that they have their fake "banned books" - the stuff which is given prominence in mainstream book stores because some crusty conservative once complained about it many decades ago. Buying such books fulfils the need to feel edgy.
Meantime, actual banned books will be reviled, precisely by the likes of Stephen King.
The power of media propaganda
It was history's most gigantic coordinated propaganda campaign, to manipulate public opinion against the unvaccinated; coming from every government, every corporation, every media outlet, and every malicious globalist entity and institution, and these are the horrendous results. All for a vaccine that didn't stop infection or transmission.
So the covid vaccinated are now, what? The most discriminatory group of all time? The will to self-preservation and health is seen as a trait of parasitism. That is, if we can believe this study.
🔗 The Conversation
✨ @MediaTricks
It was history's most gigantic coordinated propaganda campaign, to manipulate public opinion against the unvaccinated; coming from every government, every corporation, every media outlet, and every malicious globalist entity and institution, and these are the horrendous results. All for a vaccine that didn't stop infection or transmission.
So the covid vaccinated are now, what? The most discriminatory group of all time? The will to self-preservation and health is seen as a trait of parasitism. That is, if we can believe this study.
🔗 The Conversation
✨ @MediaTricks
Forwarded from GTK Radio (Guide to Kulchur)
"You would have a far-Right government in every country in Europe"
An item in the Swedish news caught my attention the other day.
Swedish state TV was in Davos. They took the opportunity to interview Alex Karp, head of tech company Palantir.
Palantir has developed AI technology for American intelligence agencies and now they're working with Ukrainian military to counter the Russian invasion.
What caught my attention was an offhand comment Karp made about a completely different topic...
After the mandatory cringe COVID fist-bump, he tells the reporter about one of his AI products:
"This product has stopped major terror attacks multiple times every year... And I believe... One of the things I'm most proud of is that... if those terror attacks had happened, you would have a far-Right government in every single country in Europe... and especially in the [Nordic countries]."
Presumably, Karp is saying that migrants would have caused so many terror attacks that every country in Europe would elect a "far-Right" government to end the madness.
Now, this brings up several issues:
1. Mass immigration is such a bad idea that you need the latest AI tech to prevent if from causing civil war. (And even with that tech, mass immigration is destroying Europe.)
2. The appropriate response would be to elect "far-Right" governments to end the problem. In fact, that is what people would do if not for this AI technology.
3. What does this say about our "democracy"? European countries need to elect "far-Right" governments, but the ruling class is using the latest AI tech to prevent that from happening...
Source: Svt (You can hear Karp's statement in the video)
An item in the Swedish news caught my attention the other day.
Swedish state TV was in Davos. They took the opportunity to interview Alex Karp, head of tech company Palantir.
Palantir has developed AI technology for American intelligence agencies and now they're working with Ukrainian military to counter the Russian invasion.
What caught my attention was an offhand comment Karp made about a completely different topic...
After the mandatory cringe COVID fist-bump, he tells the reporter about one of his AI products:
"This product has stopped major terror attacks multiple times every year... And I believe... One of the things I'm most proud of is that... if those terror attacks had happened, you would have a far-Right government in every single country in Europe... and especially in the [Nordic countries]."
Presumably, Karp is saying that migrants would have caused so many terror attacks that every country in Europe would elect a "far-Right" government to end the madness.
Now, this brings up several issues:
1. Mass immigration is such a bad idea that you need the latest AI tech to prevent if from causing civil war. (And even with that tech, mass immigration is destroying Europe.)
2. The appropriate response would be to elect "far-Right" governments to end the problem. In fact, that is what people would do if not for this AI technology.
3. What does this say about our "democracy"? European countries need to elect "far-Right" governments, but the ruling class is using the latest AI tech to prevent that from happening...
Source: Svt (You can hear Karp's statement in the video)
SVT Nyheter
AI-teknik kan ge ett övertag i kriget
Det amerikanska it-företaget Palantir hjälper Ukraina att få ett digitalt övertag på slagfältet. Men bolagets vd Alex Karp säger till SVT att de även har nordiska myndigheter på kundlistan. – Den här produkten har stoppat många större terrorattacker.
8 out of 9 dog-fearing children find their dog fears eliminated when shown a video of someone their age and sex interacting happily with a dog (compared to a control group result of 3 out of 9). This means more than 50% of the children had their fears altered with an 11 minute video.
Experiments like these in the 1960s led to researchers discovering the incredible power of video to normalise behaviour that was previously not normal.
Now the world is dominated by abnormal behaviours portrayed in movies and online. Bad actions are portrayed as leading to success and adulation, and good actions are portrayed as leading to failure and mockery. The result of this is widespread maladjustment and dysfunction.
Those in control of the airwaves and movie studios understand the power of the weapon they are wielding against us. When they talk about "normalising" things through media, they are literally talking about brainwashing people using scripted visual stimuli to accept the unacceptable.
Experiments like these in the 1960s led to researchers discovering the incredible power of video to normalise behaviour that was previously not normal.
Now the world is dominated by abnormal behaviours portrayed in movies and online. Bad actions are portrayed as leading to success and adulation, and good actions are portrayed as leading to failure and mockery. The result of this is widespread maladjustment and dysfunction.
Those in control of the airwaves and movie studios understand the power of the weapon they are wielding against us. When they talk about "normalising" things through media, they are literally talking about brainwashing people using scripted visual stimuli to accept the unacceptable.