Forwarded from ヒマワリ会 Sunflower Society
Cholesterol being bad was a psyop to keep people from noticing inflation, it just never ended. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2011/06/24/137400235/lbj-fights-inflation-one-egg-at-a-time
Gaming journalist says the review scores were rigged, and he was made to alter game reviews to match pre-determined game ratings.
The bit about child abuse in the headline is management not giving him time off when his daughter was abused. They wrote the headline that way on purpose obviously.
🔗 Bounding Into Comics
The bit about child abuse in the headline is management not giving him time off when his daughter was abused. They wrote the headline that way on purpose obviously.
🔗 Bounding Into Comics
🇨🇦 Toronto Star blames covid misinformation and the unvaccinated for the return of polio, neatly ignoring the millions of people imported from across the 3rd world into the same Western nations now discovering polio in the water supply, after Western countries were free of the disease for decades.
Polio is “very contagious” and spread through the fecal matter of an infected person.
The polio strain now spreading in the UK is from a foreign vaccine strain of the virus, a strain the UK hasn't used in vaccines since 2004.
Polio is “very contagious” and spread through the fecal matter of an infected person.
The polio strain now spreading in the UK is from a foreign vaccine strain of the virus, a strain the UK hasn't used in vaccines since 2004.
The mass movement of people from countries that have not eradicated certain diseases will of course spike those diseases across the West. Globalism is necessarily a globalisation of disease. So medical tyranny is the necessary outcome of mass migration. But don't expect the Toronto Star or anyone else in the media to inform you of that simple, logical fact. They only want to blame covid dissidents.
𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠
#RememberWhen
Funny how Obama's statement, "marriage is between a man and a woman", is now triply problematic because men and women don't exist anymore.
Forwarded from Millennial Woes
Twitter censorship has now reached such a fever pitch of daily culling that, pretty much every single day, another public figure is banned for life from the platform.
Since the ascent to this fever pitch has been gradual, it is easy to forget what things were like in the before-time.
In 2014, you could pretty much say whatever you wanted on Twitter. People were voicing whatever their opinion was that day on any given topic, with no hesitancy, no worry, no fearful looking over their shoulder or second-guessing how their words could be misconstrued. Other people were posting obscenely racist memes. Many people were insulting celebrities and politicians.
Very controversial people were amassing large followings, and this was not even remarked upon, since everyone took for granted that everyone - everyone - was entitled to take part in the public discourse. The idea of banning somebody merely for expressing an opinion would have seemed laughable to everyone in 2014.
Especially after the so-called "Arab Spring" of 2010/1, it was understood not only that rebellion against the status quo happened on Twitter, but that this was one of the platform's primary and most noble purposes. The very opposite is the case today, the status quo being seen as something very fragile, very vulnerable, which has to be defended constantly from villains of a thousand descriptions - and they are always villains, for no good person would want to change the status quo we all enjoy in the West of 2022.
I can't remember exactly how the deplatforming began. So much has happened, it feels like deep lore at this stage. I think it played out something like this:
1. Andrew Anglin
2. Milo
3. the more "outrageous" Alt-Right figures (eg. Mike Enoch)
4. Alex Jones
5. then virtually all other Alt-Right figures
6. anyone saying anything anti-Semitic
7. anyone saying anything racist
8. a whole list of bigotries became bannable offences (transphobia, homophobia, Islamophobia...)
9. a whole list of opinions became bannable offences (covid is a hoax, George Floyd wasn't murdered, the Biden election was rigged, transgenderism is a mental illness, etc.)
10. The sitting President of the USA, Donald Trump
... so that, today, far from needing to post crass Sturmer-style anti-Semitism to get banned, merely voicing an unfashionable opinion can see anyone banned for life, whether they are an anonymous shit-poster or a high-profile public person.
I don't know when or how it will end, but I doubt it will be pretty.
Since the ascent to this fever pitch has been gradual, it is easy to forget what things were like in the before-time.
In 2014, you could pretty much say whatever you wanted on Twitter. People were voicing whatever their opinion was that day on any given topic, with no hesitancy, no worry, no fearful looking over their shoulder or second-guessing how their words could be misconstrued. Other people were posting obscenely racist memes. Many people were insulting celebrities and politicians.
Very controversial people were amassing large followings, and this was not even remarked upon, since everyone took for granted that everyone - everyone - was entitled to take part in the public discourse. The idea of banning somebody merely for expressing an opinion would have seemed laughable to everyone in 2014.
Especially after the so-called "Arab Spring" of 2010/1, it was understood not only that rebellion against the status quo happened on Twitter, but that this was one of the platform's primary and most noble purposes. The very opposite is the case today, the status quo being seen as something very fragile, very vulnerable, which has to be defended constantly from villains of a thousand descriptions - and they are always villains, for no good person would want to change the status quo we all enjoy in the West of 2022.
I can't remember exactly how the deplatforming began. So much has happened, it feels like deep lore at this stage. I think it played out something like this:
1. Andrew Anglin
2. Milo
3. the more "outrageous" Alt-Right figures (eg. Mike Enoch)
4. Alex Jones
5. then virtually all other Alt-Right figures
6. anyone saying anything anti-Semitic
7. anyone saying anything racist
8. a whole list of bigotries became bannable offences (transphobia, homophobia, Islamophobia...)
9. a whole list of opinions became bannable offences (covid is a hoax, George Floyd wasn't murdered, the Biden election was rigged, transgenderism is a mental illness, etc.)
10. The sitting President of the USA, Donald Trump
... so that, today, far from needing to post crass Sturmer-style anti-Semitism to get banned, merely voicing an unfashionable opinion can see anyone banned for life, whether they are an anonymous shit-poster or a high-profile public person.
I don't know when or how it will end, but I doubt it will be pretty.
Media Tricks Exposed ✨
Taylor Lorenz, on why she doxxed the LibsOfTikTok woman: “And I think it’s incredibly important, you know, as someone that covers the influencer industry to know who is exerting influence in this way. I mean, for all we knew, this could have been a foreign…
"Doxxing isn't doxxing when we do it"
If you want to get funding for your scientific study, about how kids are fat in this case, if you write "we want to study how fat kids are" in your proposal, you will probably struggle for funding. But if you write "we want to study how fat kids are and how this relates to global warming", you will get all the money you need.
Then the waistlines get measured, "The Science" is produced, conclusions are written to satisfy the funding proposal, then the media hops on board for their part in the giant scam, and the ultimate solution is always to hand more power and money over to the Surveillance State to micromanage our lives. The Science™️ is rigged, just like everything else.
Then the waistlines get measured, "The Science" is produced, conclusions are written to satisfy the funding proposal, then the media hops on board for their part in the giant scam, and the ultimate solution is always to hand more power and money over to the Surveillance State to micromanage our lives. The Science™️ is rigged, just like everything else.
It's like a giant ponzi scheme. They use existing studies to justify taking more of your money and power, and funnel much of it into making more studies to further justify taking more money and power. And before you know it every branch of science is out there promoting "and how it relates to global warming", because that's where all the funding is. And as the lie gets stronger, we all get weaker.