Media Tricks Exposed
6.05K subscribers
2.41K photos
418 videos
17 files
861 links
Alerting those you know and love to mass media deception tricks has never been easier, and has never been more important.

DISCOVER: https://MediaTricks.org
DONATE: https://MediaTricks.org/donate
Download Telegram
🔴 NewsGuard, the establishment “news-rating” project that presents itself as a source of expert knowledge on which news sources can be trusted and which ones cannot, will be rolling out to millions of American schoolchildren due to a partnership with the American Federation of Teachers.

NewsGuard maintains a list of news outlets it considers “trustworthy” and “untrustworthy”.

When the NewsGuard browser extension is installed, it displays red warning labels alongside links to websites NewsGuard considers untrustworthy, and green labels next to links to websites it considers trustworthy.

It discriminates in exactly the way you'd expect
The Guardian kicks off the mainstream media censorship campaign against SubStack.

Opposing experimental vaccines is "hate" now, and the "Center for Countering Digital Hate" company will come after you.
The "Center for Countering Digital Hate" has made a bizarre 1 minute video trying to make scientific debate seem ominous. They have managed to achieve a whopping 570 views so far. Obviously that is 570 establishment shill "journalists".

They are now trying to brand opposition to rushed vaccines as "hate", without explanation. Soon, opposition to every single regime lie will be branded as "hate".

https://youtu.be/Vb6GCU5hTnA
You could start a whole news website—and be busy with a large full time staff—dedicated solely to critiquing the studies the mainstream media passes off uncritically as the basis of their propaganda reporting.

⚫️ Is it a good study?

⚫️ How big was this study?

⚫️ Can we scale up the studied sample to apply the results to the entire population?

⚫️ Who funded the study?

⚫️ How are the key terms specifically defined?

⚫️ Does the conclusion match the findings?

⚫️ Do the findings match the headlines?

⚫️ What was the methodology?

⚫️ What are the flaws in the methodology?

⚫️ In what ways could the study be improved?

⚫️ If the study was improved in these ways, what different results might be found and why?

⚫️ How can we read the study PDF for ourselves?

Almost never do media reports on study findings give us even a hint of a real critique, or anything remotely close to an accurate representation of the study itself. Even these basic questions are never asked.
A man bamboozled by media reports of conflicting studies wonders aloud, "but one study says one thing, and another study says something completely different.."

And the wise monk says, "so read both studies idiot, they're both crap."
The new censorship scheme from YouTube, the latest move in the media giant's War Against The People.
YouTube should be renamed CorporateTube.
It is not just political targeting: an owner of a small how-to engineering channel complained on Reddit a month ago of this same account limitation despite having a 7 year channel history. The mega corporations are at war with everyone who isn't a controlled corruptocrat. Of course we will crush this regime. But until we do, they are frantically building their walls around us.
TODAY IN HISTORY: February 1st, 1893

Thomas Edison completes construction on the world's first movie production studio, the Black Maria, built on the grounds of his laboratories at West Orange, New Jersey.
Canadian newspaper desperate to meme the absurd phrase "non-violent dangers" into our minds. They wanted to associate the word violent with the protest and this is the best they could do.
Cramming buzzwords into sentences, and poisoning ideas in people's minds; this is the job of the media control system.