Forwarded from В пам'ять про Чтиво
❤5😁1
https://matduggan.com/i-sold-out-for-200-a-month-and-all-i-got-was-this-perfectly-generated-terraform/
"You know what the difference is between you and me? I know I'm a mercenary. You thought you were an artist. We're both guys who type for money."
"You know what the difference is between you and me? I know I'm a mercenary. You thought you were an artist. We're both guys who type for money."
matduggan.com
I Sold Out for $20 a Month and All I Got Was This Perfectly Generated Terraform
Until recently the LLM tools I’ve tried have been, to be frank, worthless. Copilot was best at writing extremely verbose comments. Gemini would turn a 200 line script into a 700 line collection of gibberish. It was easy for me to, more or less, ignore LLMs…
👍2😁2😱1
Forwarded from HN Best Comments
Re: Astral to Join OpenAI
A concern:
More and more plainly, OpenAI and Anthropic are making plays to own (and lease) the "means of production" in software. OK - I'm a pretty happy renter right now.
As they gobble up previously open software stacks, how viable is it that these stacks remain open? It seems perfectly sensible to me that these providers and their users alike have an interest in further centralizing the dev lifecycle - eg, if Claude-Code or Codex are interfaces to cloud devenvs, then the models can get faster feedback cycles against build / test / etc tooling.
But when the tooling authors are employees of one provider or another, you can bet that those providers will be at least a few versions ahead of the public releases of those build tools, and will enjoy local economies of scale in their pipelines that may not be public at all.
NiloCK, 2 hours ago
A concern:
More and more plainly, OpenAI and Anthropic are making plays to own (and lease) the "means of production" in software. OK - I'm a pretty happy renter right now.
As they gobble up previously open software stacks, how viable is it that these stacks remain open? It seems perfectly sensible to me that these providers and their users alike have an interest in further centralizing the dev lifecycle - eg, if Claude-Code or Codex are interfaces to cloud devenvs, then the models can get faster feedback cycles against build / test / etc tooling.
But when the tooling authors are employees of one provider or another, you can bet that those providers will be at least a few versions ahead of the public releases of those build tools, and will enjoy local economies of scale in their pipelines that may not be public at all.
NiloCK, 2 hours ago
😁7🤔1
Forwarded from Sillymelon 🦔💨 ()
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💊23💯4😁2🤡1
Forwarded from Portal Ibis
“In one place he is taken for a madman, in another he is lavished with royal honors; sometimes he brings with him delusion, sometimes perfect peace and tranquility; he is often met with the lazy indifference of a boa constrictor; in one place he is extolled, in another he is shown every contempt; in a third he is completely do not notice - this is the appearance of a learned sage who has found eternal happiness in supreme bliss.”
— Sri Shankaracharya
Art: The Hermit, Knapp-Hall Tarot, c. 1929
— Sri Shankaracharya
Art: The Hermit, Knapp-Hall Tarot, c. 1929
❤5😁1🤯1