FVAMB
FVAMB = Female Violence Against Men/Boys
I hate how this issue is often ignored and dismissed, despite it also occuring. I hate in general how violence is made to be a gendered issue when both genders can be horribly violent and abusive to each other. Even if male-on-female instances may be higher, it doesn't change or negate the fact the other way around absolutely happens too and in far high numbers than many realize.
Female violence against men (and boys) is absolutely not uncommon and is massively underreported for several reasons, not the least of which is societal shame and stigma, and men/boys who are victims afraid to strike back knowing their female attacker will still get to play victim and have people siding with her even with her clearly being the guilty one (which you can clearly see in this incredibly infuriating video; a problem even worse today thanks to "believe women." To say nothing how under the VAWA, any kind of violence against men is still counted against women which of course heavily skews and distorts the stats, and it's made even worse with how there's never a distinction made between violence done out of genuine malice versus that done in self-defense for a man/boy defending himself against a female attacker. Let's not forget other problems as well like the Duluth model and how there's very few shelters that even acknowledge or help male victims. Society often still makes light when men/boys get raped by women, especially teachers in schools who violate boys. It's sickening how that gets treated as a joke.
I don't deny male violence against women/girls happens, yes it does and it's wrong. But the other way around also happens, it's also prevalent and it's just as bad. Does it happen as much? Maybe not, but that doesn't change, negate or mitigate the fact it still happens and is still traumatic. The constant dismissal and ignorance of it and the usual rebuttals is just another means to deflect from it and to further divide the genders and further dismiss male issues. Sadly this rhetoric is largely accepted as factual and nobody questions it, which is also a big issue with the issue of misandry and how's existence and severity is frequently dismissed. Misandry exists and is a problem just like misogyny. And likewise, female violence against men/boys also exists and is also a problem just like it's counterpart.
I really hate how violence has been made into a gendered issue pitting both against each other when it's a fact both men/boys and women/girls can be terribly violent to each other and it's a no-brainer to help victims and condemn offenders of both genders. I'm so sick of hearing the usual deflections of "But men are so much more violent," "It's not on the same scale," etc. just acknowledge and condemn it in all forms, frequency and statistics of either be damned.
https://redd.it/1uam3t3
@manpill
FVAMB = Female Violence Against Men/Boys
I hate how this issue is often ignored and dismissed, despite it also occuring. I hate in general how violence is made to be a gendered issue when both genders can be horribly violent and abusive to each other. Even if male-on-female instances may be higher, it doesn't change or negate the fact the other way around absolutely happens too and in far high numbers than many realize.
Female violence against men (and boys) is absolutely not uncommon and is massively underreported for several reasons, not the least of which is societal shame and stigma, and men/boys who are victims afraid to strike back knowing their female attacker will still get to play victim and have people siding with her even with her clearly being the guilty one (which you can clearly see in this incredibly infuriating video; a problem even worse today thanks to "believe women." To say nothing how under the VAWA, any kind of violence against men is still counted against women which of course heavily skews and distorts the stats, and it's made even worse with how there's never a distinction made between violence done out of genuine malice versus that done in self-defense for a man/boy defending himself against a female attacker. Let's not forget other problems as well like the Duluth model and how there's very few shelters that even acknowledge or help male victims. Society often still makes light when men/boys get raped by women, especially teachers in schools who violate boys. It's sickening how that gets treated as a joke.
I don't deny male violence against women/girls happens, yes it does and it's wrong. But the other way around also happens, it's also prevalent and it's just as bad. Does it happen as much? Maybe not, but that doesn't change, negate or mitigate the fact it still happens and is still traumatic. The constant dismissal and ignorance of it and the usual rebuttals is just another means to deflect from it and to further divide the genders and further dismiss male issues. Sadly this rhetoric is largely accepted as factual and nobody questions it, which is also a big issue with the issue of misandry and how's existence and severity is frequently dismissed. Misandry exists and is a problem just like misogyny. And likewise, female violence against men/boys also exists and is also a problem just like it's counterpart.
I really hate how violence has been made into a gendered issue pitting both against each other when it's a fact both men/boys and women/girls can be terribly violent to each other and it's a no-brainer to help victims and condemn offenders of both genders. I'm so sick of hearing the usual deflections of "But men are so much more violent," "It's not on the same scale," etc. just acknowledge and condemn it in all forms, frequency and statistics of either be damned.
https://redd.it/1uam3t3
@manpill
Reddit
From the PublicFreakout community on Reddit: Boy Suspended From School After Fighting Back Against Girl Bully Who Kept Hitting…
Explore this post and more from the PublicFreakout community
Janice Flamengo on the glorification of the psychotic man hater, Valerie Solanas, Feminism’s Death Goddess
https://open.substack.com/pub/fiamengofile/p/valerie-solanas-feminisms-death-goddess?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r89k1
https://redd.it/1uamzzx
@manpill
https://open.substack.com/pub/fiamengofile/p/valerie-solanas-feminisms-death-goddess?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=r89k1
https://redd.it/1uamzzx
@manpill
This sub illustrates why modern women are insufferable
I came across this feminist sub on my feed and holy shit, what a bunch of miserable women. Take a look: https://imgur.com/a/jB39Lkc
https://redd.it/1uarsnb
@manpill
I came across this feminist sub on my feed and holy shit, what a bunch of miserable women. Take a look: https://imgur.com/a/jB39Lkc
https://redd.it/1uarsnb
@manpill
Question: False Confessions Led to Firing and Systemic Oppression
CW: references to SA and CSA (NSFW)
I was reviewing some documents and came across an instance of what might possibly be an attempt at gaslighting in order to extract a false confession in an institutional context. The authority figure in the power position is speaking to a much younger student. Here is the excerpt, with names and dates obscured, the planted suggestions in italics (or single asterisk quotes depending on the OS formatting):
\> W met with N, student at X, and *told her that she had been >!sexually assaulted!< by C* and should see a school counselor. **After N denied she had been >!assaulted!<**, W asked N for information on *any possible legal improprieties C may have committed against >!his own children!<.* C says that W made these statements to N in (date redacted). He claims they are false because he "did not >!sexually assault!< N."
Needless to say no accounts of >!child abuse!< ever came out of this investigation. The accused employee did lose his employment. He was a single parent with children, living off food stamps (SNAP) and working two jobs at the school. He's been blackballed from his trained field since this happened over a decade ago. I don't know these people personally. I just see a pattern of systemic oppression in this case. I'm asking to see if this type of manipulation against someone's reputation is getting enough visibility, if this is important enough to improve advocacy for single fathers who are targeted in this manner. Thank you for your consideration.
https://redd.it/1uasnju
@manpill
CW: references to SA and CSA (NSFW)
I was reviewing some documents and came across an instance of what might possibly be an attempt at gaslighting in order to extract a false confession in an institutional context. The authority figure in the power position is speaking to a much younger student. Here is the excerpt, with names and dates obscured, the planted suggestions in italics (or single asterisk quotes depending on the OS formatting):
\> W met with N, student at X, and *told her that she had been >!sexually assaulted!< by C* and should see a school counselor. **After N denied she had been >!assaulted!<**, W asked N for information on *any possible legal improprieties C may have committed against >!his own children!<.* C says that W made these statements to N in (date redacted). He claims they are false because he "did not >!sexually assault!< N."
Needless to say no accounts of >!child abuse!< ever came out of this investigation. The accused employee did lose his employment. He was a single parent with children, living off food stamps (SNAP) and working two jobs at the school. He's been blackballed from his trained field since this happened over a decade ago. I don't know these people personally. I just see a pattern of systemic oppression in this case. I'm asking to see if this type of manipulation against someone's reputation is getting enough visibility, if this is important enough to improve advocacy for single fathers who are targeted in this manner. Thank you for your consideration.
https://redd.it/1uasnju
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community
The Femosphere celebrates an openly male hating feminist who shot a famous artist eventually leading to his death.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jun/10/i-shot-andy-warhol-mary-harron-director-interview-valerie-solanas-lili-taylor
https://redd.it/1uau1z7
@manpill
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jun/10/i-shot-andy-warhol-mary-harron-director-interview-valerie-solanas-lili-taylor
https://redd.it/1uau1z7
@manpill
the Guardian
‘It’s not about heroes and villains’: the triumphant return of long-lost indie I Shot Andy Warhol
Director Mary Harron on her audacious ‘anti-biopic’ of Scum Manifesto author Valerie Solanas, who shot Warhol in 1968
What I've been witnessing.
When it comes to people actually being misandrist or misogynistic, I see SIGNFICANTLY more people being misandrist.
When it comes to people verbally opposing or calling out hate against men vs hate against women, I see SIGNIFICANTLY more people call out hate against women.
The gender compassion gap at work there perhaps?
https://redd.it/1ub19r1
@manpill
When it comes to people actually being misandrist or misogynistic, I see SIGNFICANTLY more people being misandrist.
When it comes to people verbally opposing or calling out hate against men vs hate against women, I see SIGNIFICANTLY more people call out hate against women.
The gender compassion gap at work there perhaps?
https://redd.it/1ub19r1
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community
The Positive Impacts Fiction can have on Gender Movements
Stories allow people to inhabit experiences that are not their own.
The Handmaid's Tale became so culturally influential b/c it translated a set of social fears into a narrative people could feel.
What would a story look like if it explored male disposability, conditional worth thru the same lens?
My result is a dystopian novella called Beckon the Butler.
A town where to want is dangerous, and to be unwanted is fatal.
Chapter One ("Bang") is here:
https://medium.com/@ipsteak/beckon-the-butler-chapter-one-bang-b22ce72280a6
I'd love feedback from this community, not only on the writing itself, but on the broader question:
Can fiction help men's advocacy in the same way it has helped other social movements?
https://redd.it/1ub0i2j
@manpill
Stories allow people to inhabit experiences that are not their own.
The Handmaid's Tale became so culturally influential b/c it translated a set of social fears into a narrative people could feel.
What would a story look like if it explored male disposability, conditional worth thru the same lens?
My result is a dystopian novella called Beckon the Butler.
A town where to want is dangerous, and to be unwanted is fatal.
Chapter One ("Bang") is here:
https://medium.com/@ipsteak/beckon-the-butler-chapter-one-bang-b22ce72280a6
I'd love feedback from this community, not only on the writing itself, but on the broader question:
Can fiction help men's advocacy in the same way it has helped other social movements?
https://redd.it/1ub0i2j
@manpill
Medium
Beckon the Butler: Chapter One, Bang
A gender-inverted dystopia in the lineage of Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery,” Beckon the Butler unfolds in…
Former Matlock Writer Sues CBS, Alleges Racism, Sexual Harassment and Retaliatory Firing
https://www.ibtimes.sg/who-jennie-snyder-urman-matlock-showrunner-faces-lawsuit-over-alleged-workplace-comments-88161?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=article_share&utm_content=article_88161
https://redd.it/1ub2n19
@manpill
https://www.ibtimes.sg/who-jennie-snyder-urman-matlock-showrunner-faces-lawsuit-over-alleged-workplace-comments-88161?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=article_share&utm_content=article_88161
https://redd.it/1ub2n19
@manpill
International Business Times
Who Is Jennie Snyder Urman? Matlock Showrunner Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Workplace Comments
John Lowe's lawsuit claims the CBS drama's writers' room fostered a hostile work environment through alleged racist and sexually explicit conduct.
Is the new UK bill about marriage absolute or it has reliefs?
So UK recently announced the changes.. but I have few questions:
1) If your wife cheats on you, is that a ground that may nullify it?
2) If your wife forces you to divorce by say being emotionally off, no intimacy, other valid violation of boundaries or changing what you all had decided before like habing kids etc..
3) Is it binary like if she doens't have a job, she gets the share, but if she has a job she doesn't?
4) What if the house is not fully paid for? Let's say the man was paying the house in small sums each month, what happens then?
https://redd.it/1uazuer
@manpill
So UK recently announced the changes.. but I have few questions:
1) If your wife cheats on you, is that a ground that may nullify it?
2) If your wife forces you to divorce by say being emotionally off, no intimacy, other valid violation of boundaries or changing what you all had decided before like habing kids etc..
3) Is it binary like if she doens't have a job, she gets the share, but if she has a job she doesn't?
4) What if the house is not fully paid for? Let's say the man was paying the house in small sums each month, what happens then?
https://redd.it/1uazuer
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community
Proud of being a man for the first time
I have been reflecting upon this thought for some weeks. I grew up without a father in a house full of unstable women. Whenever one of them was in a bad mood, they made sure that the entire place felt like they were feeling.
I never felt proud of being a man; if anything, I actually felt ashamed. Around me, at school, at home, at university, all I heard was how bad and oppressing men were, how we are literally the root of all evil, and I believed it.
Thus I hated myself, I thought I was gay because people told me all my life I was a bit effeminate; however, I was never attracted to men, I had what you could call feminine mannerism for growing 23 years of my life only around women. I thought I had no masculinity inside me, until I started reading and looking as much inwards as outwards at other men.
I could write more, but what I wanted to say is that, for the first time in my life, I feel so proud of being a man. I feel proud because everything that surrounds me, the computer I am writing this on, the building I live in, the technology I use was built thanks to the intellectual and physical work of millions of men that came before me. Because I am part of their lineage, and without them, society would not be; as matter of fact nothing would be and us humans would be extinct by now.
We carry within a connection to men like Marcus Aurelius, Jung, Nietzsche, Hesse, Debussy, Da Vinci and list goes on and on. All of them men! How could we not be proud of that?
To all men out there, never let women or other men villainize you. You are by nature a being that was built for resilience, not only physical but also mental. You are built to lead and to govern with authority and responsibility,. Govern your own life with that masculine energy (easier said that done). I know the world hates you, but this is what we are built for, to keep going even though all odds are against us.
Peace
https://redd.it/1ub7aaz
@manpill
I have been reflecting upon this thought for some weeks. I grew up without a father in a house full of unstable women. Whenever one of them was in a bad mood, they made sure that the entire place felt like they were feeling.
I never felt proud of being a man; if anything, I actually felt ashamed. Around me, at school, at home, at university, all I heard was how bad and oppressing men were, how we are literally the root of all evil, and I believed it.
Thus I hated myself, I thought I was gay because people told me all my life I was a bit effeminate; however, I was never attracted to men, I had what you could call feminine mannerism for growing 23 years of my life only around women. I thought I had no masculinity inside me, until I started reading and looking as much inwards as outwards at other men.
I could write more, but what I wanted to say is that, for the first time in my life, I feel so proud of being a man. I feel proud because everything that surrounds me, the computer I am writing this on, the building I live in, the technology I use was built thanks to the intellectual and physical work of millions of men that came before me. Because I am part of their lineage, and without them, society would not be; as matter of fact nothing would be and us humans would be extinct by now.
We carry within a connection to men like Marcus Aurelius, Jung, Nietzsche, Hesse, Debussy, Da Vinci and list goes on and on. All of them men! How could we not be proud of that?
To all men out there, never let women or other men villainize you. You are by nature a being that was built for resilience, not only physical but also mental. You are built to lead and to govern with authority and responsibility,. Govern your own life with that masculine energy (easier said that done). I know the world hates you, but this is what we are built for, to keep going even though all odds are against us.
Peace
https://redd.it/1ub7aaz
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community
Canada makes femicide first-degree murder as all three major Criminal Code reforms become law
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-justice/news/2026/06/canada-makes-femicide-first-degree-murder-as-all-three-major-criminal-code-reforms-become-law.html?hsid=523ba103-0723-486a-8ebd-7c5df6b47095
https://redd.it/1ub7ybb
@manpill
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-justice/news/2026/06/canada-makes-femicide-first-degree-murder-as-all-three-major-criminal-code-reforms-become-law.html?hsid=523ba103-0723-486a-8ebd-7c5df6b47095
https://redd.it/1ub7ybb
@manpill
www.canada.ca
Canada makes femicide first-degree murder as all three major Criminal Code reforms become law
“Victims and survivors called for stronger protections from intimate partner violence and gender-based violence. Those protections are now law,” said the Honourable Sean Fraser, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Spain must pay €2.5m to man who spent 15 years in jail for rapes he did not commit
https://www.reuters.com/world/spain-must-pay-25m-man-who-spent-15-years-jail-rapes-he-did-not-commit-2026-06-20/
https://redd.it/1uba728
@manpill
https://www.reuters.com/world/spain-must-pay-25m-man-who-spent-15-years-jail-rapes-he-did-not-commit-2026-06-20/
https://redd.it/1uba728
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit: Spain must pay €2.5m to man who spent 15 years in jail for rapes he did not commit
Posted by nrverma - 26 votes and 2 comments
Got accused of SA (I am in 7th grade)
So it happened a few weeks ago. I had broken up with my ex. Let’s call her Evianny. Now, Evianny has a first cousin who is an eighth grader. Joshua. And after school, I was walking with my friends Ray and Alexander. Then Joshua and some friends came and pressed us. Evianny had said I had grabbed her boobs. First of all, multiple guys in my class said that I wanted nothing to do with her and was trying to stay away from her (I share a class with her). Second, I stayed with two guys at all times. Third, I made it clear to my counselor that I no longer WANTED ANYTHING TO DO WITH EVIANNY. And now I’m being labeled as some pervert. Even though literally every boy in my class said HE DIDN’T DO ANYTHING TO HER. Evianny is one of those honors kids. 90s in every class. So the teachers and admins believed her. I was shouted at in the main office, and I was in tears. My mom also yelled at me, but my dad and my uncle took my side and came up to the school. It was a long period of suffering, but eventually my innocence was proven by video footage. NOTHING HAPPENED TO EVIANNY. AT ALL. She was let out SCOT FREE. Meanwhile, I am socially DESTROYED outside my friend group. Luckily, the guys I have are LOYAL. I know others are not so lucky.
https://redd.it/1ubevs6
@manpill
So it happened a few weeks ago. I had broken up with my ex. Let’s call her Evianny. Now, Evianny has a first cousin who is an eighth grader. Joshua. And after school, I was walking with my friends Ray and Alexander. Then Joshua and some friends came and pressed us. Evianny had said I had grabbed her boobs. First of all, multiple guys in my class said that I wanted nothing to do with her and was trying to stay away from her (I share a class with her). Second, I stayed with two guys at all times. Third, I made it clear to my counselor that I no longer WANTED ANYTHING TO DO WITH EVIANNY. And now I’m being labeled as some pervert. Even though literally every boy in my class said HE DIDN’T DO ANYTHING TO HER. Evianny is one of those honors kids. 90s in every class. So the teachers and admins believed her. I was shouted at in the main office, and I was in tears. My mom also yelled at me, but my dad and my uncle took my side and came up to the school. It was a long period of suffering, but eventually my innocence was proven by video footage. NOTHING HAPPENED TO EVIANNY. AT ALL. She was let out SCOT FREE. Meanwhile, I am socially DESTROYED outside my friend group. Luckily, the guys I have are LOYAL. I know others are not so lucky.
https://redd.it/1ubevs6
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community
Please critique this take on Feminism
This was originally posted in response to a post here on Feminism ASKING for a debate with people who reject the entire notion of Feminism.
Yet mysteriously both the post and user account suddenly deleted.
I would like feedback on this critique of Feminism, noting the core argument that Feminism is an UMBRELLA term not a single definition:
Argument:
The first step in most debates is often the simplest and most ignored:
* Define your terms - precisely.
”Feminist” as such has not a single exact definition but in point of fact a whole RANGE of meanings.
To state the obvious, explicitly and up front, it is categorically an UMBRELLA term in the same way Trans- is 100% an UMBRELLA term not a definition.
Stating the above, we are already off to a more useful start than 99% of these discussions.
The second step would be to short list the full range for reference or context. Seeing as this is Reddit however concessions to low attention span must be invoked here. We will skip this step as discussion or Project for a Rainy Day, invitees to this project please go on ahead here, without us.
The third step (short cut) is to take the general most applicable meaning of “Feminist” AS IT IS MOST INADVERTENTLY used, and visible most of the time in news-media.
* Definition: “Feminism“ = Female Collective Bargaining behaviour (in modern times politically in tribal past times, social politics of group power).
Just to be clear other definitions also exist, this is not a monopoly of meaning. But it is most constructive because it clearly describes the “behaviour” dynamics and how THAT shapes policy and politics independent of logical arguments derived from first principles or premises.
Let’s take two examples to contrast this:
* Female Sexual Reproductive Biology leads to NECESSARY higher Medical Funding than equivalent male version. This is a scientific fact. Here “Feminism” can be argued from premises coherently 100%.
* Glass Ceiling Rhetoric in Equality Laws in Work Places on “Unequal Salaries”. This is the deceptive real politik of female collective bartering. Thomas Sewell has studied this from the 70’s iirc and debunked it all the way back then but the argument is still used today in 2026!
Note the above is a snapshot (step 2) for necessary brevity.
But even a snapshot is sufficient for common sense to conclude albeit short of verification:
Conclusion: Feminism was a practical ideology when women had less rights in the past eg vote, work etc. In modern times it has become co-opted by older social dynamics in humans at scale in politics as a group self-interest seeking via polemics which fits female group psychology for personal gain. Where Feminism is functional eg Medicine it is redundant as factually self-apparent. Hence Feminism is logically deficient as most often used:
1. Copted group politics aka populism version within women.
2. Redundant from left over from past conditions.
3. Worst of all co-opted by global agenda for lowering fertility rates of women thenskeves via their own short-sighted emotional demands.
The final logical deficiency is a surprise fortune cookie: It is descriptive and predictive of the failure of people who willingly deal in fallacies - ultimately such behaviour becomes self-defeating.
Please note, ending on a signficant warning still leaves ample rule for exploration positively (see step 2).
If you wish to critique or question or develop from the above please feel free to do.
Note, Men’s Rights overall (not exclusively) seems more a product of response to the unfair skew of priority in politics caused by this form of Feminism in the West (supported enormously by global institutions eg UN et al and bankrolled as such). As such to understand Feminism is critical this counter-movement itself in need of a fundamental factually grounded basis aside from a counter movement to be of any lasting good for men.
=
Commentary:
1. I reject the majority of motions based on Feminism as above as meta-behaviour for personal or group advantage aka real
This was originally posted in response to a post here on Feminism ASKING for a debate with people who reject the entire notion of Feminism.
Yet mysteriously both the post and user account suddenly deleted.
I would like feedback on this critique of Feminism, noting the core argument that Feminism is an UMBRELLA term not a single definition:
Argument:
The first step in most debates is often the simplest and most ignored:
* Define your terms - precisely.
”Feminist” as such has not a single exact definition but in point of fact a whole RANGE of meanings.
To state the obvious, explicitly and up front, it is categorically an UMBRELLA term in the same way Trans- is 100% an UMBRELLA term not a definition.
Stating the above, we are already off to a more useful start than 99% of these discussions.
The second step would be to short list the full range for reference or context. Seeing as this is Reddit however concessions to low attention span must be invoked here. We will skip this step as discussion or Project for a Rainy Day, invitees to this project please go on ahead here, without us.
The third step (short cut) is to take the general most applicable meaning of “Feminist” AS IT IS MOST INADVERTENTLY used, and visible most of the time in news-media.
* Definition: “Feminism“ = Female Collective Bargaining behaviour (in modern times politically in tribal past times, social politics of group power).
Just to be clear other definitions also exist, this is not a monopoly of meaning. But it is most constructive because it clearly describes the “behaviour” dynamics and how THAT shapes policy and politics independent of logical arguments derived from first principles or premises.
Let’s take two examples to contrast this:
* Female Sexual Reproductive Biology leads to NECESSARY higher Medical Funding than equivalent male version. This is a scientific fact. Here “Feminism” can be argued from premises coherently 100%.
* Glass Ceiling Rhetoric in Equality Laws in Work Places on “Unequal Salaries”. This is the deceptive real politik of female collective bartering. Thomas Sewell has studied this from the 70’s iirc and debunked it all the way back then but the argument is still used today in 2026!
Note the above is a snapshot (step 2) for necessary brevity.
But even a snapshot is sufficient for common sense to conclude albeit short of verification:
Conclusion: Feminism was a practical ideology when women had less rights in the past eg vote, work etc. In modern times it has become co-opted by older social dynamics in humans at scale in politics as a group self-interest seeking via polemics which fits female group psychology for personal gain. Where Feminism is functional eg Medicine it is redundant as factually self-apparent. Hence Feminism is logically deficient as most often used:
1. Copted group politics aka populism version within women.
2. Redundant from left over from past conditions.
3. Worst of all co-opted by global agenda for lowering fertility rates of women thenskeves via their own short-sighted emotional demands.
The final logical deficiency is a surprise fortune cookie: It is descriptive and predictive of the failure of people who willingly deal in fallacies - ultimately such behaviour becomes self-defeating.
Please note, ending on a signficant warning still leaves ample rule for exploration positively (see step 2).
If you wish to critique or question or develop from the above please feel free to do.
Note, Men’s Rights overall (not exclusively) seems more a product of response to the unfair skew of priority in politics caused by this form of Feminism in the West (supported enormously by global institutions eg UN et al and bankrolled as such). As such to understand Feminism is critical this counter-movement itself in need of a fundamental factually grounded basis aside from a counter movement to be of any lasting good for men.
=
Commentary:
1. I reject the majority of motions based on Feminism as above as meta-behaviour for personal or group advantage aka real
politik not good faith logical argument via thesis vs antithesis. Hence the tone is slightly acerbic above.
2. The reply is very incomplete as I do not list all the Umbrella terms within Feminism and thus leaves a mild sense of frustration in the post - apologies if that is evident while reading. But brevity is importantly for the main argument.
3. I posit s profound prediction that Feminism based on fallacy itself is exploited and will ultimately become self-defeating to the group of advocates who hold to it.
4. Finally, some women have recently posited this concept of “female collective bargaining” who are academics and begun to question if Feminism is ultimately destructive (I will dig this link up eventually).
https://redd.it/1ubkldj
@manpill
2. The reply is very incomplete as I do not list all the Umbrella terms within Feminism and thus leaves a mild sense of frustration in the post - apologies if that is evident while reading. But brevity is importantly for the main argument.
3. I posit s profound prediction that Feminism based on fallacy itself is exploited and will ultimately become self-defeating to the group of advocates who hold to it.
4. Finally, some women have recently posited this concept of “female collective bargaining” who are academics and begun to question if Feminism is ultimately destructive (I will dig this link up eventually).
https://redd.it/1ubkldj
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community
Inside an exclusive ‘man camp,’ where one woman is trying to save men from themselves
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/06/21/us/mens-camp-california-manosphere-masculinity
https://redd.it/1ubmh7t
@manpill
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/06/21/us/mens-camp-california-manosphere-masculinity
https://redd.it/1ubmh7t
@manpill
CNN
Inside an exclusive ‘man camp,’ where one woman is trying to save men from themselves | CNN
A five-day, $5,000 retreat in California promises to help men grapple with their vulnerabilities and reshape their understanding of masculinity. Here’s what it’s like
Men should boycott BBC
BBC is the most feminist and misandrist channel on earth, their programs focus on women's issues, the news are presented by women most of the time who talk to female correspondents and even those female correspondents talk mostly to women on the street
All BBC care about is women's opinions, women's issues, female presenters.
If a man appears on BBC usually it is a man of Indian or Asian or African descent.
https://redd.it/1ubo921
@manpill
BBC is the most feminist and misandrist channel on earth, their programs focus on women's issues, the news are presented by women most of the time who talk to female correspondents and even those female correspondents talk mostly to women on the street
All BBC care about is women's opinions, women's issues, female presenters.
If a man appears on BBC usually it is a man of Indian or Asian or African descent.
https://redd.it/1ubo921
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community
Women Accused Of Harassing Boys Suddenly Begin Tearing Their Clothes After Being Questioned; Internet Reacts
https://www.news18.com/viral/women-accused-of-harassing-boys-suddenly-begin-tearing-their-clothes-after-being-questioned-internet-reacts-1-10152720.html
https://redd.it/1ubph7n
@manpill
https://www.news18.com/viral/women-accused-of-harassing-boys-suddenly-begin-tearing-their-clothes-after-being-questioned-internet-reacts-1-10152720.html
https://redd.it/1ubph7n
@manpill
News18
Women Accused Of Harassing Boys Suddenly Begin Tearing Their Clothes After Being Questioned; Internet Reacts
An X post showing three women allegedly tearing their own clothes after being confronted for abusing boys has sparked heated debate online, drawing strong reactions from users
Happy Father's Day
It is Father's Day in many countries today. Wishing all dads, granddads and great granddads a special day. Shout out to everyone who has lost their fathers and to guys for who this is their first father's day. Be the best father you can be that doesn't mean being perfect it is just about being there for your children.
https://redd.it/1ubps11
@manpill
It is Father's Day in many countries today. Wishing all dads, granddads and great granddads a special day. Shout out to everyone who has lost their fathers and to guys for who this is their first father's day. Be the best father you can be that doesn't mean being perfect it is just about being there for your children.
https://redd.it/1ubps11
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community
I hate posts where single mothers are wished "happy father's day".
Such posts are so annoying! Father's day is for expressing gratitude towards good fathers.
https://redd.it/1ubp2a9
@manpill
Such posts are so annoying! Father's day is for expressing gratitude towards good fathers.
https://redd.it/1ubp2a9
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community
Why do men do all the work while females just sit around and make fun of them?
Idk if this is a fitting flair.
Edit: great, now everyone’s gonna think I’m 4 because I made a mistake.
https://redd.it/1ubuh2o
@manpill
Idk if this is a fitting flair.
Edit: great, now everyone’s gonna think I’m 4 because I made a mistake.
https://redd.it/1ubuh2o
@manpill
Reddit
From the MensRights community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the MensRights community