While men commit suicide way more often, sexist strike again and act as if only women can be driven into suicide by abuse

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/feb/15/number-uk-women-suicide-domestic-abuse-under-reported-say-experts

It is incredible how they do not mention male victims of the same phenomenon.

https://redd.it/1r6blj7
@manpill

UK: Fireman wrongly sacked after saying woman he rescued 'looked haggard'. OP: Absolutely no hope for western society.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/music/fireman-wrongly-sacked-after-saying-woman-he-rescued-looked-haggard/ar-AA1Wsrmq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=699354e08c154b459a6279bfd1a7f3ed&ei=50

https://redd.it/1r6l788
@manpill

UN Document calls for scary societal changes

Domestic Abuse and Violence International Alliance (DAVIA) has issued a [Media Release](https://endtodv.org/pr/substantive-gender-equality-blueprint-for-totalitarian-feminist-takeover/) pointing out aggressive proposals in a recent UN Guidance document - [Substantive Gender Equality](https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g25/033/75/pdf/g2503375.pdf). The document demands:

* “dismantle the structures and practices that perpetuate the inequalities.”
* “formal equality must go beyond identical treatment”
* “equality for women needs to transcend the enactment of laws or the adoption of policies that are, prima facie, gender neutral.”
* "promote men’s accountability for gender equality and actively counter toxic masculinity."
* "integrating gender-sensitive education into school curricula at all levels"

Press Release: [https://endtodv.org/pr/substantive-gender-equality-blueprint-for-totalitarian-feminist-takeover/](https://endtodv.org/pr/substantive-gender-equality-blueprint-for-totalitarian-feminist-takeover/)

https://redd.it/1r6t0hm
@manpill

There is only ONE shelter for boys who have been sex trafficked in the US. We should all support it

It stinks that we live in a country where, thanks to people who believe male victims do not, cannot exist and if they do they deserved it because they were "toxic males!" (cough)feminists(cough) As a result, there is literally ONLY ONE safe house for boys who were sexually trafficked.

Bob's House of Hope in Texas is a ranch founded by Robert "Bob" Williams to help boys who survived sex trafficking. They provide education, counseling, and healing while the boys work with animals at the ranch. This video was just suggested to me and it's so beautiful...sometimes the YouTube algorithm pulls through!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkrPDQFGSwE



So if you at all, can, please, let's all donate to these guys. Even five dollars would help, as if only half the members of r/mensrights who see this message did so, that would be huge for them. Also try to share this post and/or talk about this ranch on social media. The only way men and boys will get help is if we do so.

https://redd.it/1r9zq70
@manpill

Teacher Jailed Over Alleged Racist Attack As Witnesses Describe An Even More Disturbing Scene
https://www.boredpanda.com/teacher-jailed-over-alleged-racist-attack-at-sams-club/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=ref&utm_campaign=hard1201

https://redd.it/1raj6d3
@manpill

Radical feminists never stop blaming the victims. They cannot stoop much lower
https://ibb.co/W4sDmHMX

https://redd.it/1rai6gt
@manpill

Psychoanalytic Feminism’s War on Men with TL;DR - the Honeybadgers and TL;DR investigate the misandrist ideas feminists promulgate in the field of psychoanalysis
https://rumble.com/v760umc-feminism-has-no-excuse-psychoanalytic-feminisms-war-on-men-with-tldr.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=f5157cb4-183f-4c46-9601-1e2aeb4aadf1

https://redd.it/1ra949j
@manpill

It would be a tragedy if your son had such an intolerant mother
https://ibb.co/k29fnsW9

https://redd.it/1raicej
@manpill

Teacher’s aide sentenced to more than 50 years for sexually assaulting a 12-year-old boy at a Sleepover and for sex crime of other boys | Toronto Sun
https://torontosun.com/news/world/wisconsin-teachers-aide-sentenced-sex-abuse-of-four-boys

https://redd.it/1r9shn4
@manpill

Men’s rights come from men’s fertility

The government and women will not care about men’s issue until men withhold their fertility in exchange for rights. Women want motherhood and government wants replacement citizens. Take those away and they’ll come to the negotiating table.

Men: If you need to get a vasectomy, and loudly encourage a fertility strike in exchange for men’s rights. If you can’t afford IVF, you can’t afford children anyway.

https://redd.it/1ra6zd1
@manpill

People know nothing about South Korea

I'm from South Korea and now live in Germany. But why do so many people who have never lived there simply say that women are discriminated against? They should first consider whether women are subject to military service.

https://redd.it/1r9sqsp
@manpill

Can someone explain to me why the British mainstream media is SO obsessed with demonizing boys?

Every f*cking thing is about "the manosphere". Oh btw someone using the term manosphere to refer to a specific type of content is always a hint they have a surface-level understanding of the situation (or they're just a bad faith actor who wants to demonize literal children as long as those children are male).


Regardless, gen z boys and men aren't even properly going right wing in the UK (statistically, one gender of young people are being radicalised in the UK and it sure ain't the boys).


I just can't properly describe how vile it is that the media and government and general institutions in this country are at war with children who they, themselves have pushed to some admittedly unsavoury corners of the Internet. There's little compassion for the mental health of those boys (and those boys are FAR bigger risks to themselves than they are to anyone else). There's a shit tonne of finger wagging.

https://redd.it/1ras6un
@manpill

Time Magazine 2016: "6 Feminist Myths That Will Not Die"—Ten Years Later: Still Not Dead

I thought this was worth posting as an anniversary, of sorts: Christina Hoff Sommers wrote this article back in 2016 which Time Magazine deigned to publish (can't help but wonder if the same would happen today) providing an overview of, as the title states, "6 Feminist Myths That Will Not Die." Well, it's been a few months shy of a decade since the article came out and they're still not dead.

 

>Much of what we hear about the plight of American women is false. Some faux facts have been repeated so often they are almost beyond the reach of critical analysis. Though they are baseless, these canards have become the foundation of Congressional debates, the inspiration for new legislation and the focus of college programs. Here are five of the most popular myths that should be rejected by all who are genuinely committed to improving the circumstances of women:

#

>MYTH 1: Women are half the world's population, working two-thirds of the world's working hours, receiving 10% of the world's income, owning less than 1% of the world's property.
>
>FACTS: This injustice confection is routinely quoted by advocacy groups, the World Bank, Oxfam and the United Nations. It is sheer fabrication. More than 15 years ago, Sussex University experts on gender and development Sally Baden and Anne Marie Goetz, repudiated the claim: "The figure was made up by someone working at the UN because it seemed to her to represent the scale of gender-based inequality at the time." But there is no evidence that it was ever accurate, and it certainly is not today.
>
>Precise figures do not exist, but no serious economist believes women earn only 10% of the world’s income or own only 1% of property. As one critic noted in an excellent debunking in The Atlantic, "U.S. women alone earn 5.4 percent of world income today." Moreover, in African countries, where women have made far less progress than their Western and Asian counterparts, Yale economist Cheryl Doss found female land ownership ranged from 11% in Senegal to 54% in Rwanda and Burundi. Doss warns that "using unsubstantiated statistics for advocacy is counterproductive." Bad data not only undermine credibility, they obstruct progress by making it impossible to measure change.

#

>MYTH 2: Between 100,000 and 300,000 girls are pressed into sexual slavery each year in the United States.
>
>FACTS: This sensational claim is a favorite of politicians, celebrities and journalists. Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore turned it into a cause célèbre. Both conservatives and liberal reformers deploy it. Former President Jimmy Carter recently said that the sexual enslavement of girls in the U.S. today is worse than American slavery in the 19th century.
>
>The source for the figure is a 2001 report on child sexual exploitation by University of Pennsylvania sociologists Richard Estes and Neil Alan Weiner. But their 100,000–300,000 estimate referred to children at risk for exploitation—not actual victims. When three reporters from the Village Voice questioned Estes on the number of children who are abducted and pressed into sexual slavery each year, he replied, "We're talking about a few hundred people." And this number is likely to include a lot of boys: According to a 2008 census of underage prostitutes in New York City, nearly half turned out to be male. A few hundred children is still a few hundred too many, but they will not be helped by thousand-fold inflation of their numbers.

#

>MYTH 3: In the United States, 22%–35% of women who visit hospital emergency rooms do so because of domestic violence.
>
>FACTS: This claim has appeared in countless fact sheets, books and articles—for example, in the leading textbook on family violence, Domestic Violence Law, and in the Penguin Atlas of Women in the World. The Penguin Atlas uses the emergency room figure to justify placing the U.S. on par with Uganda and Haiti for intimate violence.
>
>What is

the provenance? The Atlas provides no primary source, but the editor of Domestic Violence Law cites a 1997 Justice Department study, as well as a 2009 post on the Centers for Disease Control website. But the Justice Department and the CDC are not referring to the 40 million women who annually visit emergency rooms, but to women, numbering about 550,000 annually, who come to emergency rooms "for violence-related injuries." Of these, approximately 37% were attacked by intimates. So, it's not the case that 22%-35% of women who visit emergency rooms are there for domestic violence. The correct figure is less than half of 1%.

#

>MYTH 4: One in five in college women will be sexually assaulted.
>
>FACTS: This incendiary figure is everywhere in the media today. Journalists, senators and even President Obama cite it routinely. Can it be true that the American college campus is one of the most dangerous places on earth for women?
>
>The one-in-five figure is based on the Campus Sexual Assault Study, commissioned by the National Institute of Justice and conducted from 2005 to 2007. Two prominent criminologists, Northeastern University's James Alan Fox and Mount Holyoke College's Richard Moran, have noted its weaknesses:
>
>"The estimated 19% sexual assault rate among college women is based on a survey at two large four-year universities, which might not accurately reflect our nation's colleges overall. In addition, the survey had a large non-response rate, with the clear possibility that those who had been victimized were more apt to have completed the questionnaire, resulting in an inflated prevalence figure."
>
>Fox and Moran also point out that the study used an overly broad definition of sexual assault. Respondents were counted as sexual assault victims if they had been subject to "attempted forced kissing" or engaged in intimate encounters while intoxicated.
>
>Defenders of the one-in-five figure will reply that the finding has been replicated by other studies. But these studies suffer from some or all of the same flaws. Campus sexual assault is a serious problem and will not be solved by statistical hijinks.

#

>MYTH 5: Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns—for doing the same work.
>
>FACTS: No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.
>
>Wage gap activists say women with identical backgrounds and jobs as men still earn less. But they always fail to take into account critical variables. Activist groups like the National Organization for Women have a fallback position: that women’s education and career choices are not truly free—they are driven by powerful sexist stereotypes. In this view, women's tendency to retreat from the workplace to raise children or to enter fields like early childhood education and psychology, rather than better paying professions like petroleum engineering, is evidence of continued social coercion. Here is the problem: American women are among the best informed and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot.

#

>MYTH 6: Men are the privileged sex
>
>FACTS: Neither sex has the better deal. Modern life is a complicated mix of burdens and advantages—for each sex. Women are assumed to be the have-nots because a massive lobby devotes itself to proving Venus is worse off than Mars. Mars' afflictions go unnoticed. So let's consider a few of them.
>
>When it comes to being crushed, mutilated, electrocuted, or mangled at work, men are at a distinct disadvantage. Most backbreaking, lethally dangerous jobs—roofer, logger, roustabout, and coal

miner, to name a few—are done by men. The Labor Department reports that nearly 5,000 American workers die from workplace accidents each year. Ninety percent, more than 4,400, ARE male. We are often reminded that only 24 women are CEOs of the Fortune 500. But what about the Unfortunate 4,400?
>
>Education beyond high school has been called "the passport to the American dream." Increasingly, women have it and men don't. From the earliest grades, our schools do a better job educating girls. Women now earn a majority of associate, bachelor, masters and doctoral degrees and their share of college degrees increases almost every year. The intersectional narrative tells us that males—especially those of the white variety–are the group most in need of atoning for their privileges. But recent government data show that Hispanic and Native American women are now more likely to attend college than white men.
>
>Finally, consider the mother of all gender gaps: life expectancy. On average, women outlive men by about five years. The numbers are starker when you factor in race and ethnicity. In the U.S., Hispanic and Asian women can expect to live to 88 and 85, respectively. For white and black men, the ages are 76 and 72.
>
>Today’s women's lobby deploys a faulty logic: In cases where men are better off than women, that’s injustice. Where women are doing better—that's life.
>
>Final verdict: If Mars needs to check his privilege, then so does Venus.

#

>Why do these reckless claims have so much appeal and staying power? For one thing, there is a lot of statistical illiteracy among journalists, feminist academics and political leaders. There is also an admirable human tendency to be protective of women—stories of female exploitation are readily believed, and vocal skeptics risk appearing indifferent to women's suffering. Finally, armies of advocates depend on "killer stats" to galvanize their cause. But killer stats obliterate distinctions between more and less serious problems and send scarce resources in the wrong directions. They also promote bigotry. The idea that American men are annually enslaving more than 100,000 girls, sending millions of women to emergency rooms, sustaining a rape culture and cheating women out of their rightful salary creates rancor in true believers and disdain in those who would otherwise be sympathetic allies.
>
>My advice to women's advocates: Take back the truth.

https://redd.it/1rb19ll
@manpill

If a man is expected to give his life to protect his wife and children, why can't the same be expected of the wife?

So this has been sort of a high-level theme that I've been thinking about over the last few months.

That women want all the benefits of being a man (and a woman) with none of the responsibilities.

They also don't want any of the responsibilities of being a woman, either.

At its surface, feminism seems to kind of be like a revisiting of the roles of women in our society. However, they don't expect men to revisit their roles.

One of those, I think, has been no-fault divorce. That a woman should be able to get divorced anytime she wants.

But if that's the case, why is a man still expected to give his life to protect his wife? Like, if an intruder breaks in or an animal attacks her, he is expected to defend her. Even to the point of giving his life.

... And then a week later she can decide she wants to get a divorce.

But why then can't a woman give her life to protect her husband? And what I mean by that is that once they're married, they're married for life.

So we're supposed to revisit the role of a woman and give her rights and allow them to abandon their previous responsibilities, but we don't revisit the role of the man.

It's supposed to be sort of a 50/50 trade-off. Like men give up something and then women give off something, but together we are a better team. At least in terms of marriage.

But this is not how feminism evolved. Feminism evolved to only revisit the roles of women, often at the detriment of men, but we are never expected to revisit the roles of men.

Women want men to remain traditional while they are not.

I think our counter to this should be, "fine, if women give up their traditional role, then men also need to give up their traditional role. "

https://redd.it/1rb1so9
@manpill

University of Kansas offers 'Angry White Male Studies' class

News to hand:

Academia ignores critiques of feminism. Responds with demonisation and ad hominem attacks. Maybe they don't actually have a counter?

https://www.foxnews.com/us/university-kansas-offers-angry-white-male-studies-class

https://redd.it/1rb362e
@manpill

Imagine if this were posted by a man
https://ibb.co/Y4pycdD7

https://redd.it/1rb39hn
@manpill

British schoolboys to be "taking a course about respecting women and girls" by september.

Let's be honest here, most boys in my country just wanna go outside and play football at 11 years old, ride bikes with mates and play games in the evening. As a 17m from the UK Idk why this law is now being put in place for september, the problem of mysogony exists, and isn't a good thing, but shouldn't we just have a "no hate course" with that topic included? The law includes a rule that says "high risk pupils" will be sent to behavioural courses, as a teenager I saw barely any hate in the classroom, people were generally nice human beings and the ones who weren't so nice weren't taken seriously. I personally feel this law is adding petroleum to a bonfire, it won't help it will just make boys feel that they did something wrong when they are only 11.

https://redd.it/1rb74mu
@manpill

r/feminism not only encouraging false accusations, but offering instruction

[https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1rajgyz/advice\_i\_witnessed\_harrasment\_of\_a\_woman\_at\_her/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1rajgyz/advice_i_witnessed_harrasment_of_a_woman_at_her/)

The original post:

# [ADVICE] I witnessed harrasment of a woman at her work place

I need advice what to do in these situations. I walked into a bakery and very soon realised a man sitting there is stalking and harrasing one of the women workers. It was clear from his words he follows her and he was now sitting there just to bother her more. One of those creepy neighbourhood men. The harrased worker just smiled in discomfort and mostly avoided responding to him, just like the other worker. I have no idea how to help other women in these situations. I'm scared to react, bring myself in danger or make the situation worse for the harrassed person. We know police wont help. Telling him to fuck off is risky and probably not long term. WHAT CAN WE DO??



**And the response:**



As a customer?

* First, quietly take a pic of him. Then go BIG. Loud and obvious. Pull out your phone, wave it around, point at him and take video while calling him out loudly as a creep - accuse him of a made up past action: "Hey Creep, what's your name? You're the creep that was creeping on my sister yesterday! That was you! You're a creep!" Then tell everyone what he was doing to your sister, like: "You were staring at her and you ran after her and tried to grab her ass! You scared her! I'm gonna call 911! Let's have the cops deal with this ass grabber creep!"

If you start out loud and shocking, holding your phone out and waving it around a few times, he won't even be able to identify you later. Fear makes people confused. He will be shocked and probably run.

Then ask the management to have him refused service in the future, as you notice he was creeping on an employee, and he tried to grab your sister. Don't feel bad about lying about him! He's a creep, he deserves it. (Don't do a false police report, tho.)

https://redd.it/1rbi4my
@manpill

The University of Toronto is hiring a biology professor. Selection will be limited to candidates who identify as women, trans, nonbinary, Two-Spirit, and gender fluid, racialized persons/visible minorities, Indigenous Peoples, persons with disabilities. The salary range is $138,000 to $153,000.
https://jobs.utoronto.ca/job/Scarborough-Assistant-Professor-Computational-Biology-and-Data-Science-ON/599939517/

https://redd.it/1rh232v
@manpill