Let's be honest about men expressing their feelings.

I'll be blunt about it, men do not express feelings the way women do. Society has paraded a very feminine method of expressing negative feelings or emotions in general. Telling men it's okay to cry, is not okay. That's not how a man deals with his pain. I don't say this to be harsh. I say this, because I've experienced it first hand. If a man is sad or unhappy, he'd rather do something physical, productive and active. Rather than shed tears.


Now obviously a man can cry if a breaking point is reached, or he can lash out. But more often than not, men would best deal with their internal pain by being productive or physical. The general point I am making here. Is men are very different from women, even when it comes to emotional expression. Women will cry and share feelings. Men will seek activity or productivity.


So men, if you don't want to cry, don't cry. If you want to cry, cry. The point is, you don't need to express your feelings the way other's tell you to do. You can handle your turmoil how you think is right.

https://redd.it/1qlv407
@manpill

UK: William Shakespeare was actually a black woman, feminist historian and LSE graduate claims in new book. OP: Feminists are crazy
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15494859/William-Shakespeare-actually-black-woman-feminist-historian-LSE-graduate-claims-new-book.html

https://redd.it/1qm3pwz
@manpill

Arizona woman indicted for second case involving alleged paternity fraud
https://www.azfamily.com/2025/11/06/arizona-woman-indicted-second-case-involving-alleged-paternity-fraud/

https://redd.it/1qm7cln
@manpill

Psychopath feminist says vasectomies should be mandatory for baby boys (270,000 likes on TikTok)
https://x.com/TheTinMenBlog/status/2016927391969423556

https://redd.it/1qqhtky
@manpill

Bold Texts From Teacher To Student After Hours‑Long Intimate Encounter Surface
https://www.boredpanda.com/teacher-mckenna-kindred-texts-to-student-surface-after-intimate-encounter/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=ref&utm_campaign=hard1201

https://redd.it/1qq4bvh
@manpill

The "Women And Children" Phrase

I've ranted before how much I hate this phrase for obvious reasons, with how it's clearly misandrist and exclusionary against men, and infantalizes women. And it's even worse when it's "women and girls" as it's morphed into in recent times. Earlier at work I was reminded how much I hate this when I was at my bookstore job going about my usual duties, and there was a teacher with her class on a special trip to the store and they were in the cafe area discussing history and they were talking about the holocaust and the lives claimed by Hitler, Stalin, etc. and one of the assistant teachers said something to the effect of the "women and children" killed by the Nazis and Russians. I wanted to shout at the top of my lungs to this idiot and say in her face "Just as many men were killed, you ignorant misandrist." I mean WTF. Always making it out that it doesn't matter when men (and boys) suffer and are affected by something. It pisses me off so much, it's like it's perfectly fine for men/boys to be victims and it's no big loss or tragedy. Especially during something like an invasion, terrorist attack, bombing, natural disaster, etc. always hearing about the "women and children" but the men treated as if their deaths are worthless

I'm sure many here agree "women and children" is a terribly misandrist phrase and one long overdue to be stricken from the public lexicon. It's an example of how misandry is seen as acceptable and not a major problem. How is it not a blatantly sexist, exclusionary term?

https://redd.it/1qqpm8q
@manpill

Sex of Employees in the Australian Public Service
https://jameslnuzzo.substack.com/p/australian-public-service-employee-sex

https://redd.it/1qqukr7
@manpill

James L. Nuzzo, PhD
@JamesLNuzzo
UN Women collecting, but then not reporting, male victimization data is consistent with my 2025 analysis of UN Women's propaganda techniques. In my analysis, I termed this: "Suppression of Male Victimization Data." I found evidence of it in 12.2% of UN Women's tweets
https://x.com/JamesLNuzzo/status/2016808719896760386?s=20

https://redd.it/1qquawv
@manpill

Baldness classified as disability by court... but only for women
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/bald-disability-hair-loss-wigs-b2910004.html

https://redd.it/1qq546j
@manpill

Real reason why men have walked away from dating
https://youtu.be/iKSbi-upr64

https://redd.it/1qqxvw2
@manpill

What’s missing on campus? Men.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/01/30/metro/men-college-campus-enrollment-declines/

https://redd.it/1qr32wa
@manpill

The concept of "Weaponized incompetence" being weaponized against men

I often see this in my feeds, women attacking men over perceived "weaponized incompetence". Usually in situations where you have a man saying "you do X or Y better than I can, so it's best if you're in charge of X or Y". This might not always be a fair situation but generally it seems like a logical position. The one that knows more can always take the time to teach the other, as long as they're both willing to. It's just as often the case that women refuse to teach, because they expect men to know.

What bothers me, however, is how much work women effectively absolve themselves from as a result of "weaponized incompetence" but which never really gets called out for. The inability or unwillingness to teach, for example, could certainly be argued to be a form of weaponized incompetence too. The inability or unwillingness to pursue men, take initiatives or lead in dating could also be argued to be a form of incompetence. Common physical tasks like shoveling, moving furniture/appliances, fixing things, staying fit, learning to protect yourself(and your family) or just being capable in any other financial, social, sexual, emotional or mental tasks, are often neglected or passed on to men by women but this is almost never actually viewed as a form of weaponized incompetence.

In fact, men who fail to do those tasks for men are typically viewed as deadbeats or not "real men". So not only are men needlessly and aggressively attacked/shamed for "weaponized incompetence" over menial tasks, they are also shamed, gaslit and manipulated into accepting women's "weaponized incompetence" too and arguably on a much larger scale. All of which is effectively invisible or ignored, because people only really care or see what affects women(whether that's because of feminist influence, asymmetrical sympathy for women or society being gynocentric).

https://redd.it/1qqb92s
@manpill

Emasculation examples?

Hi all,
I got into a discussion the other day and I mentioned that I feel that men have been so emasculated in the last 20 or so years to the point that there would be less capable men defending the country if it was ever invaded than in the 1980's (as an example). I was asked to give examples of emasculation and for the life of me, I am having a hard doing it. Real concrete examples. Can anyone help?

https://redd.it/1qr5sfy
@manpill

I swear, Twitter is the WORST place to talk about gender
https://x.com/hollyslostshoe/status/2016229415047287256?s=20

https://redd.it/1qr6em3
@manpill

Removed by Reddit

Removed by Reddit on account of violating the [content policy. ]

https://redd.it/1qqsxc1
@manpill

The IT-women sub shows how damaging victim mentality is to women, and doubly so to their male coworkers

There is this sub for women working in IT - that I won't name for obvious reasons.

Three-quarters of the sub could be summarized as this:

1. My job is stressful - my colleague/boss is a jerk - I was made redundant / was not promoted.
2. I am a woman.
3. The only possible explanation is misogyny.

I've been working in IT my whole life, and let me tell you ladies: I have experienced all of that and more. And considering that I am a male, misogyny was probably not the reason. Stress, injustice, and bad bosses are an integral part of the breadwinner's experience. Welcome to the equal workplace!

But there are things that I have experienced that you have not:

* Promotions and positions reserved for one gender in the name of equality.
* Backroom channels between your female bosses and your female colleagues and reports, where all your outputs as an IT professional are scrutinized through the gender lens.
* Frivolous reports to HR motivated by personal profit.

At this point in my career, I learned to fear my female colleagues because of the combination of oversized power they wield and the toxic victim mentality they are indoctrinated with.

https://redd.it/1qrb18t
@manpill

Hearing "Misandry only offends never harms" from a Psychological standpoint makes no sense

I keep hearing that "misandry only offends, never harms". This bothers me from a psychological standpoint. Feminists point of view is that because we live in patriarchal society, (men take up majority of billionaires and legislation makers), that misandry is a reaction that never breeds violence. As someone who has studied psychology, this is the most ridiculous form of bullshit I've ever heard. Hatred is associated with a specific "hate circuit" in the brain, primarily involving the putamen and insular cortex (insula), which activate when viewing a despised person. This network also includes the medial frontal gyrus, premotor cortex, and frontal pole, representing a unique, colder, and more calculating emotion compared to fear or anger. If you are a violent person, and you have a hatred toward someone, your brain is not NOT going to tell you "I'm an oppressed victim by the patriarchy, so I can never let my hatred get violent". I don't know where this idea comes from. It's genuinely baffling to me. Because time and time again I'm seeing women putting their hands on men, BOASTING is the fact that a man can not defend himself against a female aggressor, in the same way it is misogyny to boast about violence against women.
Can someone please chime on from a psychological POV?

https://redd.it/1qrc8zs
@manpill

A Great Video on the issue of Feminization
https://youtu.be/EWLbq7PlrIA?si=gMNh2nvzfx9EqePx

https://redd.it/1qrg0jv
@manpill

UN faces financial collapse, shouldn’t expect help from men

Considering how the United Nations has neglected and attacked men’s issues (while promoting female supremacy) over the years, it shouldn’t expect men to stand up for it as its financial crisis deepens. FAFO.

“The United Nations is at risk of "imminent financial collapse" due to member states not paying their fees, the body's head has warned.

António Guterres said the UN faced a financial crisis which was "deepening, threatening programme delivery", and that money could run out by July.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr579mdv4m7o

https://redd.it/1qrirfw
@manpill

Thomas Perez Jr. Falsely Confessed to His Father's Murder After a 17 Hour Interrogation — but His Dad Was Alive the Whole Time. Inside the Disturbing Case
https://people.com/thomas-perez-jr-murder-interrogation-11862514

https://redd.it/1qrju7a
@manpill

If we can’t get people to agree abusing men is bad for their health, we have a long road ahead

>When I say women shouldn’t hit men, it’s a moral position because it’s the wrong thing to do but anyone (oh my god use your words you troglodyte) but is unlikely to cause any real damage. When I say men shouldn’t hit women, it’s both a position of morality AND a position of “this is literally for her health and safety you big lunk”.

A post about men vs women as DV was full of gems like these. It is so soul crushing the way most of the world thinks men can’t be hurt by DV.

https://redd.it/1qrn9yf
@manpill