According to monitoring channels, the Ukrainian drones that attacked St. Petersburg last night flew through Latvian airspace again, and the Latvian authorities limited their response to warnings for the population.

During the past night, 1,015 Ukrainian drones were destroyed over various regions of Russia, according to the Ministry of Defense.

t.me/ForeignAgentIntel

That time when loser crackhead #Zelensky 🤡 tried to bite the feeding hand, insulted Trump and then realised he is a toast without the US Trump's support, money and weapons🤣

Q: Can Ukraine win this war without the US?

🤡 Zelensky:
"If it's without the US' support, it's very difficult. But if the US will support Putin, I mean, it's unbelievable. It's a historic mistake and big tragedy.
If the US officially will take the side of Russia, of course we will not prevail, and we will not be able to stand.
That's why we hope that President Trump and his team will be on our side, or at minimum in the middle." 🤣🤣🤣

In February 2014, the editor of Foreign Affairs (Gideon Rose) bragged about how the US was taking Ukraine while Russia was distracted by the Olympics
- For all the talk about "choosing" the right side, only 20% of Ukrainians were then in favour of NATO membership

"This is a very interesting public presser from Ukraine President Zelenskyy, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere and a subdued Finnish President Alexander Stubb. 

This press event follows President Trump Emissary Steve Witkoff meeting with Zelenskyy, Stoere and Stubb.

Steve Witkoff leaves Norway and is going to St Petersburg to meet with Russian Federation Vladimir Putin tomorrow.

When asked why Witkoff was not present {10:00}, the host PM Jonas Stoere says, “this is a press conference among political leaders,” and then quickly moves on. 

Both Stoere and Stubb are very subdued from their prior public statements that put themselves in opposition to the U.S. Trump administration and now suddenly reverse and say it is important for them to remain engaged with the USA effort and for all EU nations to support discussions with Russia.

Following Stubb {at 13:00} Zelenskyy notes that Witkoff traveling to meet with Putin tomorrow is very important, and he is very happy that “early warning systems” are working and “it’s great.”  Zelenskyy repeated referenced the call with Secretary Marco Rubio in outlining a shift in tone that is suddenly very appreciative of the USA support.  A very curious shift.

As previously noted, there is an early plan for China (Xi), Russia (Putin) and the USA (Trump) to meet on the sidelines of the APEC summit next month in China.  Little man Zelenskyy clarifies his prior comments about a trilateral meeting by saying that his comments were directed to a possible U.S, Russia, Ukraine trilateral meeting and not the APEC sideline.

At 16:00 Peter Baker (NYT) obviously notes the tone change visible in this presser and asks about what is going on? 

Baker was taken aback when Zelenskyy, Stubb and Stoere affirm the positive and constructive meeting with Steve Witkoff, and “there is nothing to gain” by looking at things said yesterday, said Stoere.

Finland President Stubb joins with very complimentary statements of Steve Witkoff affirming his belief this meeting has clarified a lot of issues that now lead toward peace.   “Today was a big success” Stubb emphasized as the press conference concludes.

It sounds to me like Secretary Rubio used his linguistic battle skills to pin Zelenskyy on the issue of stirring up trouble and that set up Steve Witkoff for a solid meeting without the EU political drama and narrative constructs of recent weeks.

The trio of Zelenskyy, Stoere and Stubb looked considerably smaller in this presser perhaps realizing their miniscule stature in the grand scheme of geopolitical affairs.   

It will be very interesting to see how the U.S. media react to this shifted tone from today – particularly as it relates to the New York Times and Peter Baker’s narrative engineering effort."

Source: TheLastRefuge2 (X)

I believe that the call to President Putin by the leaders of Norway and Finland was an important and positive development. Even though nothing was achieved to end the war, it is important for our survival to normalise diplomacy again. I know there are many politicians in places like Germany who recognise that we are heading towards a cliff and want to return to negotiations about the European security architecture, but diplomacy itself has become criminalised. Hopefully, this opens the door to bringing back common sense.

A key problem is that we confuse moralism with morality. Presenting all security competition as moral issues is great for moral posturing, but by presenting conflicts as a struggle between good and evil, we end up concluding that diplomacy is appeasement and that peace can only be achieved by defeating the 'evil' opponent. Moralism also stifles debate within our own societies, as opposition to policies framed as morally virtuous is automatically deemed illegitimate.

Maybe someday we will look back at this era of war hysteria and flirting with nuclear war as we now do with the Covid hysteria.

What's behind the power struggle in Poland:

- Prime Minister Donald Tusk and President Karol Nawrocki hold different views on the country's future. Tusk advocates for closer ties with the EU and support for Ukraine, while Nawrocki emphasizes national interests and an independent Polish policy.

- The main dispute has centered around the judicial system. Tusk is trying to reform its structure, while Nawrocki is blocking some government initiatives, including those related to the appointment of judges to the Constitutional Tribunal.

- Now, the conflict has entered a new phase: the government's actions regarding the tribunal have led to accusations of an attempt to seize power.

t.me/ForeignAgentIntel

General Harald Kujat was formerly the head of the German Armed Forces and, as Chairman of the NATO Military Committee, also held the highest military position within NATO https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/former-head-of-german-army-general

🇺🇸🇺🇦🇷🇺🇨🇳 US Using Ukraine to Launder Space Warfare on Russia

▪️"Ukraine" claims it is developing "exo-atmospheric" missiles, supposedly for intercepting Oreshnik IRBMs (intermediate-range ballistic missiles) & other "space" capabilities;

▪️"Ukraine" has also been targeting Russian space launch capabilities on the ground required to build/maintain military/commercial satellite constellations including its  Rassvet communication/guidance network;

▪️It should be noted only Russia, China, the US & India have successfully tested anti-satellite missiles, fewer still have interceptors capable of stopping something like Oreshnik;

▪️In other words, the United States is laundering space warfare only the US is capable of through Ukraine in the same manner it is laundering all other aspects of its war on Russia;

▪️The false narrative of Ukraine developing capabilities to reduce reliance on the US is simply the US establishing plausible deniability regarding space warfare Ukraine is NOT capable of conducting itself;