Common symptom of deracination: signal boosting an out-group that advocates for something that may also benefit you because it isn’t socially acceptable for you to do the same.
💯4👍2
“The Wall” discourse is going around again and many folks (both men and women) of all stripes seem confused AND outraged so here goes. The Wall is not just physical attractiveness for women. It’s also psychological. Many misuse the term to dunk on aging women, but let’s examine.
The “manosphere” did not coin the phrase “hit the wall.” That term has been around for ages and was regularly used by women in a catty manner. It is also used in sports.
With their actions (which are usually the opposite of words about this subject) the only agency most women have is their sexual agency. This is why looks + age conversations inevitably devolve into what men prefer to bang. Crass, but obvious.
“The Wall” represents the threshold when most women realize their less ability to compete with the next generation of women. This is very psychological, obviously. Insecurity is a big business- just ask the Botox industry these days.
With these talks, there are always folks bringing up exceptions. Which prove the point. Exceptions are brought up precisely because there is such an overwhelming fear that contemporary society needed to be restructured to help avoid it.
How do you beat the fear? You can. You have a man you actually desire at your peak and you stay with him, he stays desirable to you and you likely have a family. The dream.
Why is this becoming a discussion more and more? Because women aren’t doing those things. And it’s psychologically damaging them immensely. This is embarrassing, so they cope.
Even if they are doing those things- they’re doing them later and settling. They know they could do better. This is why you get women in relationships married complaining about the discourse. Otherwise it would just be: lol me & my friends are still hot who cares and scroll on.
The only reason a woman would care about who thinks she “hit the wall” is if she is still on the market, so to speak.
The “manosphere” did not coin the phrase “hit the wall.” That term has been around for ages and was regularly used by women in a catty manner. It is also used in sports.
With their actions (which are usually the opposite of words about this subject) the only agency most women have is their sexual agency. This is why looks + age conversations inevitably devolve into what men prefer to bang. Crass, but obvious.
“The Wall” represents the threshold when most women realize their less ability to compete with the next generation of women. This is very psychological, obviously. Insecurity is a big business- just ask the Botox industry these days.
With these talks, there are always folks bringing up exceptions. Which prove the point. Exceptions are brought up precisely because there is such an overwhelming fear that contemporary society needed to be restructured to help avoid it.
How do you beat the fear? You can. You have a man you actually desire at your peak and you stay with him, he stays desirable to you and you likely have a family. The dream.
Why is this becoming a discussion more and more? Because women aren’t doing those things. And it’s psychologically damaging them immensely. This is embarrassing, so they cope.
Even if they are doing those things- they’re doing them later and settling. They know they could do better. This is why you get women in relationships married complaining about the discourse. Otherwise it would just be: lol me & my friends are still hot who cares and scroll on.
The only reason a woman would care about who thinks she “hit the wall” is if she is still on the market, so to speak.
💯7👎2💩1
I have never seen so many leftists in replies to (non-viral) posts as I have in replies to my posts about the Babylon Been tonight. Interesting phenomenon, there.
🤔6
Remember when Richard Spencer got punched in the face and anyone with half a brain cell said if they justify violence against him for “being a Nazi” then all they have to do is call you a Nazi? Something something denazification. Anyways.
👍7
It seems like subversion that conservatives would so (allegedly) whole-heartedly embrace anti-identity politics and embrace never being angry at anything as a virtues.
Worried about a group you belong to, your family, etc? Wow, collectivist!
Worried about obvious rhetoric against those groups? Wow, snowflake!
It’s so obvious.
Worried about a group you belong to, your family, etc? Wow, collectivist!
Worried about obvious rhetoric against those groups? Wow, snowflake!
It’s so obvious.
🔥8
Forwarded from The Arcadian
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Do you have an activity that involves nature and/or conservation that you’re passionate about? Write about it for us. The-Arcadian.com
Reality as a homemaker: “That’s wonderful, I wish more people did that.”
“The best job in the world.”
“Your husband is so lucky.”
“You must have a great husband.”
Online: “A bunch of people I don’t know said mean things on a viral post. Men hate mothers and women!”
Touch grass.
“The best job in the world.”
“Your husband is so lucky.”
“You must have a great husband.”
Online: “A bunch of people I don’t know said mean things on a viral post. Men hate mothers and women!”
Touch grass.
👍5👎2💩2
Forwarded from Millennial Woes
Exhausting, financially ruinous and impossible-to-satisfy lawfare has been used to kill VDare. This is shocking, really. Anarcho-tyranny in action.
https://vdare.com/articles/it-is-finished-nyag-letitia-james-crucifies-vdare-com
https://vdare.com/articles/it-is-finished-nyag-letitia-james-crucifies-vdare-com
VDARE.com
“IT IS FINISHED”—NYAG Letitia James Crucifies VDARE.com
VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow writes: I launch...