🔹 SC Quashes Abetment to Suicide Case Against In-Laws

Case: Shenbagavalli & Ors. v. Inspector of Police

A man died by suicide after his in-laws allegedly insulted him by calling him "impotent" during a marital dispute. The Madras HC refused to quash the FIR under Section 306 IPC, prompting an appeal.

The Supreme Court ruled:

🔹No abetment established: Insults alone do not constitute abetment under Sections 306 and 107 IPC.

🔹Mens rea missing: No continuous cruelty or direct instigation shown.

🔹Suicide occurred nearly a month after the alleged insult, with no contact in between.

🔹The suicide note lacked clear evidence of intent or inducement.

📌 Mere use of abusive language, without intent to provoke suicide, does not amount to abetment.

FIR quashed. Proceedings against the in-laws cannot continue.

India’s Strong Stand on Terrorism
The Government of India has declared that any future terror attacks will be treated as ACTS OF WAR and responded to with full force.
National security is non-negotiable.
#IndiaFirst #NationSecurity #IndianArmy

Just finished your 10th or 12th boards and wondering what’s next? 🤔

If law school is even slightly on your mind, the CLAT Success Test on 15th May is a no-brainer.

✔️ Test your aptitude
✔️ Get a guaranteed scholarship
✔️ Figure out if CLAT is your path

One test. Zero pressure. Maximum reward💪

📅DATE - 15 May 2024
🕙 Online | 10 AM – 10 PM

Your NLU journey could begin with this one test

Register Now: https://tinyurl.com/mp4ytr5p

🚨WATCH NOW🚨

CLAT 2026: Master Logical Reasoning | Types of Questions You Must Know

In this session, we’ll break down the types of questions you must master, share psychological tips to maintain clarity under pressure, and reveal smart strategies to avoid common traps. Logical Reasoning isn’t just about solving questions, it’s about developing a sharp, analytical mindset.

🔗Link to watch the video : https://youtu.be/uX_PkUpycxk

🚨WE ARE LIVE NOW: https://youtube.com/live/GFMDyg5u09I

Not all heroes wear capes…
Some carry bags, wipe tears, give strength, and raise legends🫶🏻

Happy Mother’s Day!🌍❤️🪬

📌 Case Title : Punit Beriwala vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Bench: Justices Dipankar Datta & Manmohan
Court: Supreme Court of India

Key Points:
🔹FIR was filed under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, and 120B IPC (offences punishable with over 3 years).

🔹High Court quashed the FIR, citing a 16-year delay.

🔹The Supreme Court reversed this, ruling that delay alone is not a valid ground to quash an FIR if a cognizable offence is disclosed.

SC's Observations:
🔹Section 468 CrPC: No limitation for offences punishable with over 3 years imprisonment.

🔹Section 469 CrPC: Limitation starts from discovery of offence—in this case, December 28, 2021.

🔹FIR was filed within 15 days of discovery, making it valid and timely.

Outcome:
The appeal was allowed, and the High Court’s decision quashing the FIR was set aside. Investigation to proceed.