Rahul Gandhi v. State of U.P. and Anr.
SLP(Crl) No. 6196/2025

📌 Key Points:

🔹Supreme Court stayed defamation proceedings against Rahul Gandhi over remarks on VD Savarkar.

🔹Bench: Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan.

🔹Court warned Gandhi against future irresponsible statements, threatening suo motu action.

🔹Complaint filed by Advocate Nripendra Pandey alleging hate speech.

🔹Gandhi’s counsel A.M. Singhvi assured no further comments.

✅ Conclusion:
Stay granted; leaders must speak responsibly about freedom fighters.

WATCH NOW!🚨

Journey Through the Making of the Indian Constitution| Part-2|

Get ready to dive into the history, key acts, and major milestones that shaped the Indian Constitution. In this session, we’ll simplify important topics like the Regulating Act of 1773, Pitt’s India Act, Charter Acts, Crown Rule, and more all explained in easy language!

🔗Link to watch the video : https://youtu.be/s0OjZz4P2Rw

📣 BOOTCAMP ALERT!

We’re bringing you a 4-Day FREE Offline Bootcamp to help you solve tricky questions, clear doubts, and learn smart tips from experts!

🗓 Date: 1st – 4th May 2025
📍 Location: All Law Prep Centres

Struggling with: GK overload?, RCs chasing you at 2 AM?, Legal reasoning giving you a headache?
This bootcamp is your SOS! 🚨

Come learn, grow & connect with students just like you!😊

👉 Register Now! 🔗: https://tinyurl.com/y6w72dfj

📢 URGENT UPDATE 📢

Supreme Court Stays Delhi HC Direction to Revise CLAT UG 2025 Merit List 🏛📜

The Supreme Court has stayed (put on hold) the Delhi High Court's judgment that had directed the Consortium of National Law Universities to revise the merit list for CLAT UG 2025 admissions. 😮

The Delhi High Court had previously found errors in four questions across sets B, C, and D of the question papers 🤔 and ordered marks to be awarded for these questions to candidates who attempted those sets. It also directed the CLAT consortium to revise the merit list within four weeks. 📝

The Supreme Court's interim order was issued based on a Special Leave Petition challenging the High Court's decision. The petitioner argued that the High Court's direction put candidates who received question paper set A at a disadvantage. ⚖️

🚨 WE ARE LIVE NOW 🚨

CLAT Result 2025 : Supreme Court Stays Delhi HC Direction To Revise CLAT-UG 2025 Merit List

LINK🔗: https://youtube.com/live/7GBnVxoW2q8