Please watch and share this interview. And...check out Section 3024 of the CURES Act - informed consent can be waived for the 2 reasons Stew Peters mentions, as well as a third reason
‘informed consent can be waived if it is not in the best interest of human subjects (to be informed)’

Karen Kingston says that there’s a plot for the mass murder of the American people, and she has the receipts to prove it.

Karen says it’s all buried in a normal-looking law called the 21st Century Cures Act, a bill pushed by Democrat Diana DeGette and Republican Fred Upton. Despite the name of the bill, Karen says the bill’s purpose was to gut the legal and ethical standards that govern the FDA and keep it from approving dangerous or defective drugs and medical devices. The bill also made it easier to collect research data from human subjects. Fans of the bill included Big Pharma, medical device manufacturers, and the National Institutes of Health. You know, the place Tony Fauci works.

The actual FDA itself at the time opposed the bill. They begged Congress to not pass it, because they said it would sabotage their safety efforts. But you won’t be surprised to learn that well-paid Big Pharma lobbyists carry a lot more weight in Washington than FDA safety inspectors.

The CURES act gave the NIH the right to spend billions of millions of dollars on “high risk, high reward” research, without the oversight that would usually be used in research. Traditionally, high-risk high-reward research was done by DARPA in the U.S. military. It’s for advanced military projects of crucial national security importance. Now, Congress is using it to power up Big Pharma.

The CURES Act also allows for the institutional review boards at the FDA to waive the right of informed consent, which is supposed to make sure that experimental subjects know what is being done to them and what the risks are. Now, that rule can just be ignored if the board claims that providing informed consent would make it difficult to conduct the study. All they have to do is say the risk is “minimal.” What guarantees that it actually is? Why, the judgment of the same people who have spent two years telling you that masking kids for two years isn’t a big deal, and that it’s a great idea to inject five-year-olds with a barely-tested shot with unclear side effects and operating on novel medical technology.

By the way, we might be on the brink of CURES Act 2.0. That bill got proposed last November. It would spend several billion more dollars on new, even less-regulated research activities, and it would force the FDA to meet with Big Pharma representatives to be pressured on ways they can have more “innovative approaches.”

This is a survey among mostly scientists and doctors, many of which are experts in coronaviruses.

Also, just to clarify - the CURES Act is not a plot for mass murder. The CURES Act and PREP Act combined did however legalize mass murder by means of waiving informed consent for clinical trials - if it’s not in the best interest of human subjects - and by granting immunity to organizations, businesses, the government and individuals who engage in Willful misconduct as long as they are following ‘HHS Guidance’

Karen Kingston says that there’s a plot for the mass murder of the American people, and she has the receipts to prove it.

Karen says it’s all buried in a normal-looking law called the 21st Century Cures Act, a bill pushed by Democrat Diana DeGette and Republican Fred Upton. Despite the name of the bill, Karen says the bill’s purpose was to gut the legal and ethical standards that govern the FDA and keep it from approving dangerous or defective drugs and medical devices. The bill also made it easier to collect research data from human subjects. Fans of the bill included Big Pharma, medical device manufacturers, and the National Institutes of Health. You know, the place Tony Fauci works.

The actual FDA itself at the time opposed the bill. They begged Congress to not pass it, because they said it would sabotage their safety efforts. But you won’t be surprised to learn that well-paid Big Pharma lobbyists carry a lot more weight in Washington than FDA safety inspectors.

The CURES act gave the NIH the right to spend billions of millions of dollars on “high risk, high reward” research, without the oversight that would usually be used in research. Traditionally, high-risk high-reward research was done by DARPA in the U.S. military. It’s for advanced military projects of crucial national security importance. Now, Congress is using it to power up Big Pharma.

The CURES Act also allows for the institutional review boards at the FDA to waive the right of informed consent, which is supposed to make sure that experimental subjects know what is being done to them and what the risks are. Now, that rule can just be ignored if the board claims that providing informed consent would make it difficult to conduct the study. All they have to do is say the risk is “minimal.” What guarantees that it actually is? Why, the judgment of the same people who have spent two years telling you that masking kids for two years isn’t a big deal, and that it’s a great idea to inject five-year-olds with a barely-tested shot with unclear side effects and operating on novel medical technology.

By the way, we might be on the brink of CURES Act 2.0. That bill got proposed last November. It would spend several billion more dollars on new, even less-regulated research activities, and it would force the FDA to meet with Big Pharma representatives to be pressured on ways they can have more “innovative approaches.”

Rochelle Walensky knew she was lying to the American people. ‘Just following orders,’ is not an excuse when advocating for the use of a bioweapon on the American people and our children.

There was never any scientific basis for the idea that vaccinated people do not "carry the virus." This false idea was the fundamental premise behind the discriminatory vaccine mandate/passport scheme that has violated the civil rights of countless people worldwide.

Credit: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

Well I am shocked! Vanity Fair is covering content from @RealStewPeters, including the 2014 NIAID grant to EcoHealth we discussed that funded the ‘research’ to explain which coronaviruses could jump from bats to humans. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/03/the-virus-hunting-nonprofit-at-the-center-of-the-lab-leak-controversy

Summary of some of my recent interviews. https://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/commentary/are-covid-vaccines-the-latest-medical-experiment-on-american-citizens-143139/

I wonder if Vanity Fair’s research team knows that Robert Garry is a ‘hired gun’ by Fauci? https://gettr.com/post/pxtqhxaaa4

This is EXACTLY why children and healthy young adults should have never gotten a CV19/Sars-CoV-2 mRNA IM inoculation

"...high CD4+ T cell reactivity to CCC, but not antibody responses, was associated with high pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 immunity. Overall, these results suggest that the steady and sustained CCC responses observed in the study cohort are likely due to a relatively stable pool of CCC-specific memory CD4+ T cells instead of fast decaying responses and frequent reinfections..."
CCC = common cold coronaviruses
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.01.482548v1

A strong warning ⛔️

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/04/covid-19-vaccines-are-a-bioweapon-crimes-against-humanity-novavax-dr-richard-fleming-with-maria-zeee/

Ebola and other hemorrhagic fever (HF) viruses will be the next terrorizing threat. Get ahead of the narrative with facts. Don’t buy into the fear. Follow the money, the NIH/NIAID money. https://rumble.com/v102z8j-urgent-karen-kingston-next-bioweapon-release-hemorrhagic-fever-and-the-endg.html?mref=u0e78&mc=2duvi

Stay informed. As a parent, you have the ultimate authority to decide what is best for child’s emotional, physical and developmental health. Don’t allow CA officials to vote away parental rights. The State or California does not have ownership of our children, but the state will if we don’t stop these bills. 👊❤️🇺🇸
https://ca.childrenshealthdefense.org/legislation-ca-b/?fbclid=IwAR3cCgt64wFdG3v1lSTWGwLzhHOUZs3-YeIiIz3ntQ7TDtQ-uuzS0SQ5ffU&mibextid=ATveJy

Per the NY Post, more people die under tyrannical governors than those that respect the Constitution and God-given rights, even during a pandemic. Shocker. Maybe the founding fathers were pretty smart in declaring the power of America is in our freedom. History has shown us that tyrannical power and socialism increase poverty, misery and death. Any democrats think we should continue with this experiment called the ‘COVID-19 declaration threat to public health and national security requiring mandates and financial support to schools, counties and hospitals to continue to annihilate freedom of speech, choice and other founding principles of the United States of America? Anyone?
Https://nypost.com/2022/04/11/ny-handled-covid-19-lockdown-poorly-florida-among-best-study/

Watch this interview. Dr. Ardis goes through study by study the venom codons that result in CV-19 symptoms. https://www.brighteon.com/2b090826-787f-4d03-9f78-a1a80d3fe767

So I just posted this on Facebook.

I’m saddened that Brene Brown and her followers are praising the confirmation of a person to the highest court of our nation. Your praise is not based on ‘her’ values, actions or decisions, but based on the color of ‘her’ skin and gender, which Jackson herself is unable to define. Why are you praising the appointment of a woman who can’t even tell Americans what a woman is? ‘She’ defends pedophiles and apologizes to sexual perverts that they have to be reprimanded and punished for their sexual perversion in desiring to abuse and violate children. If a white male had Jackson’s historical judicial record and spoke the same words to defend pedophiles in front of the Senate the way ‘she’ did, Brene Brown and her followers would not be posting virtue signaling praises of victory. There would be posts of criticisms, disgust, and blatant signs of a failed government system.

The financial elite have so much money and power that their corporations and stakeholders are no longer concerned about money.....
Leading global corporations and media platforms are singularly focused on gaining more control over citizens, no matter what the loss, financial or otherwise.