Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
If you are in CA, Call, email, and/or send a 30 second video to oppose mandating Covid-19 vaxx for CA employers to impose on their employees and contractors. https://oneclickpolitics.global.ssl.fastly.net/messages/edit?promo_id=16097
So...now graphene oxide is ‘good for your health. And...breaking news! Graphene Oxide is in surgical masks as a anti-bacterial. https://www.innovationnewsnetwork.com/zenguard-graphene-based-nanotechnology-reduces-transmission/19751/
Innovation News Network
ZenGUARD™: Graphene-based nanotechnology reduces transmission risk
Zentek’s ZenGUARD™ graphene-based nanotechnology filters and deactivates pathogens to reduce the risk of transmission.
SCOTUS rules against US Navy Seals Constitutional and God-given right to religious exemptions. Amy Coney Barret and Brett Kavanaugh side with liberal ideology and globabists.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a477_1bo2.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a477_1bo2.pdf
Please watch and share this interview. And...check out Section 3024 of the CURES Act - informed consent can be waived for the 2 reasons Stew Peters mentions, as well as a third reason
‘informed consent can be waived if it is not in the best interest of human subjects (to be informed)’
‘informed consent can be waived if it is not in the best interest of human subjects (to be informed)’
Forwarded from Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
Karen Kingston says that there’s a plot for the mass murder of the American people, and she has the receipts to prove it.
Karen says it’s all buried in a normal-looking law called the 21st Century Cures Act, a bill pushed by Democrat Diana DeGette and Republican Fred Upton. Despite the name of the bill, Karen says the bill’s purpose was to gut the legal and ethical standards that govern the FDA and keep it from approving dangerous or defective drugs and medical devices. The bill also made it easier to collect research data from human subjects. Fans of the bill included Big Pharma, medical device manufacturers, and the National Institutes of Health. You know, the place Tony Fauci works.
The actual FDA itself at the time opposed the bill. They begged Congress to not pass it, because they said it would sabotage their safety efforts. But you won’t be surprised to learn that well-paid Big Pharma lobbyists carry a lot more weight in Washington than FDA safety inspectors.
The CURES act gave the NIH the right to spend billions of millions of dollars on “high risk, high reward” research, without the oversight that would usually be used in research. Traditionally, high-risk high-reward research was done by DARPA in the U.S. military. It’s for advanced military projects of crucial national security importance. Now, Congress is using it to power up Big Pharma.
The CURES Act also allows for the institutional review boards at the FDA to waive the right of informed consent, which is supposed to make sure that experimental subjects know what is being done to them and what the risks are. Now, that rule can just be ignored if the board claims that providing informed consent would make it difficult to conduct the study. All they have to do is say the risk is “minimal.” What guarantees that it actually is? Why, the judgment of the same people who have spent two years telling you that masking kids for two years isn’t a big deal, and that it’s a great idea to inject five-year-olds with a barely-tested shot with unclear side effects and operating on novel medical technology.
By the way, we might be on the brink of CURES Act 2.0. That bill got proposed last November. It would spend several billion more dollars on new, even less-regulated research activities, and it would force the FDA to meet with Big Pharma representatives to be pressured on ways they can have more “innovative approaches.”
Karen says it’s all buried in a normal-looking law called the 21st Century Cures Act, a bill pushed by Democrat Diana DeGette and Republican Fred Upton. Despite the name of the bill, Karen says the bill’s purpose was to gut the legal and ethical standards that govern the FDA and keep it from approving dangerous or defective drugs and medical devices. The bill also made it easier to collect research data from human subjects. Fans of the bill included Big Pharma, medical device manufacturers, and the National Institutes of Health. You know, the place Tony Fauci works.
The actual FDA itself at the time opposed the bill. They begged Congress to not pass it, because they said it would sabotage their safety efforts. But you won’t be surprised to learn that well-paid Big Pharma lobbyists carry a lot more weight in Washington than FDA safety inspectors.
The CURES act gave the NIH the right to spend billions of millions of dollars on “high risk, high reward” research, without the oversight that would usually be used in research. Traditionally, high-risk high-reward research was done by DARPA in the U.S. military. It’s for advanced military projects of crucial national security importance. Now, Congress is using it to power up Big Pharma.
The CURES Act also allows for the institutional review boards at the FDA to waive the right of informed consent, which is supposed to make sure that experimental subjects know what is being done to them and what the risks are. Now, that rule can just be ignored if the board claims that providing informed consent would make it difficult to conduct the study. All they have to do is say the risk is “minimal.” What guarantees that it actually is? Why, the judgment of the same people who have spent two years telling you that masking kids for two years isn’t a big deal, and that it’s a great idea to inject five-year-olds with a barely-tested shot with unclear side effects and operating on novel medical technology.
By the way, we might be on the brink of CURES Act 2.0. That bill got proposed last November. It would spend several billion more dollars on new, even less-regulated research activities, and it would force the FDA to meet with Big Pharma representatives to be pressured on ways they can have more “innovative approaches.”
This is a survey among mostly scientists and doctors, many of which are experts in coronaviruses.
Forwarded from Dr. Simon
What would convince you to get vaccinated?
Anonymous Poll
94%
Nothing
2%
Traditional vaccine
2%
More research
1%
Mandatory/Required for work
0%
Money
1%
I'm already vaxxed
Also, just to clarify - the CURES Act is not a plot for mass murder. The CURES Act and PREP Act combined did however legalize mass murder by means of waiving informed consent for clinical trials - if it’s not in the best interest of human subjects - and by granting immunity to organizations, businesses, the government and individuals who engage in Willful misconduct as long as they are following ‘HHS Guidance’
Forwarded from Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
Karen Kingston says that there’s a plot for the mass murder of the American people, and she has the receipts to prove it.
Karen says it’s all buried in a normal-looking law called the 21st Century Cures Act, a bill pushed by Democrat Diana DeGette and Republican Fred Upton. Despite the name of the bill, Karen says the bill’s purpose was to gut the legal and ethical standards that govern the FDA and keep it from approving dangerous or defective drugs and medical devices. The bill also made it easier to collect research data from human subjects. Fans of the bill included Big Pharma, medical device manufacturers, and the National Institutes of Health. You know, the place Tony Fauci works.
The actual FDA itself at the time opposed the bill. They begged Congress to not pass it, because they said it would sabotage their safety efforts. But you won’t be surprised to learn that well-paid Big Pharma lobbyists carry a lot more weight in Washington than FDA safety inspectors.
The CURES act gave the NIH the right to spend billions of millions of dollars on “high risk, high reward” research, without the oversight that would usually be used in research. Traditionally, high-risk high-reward research was done by DARPA in the U.S. military. It’s for advanced military projects of crucial national security importance. Now, Congress is using it to power up Big Pharma.
The CURES Act also allows for the institutional review boards at the FDA to waive the right of informed consent, which is supposed to make sure that experimental subjects know what is being done to them and what the risks are. Now, that rule can just be ignored if the board claims that providing informed consent would make it difficult to conduct the study. All they have to do is say the risk is “minimal.” What guarantees that it actually is? Why, the judgment of the same people who have spent two years telling you that masking kids for two years isn’t a big deal, and that it’s a great idea to inject five-year-olds with a barely-tested shot with unclear side effects and operating on novel medical technology.
By the way, we might be on the brink of CURES Act 2.0. That bill got proposed last November. It would spend several billion more dollars on new, even less-regulated research activities, and it would force the FDA to meet with Big Pharma representatives to be pressured on ways they can have more “innovative approaches.”
Karen says it’s all buried in a normal-looking law called the 21st Century Cures Act, a bill pushed by Democrat Diana DeGette and Republican Fred Upton. Despite the name of the bill, Karen says the bill’s purpose was to gut the legal and ethical standards that govern the FDA and keep it from approving dangerous or defective drugs and medical devices. The bill also made it easier to collect research data from human subjects. Fans of the bill included Big Pharma, medical device manufacturers, and the National Institutes of Health. You know, the place Tony Fauci works.
The actual FDA itself at the time opposed the bill. They begged Congress to not pass it, because they said it would sabotage their safety efforts. But you won’t be surprised to learn that well-paid Big Pharma lobbyists carry a lot more weight in Washington than FDA safety inspectors.
The CURES act gave the NIH the right to spend billions of millions of dollars on “high risk, high reward” research, without the oversight that would usually be used in research. Traditionally, high-risk high-reward research was done by DARPA in the U.S. military. It’s for advanced military projects of crucial national security importance. Now, Congress is using it to power up Big Pharma.
The CURES Act also allows for the institutional review boards at the FDA to waive the right of informed consent, which is supposed to make sure that experimental subjects know what is being done to them and what the risks are. Now, that rule can just be ignored if the board claims that providing informed consent would make it difficult to conduct the study. All they have to do is say the risk is “minimal.” What guarantees that it actually is? Why, the judgment of the same people who have spent two years telling you that masking kids for two years isn’t a big deal, and that it’s a great idea to inject five-year-olds with a barely-tested shot with unclear side effects and operating on novel medical technology.
By the way, we might be on the brink of CURES Act 2.0. That bill got proposed last November. It would spend several billion more dollars on new, even less-regulated research activities, and it would force the FDA to meet with Big Pharma representatives to be pressured on ways they can have more “innovative approaches.”
Rochelle Walensky knew she was lying to the American people. ‘Just following orders,’ is not an excuse when advocating for the use of a bioweapon on the American people and our children.
Forwarded from The Vigilant Fox 🦊
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There was never any scientific basis for the idea that vaccinated people do not "carry the virus." This false idea was the fundamental premise behind the discriminatory vaccine mandate/passport scheme that has violated the civil rights of countless people worldwide.
Credit: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
Credit: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
Well I am shocked! Vanity Fair is covering content from @RealStewPeters, including the 2014 NIAID grant to EcoHealth we discussed that funded the ‘research’ to explain which coronaviruses could jump from bats to humans. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/03/the-virus-hunting-nonprofit-at-the-center-of-the-lab-leak-controversy
Summary of some of my recent interviews. https://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/commentary/are-covid-vaccines-the-latest-medical-experiment-on-american-citizens-143139/
Communities Digital News
Are Covid vaccines just the latest medical experiment on American citizens
The government has used Americans as experimental subjects for drugs for centuries. Are the Covid vaccines just the latest?
I wonder if Vanity Fair’s research team knows that Robert Garry is a ‘hired gun’ by Fauci? https://gettr.com/post/pxtqhxaaa4
GETTR - The Marketplace of Ideas
karenkingston on GETTR : When expert scientists, such as Robert Garry from Tulane, sides with Fauci and Collins by vehemently defending…
This is EXACTLY why children and healthy young adults should have never gotten a CV19/Sars-CoV-2 mRNA IM inoculation
Forwarded from Ingo
"...high CD4+ T cell reactivity to CCC, but not antibody responses, was associated with high pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 immunity. Overall, these results suggest that the steady and sustained CCC responses observed in the study cohort are likely due to a relatively stable pool of CCC-specific memory CD4+ T cells instead of fast decaying responses and frequent reinfections..."
CCC = common cold coronaviruses
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.01.482548v1
CCC = common cold coronaviruses
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.01.482548v1
bioRxiv
Immunological memory to Common Cold Coronaviruses assessed longitudinally over a three-year period
Understanding immune memory to Common Cold Coronaviruses (CCCs) is relevant for assessing its potential impact on the outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and for the prospects of pan-corona vaccines development. We performed a longitudinal analysis, of pre…
Forwarded from Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
A strong warning ⛔️
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/04/covid-19-vaccines-are-a-bioweapon-crimes-against-humanity-novavax-dr-richard-fleming-with-maria-zeee/
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/04/covid-19-vaccines-are-a-bioweapon-crimes-against-humanity-novavax-dr-richard-fleming-with-maria-zeee/
Red Voice Media
COVID-19 & Vaccines are a Bioweapon, Crimes Against Humanity & NOVAVAX - Dr. Richard Fleming With Maria Zeee
He also issued a warning to all people considering...
Ebola and other hemorrhagic fever (HF) viruses will be the next terrorizing threat. Get ahead of the narrative with facts. Don’t buy into the fear. Follow the money, the NIH/NIAID money. https://rumble.com/v102z8j-urgent-karen-kingston-next-bioweapon-release-hemorrhagic-fever-and-the-endg.html?mref=u0e78&mc=2duvi
Rumble
URGENT: Karen Kingston - Next Bioweapon Release, Hemorrhagic Fever & The Endgame
Biotech Analyst Karen Kingston joined us today to discuss her discovery of millions of dollars of funding for Ebola and various types of Hemorrhagic Fever over the past 24 months that she believes cou
Stay informed. As a parent, you have the ultimate authority to decide what is best for child’s emotional, physical and developmental health. Don’t allow CA officials to vote away parental rights. The State or California does not have ownership of our children, but the state will if we don’t stop these bills. 👊❤️🇺🇸
https://ca.childrenshealthdefense.org/legislation-ca-b/?fbclid=IwAR3cCgt64wFdG3v1lSTWGwLzhHOUZs3-YeIiIz3ntQ7TDtQ-uuzS0SQ5ffU&mibextid=ATveJy
https://ca.childrenshealthdefense.org/legislation-ca-b/?fbclid=IwAR3cCgt64wFdG3v1lSTWGwLzhHOUZs3-YeIiIz3ntQ7TDtQ-uuzS0SQ5ffU&mibextid=ATveJy
Children's Health Defense California Chapter
bills_v1 - Children's Health Defense California Chapter
Per the NY Post, more people die under tyrannical governors than those that respect the Constitution and God-given rights, even during a pandemic. Shocker. Maybe the founding fathers were pretty smart in declaring the power of America is in our freedom. History has shown us that tyrannical power and socialism increase poverty, misery and death. Any democrats think we should continue with this experiment called the ‘COVID-19 declaration threat to public health and national security requiring mandates and financial support to schools, counties and hospitals to continue to annihilate freedom of speech, choice and other founding principles of the United States of America? Anyone?
Https://nypost.com/2022/04/11/ny-handled-covid-19-lockdown-poorly-florida-among-best-study/
Https://nypost.com/2022/04/11/ny-handled-covid-19-lockdown-poorly-florida-among-best-study/
New York Post
NY, Calif. failed in handling of COVID -- but Florida was among best:...
The study, published by the Committee To Unleash Prosperity, graded states by comparing COVID-19 outcomes based on the number of deaths, the economy and impact on education.