dhak dhak 🫀

Its a moment we have been waiting for since past 4-5 years.

few minutes to go before I share the launch video link to our telegram members.

https://youtu.be/Ek707Pshpg0?si=yweHQAQbwH1V7OGL

Our Telegram community eats the first half of the pie 🥧

Badi mehnat h, kya kiya jaye agar neend sataye 🫩

Lagta h launch m agli bar IIT B vs AIIMS karvana padega views kam aarahe hein 🌝

Jokes aside, launch went well, It got us recognition among students and industry too.

Now we are all in to team up with best and most cracked people who want to bring a change!

Bro’s post went crazy viral on solve arena!!

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.solvearena.app&hl=en_IN

5000+ Questions got solved on Solve Arena yesterday.

Anyone facing login issues?

In the midst of launching solve arena, I forgot to ask

How are you?

Good Morning guys!!!

Applying for funding, College ka naam kya dalun 🥹 ?

Above all sits one thing: a strong foundational belief, with a pyramid of ever-updating beliefs built on top.

Rigidity makes you a narcissist. A strong foundation gives you an identity.

Here’s mine:

“Hard work always pays off. If it’s not paying, I haven’t worked hard enough.”

That sits at the base. Unmoved.

Everything above it keeps updating. How I work. What “hard” means. What “paying off” looks like. All of it revises with evidence.

Most people do this backwards. They keep their surface opinions rigid and let their foundation wobble. So criticism breaks them, and they never actually improve.

Flip it.

Hold the base. Update the rest.

More doubts, More mentors, More discussion, More growth!!!

bro shared short notes on solve arena but v don’t know who bro is 😕

https://solvearena.com/discuss/1237

Good night guys, Make sure to burn brighter tomorrow.

Will read all ur replies Kal properly.

How to use solve arena?

https://youtu.be/gGdFzCkhh54?si=OhcMuiDjj9dm2IeN

He asked one sharp question: does this student's performance actually match what we'd expect from them?

That's where the model comes in.

Item Response Theory, running quietly in the background, tracking three things at once, how good each student is, how hard each question is, and the odds they'll get it right. Then comes the test.

80,000 submissions, one calculation for every student: what actually happened, against what the model predicted. The honest ones land near zero, wins and misses balancing out exactly as expected.

But a few break the pattern. They keep solving questions they statistically shouldn't, and the gap keeps growing.

The result: thirty students, performing far beyond anything their history could explain. One was predicted to solve seven hundred and eighty. He'd solved nine hundred and sixty. The system doesn't flag high scores.

It flags what the data can't explain.