One thing I noticed from all the posts about Teddy Afroβs new album, which dropped last Thursday with 18 tracks is that many of the contributors, from stylists to producers, mention someone who believed in them, trusted their talent, and recommended them to Teddyβs team. What stands out even more is that many of the producers are relatively small names, but highly talented. It really shows that recommendations and relationships run the world.
β€13π―2
myCorner
well well well . . . There is a website called futureme.org that lets you write a letter for your future self and emails it back on your birthday. And this is what I wrote last year.
I am actually living what I wrote last year too. On to the next.
Thank GOD
Thank GOD
π₯11
I want to learn Arabic just to watch football with Arab commentary
π12π€4β€1
The best thing you can do for yourself is actively increase your surface area for luck to hit you.
π―22β€3π₯2π€2
Leonhard Euler discovered so many things that most of the things he discovered were named after other people because otherwise, most of the things would be named "Euler's theorem"
π€―5β€2
myCorner
Introducing floww - a CLI to manage workflows on Linux
Updated floww to v0.4.0
- Hyprland support (by someone else)
- Niri support (by me)
* Its just a workflow management CLI, you run
*and niri is the best
- Hyprland support (by someone else)
- Niri support (by me)
* Its just a workflow management CLI, you run
floww apply <worflow.yaml> and all your apps defined in the workflow file will be opened in their dedicated workspace.*and niri is the best
GitHub
GitHub - dagimg-dot/floww: floww - workflow management for linux
floww - workflow management for linux . Contribute to dagimg-dot/floww development by creating an account on GitHub.
β€3
Hacker News
Idempotency Is Easy Until the Second Request Is Different
The problem I am dealing with these days.
Chapi Dev Talks
Case study - Carrier-Grade VoIP Platform
Great read !
Even though I don't understand most of the technical terms π.
And I think the idea on the image attached above applies to other things as well. π₯π₯
Even though I don't understand most of the technical terms π.
And I think the idea on the image attached above applies to other things as well. π₯π₯
π₯4
There are 2 kinds of "not knowing"
1. When you know a given question but do not yet know the answer. E.g. how old is the oldest person on the planet? I know a truth exists but I do not know the answer.
2. When you do not even know the question which we could answer.
When humans discover stuff through science, they find answers, but usually, they find even more questions. E.g. the question "what does Hydrogen consist of?" was always a valid question and it always had an answer. However, until we discovered that Hydrogen exists we did not know this was even something we didn't know. The question had not existed in any human mind.
It's a reasonable conclusion that as human technology progresses, many more questions will pop up that we, today, do not even know we could ask. These questions all hide truths about reality and we do not yet know them.
But question is: Will we able to come up with *all* the questions we could answer? Or, more importantly, how could we even know we asked all the questions we could ask? Are we fundamentally capable of asking all the questions about anything we could ask a question about? We don't know.
[comment]
1. When you know a given question but do not yet know the answer. E.g. how old is the oldest person on the planet? I know a truth exists but I do not know the answer.
2. When you do not even know the question which we could answer.
When humans discover stuff through science, they find answers, but usually, they find even more questions. E.g. the question "what does Hydrogen consist of?" was always a valid question and it always had an answer. However, until we discovered that Hydrogen exists we did not know this was even something we didn't know. The question had not existed in any human mind.
It's a reasonable conclusion that as human technology progresses, many more questions will pop up that we, today, do not even know we could ask. These questions all hide truths about reality and we do not yet know them.
But question is: Will we able to come up with *all* the questions we could answer? Or, more importantly, how could we even know we asked all the questions we could ask? Are we fundamentally capable of asking all the questions about anything we could ask a question about? We don't know.
[comment]
β€4π₯1
I heard someone say, "I fell in the shower and tried to grab the water" ππ
π
π
π
π
π€£22
Try to shake up just one thing every day. A different route, new food or coffee, new conversation...childhood was full of novelty but not anymore.
π₯6