🦄 Startups & VCs (Web3, AI & SaaS)
3.89K subscribers
928 photos
80 videos
13 files
1.54K links
Fundraising tips, investor insights & startup growth tactics for Web3, AI & SaaS founders. Deck reviews, VC databases, startup deals & perks, tokenomics tools & more → https://innmind.com/
Download Telegram
📉 Market-Maker Insider #4: How One Sell Can Kill Your Token Momentum

We’re continuing our #MarketMakerInsider series — and today’s story hits close to home for many founders.

This one is about token selling mistakes that quietly destroy trust, momentum, and sometimes entire projects.

Read carefully 👇

A founder I know needed $40K for payroll last year.

His token was trading around $0.85 with decent volume. Nothing spectacular, but alive. Community was growing. Things were moving forward.

He didn't have fiat reserves. So he did what every founder in crypto eventually does — he sold tokens. Not a lot. About 50K tokens from the team wallet.

Here's what happened next:
The order book on his main exchange was thin. His sell hit the market in one block. Price dropped from $0.85 to $0.71 in under an hour.
A community member noticed. Screenshotted the wallet. Posted it on Twitter: "Team is dumping. Rug incoming." 📉

Within 24 hours:
— Three Telegram moderators quit
— The main holder group started panic-selling
— Two influencers who had been supporting the project publicly distanced themselves
— Price hit $0.54

The founder wasn't scamming anyone. He was paying his team. But nobody knew that. And even if they did, it doesn't matter. The chart doesn't care about your intentions. It only shows what happened.

This is more common than anyone admits.

Most projects don't have two years of runway sitting in a bank account. At some point, almost every founder has to convert tokens into money to keep operating. Salaries, development costs, exchange fees, marketing, it all costs real money.

The problem isn't that they sell. The problem is how they sell.

⛔️ Here's what usually goes wrong:

1️⃣ Selling into thin books
The founder dumps on their own exchange, where there's no depth. One sell order eats through five levels of the order book. Everyone watching sees a red candle that looks like a cliff

2️⃣ Selling from a known wallet
On-chain analytics in 2025 is not a hobby anymore; it's an industry. Lookonchain, Arkham, Nansen, are tools that flag team wallet movements within minutes. If your sell comes from a wallet the community already watches, you won't get to explain before the panic starts

3️⃣ Selling at the worst possible time
The token just recovered after a dip. Community is finally feeling optimistic. And then a team wallet sells into the rally. Price stalls. Momentum dies. Buyers who were coming back walk away again

4️⃣ No communication
The community sees a large sale. Radio silence from the team. No explanation. No context. The void gets filled with the worst possible assumption: "They're exiting"

How smart founders actually cash out:

→ OTC, not open market
If you need to sell a meaningful amount, do it off-exchange. OTC desks exist specifically for this; they match your sell with a private buyer. No market impact. No red candle. No public panic

→ Algorithmic selling
If OTC isn't available, use a TWAP strategy: Time-Weighted Average Price. Spread the sale across hours or days in small orders. The chart barely notices. This is what institutional players do. There's no reason founders shouldn't do the same

→ Cash-out through market making
Some market makers offer revenue-generating strategies that let projects raise funds gradually by selling into active volume, without putting negative pressure on the price. The tokens get distributed across natural trading activity instead of showing up as one big red wall

→ Announce it
This one is simple, but almost nobody does it. If you're going to sell tokens for operational expenses, tell your community in advance. "We will be converting X tokens over the next 30 days for development costs." Transparency kills rumors before they start. The projects that do this actually gain trust, because the community sees an honest team, not a team that sells in silence
🔥3
→ Build a fiat runway first
The best time to plan your cash-out strategy is before TGE. Set aside stablecoin reserves during the raise specifically for 6-12 months of operating costs. If you launch with zero fiat and 100% token treasury, you're guaranteed to face this problem at the worst possible moment.

The ugly math
That founder's $40K payroll cost him over $300K in market cap loss. The token never recovered its pre-sell price. Not because of the market. Not because of the product. Because of one badly executed sell from a team wallet on a Tuesday afternoon.

Every founder in crypto will face this moment. The question is whether you plan for it or let it plan your project's funeral.


Your community doesn't expect you to starve. They expect you to be smart about it.


This is the fourth edition of #MarketMakerInsider

(c) Contributed by @KadirovIbragim from EasyMM, a market-maker, trusted by many founders on InnMind.
4🔥2
📊 Web3 Grants in 2026: Strategy, Mistakes, Opportunities

We didn’t just update the grants database. We also updated the full guide to help you actually use it effectively ⚡️

Тhis article will help you:
• Understand how Web3 grants work in 2026
• Figure out if your startup is a good fit
• Avoid the most common application mistakes
• Evaluate grants before wasting time on them
• Build a smarter non-dilutive funding strategy

⚠️ April reality:
Most grant lists are already outdated

That’s why inside the article you’ll also find access to:
📊 Web3 Grants Database 2026 (April Update)
→ 40 active opportunities with verified apply links

This combo = strategy + execution 💡

If you’re fundraising right now, don’t skip this.


👉 Read the updated guide
3🔥2👍1🤩1
Not seeing progress in your raise?

If you’re fundraising in 2026, but don’t see the progress or conversions to investor calls & conversations - this one is for you 👇

PitchPop.app - a startup fundraising copilot & practical fundraising advisor focused on moving the needle for your particular round.

Today we're opening it for public beta - for early adopters, testers & "founding users", who will get the maximum value for joining early.

PitchPop is not another ai-wrapper built overnight. It uses data from thousands of investor interactions, hundreds of hours of fundraising advisory calls, and analysis of what actually closed rounds at pre-seed and seed in 2025-2026.

It maps exactly which blocker is killing your round: wrong investor access. Weak proof for your stage & valuation. A story that doesn't land in investor language. Misaligned raise logic. Round size & valuation mismatch. Or raising before you're actually ready.

Beta is mostly useful for startups in web3 and AI verticals.

Start now, diagnose your fundraising for free, and if you feel value - upgrade at early beta conditions: 49 one-time fee to access existing and future premium features, resources and perks.

We ship new featured and updates daily, so founding users who upgrade now get the best value for the one-time cost + access to all new featured as it evolves + human support & feedback loop for your round specifically.

Our goal: put decades of fundraising knowledge & expertise of our team & partners, all resources and data that helps us close deals, and provide you with a real unfair advantage in your raise. The kind of insight that used to live only with well-connected insiders who cost thousands of dollars in advisory fees.

Start free → https://pitchpop.app/

Then tell us in comments what blocker it found for your round 👇
🔥4🤩1
⚠️📊2026 Seed fundraising bar moved.

Here's what the VC won't tell you on the call where they say "we love what you're building" & then disappear.

They're passing not because your product isn't good enough.
They're passing because your metrics don't fit the new venture capital mandate ⚠️ and nobody's going to explain the new rules to you.

The 2026 seed market changed dramatically. But most founders are still pitching by 2021 logic.

What's actually happening under the hood is a total recapitalization of the early-stage world. It’s not my guess - all recent venture industry reports (incl the latest PitchBook-NVCA Venture Monitor) prove this trend.

1. Seed is the new Series A. Seriously..
→ Seed in 2026 requires what Series A required in 2021
→ $300–500K ARR before a serious seed conversation is not «nice to have» anymore. Pre-revenue = pre-institutional.
→ 20%+ month-over-month growth. Not "growing." Specifically 20%+.
→ Gross margins that show the business can scale. Sub-50% gross margins on a SaaS = hard pass.
→ 20+ months of post-round runway in your model. 12 months signals you'll be back begging before you hit milestones.
The NVCA 2026 Yearbook put a number on the concentration: remove the top 5 deals from Q1 2026, and total deal value drops 73%. The "VC boom" is real for a handful of companies. For everyone else, it's the tightest market in a decade.

2. Your headcount/hiring plan is a red flag.
In 2026, VCs back micro-teams (yes, powered by AI). If your deck says 'we’ll hire 15 people with this capital,' you’ve already lost. The actual question is: can you hit $1M ARR without doubling the team? Efficiency is the new growth.

3. The 9-month marathon.
The raise takes 6–9 months now. Not 3. If you start fundraising with 5 months of cash left, you aren't raising—you’re begging. Investors can smell the desperation in your subject line.

4. 92% of Pre-seed rounds are now SAFEs.
(report from Carta shows it clearly). This means investors aren't 'betting' on you anymore; they are buying a cheap option to see if you survive the chasm.

The founders closing rounds right now started 9 months before they needed the money, and stress-tested their metrics against these benchmarks before they ever hit 'send.'

If you're not sure where you stand
- PitchPop diagnoses exactly that. Free. 60 seconds. No signup.

app.pitchpop.app
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤔2🤩2🔥1
🚨 Most Web3 Pitch Decks Don’t Get Rejected. They Get Silently Filtered.

In Web3 fundraising, silence is often not random.
But in 2026, that usually means one thing: your deck was filtered out in the first pass.

📊 The market is still active:

▪️ $8.5B invested in crypto startups in Q4 2025
▪️ $20B+ across 2025 total funding
▪️ 85% of capital went to just 11 mega-deals
▪️ Only $659M raised in April 2026 vs $2.6B in March

Capital is there 💸. Attention is not.

We analysed why crypto VCs ignore decks across multiple market research reports and VC insights (Galaxy, Delphi Digital, Coinbase Research, Placeholder, and others) — and the conclusion is consistent: it’s rarely about outreach.

It’s usually about what’s inside the pitch itself:

⚠️ unclear token logic
⚠️ weak or incentivized traction
⚠️ wrong fundraising instrument
⚠️ premature TGE assumptions
⚠️ poor investor fit
⚠️ missing proof of real demand

💡 Key insight:
Founders optimise for sending more decks; investors optimise for filtering faster.

👉 Want to understand what actually triggers investor “no” in seconds?

🔗 Get the full breakdown of 12 fundraising blockers + investor logic here
👍2🤩21
🚀 Sequoia AI Ascent 2026: What AI Founders Must Fix in Their Pitch Decks

AI fundraising in 2026 is no longer about “model-powered products.” It’s about proving you own real work, real budgets, and real outcomes.

Sequoia’s latest thinking around AI Ascent 2026 makes one thing very clear: the winners are not building tools, they are building systems that complete work through long-horizon agents and AI-native services.

What Sequoia is really signalling in 2026:

⚙️ Long-horizon agents are the new product layer
Not chatbots. Not copilots. Systems that complete multi-step work reliably.

💼 “Selling work” beats selling software
AI-native services are capturing budgets that are ~6x larger than SaaS spend

🧩 Enterprise reality: AI fatigue is real
Companies are no longer experimenting for fun, they are buying outcomes or stopping altogether, and other things.

The core investor question in 2026:
“What work do you own that gets more valuable as models improve?”

If your deck cannot answer this clearly, it blends into noise.

👉 Read the full breakdown and learn how to upgrade your AI pitch deck in 2026
🤩4
Web3 VC isn't dead. It's just much harder to read.

We scraped 2026 deal data to feed into PitchPop's new Web3 fundraising benchmark. Here's what's actually happening:

Babylon — $15M (a16z)
Exponent — $5M (Multicoin)
Nava — $8.3M (Polychain + Archetype)
SimpleChain — $15M seed
UnblockPay — $4.5M (Prelude)
+ 30 more in Q1 alone (not counting those that don’t have verified lead & captable info).

Median seed round: $4–8M. Hot verticals: RWA infra, AI agents, stablecoin rails. Instrument: equity + token warrant (demand for token/SAFT deals is all time low).

If your raise isn't moving - it's probably not the market. It's the shape of your round, who you're targeting, or what investors hear first.

PitchPop now maps your Web3 raise against benchmark data, and tells you where the gap is, what VCs are backing similar companies & recommends outreach messages for better conversions to reply.

Start free diagnosis 👉 pitchpop.app/web3-fundraising
🔥1🙏1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💀 12 Reasons Crypto VCs Don’t Reply (And It’s Not What You Think)

If investors are not responding to your Web3 pitch deck…

It doesn’t automatically mean the market is bad. And it doesn’t mean your idea is weak either.

Most of the time, your deck just triggered a fast “disqualify” signal.

Here are the most common blockers 👇

💡 The real takeaway:
Most fundraising problems are not about effort. They are about the misalignment between how founders pitch and how VCs actually filter deals.

🧠 Understand what investors really want to see and what makes them ignore a deck within minutes 👇

Web3 Fundraising Blockers: Why Crypto VCs Ignore Your Deck
🤩2🔥1
👋 we’re cooking something spicy.

We went through 100+ pre-seed & seed AI raises in 2026 and pulled out the real patterns that are actually winning right now.

Here’s the tl;dr you won’t find anywhere else:

1️⃣ The “execution gap” is everywhere, & it’s the single biggest silent killer in 2026. Everyone claims they solve it. Almost nobody actually does.

2️⃣ Vertical AI is absolutely dominating. Legal, medical, and real-estate ops plays are closing rounds in half the time of generic horizontal agent platforms.

3️⃣ The unsexy but insanely valuable layer right now? Last-mile agent infrastructure: dedicated email for agents, specialized search, autonomous goal-tracking systems. Boring on the surface, printing money underneath.

4️⃣ In regulated verticals, “AI psychosis” (hallucinations in high-stakes environments) is creating real moats for the teams that actually fix it.

Right now, as I’m typing this, InnMind team is turning all of this into a proper deep dive blog with founder quotes, data breakdowns, and what it actually means for builders and investors.

Drop 🔥 if you’re keen to read the dive-in in our blog soon.
🔥51
🔎 The AI Seed Market in 2026 Is Not What It Looks Like

🔥 AI is breaking fundraising records, yet early-stage founders are facing more silence than ever.

We just broke down what’s really happening behind AI seed rounds in 2026, based on live deal data and founder sessions across InnMind and PitchPop.

Here’s the reality most “AI funding trends” miss:

💰 Capital is massive, but extremely concentrated
80% of VC money is going into AI, yet most of it flows to a handful of mega players

📉 Seed deal count is falling

Fewer startups are getting funded, but those who do raise larger checks at higher valuations

🧠 AI premium is not universal

It mostly applies when founders have a strong pedigree or real production traction

⚙️ Seed now looks like old Series A
Investors expect pilots, revenue signals, and real-world usage, not just demos

🚫 Generic AI startups are getting filtered out
“AI-powered” is no longer a positioning advantage without clear execution depth

This is not a broken market. It is a filtered one.

We put together 7 deeper patterns shaping AI seed deals in 2026 and what actually works for founders raising right now.

📖 Read the full breakdown here

If you are building in AI or Web3 AI, this is the signal check before your next raise.
🔥2
🔎 Market-Maker Insider #5: Here’s How Market Makers Spot the Difference

InnMind partner EasyMM is back with another deep dive into the realities of crypto market making #MarketMakerInsider

Today’s long-read dives into one of the most dangerous situations for any crypto project: when a “normal correction” quietly turns into a death chart ☠️

Read carefully, save for later, and use these insights to build stronger market foundations for your project.

Market-Maker Insider #5

A healthy correction and a death chart can look almost the same at the beginning ⚠️ That is what makes it dangerous.

Price drops 12%.
Community gets nervous.
Founder says it is just normal volatility.
Market maker says nothing critical yet.
Holders remind each other that crypto always moves like this.

And sometimes they are right.
No chart goes up forever. Even strong tokens pull back after launch hype, after campaigns, after unlocks, or simply because the wider market is having a bad day.
The problem is that not every dip is just a dip.

💡 Some drops are the first sign that the market structure underneath the token is starting to break. And if the team only looks at the price, they usually notice it too late.

Here is how to tell the difference 👇

1️⃣ A healthy correction still has buyers

In a normal pullback, the price can fall, but there are still buyers waiting at reasonable levels. Maybe the token drops 10–15%. Maybe the chart looks ugly for a few hours. But when the price reaches previous support areas, limit orders are still there, the spread does not completely open up, and the market still has two-sided activity.

That means the market is cooling down, not disappearing.

❗️ A death chart feels different.

Price drops and nobody really steps in. Buy orders keep moving lower. Every small sell pushes the token further down. The spread gets wider, the book gets thinner, and the chart starts moving in one direction only.

At that point, the issue is no longer “normal volatility.” It is liquidity leaving the market.

2️⃣ Volume during the drop tells you more than the drop itself

Most founders look at the percentage first ⬇️
Down 8%.
Down 15%.
Down 25%.

But the better question is not only how much the token dropped. The better question is what kind of volume created that move.

If price is falling with active, balanced volume, it can still be normal market rotation. Some holders take profit, some short-term buyers leave, and new buyers enter lower. It is not pleasant, but the market is still functioning.

❗️If price is falling on thin volume, that is a much worse signal.

It means the token does not need serious sell pressure to move down. A few moderate sells are enough to break levels, which tells traders that there is not much real liquidity behind the price.

And if price is falling on heavy sell volume with no recovery candles after, that is another problem. It means supply is hitting the market faster than demand can absorb it.

So the real question is not, “Why did price drop?”. The real question is, “Was there enough liquidity to handle the drop?”

3️⃣ A healthy correction respects structure

Strong charts usually have levels.

▪️ Previous support.
▪️ Accumulation zones.
▪️ High-volume areas.
▪️ Psychological prices where buyers tend to appear.

A normal correction can test those levels. It can even briefly break below them and recover. That happens all the time.

❗️ But a death chart ignores structure completely.

It cuts through every level like nothing is there. No reaction. No bounce. No real buyer interest. Every support becomes just another line on the chart that nobody defended.

And once the community sees that, panic becomes much easier to justify.

People stop thinking, “This is a discount.” They start thinking, “There is no floor.”

That shift is dangerous, because after that the problem becomes emotional, not only technical.
2👍1🔥1
4️⃣ The order book usually warns you before the chart does

By the time Telegram starts panicking, the order book has usually been showing the problem for hours or even days.

Depth starts getting thinner ➡️ Buy support moves lower ➡️ Sell pressure gets heavier ➡️ Spread slowly opens up ➡️ Small trades start moving price more than they should.

❗️ None of this looks dramatic at first, which is exactly why teams miss it.

They check the chart, see that the price has not fully collapsed yet, and assume everything is under control. But underneath the chart, the market is already becoming easier to break.

The chart is what everyone sees.

The order book is where the damage usually starts.

5️⃣ Fake support makes things worse


A lot of teams panic and try to “show strength” by placing one huge buy wall. It looks good for a screenshot.

The community relaxes for a few minutes. People say support is strong. The founder feels like something has been done. But traders are not stupid.

If that wall is too obvious, too close, or disappears the moment real sell pressure comes in, it creates more fear than confidence.

❗️ Because now the market has seen the support was not really support.

Real support should not feel like one oversized number placed there to calm people down. It should be layered, believable, and consistent enough that traders feel there is actual structure behind the price.

A market does not need to look artificially defended. It needs to look tradable.

6️⃣ Communication can stop a dip from becoming a story

Every red candle creates a question. Sometimes the answer is simple.

The market is down ➡️︎ An unlock happened ➡️︎ A campaign brought in short-term users ➡️︎ A large holder exited ➡️︎ A liquidity adjustment is in progress.

❗️ But if the team says nothing, the community will create its own explanation. And that explanation is almost always worse than reality.

Silence makes every red candle feel heavier. It turns normal volatility into suspicion, and suspicion into panic.

Good communication does not mean promising the price will recover. That would be wrong and usually sounds desperate.

It means giving context before people start writing their own version of events.

A calm explanation at the right time can save the team days of damage control later.

7️⃣ The strategy has to change with the market

A launch strategy is not the same as a post-campaign strategy.

A recovery strategy is not the same as a growth strategy.

What worked when hype was strong may completely fail once the first wave of attention is gone. The same setup that looked fine during high demand can become dangerous when sellers start testing the book.

❗️ That is why market making cannot be treated like something you set once and forget.

The market changes every day, and the strategy has to adjust with it. Otherwise, the chart starts reacting to yesterday’s conditions while the market has already moved on.
👍21🔥1
🧠 So what actually works?

☑️ Watch liquidity, not only price
A 10% drop with real depth is manageable. A 5% drop with an empty book can be much more dangerous.

☑️ Defend key levels before panic starts
Support is useful when it is prepared early. If the team only reacts after the chart is already broken, the market usually demands much more effort to repair.

☑️ Keep the spread under control
Wide spreads make traders feel like the market has been abandoned. Tight spreads show that the pair is still active, watched, and managed.

☑️ Avoid fake walls
Huge artificial buy walls may look comforting for a moment, but traders notice when they disappear. Real support should be layered, believable, and consistent.

☑️ Communicate early
If there is market-wide volatility, an unlock event, campaign-related sell pressure, or any other expected pressure, explain it before people start building theories.

☑️ Adjust the strategy daily
The market does not care what worked last week. Market making has to follow current conditions, not old assumptions.

The difference between a correction and a death chart is not just the size of the drop.

It is what happens underneath it.

🔹 Are buyers still showing up?
🔹 Is liquidity still present?
🔹 Does the order book still have structure?
🔹 Is the spread controlled?
🔹 Does the chart still feel alive?

A healthy correction scares weak hands. A death chart makes everyone question the project.

The teams that survive are not the ones that avoid every dip. Nobody avoids every dip in crypto.

They are the ones that understand which dips are normal, and which ones need action before the market makes that decision for them 🙏


This is the 5th edition of #MarketMakerInsider

(c) Contributed by @KadirovIbragim from EasyMM, a market-maker, trusted by many founders on InnMind.
2👍2🔥2
so true…🤣
🔥3👍2🤩2🐳2
💰 Record AI Funding Is Hiding a Brutal Reality for Founders

Earlier, we shared a striking trend in the AI industry:

⚡️ OpenAI and Anthropic control 88% of AI-native revenue
☁️ Amazon, Microsoft, and Google own 63% of cloud infrastructure
🖥 NVIDIA supplies 94% of GPUs powering AI data centers

Now we’re seeing the same pattern in venture funding.

Q1 2026 hit a record-breaking $297B in global VC funding. AI captured around 80% of it.

Sounds bullish, right?
But here’s the catch 👇

Most of that capital is flowing into a tiny group of companies, while seed-stage founders are fighting for visibility, replies, and investor attention.

In our new article, we break down what is really happening inside AI pre-seed and seed rounds in 2026:

📉 Why seed deal count is shrinking
💰 Why bigger rounds go to fewer startups
🧠 Why “AI-powered” pitches get ignored
⚙️ What investors actually want to see now
🚀 And how founders can improve their fundraising narrative before burning more leads

If you’re raising in AI or AI x Web3, this article will save you weeks of guessing.

📖 Read the full article

🤔 What do you think about this concentration trend in AI?
Is it a natural market evolution… or are we heading toward an ecosystem controlled by a handful of players?
🤩4
🚀 New Perks for Founders Who Want to Save Runway, Time & Nerves

Early-stage startups rarely lack tools. They lack budget, time, and operational focus.

That’s why we added 3 new perks to InnMind Perks Club👇

🧠 Zendesk for Startups
Get up to $25’000 in benefits FREE for 6 months to build world-class customer support without draining your runway.

▪️ AI Copilot + AI Agents included
▪️ Up to 50 seats
▪️ Automated customer support
▪️ Full API access
▪️ No-code workflow builder

Perfect for startups scaling support without hiring a huge team.

💸 Causo AI Fundraising Automation. 50% OFF for InnMind founders

Turn your pitch deck into AI-powered VC outreach:
Causo helps founders find relevant VC partners, create personalized outreach in their own voice, manage follow-ups directly from Gmail, and keep fundraising campaigns organized without endless spreadsheets.

Less spreadsheet chaos. More investor conversations.

🛡 LOT Network
FREE for startups under $25M revenue.

Join 6,100+ companies protected against patent trolls, including Coinbase, Meta, OpenSea, Circle & Ledger.

▪️ Reduce legal risks
▪️ Protect innovation
▪️ Strengthen your IP position

Feel free to claim the deals. Small teams win when they remove operational noise early 🧡