Read this passage for the next poll...
(The Parable of The Sower)
ΒΉΒ²Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved.
ΒΉΒ³They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away.
ΒΉβ΄And that which fell among thorns are they, which, when they have heard, go forth, and are choked with cares and riches and pleasures of this life, and bring no fruit to perfection.
ΒΉβ΅But that on the good ground are they, which in an honest and good heart, having heard the word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with patience.
β|Luke 8:12-15|β
(The Parable of The Sower)
ΒΉΒ²Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved.
ΒΉΒ³They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away.
ΒΉβ΄And that which fell among thorns are they, which, when they have heard, go forth, and are choked with cares and riches and pleasures of this life, and bring no fruit to perfection.
ΒΉβ΅But that on the good ground are they, which in an honest and good heart, having heard the word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with patience.
β|Luke 8:12-15|β
β‘5π©1
Forwarded from Christian Spreadsheet Camp
freegraceluke8.png
6 MB
Christian Spreadsheet Camp
freegraceluke8.png
Who is saved according to the Parable of The Sower?
Anonymous Poll
29%
1/4 β Only those on good soil
5%
2/4 β Those on good soil and among the thorns
18%
3/4 β Good soil, among the thorns, and those on the rock who temporarily believed
15%
Unsure
33%
No vote / show results
π€4
Have you been using YouTube less recently compared to other social media?
Anonymous Poll
20%
Yes, tired of the AI slop and censorship. There are much better platforms.
20%
Yes, it just got boring
43%
No, although YouTube sucks its where my favorite content creators/majority of people are
15%
No, YouTube is a good platform people just don't know how to use it correctly
1%
No, I've never been on YouTube in my life
Forwarded from Strength Made Perfect
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β‘28π€‘3π«‘3π³1
Who hates Christmas the most?
Anonymous Poll
5%
Atheists
4%
Pagans
13%
Muslims
67%
Jews
3%
Christians
8%
Corporate HR departments
π Politically Incorrect Polls
(For the poll below)
Is this John McAfee's secret Telegram channel?
Anonymous Poll
10%
Yes, I know for a fact
31%
Maybe
59%
No, that guy is retarded
Do you think Trump really is a homo?
Anonymous Poll
34%
Yes, he did sexual acts with another man
15%
Yes, even if it was a joke its still homo
15%
Yes, the Bill Clinton leak is only the beginning.
9%
No, they were just messing around he didnt actually do anything sexual
6%
No, he was blackmailed into doing it
22%
No, the pic was AI
Idk who needs to hear this but Gypsycrusader is white, cry abt it
π€‘44π₯13π7π€£6
Forwarded from π¬πππ π³πππππππ
INTEL SLAVA O INTEL PAJEEET?
"Saar! Fidati dei professionisti della Tradizzzione, saar!"
π¬πππ π³πππππππ
"Saar! Fidati dei professionisti della Tradizzzione, saar!"
π¬πππ π³πππππππ
π24π©2β‘1π€£1
Piercing or no piercing?
Anonymous Poll
4%
Piercing
81%
No piercing
10%
Doesn't matter to me
5%
It depends
can someone post and take this coal off the front of the channel thanks
π9π€6
Forwarded from Johan Oosthuizen Research
The Israelite Population in the Roman Province of Judaea during the 1st Century AD
https://www.academia.edu/145245296/
Abstract (click to expand):
Manuscript may be subject to future updates.
@J_Oosthuizen
Hightlights:
β’ Archaeological estimates suggest 6.4-21.8% of the population of Roman-period Judaea retained at least partial Israelite ancestry.
β’ In spite of this, archaeological estimates suggest as much as 95% of the population of Judaea may have adhered to Judaean customs and religion.
β’ Archaeological estimates using stricter definitions of "pure" Israelite descent yield a narrower range of 3.5-13.4%.
β’ Archaeological estimates suggest over 50% of the population of Roman-period Judaea was of Idumaean origin.
β’ Key Conclusion: There is a profound gap between ethnic ancestry and religious-cultural identity in late Second Temple- and Roman-period Judaea, which has significant implications for narratives concerning Jewish diaspora groups.
https://www.academia.edu/145245296/
Abstract (click to expand):
This study investigates the proportion of the Israelite-descended population within the Roman province of Judaea during the 1st century AD. Using archaeological data, biblio-historical texts, and demographic modelling, the paper reconstructs long-term population trajectories from the Persian period (5th century BC) through the Hasmonean and early Roman periods. Population baselines are established for Yehud (12,000-30,000 in 432 BC), Samaria (43,000 in 432 BC), and Idumaea (100,000-200,000 in 177 BC), with growth projected under worldwide and regional rates (0.12%-0.21% per annum). The ethnic composition of Samaria before the Assyrian deportation campaigns is assessed through settlement archaeology, pig-avoidance patterns, architectural markers, and Biblio-historical testimonies. Some of these are also used to assess the Assyrian deportations and Hasmonean conversions. Results suggest that, of an estimated total provincial population of c. 552,000 by the mid-1st century AD, approximately 35,000-120,000 individuals (6.4-21.8%) retained at least partial Israelite ancestry, whilst as much as 95% of the population of Judaea may have adhered to Judaean customs and religion (being thus considered Judaean). Stricter definitions of "pure" descent yield a narrower range of 19,000-74,000 (3.5-13.4%). Biblical figures, if taken at face value, produce higher proportions (17.5-29.9%), though archaeological modelling, and Biblio-historical context, suggests that the Biblical figures for the people who returned to Jerusalem from exile in Babylonia, are merely snapshots that don't account for the later expulsions of foreigners, their offspring, and those who cohabited with them, under the regimes of Ezra and Nehemiah, as described later in the Biblical record. All the preceding figures are to some degree overestimates. This research highlights the gap between ethnic ancestry and religious-cultural identity in late Second Temple-and Roman-period Judaea. This has profound implications for the narratives surrounding the ethnogenesis and historical claims of various Jewish diaspora groups.
Manuscript may be subject to future updates.
@J_Oosthuizen
Hightlights:
β’ Archaeological estimates suggest 6.4-21.8% of the population of Roman-period Judaea retained at least partial Israelite ancestry.
β’ In spite of this, archaeological estimates suggest as much as 95% of the population of Judaea may have adhered to Judaean customs and religion.
β’ Archaeological estimates using stricter definitions of "pure" Israelite descent yield a narrower range of 3.5-13.4%.
β’ Archaeological estimates suggest over 50% of the population of Roman-period Judaea was of Idumaean origin.
β’ Key Conclusion: There is a profound gap between ethnic ancestry and religious-cultural identity in late Second Temple- and Roman-period Judaea, which has significant implications for narratives concerning Jewish diaspora groups.
β4