The line graph demonstrates the proportion of the Asian people that come from Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia who live in the city during the periods from 1970 to 2020, and also predict the population from 2030 to 2040.

Overall, the population were increased during the period from 1970 to 2020, also the predictions illustrate that the percentage of total population will be more from the beginning.

Indonesia and Thailand had the least inhabitants population at first in 1970 just over 10 percent and just under 20 percent. Indonesia had an upward trend until 2020 while Thailand remained steady. In addition, the predictions show that this trend will be continued slightly from 2030 to 2040 in both countries.

Malaysia and Philippines started at around 30%. Malaysia reached to the peak almost 75% in 2020, but Philippines fluctuated through the years and finally in 2020 the amount of people can get to around 40 percent or just over. The population’s predictions in both Malaysia and Philippines indicate a slightly growth for 2030 and 2040.

The population of the megacities are increasing gradually. The figures for people who live in the countryside are declined globally due to translocation of their inhabitants to the large cities. This essay will explain how this issue affects on the countries’ development and will argue both negative and positive sides.

Every body has some primary needs which include educational, medical and recreational facilities. In addition, each person must have an appropriate occupation to make their living. When people can not find suitable job and as the result can not response to their need, and also if their living area does not have good facilities so they will decide to change their home. This affair leads to numerous problems such as disappearing rural jobs, getting old of the population in the countryside and etc. Also, this problem can prevent of the improvements in many villages.

On the other hand, some people may suppose this event as a positive development. They just see one side that the person who moves to the big city has better life than before. Individuals have more access to main facilities like hospitals, educational centers, entertainments areas and more than other things they have more chance to achieve their dream. However, these dilemmas can be solved by governments. Governments should do more investing in rural areas

In conclusion, translocation of rural people is considered as both negative and positive development. This essay thinks that the drawbacks of this movement not only outcome but also cause to new concerns. Furthermore, authorities can solve the people’s problems to prevent their movement.

✍️ واژگان مناسب برای توصیف map
👥 @ielts2group
✍️ @ielts2WritingCorrection
➖➖➖➖

appear:
A number of new shops and a new school appeared in 2003.

construct:
A pedestrian bridge was constructed over the highway.

establish:
A new gym was established.

set up:
A primary school was set up.

build:
A factory was built in the outskirts of the city.

develop:
A new residential area was developed in the east.

plant:
A row of trees was planted along the main road.

🔽 دانلود جزوه لغات و ساختارهای ضروری تسک 1 آکادمیک

Increasing the average life expectancy of people all around the world, has raised concerns for some who think aged people put excessive strains on the states. However, some others believe that the society would benefit, if we have more aged people. In my opinion, the elderly is beneficial both for governments and society and even young people.

Although, many believe that aging population bring about some serious issues for government, arguing that they limit the available job opportunities for younger generation which lead to increment of unemployment rate. However, in recent time young people have shown great tendency toward occupation in social media, being a blogger or influencer, as well as freelancing. This means governments have fewer, if ever, work force available for substituting in their organizations. Additionally, people who live longer pay more tax and retire later. The more people work during their life, the less governments should pay less for their healthcare service.

Another positive aspect about people who live longer is that they not only perform their tasks in work place more efficiently, but they also less time for doing their responsibilities. As older people gained more experience and they have done a special task several times, there are more proficient. Accordingly, they do it more quickly than their younger peers. Whereas, the young work force is still in trial and error phase and need supervisors supports for doing their jobs. In my country, for example, it must have about five years ago when a project of shopping mall construction in the capital collapsed in the first stage. consequently, they were forced to demolish the construction and planned it again with more experienced and professional architects. Thus, aged people are not only a burden, but a valuable asset for the society.

In conclusion, I do believe that the aged people are a precious asset for both governments and societies.

#فیدبک_رایگان_رایتینگ

🔴 اگر از سرویس فیدبک رایگان به صورت پیوسته استفاده میکنید باید در آینده در فعالیت های دیگه گروه هم شرکت داشته باشید.

In current era, some children have spent considerable time on their mobile phones. The reason behind this might be that mobile phones are versatile devices for children at home. I believe this is a negative advancement. I shall explain my reasons in the following paragraphs.

Today, children used to stay at home for a long duration in comparison with the past. It means that, compared to past that children play with peers outside their home, they would stay at home and play with cell phones. A salient example is online games which they could play with their friends without needing to meet them out of their house. Moreover, mobile is a versatile tool. That is to say, they could communicate easily with their friends or surfing on the internet to entertain themselves. Thus, they would use it for long hours. These salient examples vividly elaborate why children would spend hours on their smartphones.

Spending time on mobile phone for long hours would be detrimental for children. In other words, it may harm their health. If children accustomed to sit for long hours on their phone, this sedentary lifestyle would make them become fat in the long run. A prime example is heart disease that the rate of this disease would increase among people who used to have sedentary lifestyle. Furthermore, the content of all applications in phones would not be suitable for children. There are different types of people on social media that they might not only provide positive content but also they may defraud them. So, this advancement would not be a positive one for children.

In conclusion, although mobile is amusing for children, I reaffirm my position that due to adverse impact on children's health and life, it would be a negative development.