The migration of rural people to cities has a significant impact on a nation's development process. This phenomenon has different consequences in modern and undeveloped countries. In developed nations, such migration has fewer negative effects compared to less developed countries. Organized cities in developed nations have appropriate plans to manage this situation, while less developed countries may experience serious problems due to the migration of peasants from villages to cities.

In developed nations, there is a smaller gap between the facilities provided in villages and modern cities. As a result, fewer people move to cities compared to less developed countries. Governments in developed nations have the ability to manage production shortages and can replace the agricultural and dairy products previously produced by peasants with products from large factories and companies, resulting in minimal impact on the country's development. Additionally, developed nations provide equal educational opportunities in both cities and the countryside, reducing cultural conflicts between rural migrants and city residents.

In contrast, less developed nations experience a large population shift to cities as people seek better facilities for their families due to the significant differences in government provided facilities in cities and villages. This results in deserted villages and overcrowded cities, leading to a lack of adequate facilities per person. The weaker governance in less developed countries also hinders their ability to replace traditional agricultural and dairy production methods, causing economic problems.

Overall, the harmful effects of rural-urban migration on a nation's development are more pronounced in less developed countries due to their less advanced governments, making it a negative development compared to advanced nations.

Special thanks to Mr. Abolghasemi and his essay writing guidelines at  www.ielts2.com

Countryside populations worlwide are migrating to cities, resulting in a decline in rural residents. While urbanization contributes to industrial growth, I believe this trend leads to overpopulation issues in cities.

 Industrial growth is undoubtedly considered an advantage in the aftermath of increasing population density in towns and cities. Developing zones offer a variety of vacancies, therefore, the working class in need of immediate income from rural areas, are effortlessly absorbed to these employment opportunities. As a consequence, the overflow of the labour force keeps the wheels of industry turning around prosperously. Take my country in the 1970s as an example that possessed  a flourishing industry and economy due to this shift and rural citizens from all over the country were attracted to factories and companies.

However, the new migration patterns can present significant overpopulation challenges that must not be overlooked. Rapid population rise increases demands in public facilities, whereas no infrastructures are provided. More people means an increased demand for food, water, housing energy, health care, transportation and more, which leads to additional strains on resources. India depicts a great example of a developing country with cramped urban districts where a majority of citizens live in a shortage of sanitary facilities, with no access to basic commodities and housing.

 In conclusion, urbanization is occurring at great speed and although it assists countries in developing economically and industrially , I believe we should not underestimate the drawbacks resulting  in a state of complete chaos in the industrialized regions. 

#فیدبک_رایگان_رایتینگ

🥇 سطح نمره 7

The given graph illustrates information regarding the proportion of urban population in four Asian countries over a period of fifty years from 1970 to 2020. The graph also includes procrastinations for 2030 and 2040.

Overall, what stands out from the graph is that more and more people immigrated to cities from 1970 onwards. The number of those who live in cities in all countries (the Philipines, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia) showed an upward trend and is predicted to grow even more in the following decades.

Back in 1970, approximately 30% of total population of the Philipines and Malaysia lived in cities and the rest of people located in rural areas. While the number of urban residants of the Philipines peaked to more than 70% in 2020, less than half of Malaysians chose to live in the cities. However, the figures anticipated to increase to more than 80% for the former and 60% for tha latter in 2040.

Both Thailand and Indonesia experienced a gradual rise in terms of city inhabitants, Although the statistics for Indinesia were a bit sharper. Whereas both countries had less than 20% of their population living in urban regions, in the next 50 years, their urban residents grew to 30% and 50% respectively in 2020.

#فیدبک_رایگان_رایتینگ

🥇 سطح نمره 7

🔴 اگر از سرویس فیدبک رایگان به صورت پیوسته استفاده میکنید باید در آینده در فعالیت های دیگه گروه هم شرکت داشته باشید.

Special thanks to Mr. Abolghasemi and his essay writing guidelines at  www.ielts2.com

The line graph illustrates some information about proportion of people who live in four Asian countries between 1970 and 2020 with prediction by 2040.

Overall, we can see the most increasing trend in Malaysia and the least in Thailand.

In Malaysia we can see this amount steadily increase and it is predicted to reach approximately 80% until 2040. In 1970, Thailand had the lowest percentage of population living in cities ,around 14% and it is predicted to rise about 60% in 2040. Moreover, the highest percentage of people was for Philippines in 1970, the proportion had a slight increase until 1980 but after this year the percentage fluctuated . It climbed up to nearly 50% in 1990 but the percentage fell to about 40% in 2010. At least it predicted to grow again around 55% by 2040. In Thailand the percentage of total population was just under 20%. in addition, we had slow upward trend until 2010. after that it remained steady until 2020 but the percentage is predicted to have significant growth around 45% by 2040.

#فیدبک_رایگان_رایتینگ

🔴 اگر از سرویس فیدبک رایگان به صورت پیوسته استفاده میکنید باید در آینده در فعالیت های دیگه گروه هم شرکت داشته باشید.

These days many people are moving from countryside to big towns from all walks of life, so the population in megacities is growing . I consider it anegative development and in this essay argues both side.

In today's societies most people tend to live in convenient situation where all their needs are provided by the country with adequate facilities. For instance, some people prefer to have the best quality in education, treatment or entertainment. To have all of these in a package ,you have to live in a country that is big and developed .However, moving to an advanced country not only offers many possibilities but also presents some difficulties , both economically and socially .

Generally, living in progressive countries have some problems for people and societies . One of the most important issue that societies deal with in big cities is overpopulation . Congested cities have lots of problem. For example, in our country many people think living in Tehran is great because of the numerous opportunities it offers .In case that , sometimes you may face with lack of medicine in pandemic due to throng of sick people .In addition when you want to go anywhere in over crowded cities , you often get stuck in traffic jam especially during the day.

In conclusion, societies should think about fundamental solution for extending countryside . They can provide rural areas with facilities such as job opportunities , medical center and variety of hobbies that people won't have to migrate to big cities for their basic needs .
#فیدبک_رایگان_رایتینگ

🔴 اگر از سرویس فیدبک رایگان به صورت پیوسته استفاده میکنید باید در آینده در فعالیت های دیگه گروه هم شرکت داشته باشید.

#فیدبک_رایگان_رایتینگ

🔴 اگر از سرویس فیدبک رایگان به صورت پیوسته استفاده میکنید باید در آینده در فعالیت های دیگه گروه هم شرکت داشته باشید.

The line graph demonstrates the proportion of the Asian people that come from Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia who live in the city during the periods from 1970 to 2020, and also predict the population from 2030 to 2040.

Overall, the population were increased during the period from 1970 to 2020, also the predictions illustrate that the percentage of total population will be more from the beginning.

Indonesia and Thailand had the least inhabitants population at first in 1970 just over 10 percent and just under 20 percent. Indonesia had an upward trend until 2020 while Thailand remained steady. In addition, the predictions show that this trend will be continued slightly from 2030 to 2040 in both countries.

Malaysia and Philippines started at around 30%. Malaysia reached to the peak almost 75% in 2020, but Philippines fluctuated through the years and finally in 2020 the amount of people can get to around 40 percent or just over. The population’s predictions in both Malaysia and Philippines indicate a slightly growth for 2030 and 2040.

The population of the megacities are increasing gradually. The figures for people who live in the countryside are declined globally due to translocation of their inhabitants to the large cities. This essay will explain how this issue affects on the countries’ development and will argue both negative and positive sides.

Every body has some primary needs which include educational, medical and recreational facilities. In addition, each person must have an appropriate occupation to make their living. When people can not find suitable job and as the result can not response to their need, and also if their living area does not have good facilities so they will decide to change their home. This affair leads to numerous problems such as disappearing rural jobs, getting old of the population in the countryside and etc. Also, this problem can prevent of the improvements in many villages.

On the other hand, some people may suppose this event as a positive development. They just see one side that the person who moves to the big city has better life than before. Individuals have more access to main facilities like hospitals, educational centers, entertainments areas and more than other things they have more chance to achieve their dream. However, these dilemmas can be solved by governments. Governments should do more investing in rural areas

In conclusion, translocation of rural people is considered as both negative and positive development. This essay thinks that the drawbacks of this movement not only outcome but also cause to new concerns. Furthermore, authorities can solve the people’s problems to prevent their movement.