Children who grow up in needy families are better prepared to deal with problems in their adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. Do you agree or disagree?
***********************************************************************
Many needy parents are concerned that poverty will hold their children back in their academic and professional development. However I believe children raised in poor families may actually have some advantages that rich parents cannot give their offspring.
Children raised in poor households have stronger self-control as they have learned from their childhood experience that things do not come easily. They have to save up their allowance for expensive things they want to buy so when they become adults, they will be more patient and can wait for months or even years before their needs are satisfied. It seems to me this strong self-discipline will be a significant element of success.
Also, to these kids, the ability to make good use of limited resources is a necessity. They do no waste money on parties or buying clothes they only wear once or twice a year so they become better at managing resources on important quality for achieving success when they become adults.
Further, children who grow up in poor families are generally more independent and more hardworking than children brought up by rich parents. Due to their parents’ limited incomes, these children have learned at a very young age to depend on themselves in making toys, cleaning up their rooms and cooking meals for themselves. These experiences make them better at handling difficult situations and solving problems by themselves, which will be very helpful for career success in the future.
To conclude, growing up in poor families may be in fact an advantage in terms of children‘s development because it helps to cultivate some qualities that adult success requires.

Nowadays cheap air travel is increasingly popular in the world. To what extend do you think its advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
********************************** There was a time when air travel was only for the wealthy people and out of reach for the majority of citizens. Technological development has made traveling by air affordable. Low-cost flights are available in many countries. I believe this is, overall, a positive development.

The most obvious advantage of low-priced flights is their affordability. Nowadays, it is possible to get discounts when buying an airline ticket. This change can certainly give more people affordable access to air travel and help them to save money. At the same time, it can increase the efficiency of traveling, either for business or for pleasure. Moreover, cheap air travel also contributes to the growth of tourism as it provides more tourists with the chance to travel to more distant destinations in less time. As a result, it is likely to stimulate the economy by providing more job opportunities, which is beneficial to the development of a city's economy.

On the other hand, some individuals think otherwise. Some fear that air service companies might lower the safety standards in order to control their cost while others think fuel consumption of an airplane is higher than any other means of transportation, and because of this, taking flight tends to contaminate the atmosphere more seriously than automobiles does. However, air travel is not more damaging to the environment than car rides because the number of passengers that a plane can carry is far more than cars or other means of transportation.

In conclusion, cheap air travel not only can offer us affordable flights but also can give us greater convenience by saving money and increase efficiency and more options, on which we cannot put a price tag.

Nowadays, some people claim that public museums and galleries are not necessary anymore because people can see the things in those places on the Internet. Do you agree or disagree?
****************************
Nowadays, with the widespread of the Internet technology, people can visit the online websites of museum and galleries to see the historical collections. As a result, people have different views about the role and function of those places. From my perspective, regardless of the convenience of online collections, the traditional expositions are still indispensable.

Technological advances have revolutionized people’s lives. It is possible to access any information electronically from the remote location and even view exhibitions displayed in art galleries and museums from one’s own bedroom. Nevertheless, viewing them on screen is certainly different from seeing them in person. Take for example a exhibition of sculptures, you can walk all the way around a tjem, see the back, see the marks of labor that made it and learn background information through the description or listening to the tour guide.

Moreover, the museums and art galleries are symbols of the culture of a city, or even a country. They are places where tourists can learn about the local culture and history. One example to illustrate this is the most famous museum in France, the Louvre. It not only has thousands of artworks on display but the museum itself also represents the history of Paris, which greatly helps to promote the reputation of the city and attracts more people to visit it.

That is not to say that the online museums are useless. For many people who are keen on historical objects and artworks, but unfortunately live far away from them, it is cheaper and more convenient to surf the Internet than to visit famous museums and art galleries around the world. But to be honest, it will not impress them as greatly as the real things.

In conclusion, technology can supplement museums and galleries but not replace them as they provide the public with irreplaceable first-hand experience.

Nowadays, some people claim that public museums and galleries are not necessary anymore because people can see the things in those places on the Internet. Do you agree or disagree?
****************************

Nowadays, with the widespread of the Internet technology, people can visit the online websites of museum and galleries to see the historical collections. As a result, people have different views about the role and function of those places. From my perspective, regardless of the convenience of online collections, the traditional expositions are still indispensable.

Technological advances have revolutionized people’s lives. It is possible to access any information electronically from the remote location and even view exhibitions displayed in art galleries and museums from one’s own bedroom. Nevertheless, viewing them on screen is certainly different from seeing them in person. Take for example a exhibition of sculptures, you can walk all the way around a tjem, see the back, see the marks of labor that made it and learn background information through the description or listening to the tour guide.

Moreover, the museums and art galleries are symbols of the culture of a city, or even a country. They are places where tourists can learn about the local culture and history. One example to illustrate this is the most famous museum in France, the Louvre. It not only has thousands of artworks on display but the museum itself also represents the history of Paris, which greatly helps to promote the reputation of the city and attracts more people to visit it.

That is not to say that the online museums are useless. For many people who are keen on historical objects and artworks, but unfortunately live far away from them, it is cheaper and more convenient to surf the Internet than to visit famous museums and art galleries around the world. But to be honest, it will not impress them as greatly as the real things.

In conclusion, technology can supplement museums and galleries but not replace them as they provide the public with irreplaceable first-hand experience.

Some people believe that students should take a wide range of courses. However, others believe that students would focus on the subject that they are good at or they are interested in. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
************************

There has been a debate about the range of subjects students are encouraged to learn. While some people recommend students to take a wide variety of subjects, others propose a more concentrating way of study.

The main advantage for students to engage into a broad range of subjects is they would be exposed to various disciplines which allow them to understand the work and society from a variety of perspectives. Moreover, these diverse areas of knowledge are connected with each other directly or indirectly, allowing students to better and more deeply understand each subject and inspiring their curiosity to their world. However, every student's aptitude is different. Some students are excellent at language and weak at mathematics. If we force them to study the subject that they find difficult is very likely to dampen the student's enthusiasm and damage their self-confidence, which is certainly the last thing that educators and parents would want to see.

On the other side, by focusing on a few subjects, students tend to able to perform well because they can concentrate their limited time and energy on a narrow range of school work. As a result, it enhance their confidence in their academic ability and sense of achievement. Allowing students to select a small number of courses also gives them the opportunity to be only immersed in their favorite classes or what they are good at instead of these that they have no clue about at all.

My personal view about this controversy is that both sides are based on good sense, and they can be reconciled with each other. During primary, children should be encouraged to get involved in as many areas of knowledge as possible in order to experience the world. Whereas in secondary school, adolescents basically have identified their tendency in academic and career terms, so they should be allowed to narrow down their study to a particular domain related to their future career.

If a product is good or it meets people's needs, people will buy it. Advertising is no more than a form of entertainment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
*************************
Nowadays, we are surrounded by all kinds of advertisements which is significantly influencing our lives. While it is true that some good products sells even without any propaganda, I disagree that advertisements are unnecessary and only a form to content people.

Advertising offers many advantages that benefits not only manufactures, but also consumers and the society as a whole. For the manufactures, advertising plays a significant role in the introduction of a new product in the market. It also stimulates people to purchase the product which will led to a market expansion. Besides, repeated advertising and better quality of products brings more reputation for the producer and enhances goodwill for the concern. For the consumers, commercials offers a wide range of options, thus buyers can compare and make the best choice according to their needs with the best price. For the society, publicity nourishes people's consuming power and by bringing to the knowledge of the consumers different variety and better quality products, it increase the standard of living of the whole society.

One the other hand, advertisements attract mass consumers by making goods more attractive using creative presentation. In other words, making the product more desirable. As a result, people often buy goods without enough considerations, therefore causing wasteful spending. In addition to this, in order to appeal to a larger section of the population, advertisers uses misleading information or provocative images and violence to attract viewer's attention. Consequently, the product becomes well-known because of advertising appeal they have or the hype created by false advertising.

In conclusion, advertising plays an essential role in society, not only making consumers well-informed buyers but also stimulates the economic development. It is wrong to think publicity just a form of entertainment, even the products that excel in quality needs propaganda in today's competitive market.

Students at schools and universities learn more from lessons with teachers than from others sources (such as the Internet or television). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
***********************
Today, new technologies, such as the Internet and television, has made great changes in education. In spite of this, many people still believe that traditional education system is more useful when it comes to impart knowledge on students. In my personal opinion, although the role of teachers in the classroom is undeniably essential, we still cannot ignore other sources of learning.

Teachers cannot only inculcate knowledge to students, but also instill high moral values and give students inspiration and encouragement. In other words, teachers serves as guides for students, by showing them the path, give them the interpretation, encourage them to think critically and correct the misunderstandings. However, it is also true that not all teachers are qualified and not everyone can go to schools and universities. For instance, some students are afraid of entering the classroom because of the bad impression of teachers or some others, due to personal or economical reasons, cannot attend universities.

For those kind of students, they might feel more comfortable learning with the Internet or television. The easy access to other learning resources has allowed students to learn any subject they are interested in at any time of the day. Moreover, stimulating and complementing the learning experience by employing different sources of information is also beneficial for students. For instance, by doing a research as an assignment for school or university, pupils are forced to read additional material of the topic in order to complete the task, and this kind of extra material are mostly available online. Thus, they are learning with other sources.

To sum up with my view, the pivotal role of educators is acknowledged due to their irreplaceable contribution in any student's learning journey. But equal importance should be given to alternative sources of information during children's development.

Some people argue that modern technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. To what extend do you agree with their opinion?
********************************
Modern technology has literally changed every corner of the world and people's lives basically revolve around it. However, despite all the benefits technology has brought to our life, some people believes that the gap between the wealthy and the needy has also widened because of it. Personally, I agree with this view for the following reasons.

Firstly, there is a major gap between industrialized and developing countries in terms of their access to information and communication technology. While most industrialized countries were linked into the global information economy through high speed information networks and computers, the majority of people in the developing areas had very little or no access to basic information and communication networks, such as the Internet. Indeed, more than half of the people on the planet, mostly in the developing countries, have yet to make a telephone call.

Secondly, people who invented or apply new technology are paid in proportion to their larger market potential that their work holds. High-tech entrepreneurs such as Larry Page and Bill Gates make millions of dollars every minute. Moreover, technology is a form of intellectual capital, this will lead to an increase of income gap due to technological advances. The wealthy can afford better education about technology, they have more intellectual capital to invest as well.

In conclusion, breach between the rich and the poor has been widening because the poor almost inevitably have little chance of understanding and applying new technology; therefore, they are more likely to remain struck in poverty. Thus, I strongly believe, the most effective means to narrow the rich-poor gap would not be through financial aid or taxing the rich more heavily, but by offering better educational and training opportunities to the most needed ones.

برای مشاهده سوالات بیشتر به سایت زیر مراجعه نمایید.👇👇👇👇👇👇http://borzabadi.com/practices.php?id=106

#TOEFL #iBT November 26, 2016: @ibtil
#Writing Task 2
🔷 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is easier to become educated today than it was in the past.
@aalaeeTOEFLiBT
#Speaking Task 1
🔷 Your friends are planning to take a part-time job while attending the university. Do you think it is a good idea? Why?
@ibtil
#Speaking Task 2
🔷 There are two invitations. One is a party with your friends and the other is having a dinner party with your parents. Which one would you prefer and why?
@aalaeeTOEFLiBT
#Reading Vocabulary Questions
1. inspiring = striking
2. discarded = abandoned
3. baffled= puzzled
4. confirming = proving
5. of no need to say= obvious
6. adhesive = sticky
7. Ensured=guaranteed
8. Duration of =the length of
9. enabled= allowed
10. to some extent = to a certain degree of
#Reading Passages Topics
1. Easter Island’s Statues
2. Primitive and Advanced Termites Species
3. Birds and Food Storage
@ibtil

#تجربه آزمون #تافل
سلام
من امروز 12 اذر ماه در سنتر امیر بهادر امتحان دادم. سنتر بسیار خوب و همه چیش عالی و منظم بود. در امتحان امروز ریدینگ من لانگ شد 4 تا متن بود که متاسفانه فقط یکی از اون ها یادمه که درباره منشاء انقلاب صنعتی و مزایای اون بود.
لیسنینگ:کانورسیشن اول در این مورد بود که دانشجو رفت پیش کارمند قسمت کامپیوتر دانشگاه تا ازش هم بپرسه چرا پسورد کار نمیکنه و اگه میشه بهش یک پسورد بده چون باید حتما یک تکلیف که استاد فرستاده برای کلاس رو بگیره و انجام بده.
لکچر دوم: درباره oceanography بود و یک فرآیند رو به توضیح میداد که سبب تغییرات تو جمعیت ارگانیسم ها در اعماق اقیانوس میشد.
@ibtil

لکچر سوم: درباره روانشناسی بود و اینکه آیا بچه ها توانایی یادگیری زبان رو بعد از تولد بدست میارن یا قبل از تولد.
کانورسیشن دوم: دانشجو رفت پیش استاد باستان شناسی تا درباره موضوع تحقیق و مقاله ای که استاد تو کلاس مطرح کرده بود صحبت کنه.
لکچر سوم: art history بود و درباره یک اصطلاح به اسم art neavue (با عرض معذرت احتمالا اسپل لغت اشتباه) توضیح میداد.
لکچر چهارم: درباره biology و درباره گونه های شاخص key species و عوامل موثر در از بین رفتن اون ها.
اسپیکینگ خیلی خوب بود اصلا چیز خاصی نداشت در واقع از تی پی او ها هم به نظر من ساده تر بود.
تسک اول رو یادم نمیاد متاسفانه سوالش چی بود دقیقا.
تسک دوم سوالش این بود که ایا شما موفق با این جمله هستید که بهتر است افراد نکات مثبت رفتاری بچه ها رو بیشتر بگن تا نکات منفی رفتاری اون ها.
تسک 3: ریدینگ میگفت که دانشگاه برنامه داره که سخنرانی استادهای مدعو به دانشگاه رو حذف کنه به دلیل اینکه دانشجو ها خیلی استقبال نمیکنن و خیلی پرهزینه. تو لکچر پسره مخالفت میکنه با این پلن و میگه که علت اینکه دانشجوها شرکت نمیکنن در سخنرانی اینه که دانشگاه خیلی تبلیغ نمیکنه سخنرانی ها رو و همینطور میگه که راه های بهتری برای مدیریت مالی سخنرانی ها وجود داره مثل اینکه سخنرانی ها در اتاق های خالی خوابگاه برگزار بشه.
تسک 4: درباره co-extinction بود یعنی اینکه وقتی یک موجود منقرض میشه بقیه موجودات هم منقرض میشن بخاطر اینکه این موجودات به یکدیگر وابسته هستند و پروفوسور هم تو قسمت لکچر یک مثال از یک نوع گیاه تو جنگل های جنوبی استوایی مثال میزنه که با انقراض اون باعث انقراض پروانه های اون منطقه هم شده است.
تسک 5: دختر مشکلش این بود که نمیتونست تو اتاقش تو خوابگاه درس بخونه برای اینکه هم اتاقی اون صدای تلویزیون رو خیلی بلند میکرد. دو تا راه حل هم این بود که بره تو یک جای دیگه مثل کتابخونه درس بخونه و یا اینکه یک اتاق دیگه و یک هم اتاقی دیگه پیدا کنه.
تسک 6: درباره بیزینس بود و اینکه پروفسور میگفت دو فاکتور خیلی مهم وجود داره که بر روی تصمیم مشتری برای انتخاب تولیدات تاثیر میذاره یکی از این فاکتورها قیمت تولیدات و دیگری تبلیغات تلویزیونی یا بقیه تبلیغات.
رایتینگ هم خیلی عادی بود و چیز خاصی نداشت.
@aalaeeTOEFLiBT

تسک اول: ریدینگ میگفت شواهدی وجود داره که این نظر که هواپیمای whitehead که دو سال قبل از هواپیمای برادران رایت ساخته شده در واقع یک هواپیما نمیتونه باشه. برای این ادعا سه تا دلیل میاره یکی اینکه روزنامه های اون زمان هیچ عکسی از هواپیمای whitehead ارائه نکردن . دوم اینکه طراحی هواپیمای whitehead مناسب برای هواپیما نیست و سوم اینکه موتور هواپیمای whitehead توانایی عملکرد به عنوان یک هواپیما رو نداره. تو لکچر پروفوسور طبق معمول هر سه دلیل رو رد میکرد.
سوال تسک دو هم این بود آیا شما موافق با این نظر هستید که افرادی که نظرات مخالف خود را که از جانب سایر اعضاء مطرح میشه قبول نمیکنن، نمیتونن موفق باشن در زندگی خود.
@ibtil

#Writing_Task2
20161119
@yourIELTS

In some countries, more people choose to live by themselves in recent years, why is it case? Is it a positive or negative development for society?
@ibtil

#Writing_Task2

@ibtil

Sample Answer:
In recent years, living alone has become increasingly normal around the world, especially in those major cities. There could be several reasons why this is the case, and I believe that it has both positive and negative effects on our society.
@yourIELTS
There are various reasons why many people choose to live by themselves. Firstly, because of urbanization and globalization, a growing number of people of working age have to live in cities far away from their hometown, especially those who just graduate from universities. As they d not want t disturb or be disturbed by their parents, they prefer to live by themselves. Besides, the increasing awareness of independence may also have an impact on the choice of how to live. In addition, the convenient transport, such as railway and airplane and technology like mobile phones could meet the demand for contacting with our family members and friends both physically and emotionally, which provides the possibility for us to live on our own.

In my view, the rapid increase in the number of one person households has both beneficial and detrimental effects on our community. From the perspective of economy, the trend of living individually could lead to the increasing demand of housing, which could boost construction industry, real estate, bank and other related industries which provide services and products for homeowners. On the other hand, people living along for a long time might suffer from depression and feel isolated since they lack a sense of community, which is not good for neighborliness.
@ibtil
In conclusion, on the societal level, living by oneself can have both positive and negative influence.

سوالات تافل اینترنتی 3 دسامبر 2016
هر هفته چند سری آزمون در کشور ها و سنتر های مختلف برگزار می شود. اطلاع از سوالات هر هفته به شما کمک می کند با موضوعات اخیر آشنا شوید. احتمال زیادی وجود دارد این سوالات در ماه های آینده عینا تکرار شود.
👈👈👈به علت برگزاری چند سری آزمون در یک هفته، ممکن است تعدادی از داوطلبان با سوالات دیگری در آزمون خود مواجه شده باشند.

#TOEFL #iBT December 3, 2016: @ibtil
#Writing Task 2
🔷 Do you agree or disagree? People nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past.
@aalaeeTOEFLiBT
#Speaking Task 1
🔷 What would you most like to take a course in?
1. Mathematics
2. Painting
3. Science
@ibtil
#Speaking Task 2
🔷 Do you agree or disagree? It is important for a child to spend a short period of time living far away from home, visiting relatives and friends.
@aalaeeTOEFLiBT
#Reading Vocabulary Questions
1. compounded=added to
2. accessible=available
3. consensus=widespread agreement
4. exclusive=sole
5. indefinitely=endlessly
6. compensate for=make up for
7. extended=lengthened
8. consistent=unvarying
9. robust=healthy
10. optimal=ideal
11. obstruction=barrier
12. predominantly=mainly
#Reading Passages Topics
1. The Classic Mayan Collapse
2. The sleep
3. The Qualities a Good Trout Streams
@ibtil

#تجربه آزمون #تافل
December 3, 2016

من امروز ساعت ۱۲:۳۰تو موسسه معرفت آزمون دادم و خیلی راضی بودم. دوتا اتاق کوچیک بغل هم بود که یکی مخصوص ریپورت و یکی مخصوص آزمون بود. بزرگترین مزیتش اینه که تعداد افراد کم هستش ما فقط ۸نفر بودیم لذا تنش و استرس و همهمه ای وجود نداره قبل امتحان.یه خانوم خیلی مهربون و با انرژی اومدن نکات مهمو توضیح دادنو و با رفتار خوبش استرس مارو خیلی کم کردن. بعد رفتیم برای ریپورت. من کارت ملیم هوشمند نبود و به شدت میترسیدم سر شناسایی ولی برخلاف تصورم، حتی به کسی که پاسپورتش باطل شده بود سخت نگرفتن و گفتن بعد آزمونش مدارکشو بررسی میکنن. کلا با هیچکس قبل امتحان بدرفتاری نشد. شرایط دمایی و محیطی و همه چیشم خوب بود. مهم تر از همه این که برای break رفتیم‌همون اتاق بغل و پذیرایی شدیم ک مجبور نشدیم چند طبقه بریم پایین. ضمن اینکه اسم‌هرکسی که وقت استراحتش تموم شده بود رو اعلام میکردن ولی بهمون گفتن همتون باهم‌میتونید برید شروع کنید. تنها مشکلی که وجود داشت این بود سر اسپیکینگ بخاطر کوچیکی فضا ممکن بود صدا کسیو اذیت کنه ولی خوب اولا تا وقتی که تو هدفونتون صحبت میشه صدا نمیاد دوما من خودم اولا سریع شروع ب صحبت میکردم که صدای خودمو بشنوم و حواسم ب کسی نره ثانیا هدفونو محکم ب گوشام فشار میدادم ینی در کل مشکل چشم گیری نیس.
@ibtil

در مورد سوالام که متنارو تقریبا یادم نمیاد :) ولی لغات نسبتا جدید بودن و در کل فک میکنم در سطح همون تی پی او ها بود چیز سخت تری نبود. در کل شما تی پی اوهای ۴۰ ب بعدو ببینید ترستون قطعا میریزه چون از اون سخت تر مطمئن باشید نیس.

قسمت لیسنینگ هم به جرات میتونم‌بگم‌از تی پی او ها راحت تر بودن.هیچ لهجه عجیب و لکچری با کلمه های فوق قلمبه توش نبود،خداروشکر اون خانومه که زورش میاد دهنشو باز کنه نبود :D. کانورسیشنا یادم نیس ولی لکچرا یکی راجب نجوم بود،یکی راجب همون مجسمه های رومی بود ک ایا تقلید از یونانیاس یا نه، یکیشم راجب ی ماهی خاصی بود ک فسیلش پیدا شده بود و با DNAاش کلی ویژگیاشو پیدا کرده بود برخلاف ی ماهی دیگه که DNAاشم نابود شده. برای تقویتشم تنها راهش اینه که اولا زیاد گوش بدین، ثانیا پیدا کنید چطوری بهتر میتونید تمرکز کنید. من خودم‌ اول سعی کردم راحت شم با شنیدن بعد از اسلایدها یاد گرفتم چجوری نت بردارم و در نهایت فهمیدم که من ستونی کلمات کلیدیو بنویسم راحت ترم برخلاف اسلاید ها. خوب هرکسی ساختار مغزش با یه مدل راحته. خیلیام‌هستن ننویسن راحتن.
@aalaeeTOEFLiBT

قسمت اسپیکینگم که همه سوالا راحت بود نسبتا. سوال یک و دو تاپیک های روتین بودن عجیب غریب نبودن. فک کنم سخت ترینش سوال ۶بود که باز اونم قابل قبول بود. برای اینم باز تنها راه تمرینه. ثانیا سعی کنید تایمو تقسیم کنید و نگاهش کنید طبق اسلاید ها ک بدونید تا فلان ثانیه حالا یکم اینور اونور مثلا توضیح پروپوزال تموم باید باید بشه. برای بالا رفتن اعتماد بنفسم اولا ویس های بچه هایی که نمره بالا گرفتنو گوش کنید، ثانیا ورژن جدید تی پی اون نمونه جواب داره. سعی کنید به اندازه اون اقاهه با ارامش و اعتماد بنفس بگید. من اولا فک‌میکردم هرچی بلند تر بگم بهتره ولی انگار فقط گیج تر میشدم.
@ibtil

Integrated Writing Task
🔷🔷🔷 استاد اون سه تا دلیل غیرممکن بودن افزایش جمعیت پرنده رو رد کرد
1- دلیل اول پایین بودن سرعت تکثیر owl parrot بود که چند سال یکبار تخم گذاری میکنه... استاد این دلیل رو آورد که تنوع غذایی اونها کم و همچنین از لحاظ مواد مغذی بی ارزشه... محیطبانان آوردن برای اونها سیب و دانه های خوراکی (seed) پخش کردن و زاد و ولد اونها افزایش چشمگیری پیدا کرد
2- دلیل دوم رشد اندک جمعیت پرنده، وجود بیماری شناسایی نشده ای هست که باعث میشه جوجه درون تخم پرنده بمیره... استاد این توضیح رو آورد که این نوع پرنده شبها میرن دنبال غذا و چون شبها سرده، افت دمایی شدید تخم باعث خرابی اونها میشه.... راه حل انجام شده این بود که برای لانه های اونها هیتر برقی گذاشتن و تخم هارو گرم نگه داشتن...
3- دلیل سوم وجود یه حیوان شکارچی بود که قبلا برای کنترل جمعیت خرگوشهای نیوزلند به اون سرزمین آورده شده بودن و چون پرنده مورد نظر پرواز نمیکرد، میتونستن راحت پرنده هارو شکار کنن... استاد توضیح داد که جزایری دور افتاده هستش که میشه پرنده هارو اونجا تکثیر داد... از طرفی متن گفته بوده که اون حیوان شکارچی، قادر به شنا کردن و رسوندن خودش به جزایر دور افتاده هستش... در حالی که استاد گفت اون جزایر کوچک هستن و وجود هرنوع شکارچی قابل شناسایی و حذف کردنه... (دقیقا یادمه کلمه the predators can be caught and eliminated from those islands)
نکته اول: استاد با لحن موافق شروع کرد... چیزی که منو هم به شک انداخت (منظورم اینه که دلایل متن درست بود ولی استاد براشون راهکار داد و """با ارائه راه حل، پیچیدگی و تاثیر اون موانع رو رد کرد"""" و افزایش جمعیت پرنده "غیرممکن" نیست بلکه شدنیه)

#تجربه آزمون #تافل

یه نکته ای به نظرم مهم اومد خواستم بدونید شاید خوب باشه که به بچه ها منتقل کنین
من دوبار تست دادم، یه بار 15 اوکتبر و یه بار 19 نوامبر
بار اول
R:20 , L:28, S:22 , W:21
شدم
و بار دوم
R:28 , L:23, S:23 , W:27
البته به خاطر شرایطی که داشتم نمی تونستم خیلی وقت بذارم
ولی زدن تست های tpo خیلی موثر بود برای reading و اینو واقعا توصیه میکنم هر چند که همون طوری که خودتون میگفتین روند رشدش آرومه و ممکنه دلسردکننده باشه
برای رایتینگ کاری خاصی نکردم فقط سعی کردم حدود 50 کلمه بیشتر بنویسم و یکی دو تا جمله با ساختار گرامری خاص استفاده کنم؛ به نظرم سری اول احتمالا عنوان تسک دوم رو درست متوجه نشده بودم؛ ریپورت خود ets هم نمره ی خیلی پایینی به این بخش داده بود
@ibtil

اما برای لیسنینگ به نظرم یه مقدار سخت شده، سوال ها نسبت به قبل کمتر قابل پیش بینی هستن، در حالی که خودش قابل فهم بود سوال ها یکم غافل گیر کرد منو، البته حتما شرایط استرس در امتحان موثر بوده من صرفا با آزمون قبلی می تونم مقایسه کنم
:) راهکارش رو خودتون می دونین احتمالا
و اینکه من یه فایلی آماده کردم از لغات ریدینگ ها مربوط به سال اخیر
امیدوارم کمک کننده باشه برای بقیه👇👇👇👇