Forwarded from ibtil_ IELTS
22 October, 2016
It is known to all that the technological and scientific advances have made great
changes to the range and quality of our food. Some people regard it as an
improvement while others believe that the change is harmful.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is known to all that the technological and scientific advances have made great
changes to the range and quality of our food. Some people regard it as an
improvement while others believe that the change is harmful.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Forwarded from ibtil_ IELTS
Idea for the topic Essay
Positives of advances in food technology:
• Farmers can produce crops that grow bigger and faster.
• Genetically modified crops may be more resistant to disease or insects.
• This could be important for food production in developing countries.
• Faster growing cereals, fruit and vegetables will mean more profit.
• Foods can be modified to look perfect and last longer.
• They may be more attractive to customers.
Negatives of advances in food technology:
• Many people distrust foods that have been modified or processed.
• They prefer organic foods which are produced without chemicals.
• Farming without fertilisers or pesticides is more environmentally friendly.
• There may be risks involved in the genetic engineering of foods.
• Genetically modified crops might change whole ecosystems.
• Food chains could be broken if crops are resistant to predators.
Positives of advances in food technology:
• Farmers can produce crops that grow bigger and faster.
• Genetically modified crops may be more resistant to disease or insects.
• This could be important for food production in developing countries.
• Faster growing cereals, fruit and vegetables will mean more profit.
• Foods can be modified to look perfect and last longer.
• They may be more attractive to customers.
Negatives of advances in food technology:
• Many people distrust foods that have been modified or processed.
• They prefer organic foods which are produced without chemicals.
• Farming without fertilisers or pesticides is more environmentally friendly.
• There may be risks involved in the genetic engineering of foods.
• Genetically modified crops might change whole ecosystems.
• Food chains could be broken if crops are resistant to predators.
Forwarded from ibtil_ IELTS
Sample Answer 1:
Yesterday’s fiction is today’s reality. Such colossal developments have taken place in range and quality of food which we could not even think of earlier. It is a highly debated issue as to whether these advances are a blessing or a curse. This essay shall delve into the merits and demerits of these developments.
The proponents claim that genetic modification of foods has given us such species which need little or no insecticides and no fertilizers. GM crops do not require spraying with toxic insecticides and as a consequence environmental damage such as the indiscriminate killing of insects and the contamination of soils and rivers is avoided. Moreover, since age old times, farming methods have always involved selective breeding and methods of cross- pollination. In that sense genetic modification is nothing new.
What is more, the quality of food has also improved. For example, fish gene has been added to tomato to make it frost resistant. A nut protein has been added to soya bean to increase the protein content. Finally, technology has saved people from tedious work and in the meantime increased the production markedly. All this is needed to meet the demands of the burgeoning population.
The opponents say that GM crops are unnatural and that by creating them we are altering the natural world. A more worrying argument raised by objectors to GM foods is that they could constitute a health risk, for example by causing allergies or even by being toxic. The final objection is strictly environmental. It is argued that crops which are genetically modified to kill the pests which attack them may also kill harmless insects. This, it is claimed will have a disastrous effect on the wider environment beyond the crop themselves.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that GM crops offer increased agricultural productivity and foods of higher nutritional value, both of which are essential if the growing world population of the twenty-first century is to be fed. Indeed, these crops have the potential to improve the health of millions throughout the world while causing less environmental damage than standard farming methods used today. I think it essential that GM foods should be encouraged.
Yesterday’s fiction is today’s reality. Such colossal developments have taken place in range and quality of food which we could not even think of earlier. It is a highly debated issue as to whether these advances are a blessing or a curse. This essay shall delve into the merits and demerits of these developments.
The proponents claim that genetic modification of foods has given us such species which need little or no insecticides and no fertilizers. GM crops do not require spraying with toxic insecticides and as a consequence environmental damage such as the indiscriminate killing of insects and the contamination of soils and rivers is avoided. Moreover, since age old times, farming methods have always involved selective breeding and methods of cross- pollination. In that sense genetic modification is nothing new.
What is more, the quality of food has also improved. For example, fish gene has been added to tomato to make it frost resistant. A nut protein has been added to soya bean to increase the protein content. Finally, technology has saved people from tedious work and in the meantime increased the production markedly. All this is needed to meet the demands of the burgeoning population.
The opponents say that GM crops are unnatural and that by creating them we are altering the natural world. A more worrying argument raised by objectors to GM foods is that they could constitute a health risk, for example by causing allergies or even by being toxic. The final objection is strictly environmental. It is argued that crops which are genetically modified to kill the pests which attack them may also kill harmless insects. This, it is claimed will have a disastrous effect on the wider environment beyond the crop themselves.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that GM crops offer increased agricultural productivity and foods of higher nutritional value, both of which are essential if the growing world population of the twenty-first century is to be fed. Indeed, these crops have the potential to improve the health of millions throughout the world while causing less environmental damage than standard farming methods used today. I think it essential that GM foods should be encouraged.
Forwarded from ibtil_ IELTS
Model Answer 2:
It is true that we are buying food products which have changed both in quality and variety, with the aid of latest scientific and technological breakthroughs. Many people consider this as a negative development, but i think it is a real breakthrough to fulfill the growing demands for food.
Many people think that using the technological methods for increasing food output is a bad practice. It is harmful to human beings and animals in a number of ways. For example, use of pesticides and fertilizers although help to control insects and produce more amount of crops, those chemicals get absorbed by crops. When such food, containing harmful chemicals, is consumed by human beings, it affects their health in a bad way. Furthermore, in order to get more amount of milk and meat from animals, certain drugs are used. they are harmful not only to animals but also to humans. For example, scientists have found significant levels of a harmful drug, used for producing more milk, in animal milk which we consume on daily basis.
Many people advocates the role of scientific research and development programmes in achieving greater output of food and variety of crops. I totally agree with this school of thought. To meet with the growing demands of food, more food production is required. It can only be achieved by using scientific techniques like genetic modification and genetic engineering. Genetically modified crops can result in high output of food, which can feed hungry people around the world. Otherwise people will die out of hunger due to shortage of food. For example, many children are dying in Africa because of shortage of food. By producing more and more food using modern methods, we can save their life.
In conclusion, technology development in the field of food production can play a very important role in order to avoid disastrous impacts of hunger on people living in impoverished regions.
It is true that we are buying food products which have changed both in quality and variety, with the aid of latest scientific and technological breakthroughs. Many people consider this as a negative development, but i think it is a real breakthrough to fulfill the growing demands for food.
Many people think that using the technological methods for increasing food output is a bad practice. It is harmful to human beings and animals in a number of ways. For example, use of pesticides and fertilizers although help to control insects and produce more amount of crops, those chemicals get absorbed by crops. When such food, containing harmful chemicals, is consumed by human beings, it affects their health in a bad way. Furthermore, in order to get more amount of milk and meat from animals, certain drugs are used. they are harmful not only to animals but also to humans. For example, scientists have found significant levels of a harmful drug, used for producing more milk, in animal milk which we consume on daily basis.
Many people advocates the role of scientific research and development programmes in achieving greater output of food and variety of crops. I totally agree with this school of thought. To meet with the growing demands of food, more food production is required. It can only be achieved by using scientific techniques like genetic modification and genetic engineering. Genetically modified crops can result in high output of food, which can feed hungry people around the world. Otherwise people will die out of hunger due to shortage of food. For example, many children are dying in Africa because of shortage of food. By producing more and more food using modern methods, we can save their life.
In conclusion, technology development in the field of food production can play a very important role in order to avoid disastrous impacts of hunger on people living in impoverished regions.
Forwarded from ibtil_ IELTS
Model Answer 3:
In today modern world, the revolutions of technology and science have an impact on many aspects of life including the standard and different kinds of food we consume. However, there is some controversy about the effect of those changes. While it is possible to claim that these effects are improvement, my view is that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
There are several reasons why these innovations in food production can be considered as positive. One is that farmers can produce crops that grow bigger and faster so it leads to the reduction of food shortage in many developing countries. It also should not be forgotten that genetically modified crops are more resistant to diseases or pests so the costs of production can be reduced and limit the danger of agricultural wastes.
Those who argue for the drawbacks of technology and science’s development in agriculture base their argument on the impact of those changes on environment and human health. Firstly, there might be risk involved in the genetically modified crops because the effect of these crops to the ecosystem is unknown. In addition to this, there are concerns about man-made chemicals used in modern methods of food production could be harmful to human health. An example illustrates this is that fertilized foods are assumed to causes cancer or long-terms consequences to human kind health.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the problem, I think that the long-term dangers of these developments should be cautious. Although technology and science used in agriculture has improved the variety and quality of foods, some measures should be regulated to ensure that these developments would be used in a safe way for both environment and humans.
In today modern world, the revolutions of technology and science have an impact on many aspects of life including the standard and different kinds of food we consume. However, there is some controversy about the effect of those changes. While it is possible to claim that these effects are improvement, my view is that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
There are several reasons why these innovations in food production can be considered as positive. One is that farmers can produce crops that grow bigger and faster so it leads to the reduction of food shortage in many developing countries. It also should not be forgotten that genetically modified crops are more resistant to diseases or pests so the costs of production can be reduced and limit the danger of agricultural wastes.
Those who argue for the drawbacks of technology and science’s development in agriculture base their argument on the impact of those changes on environment and human health. Firstly, there might be risk involved in the genetically modified crops because the effect of these crops to the ecosystem is unknown. In addition to this, there are concerns about man-made chemicals used in modern methods of food production could be harmful to human health. An example illustrates this is that fertilized foods are assumed to causes cancer or long-terms consequences to human kind health.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the problem, I think that the long-term dangers of these developments should be cautious. Although technology and science used in agriculture has improved the variety and quality of foods, some measures should be regulated to ensure that these developments would be used in a safe way for both environment and humans.
Forwarded from ibtil_ IELTS
01-01 Bored to death.ppsx
436 KB
A sample essay by a student who scored 30 on the actual TOEFL iBT Test- administered on Saturday October 15, 2016> This is a sample he wrote as a part of class assignment:
TOPIC: @ibtil
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Response: @aalaeeTOEFLiBT
Throughout history, education has played a prominent role in all societies. Due to its paramount importance and direct impact on a given society’s headway, efforts for its improvements have always been amongst the top priorities of educational systems. A controversial question regarding this issue is whether a teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important or/than his/her knowledge of the teaching topic. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that a given teacher’s social and communicational skills are the most important factors contributing to a successful teaching and learning process, while others believe that lack of excellent knowledge decreases the teaching level. I, despite the general consensus, contend that both the social skill and knowledge are indeed essential for a flourishing education. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint. @aalaeeTOEFLiBT
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that without great social and communicational skills, a teacher cannot transfer an educational material to his/her students, especially if they are infants or mentally challenged ones. One of the main goals of education is to train people for their future lives and vocations; a teacher who bonds well with students can teach them invaluable experiences regarding social life apart from the ordinary teaching syllabus. Take a personal experience as an example; back in high school, most of our teachers were the recent graduates from the same school; thus, they were young and had a variety of interests in common with students. Not only did this close relation make the teaching process more efficient, but also it established a meaningful and long-lasting friendship between pupils and tutors. @ibtil
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that students’ behaviors depend highly on the aforementioned relationship. A decent well-developed relationship will make students more compromising, whereas a poor one causes students to act more irrationally. The results of a study conducted in my country indicate that a vast majority of students in schools and universities are not co-operating with teachers, for they claim the teachers cannot relate to them. The survey further asserts that such problems were aggravated in cases with critically-aged students.
Nonetheless, no one could neglect the fact that without an excellent knowledge, the teacher would be incapable of instruction; he/she might not understand a topic, let alone explain it to students. Albert Einstein, who is considered one of the most intelligent scientists of all time, has mentioned in one of his writings that in order to determine if one has understood a fact, one should be able to teach that idea to his grandmother. This humorus statement underlines the importance of knowledge prior to teaching. @aalaeeTOEFLiBT
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that neither the knowledge nor social aility are solely sufficient for an outstanding teaching experience. Knowledge is essential prior to teaching and ability skills are needed during the teaching and learning process. Consequently, I highly suggest that authorities put more emphasis on teachers’ training in order to achieve a better educational system which in turn results in a promising future for the society. @ibtil
TOPIC: @ibtil
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Response: @aalaeeTOEFLiBT
Throughout history, education has played a prominent role in all societies. Due to its paramount importance and direct impact on a given society’s headway, efforts for its improvements have always been amongst the top priorities of educational systems. A controversial question regarding this issue is whether a teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important or/than his/her knowledge of the teaching topic. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that a given teacher’s social and communicational skills are the most important factors contributing to a successful teaching and learning process, while others believe that lack of excellent knowledge decreases the teaching level. I, despite the general consensus, contend that both the social skill and knowledge are indeed essential for a flourishing education. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint. @aalaeeTOEFLiBT
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that without great social and communicational skills, a teacher cannot transfer an educational material to his/her students, especially if they are infants or mentally challenged ones. One of the main goals of education is to train people for their future lives and vocations; a teacher who bonds well with students can teach them invaluable experiences regarding social life apart from the ordinary teaching syllabus. Take a personal experience as an example; back in high school, most of our teachers were the recent graduates from the same school; thus, they were young and had a variety of interests in common with students. Not only did this close relation make the teaching process more efficient, but also it established a meaningful and long-lasting friendship between pupils and tutors. @ibtil
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that students’ behaviors depend highly on the aforementioned relationship. A decent well-developed relationship will make students more compromising, whereas a poor one causes students to act more irrationally. The results of a study conducted in my country indicate that a vast majority of students in schools and universities are not co-operating with teachers, for they claim the teachers cannot relate to them. The survey further asserts that such problems were aggravated in cases with critically-aged students.
Nonetheless, no one could neglect the fact that without an excellent knowledge, the teacher would be incapable of instruction; he/she might not understand a topic, let alone explain it to students. Albert Einstein, who is considered one of the most intelligent scientists of all time, has mentioned in one of his writings that in order to determine if one has understood a fact, one should be able to teach that idea to his grandmother. This humorus statement underlines the importance of knowledge prior to teaching. @aalaeeTOEFLiBT
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that neither the knowledge nor social aility are solely sufficient for an outstanding teaching experience. Knowledge is essential prior to teaching and ability skills are needed during the teaching and learning process. Consequently, I highly suggest that authorities put more emphasis on teachers’ training in order to achieve a better educational system which in turn results in a promising future for the society. @ibtil
Forwarded from ibtil_ IELTS
Speaking PART1 Answers (Sep-Dec).pdf
954.9 KB
#TOEFL #iBT October 28, 2016: @ibtil
#Writing Task 2
🔷 Do you agree or disagree? It is easier for parents to raise children than it was 50 years ago.
@aalaeeTOEFLiBT
#Speaking Task 1
🔷There is a project at school which needs a leader. What qualities the leader should have in your opinion? Please talk about it and give details.@aalaeeTOEFLiBT
#Speaking Task 2
🔷 Some people think it is more important to spend time with family rather than study or work. Which opinion do you prefer? Why?
@ibtil
#Reading Vocabulary Questions
1. extreme = great
2. upon reflection = after consideration
3. consult = ask
4. recognize = know
5. emit = release
6. elevate = uplift
7. dismiss= reject
8. simultaneous = at the same time
9. chaotic = disorganized
#Reading Passages Topics
1. The Tropical Mammal
2. The origin of Earth Atmosphere
3. Extinction of Cretaceous
@ibtil
#Writing Task 2
🔷 Do you agree or disagree? It is easier for parents to raise children than it was 50 years ago.
@aalaeeTOEFLiBT
#Speaking Task 1
🔷There is a project at school which needs a leader. What qualities the leader should have in your opinion? Please talk about it and give details.@aalaeeTOEFLiBT
#Speaking Task 2
🔷 Some people think it is more important to spend time with family rather than study or work. Which opinion do you prefer? Why?
@ibtil
#Reading Vocabulary Questions
1. extreme = great
2. upon reflection = after consideration
3. consult = ask
4. recognize = know
5. emit = release
6. elevate = uplift
7. dismiss= reject
8. simultaneous = at the same time
9. chaotic = disorganized
#Reading Passages Topics
1. The Tropical Mammal
2. The origin of Earth Atmosphere
3. Extinction of Cretaceous
@ibtil
Forwarded from ibtil_ IELTS
01-04 Call it a day.ppsx
407.2 KB
Forwarded from ibtil_ IELTS
01-15 I plan to + (verb).ppsx
276.4 KB
Forwarded from IBTIL TOEFL iBT💎
🖊مهم
#Writing #Template
🔵دوستان عزیز
با توجه به پیام های اخیری که در مورد تمپلیت ها در قسمت های اسپیکینگ و به خصوص رایتینگ توسط داوطلبان مطرح شده است، لازم است به اطلاع شما برسانیم این مورد اصلاً جدید نیست -اگرچه در آزمون های اخیر به صورت bold مطرح شده است. در تمام آموزش هایی که ETS در کتابها، سایت و ویدیو های خود ارايه کرده است، بر این موضوع تاکید می کند که از جملات و ساختارهای از پیش ساخته شده - و گاهی غلط یا بی ارتباط به موضوع خودداری نمایید. در ویدیویی که مربوط به سه سال پیش می باشد این موضوع به صراحت از دقیقه 2:20 به بعد اشاره می گردد. ویدیو را ببینید👈 https://telegram.me/aalaeeTOEFLiBT/648
بنابراین به دو نکته توجه فرمایید:
1. از تمپلیت های غلط و طولانی که با قسمت های دیگر رایتینگ و اسپیکینگ شما تناسب ندارد حتی الامکان استفاده نکنید. مخصوصاً دوستانی که نیاز به نمره بالا دارند توجه داشته باشند که معمولاً دلایل ، ساپورت خوب همراه با مثال، گرامر و واژگان خوب نمره بالای شما را تضمین می کند.
2. در هفته های اخیر دوستان زیادی اطلاع دادهاند که با اینکه🔵 تمپلیت شخصی چک شده🔵 خود را در آزمون استفاده کردند، در آزمون نمره بالا - 27 تا 30- کسب نمودند. نمونه ای از این نوع رایتینگ ها هفته گذشته در همین کانال پست شد.
https://telegram.me/aalaeeTOEFLiBT/720 👈
👈توجه داشته باشید نمرات سختگیرانه ETS در قسمت های رایتینگ و اسپیکینگ در سال های گذشته هم مشابه امسال اتفاق افتاده است، پس لطفاً 🔵با آرامش و تمرکز 🔵به آمادگی خود برای آزمون تافل ادامه دهید.
لطفاً با انتشار مطلب تمپلیت ها باعث عدم تمرکز و استرس دوستان خود نشوید.🙏
🔵با آرزوی موفقیت برای شما در آزمون تافل🍀
#Writing #Template
🔵دوستان عزیز
با توجه به پیام های اخیری که در مورد تمپلیت ها در قسمت های اسپیکینگ و به خصوص رایتینگ توسط داوطلبان مطرح شده است، لازم است به اطلاع شما برسانیم این مورد اصلاً جدید نیست -اگرچه در آزمون های اخیر به صورت bold مطرح شده است. در تمام آموزش هایی که ETS در کتابها، سایت و ویدیو های خود ارايه کرده است، بر این موضوع تاکید می کند که از جملات و ساختارهای از پیش ساخته شده - و گاهی غلط یا بی ارتباط به موضوع خودداری نمایید. در ویدیویی که مربوط به سه سال پیش می باشد این موضوع به صراحت از دقیقه 2:20 به بعد اشاره می گردد. ویدیو را ببینید👈 https://telegram.me/aalaeeTOEFLiBT/648
بنابراین به دو نکته توجه فرمایید:
1. از تمپلیت های غلط و طولانی که با قسمت های دیگر رایتینگ و اسپیکینگ شما تناسب ندارد حتی الامکان استفاده نکنید. مخصوصاً دوستانی که نیاز به نمره بالا دارند توجه داشته باشند که معمولاً دلایل ، ساپورت خوب همراه با مثال، گرامر و واژگان خوب نمره بالای شما را تضمین می کند.
2. در هفته های اخیر دوستان زیادی اطلاع دادهاند که با اینکه🔵 تمپلیت شخصی چک شده🔵 خود را در آزمون استفاده کردند، در آزمون نمره بالا - 27 تا 30- کسب نمودند. نمونه ای از این نوع رایتینگ ها هفته گذشته در همین کانال پست شد.
https://telegram.me/aalaeeTOEFLiBT/720 👈
👈توجه داشته باشید نمرات سختگیرانه ETS در قسمت های رایتینگ و اسپیکینگ در سال های گذشته هم مشابه امسال اتفاق افتاده است، پس لطفاً 🔵با آرامش و تمرکز 🔵به آمادگی خود برای آزمون تافل ادامه دهید.
لطفاً با انتشار مطلب تمپلیت ها باعث عدم تمرکز و استرس دوستان خود نشوید.🙏
🔵با آرزوی موفقیت برای شما در آزمون تافل🍀