Nutrition has become so over-complicated, it's absurd.
Keep it simple.
- Eat a variety of whole, real food.
- Eat seasonally, locally, and fresh.
- Eat organic, biodynamic, or spray-free produce.
- Eat food that is grown sustainably, and regeneratively.
- Eat what your ancestors ate and prepare it the way they did.
- Create your meals with time, care, love, and attention.
- Enjoy your food mindfully, with the people you care about.
Everything else is noise.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Keep it simple.
- Eat a variety of whole, real food.
- Eat seasonally, locally, and fresh.
- Eat organic, biodynamic, or spray-free produce.
- Eat food that is grown sustainably, and regeneratively.
- Eat what your ancestors ate and prepare it the way they did.
- Create your meals with time, care, love, and attention.
- Enjoy your food mindfully, with the people you care about.
Everything else is noise.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
❤141👍37🔥10👏9
There seems to be a growing trend where people claim that 'plants are toxic', and blame them for all of humanity's modern health woes.
This claim is touted as fact, but is there any truth to it?
I was a carnivore for many years and parroted the same nonsense about plants until I started looking at the evidence for myself. I trawled through the literature looking for proof showing the consumption of plants in the diet 'causes disease'. After years of searching, I have found a grand total of nothing. That is, there are no scientific experiments demonstrating a cause-and-effect relationship between plants and disease.
Might there be some plants out there that are 'toxic', sure, but our ancestors worked out how to properly prepare these foods, and consume them as part of their staple diet, for hundreds, if not thousands of years, without consequence. Last time I checked, no one was walking around eating handfuls of raw fava beans.
If you believe that edible plants are toxic, and cause disease, it should be a relatively straightforward thing to prove.
1. Provide evidence showing that the consumption of an isolated compound (i.e. a lectin, lignan, oxalate, etc) causes a specific disease in humans.
Even if this evidence exists, it doesn't reflect natural dietary practices, so additional evidence to support the claim is required.
2. Provide evidence showing the consumption of a plant containing the above-mentioned compound, prepared properly, causes disease in humans.
No one will ever be able to do it? Why, because this evidence doesn't exist. Why doesn't it exist? Because the consumption of plants in the diet does not cause disease.
It would seem that people who spout this rhetoric, are simply telling a story devoid of sound logic and evidence.
It's high time we put an end to this woeful practice of blaming mother nature for our man-made problems. As long as we are spraying our food with poison, growing it in contaminated soil, deviating away from traditional agricultural practices and food preparation techniques, and adulterating the living crap out of our food, no one gets to point the finger at the plant.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
This claim is touted as fact, but is there any truth to it?
I was a carnivore for many years and parroted the same nonsense about plants until I started looking at the evidence for myself. I trawled through the literature looking for proof showing the consumption of plants in the diet 'causes disease'. After years of searching, I have found a grand total of nothing. That is, there are no scientific experiments demonstrating a cause-and-effect relationship between plants and disease.
Might there be some plants out there that are 'toxic', sure, but our ancestors worked out how to properly prepare these foods, and consume them as part of their staple diet, for hundreds, if not thousands of years, without consequence. Last time I checked, no one was walking around eating handfuls of raw fava beans.
If you believe that edible plants are toxic, and cause disease, it should be a relatively straightforward thing to prove.
1. Provide evidence showing that the consumption of an isolated compound (i.e. a lectin, lignan, oxalate, etc) causes a specific disease in humans.
Even if this evidence exists, it doesn't reflect natural dietary practices, so additional evidence to support the claim is required.
2. Provide evidence showing the consumption of a plant containing the above-mentioned compound, prepared properly, causes disease in humans.
No one will ever be able to do it? Why, because this evidence doesn't exist. Why doesn't it exist? Because the consumption of plants in the diet does not cause disease.
It would seem that people who spout this rhetoric, are simply telling a story devoid of sound logic and evidence.
It's high time we put an end to this woeful practice of blaming mother nature for our man-made problems. As long as we are spraying our food with poison, growing it in contaminated soil, deviating away from traditional agricultural practices and food preparation techniques, and adulterating the living crap out of our food, no one gets to point the finger at the plant.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Telegram
Humanley
Helping people heal themselves. Good health is a journey not a destination. Humanley challenges the status quo of all things health and wellness.
Can You Catch A Cold?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1763504409
Podcast, blogs & more
https://www.humanley.com/
Can You Catch A Cold?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1763504409
Podcast, blogs & more
https://www.humanley.com/
👍79🔥20👏17❤9🤔5
Imagine someone goes to a butcher & buys a piece of steak. They take the steak home, cook it up, and feast on it, only to become ill soon after.
Obviously displeased, they go back to the butcher asking for an explanation.
Imagine the butcher admits that they are getting their meat from a new supplier who feeds their cows poison, & pumps the animals full of antibiotics & hormones. To top it off, the butcher sprays the steak with poison just before selling it. The butcher says not to worry because new research claims naturally occurring compounds in the meat, not the poison, are making people sick.
Would anyone in their right mind accept this explanation from the butcher? Would anyone believe this fantastical tale, or would they be outraged, demanding the butcher finds a new supplier & stops spraying poison on their food?
No one would accept this non-sensical story when it comes to meat, yet so many are willing to swallow it when it comes to plants.
We live in wild times.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Obviously displeased, they go back to the butcher asking for an explanation.
Imagine the butcher admits that they are getting their meat from a new supplier who feeds their cows poison, & pumps the animals full of antibiotics & hormones. To top it off, the butcher sprays the steak with poison just before selling it. The butcher says not to worry because new research claims naturally occurring compounds in the meat, not the poison, are making people sick.
Would anyone in their right mind accept this explanation from the butcher? Would anyone believe this fantastical tale, or would they be outraged, demanding the butcher finds a new supplier & stops spraying poison on their food?
No one would accept this non-sensical story when it comes to meat, yet so many are willing to swallow it when it comes to plants.
We live in wild times.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👏69👍36🔥27❤16😁1
Remember when science claimed eggs and red meat caused disease because of the cholesterol, saturated fat, and protein content?
Well no one believes that anymore...Why? It's not because those claims were ever disproven, but because they were never proven to begin with. A cause-and-effect relationship was never established. So-called 'scientists' simply parroted non-sense and the mindless masses gobbled it up.
It's now become trendy to blame plants as the cause of disease. But a critical thinker can see the exact same thing that happened to eggs and red meat is currently happening to plants. No cause-and-effect relationship has ever been established, yet people regurgitate this tripe as though it's a proven fact.
When are people going to realise nature is being used as a scapegoat for the true cause of disease?
Next year plants will fall out of the limelight, only to be replaced by something else, whilst the true causes of disease continue flying under the radar.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Well no one believes that anymore...Why? It's not because those claims were ever disproven, but because they were never proven to begin with. A cause-and-effect relationship was never established. So-called 'scientists' simply parroted non-sense and the mindless masses gobbled it up.
It's now become trendy to blame plants as the cause of disease. But a critical thinker can see the exact same thing that happened to eggs and red meat is currently happening to plants. No cause-and-effect relationship has ever been established, yet people regurgitate this tripe as though it's a proven fact.
When are people going to realise nature is being used as a scapegoat for the true cause of disease?
Next year plants will fall out of the limelight, only to be replaced by something else, whilst the true causes of disease continue flying under the radar.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍103🔥24❤20👏10🥰1
When Paul Zimmer-Harwood volunteered to be intentionally infected with SARS-CoV-2, he wasn’t sure what to expect. He was ready for a repeat of his first brush with COVID-19, through a naturally acquired infection that gave him influenza-like symptoms. But he hoped his immunity would help him feel well enough to use the indoor bicycle trainer that he had brought into quarantine.
It turned out that Zimmer-Harwood, a PhD student at University of Oxford, UK, had nothing to worry about. Neither he nor any of the 35 other people who participated in the ‘challenge’ trial actually got COVID-19.
When nobody developed a sustained infection, the researchers increased the dose by more and more in subsequent groups of participants, until they reached a level 10,000 times the initial dose.
I wonder why nobody got sick....
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01284-1
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
It turned out that Zimmer-Harwood, a PhD student at University of Oxford, UK, had nothing to worry about. Neither he nor any of the 35 other people who participated in the ‘challenge’ trial actually got COVID-19.
When nobody developed a sustained infection, the researchers increased the dose by more and more in subsequent groups of participants, until they reached a level 10,000 times the initial dose.
I wonder why nobody got sick....
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01284-1
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Nature
Scientists tried to give people COVID — and failed
Nature - Researchers deliberately infect participants with SARS-CoV-2 in ‘challenge’ trials — but high levels of immunity complicate efforts to test vaccines and treatments.
👍57😁20❤12🤔4🔥2👎1
What doesn't cause disease;
- Inflammation
- Oxidative stress
- Cholesterol
- Saturated fat
- Eating real food
- Elevated blood sugar
- Elevated blood pressure
- Leaky gut
- Dysbiosis
- Obesity
- Antibodies
- Hormonal imbalances
- Neurochemical imbalances
- Signs & symptoms
- Bad genes
- Mould
- Parasites
- Bacteria
- Viruses
What does cause disease;
- Toxins
- Poisons
- Emotional trauma
- Physical trauma
- Junk food
- Chronic dehydration
- Being disconnected from nature
- Being sedentary
- Living in fear
- Living without purpose
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
- Inflammation
- Oxidative stress
- Cholesterol
- Saturated fat
- Eating real food
- Elevated blood sugar
- Elevated blood pressure
- Leaky gut
- Dysbiosis
- Obesity
- Antibodies
- Hormonal imbalances
- Neurochemical imbalances
- Signs & symptoms
- Bad genes
- Mould
- Parasites
- Bacteria
- Viruses
What does cause disease;
- Toxins
- Poisons
- Emotional trauma
- Physical trauma
- Junk food
- Chronic dehydration
- Being disconnected from nature
- Being sedentary
- Living in fear
- Living without purpose
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
🔥98👍42❤39👏11👎2
French philosopher Jean-Jacque Rousseau wrote this back in 1755.
When living in harmony with nature, humans are largely free of disease.
Nature doesn't do disease, Western society does.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
When living in harmony with nature, humans are largely free of disease.
Nature doesn't do disease, Western society does.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
🔥50👍34❤17👏6👎2
When humans live in harmony with nature, they are free from disease. This means disease is a consequence of modern society.
"The people live a very long time here, they do not become ill; they never catch plague; nor suffer from respiratory disorders; they die just for natural reasons".
Amerigo Vespucci (Explorer) – 1502
“It is rare to hear of a sick person, they never saw any of the natives, either paralytic, bleareyed, toothless, or crooked with age”.
Michel de Montaigne (Philosopher) – 1580
“Before foreigners came, there were no fatal diseases, no epidemics, no contagious diseases, no diseases that eat away at the body, and no venereal diseases".
Sameul Kamakau (Historian) – 1870
“Native American people simply did not very often die from illness before the Europeans came”.
Henry Dobyns (Anthropologist) – 1983
“The North American natives were remarkably free of serious diseases before the Europeans and Africans arrived”.
Russel Thornton (Anthropologist) - 1987
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
"The people live a very long time here, they do not become ill; they never catch plague; nor suffer from respiratory disorders; they die just for natural reasons".
Amerigo Vespucci (Explorer) – 1502
“It is rare to hear of a sick person, they never saw any of the natives, either paralytic, bleareyed, toothless, or crooked with age”.
Michel de Montaigne (Philosopher) – 1580
“Before foreigners came, there were no fatal diseases, no epidemics, no contagious diseases, no diseases that eat away at the body, and no venereal diseases".
Sameul Kamakau (Historian) – 1870
“Native American people simply did not very often die from illness before the Europeans came”.
Henry Dobyns (Anthropologist) – 1983
“The North American natives were remarkably free of serious diseases before the Europeans and Africans arrived”.
Russel Thornton (Anthropologist) - 1987
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍46❤18👏7🔥4
My latest interview with Brendan D. Murphy on truthiverse.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqTTNxz4b0Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqTTNxz4b0Q
YouTube
The Return to Health Wisdom and Truth in Medicine With Daniel Roytas
Leading health educator and author Daniel Roytas joins Brendan to discuss his journey from being a naturopath and nutritionist to quitting his job as a lecturer and swinging a wrecking ball through established health dogma.
Daniel elucidates the mistakes…
Daniel elucidates the mistakes…
👍32❤14
Does inflammation cause disease?
If inflammation causes disease, this means that a completely healthy person can be walking down the street, minding their own business, then from out of nowhere 'inflammation' floods the body with the sole purpose of destroying healthy tissue.
Does anybody truly believe this, or are people simply confused about what's really going on?
Inflammation is the body's healing response. It's not the cause of disease. Tissue damage (caused by negative external inputs - i.e. toxins, poisons, physical trauma etc) occurs first. The body responds to this damage by mounting an inflammatory response (i.e. healing). People see tissue damage and inflammation in the same place, and come to an erroneous conclusion that inflammation must be the cause.
Talk about putting the horse before the cart.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Image attribution
If inflammation causes disease, this means that a completely healthy person can be walking down the street, minding their own business, then from out of nowhere 'inflammation' floods the body with the sole purpose of destroying healthy tissue.
Does anybody truly believe this, or are people simply confused about what's really going on?
Inflammation is the body's healing response. It's not the cause of disease. Tissue damage (caused by negative external inputs - i.e. toxins, poisons, physical trauma etc) occurs first. The body responds to this damage by mounting an inflammatory response (i.e. healing). People see tissue damage and inflammation in the same place, and come to an erroneous conclusion that inflammation must be the cause.
Talk about putting the horse before the cart.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Image attribution
👍83❤25🔥10👎2
The truth about inflammation, is that it is a conservative and regenerative process.
Inflammation is not the enemy, it's the body's healing response.
It's not out to harm you, or cause disease. It's there to repair the damage done to tissue from a harmful external input.
The tissue damage happens FIRST, followed by the inflammatory response (i.e. healing response).
Tissue damage (cause). Inflammation (effect).
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Inflammation is not the enemy, it's the body's healing response.
It's not out to harm you, or cause disease. It's there to repair the damage done to tissue from a harmful external input.
The tissue damage happens FIRST, followed by the inflammatory response (i.e. healing response).
Tissue damage (cause). Inflammation (effect).
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
❤50👍38🔥17
The Bean People of Sonora
The O’odham people thrived in the harsh climate of the Sonoran desert for millennia. Spanish explorers nicknamed them the Papago, or “bean people”, because their diet consisted primarily of mesquite beans, ironwood seeds, palo verde pods, acacia pods, red, white and yellow tepary beans, and lima beans. They also ate acorns, prickly pear cactus, and cholla buds. When Europeans made contact with the O’odham, they described them as exceptionally healthy and physically fit people.
If plants cause disease, how were the O’odham able to consume a wide range of vegetation, whilst maintaining an exceptional standard of health?
Maybe the simple answer is, eating plants doesn’t cause disease.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
The O’odham people thrived in the harsh climate of the Sonoran desert for millennia. Spanish explorers nicknamed them the Papago, or “bean people”, because their diet consisted primarily of mesquite beans, ironwood seeds, palo verde pods, acacia pods, red, white and yellow tepary beans, and lima beans. They also ate acorns, prickly pear cactus, and cholla buds. When Europeans made contact with the O’odham, they described them as exceptionally healthy and physically fit people.
If plants cause disease, how were the O’odham able to consume a wide range of vegetation, whilst maintaining an exceptional standard of health?
Maybe the simple answer is, eating plants doesn’t cause disease.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍55❤20🔥11🤔1
What really happened during the Spanish Flu?
We are told that the H1N1 virus swept across the world, but was something else going on?
The symptoms of the Spanish Flu included;
- Coughing up blood
- Shortness of breath
- Right-sided heart failure
- Fluid accumulation in the lungs
- Body odour of musty hay, or straw
- Purplish-black skin discoloration (heliotrope cyanosis)
These symptoms are exactly the same as phosgene gas poisoning, a chemical warfare agent used during WWI. The damage to the body was so similar, that during autopsies, pathologists could not tell the difference between gas victims and those who had died of the flu.
Interestingly, the military and media outlets published reports of enemy spies deploying canisters of ‘flu germs’ in the streets, shopping centers, and cinemas of major cities. Were they really using ‘germs’ or something far more insidious?
All of this and much more is discussed in my new book Can You Catch A Cold?
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Image source
We are told that the H1N1 virus swept across the world, but was something else going on?
The symptoms of the Spanish Flu included;
- Coughing up blood
- Shortness of breath
- Right-sided heart failure
- Fluid accumulation in the lungs
- Body odour of musty hay, or straw
- Purplish-black skin discoloration (heliotrope cyanosis)
These symptoms are exactly the same as phosgene gas poisoning, a chemical warfare agent used during WWI. The damage to the body was so similar, that during autopsies, pathologists could not tell the difference between gas victims and those who had died of the flu.
Interestingly, the military and media outlets published reports of enemy spies deploying canisters of ‘flu germs’ in the streets, shopping centers, and cinemas of major cities. Were they really using ‘germs’ or something far more insidious?
All of this and much more is discussed in my new book Can You Catch A Cold?
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Image source
👍65❤26🔥15🤯12
My latest podcast about my new book Can You Catch A Cold? has just been over on Jerm Warfare.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍31❤5👎1
Forwarded from Battleground (Jerm)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Can you catch a cold from somebody?
No.
There is no evidence of a cold being a viral contagion.
Become a member for the full conversation: https://jermwarfare.com/join-our-tribe
No.
There is no evidence of a cold being a viral contagion.
Become a member for the full conversation: https://jermwarfare.com/join-our-tribe
❤48👍26🔥6🤩6👎1
Hi everyone,
This is a friendly reminder that this forum is a place for people to engage in an open and honest discussion about health. We welcome all kinds of differing opinions and perspectives. Name calling, personal attacks, ad-hominem attacks, abusive behaviour, verbal abuse, insults, or any other kind of derogatory behaviour will not be tolerated.
Whilst the overwhelming majority of people do the right thing there are a few who choose to act in an unacceptable manner. There is zero tolerance for this kind of behaviour and it will result in the immediate and permanent removal from the forum.
Thank you to everyone who continues to engage cordially.
Dan
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
This is a friendly reminder that this forum is a place for people to engage in an open and honest discussion about health. We welcome all kinds of differing opinions and perspectives. Name calling, personal attacks, ad-hominem attacks, abusive behaviour, verbal abuse, insults, or any other kind of derogatory behaviour will not be tolerated.
Whilst the overwhelming majority of people do the right thing there are a few who choose to act in an unacceptable manner. There is zero tolerance for this kind of behaviour and it will result in the immediate and permanent removal from the forum.
Thank you to everyone who continues to engage cordially.
Dan
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍125❤57🔥8👏3👎2
What’s that smell?
The ‘mouldy odour’ in damp, water damaged buildings, might not be due to the mould itself, but from the aerosolization of toxic chemicals present in construction material. For example, chloroanisoles, a group of toxic chemicals used as a timber preservative, are converted into chlorophenols in the presence of dampness and mould. Chlorophenols are level 1 carcinogens, they cause acute intoxication in humans, and give off a characteristic ‘mouldy odour’. Exposure to these chemicals results in symptoms that resemble mould related illness.
A recent 2024 study concluded that the adverse health effects of these toxic substances has been confused with mould exposure. They also stated that ambiguous and misleading terms such as “sick building syndrome” and “dampness and mould” should be avoided, as they neglect or obscure more important hazards such as exposure to harmful man-made chemicals.
Mould isn't the problem, it's the toxic building material.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
The ‘mouldy odour’ in damp, water damaged buildings, might not be due to the mould itself, but from the aerosolization of toxic chemicals present in construction material. For example, chloroanisoles, a group of toxic chemicals used as a timber preservative, are converted into chlorophenols in the presence of dampness and mould. Chlorophenols are level 1 carcinogens, they cause acute intoxication in humans, and give off a characteristic ‘mouldy odour’. Exposure to these chemicals results in symptoms that resemble mould related illness.
A recent 2024 study concluded that the adverse health effects of these toxic substances has been confused with mould exposure. They also stated that ambiguous and misleading terms such as “sick building syndrome” and “dampness and mould” should be avoided, as they neglect or obscure more important hazards such as exposure to harmful man-made chemicals.
Mould isn't the problem, it's the toxic building material.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍85🔥27❤13👏11🤯1
Episode 77: Paul Hellier - Waking Up
In this Episode, the Fair Food Forager, Paul Hellier, joins me to talk about his journey that led him to wake up to what's really going on in this world. We cover a range of topics including censorship, media mind manipulation, government overreach, the broken political system, the systematic destruction of democracy, easy-parenting, escaping the matrix, getting back to basics, and becoming empowered.
https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode77
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
In this Episode, the Fair Food Forager, Paul Hellier, joins me to talk about his journey that led him to wake up to what's really going on in this world. We cover a range of topics including censorship, media mind manipulation, government overreach, the broken political system, the systematic destruction of democracy, easy-parenting, escaping the matrix, getting back to basics, and becoming empowered.
https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode77
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Humanley
Welcome to Humanley. Simplifying Health.
Humanley is revolutionising health by getting back to basics. Learn about health & wellness via our blog, podcast, webinars & short courses.
❤23👏11🔥1
In 1845, the Royal Society of Medicine held an enquiry into influenza. They found that pandemics spread East to West, irrespective of which direction the prevailing winds blew. Even when the winds came from the West, the direction of spread remained unaffected.
In 1951, the Royal Society held another committee on influenza. In relation to the East to West phenomenon, Dr. Edgar Hope Simpson said, “The spread of influenza is roughly geographical, and not as one would expect along the lines of communication”.
If influenza is contagious, then the pattern of spread should reflect human social behaviour. That is, pandemics should have an epicenter and spread outwards in all directions. Curiously, every major pandemic in history has dispersed in an East to West direction. This environmental trend is incompatible with the theory of contagion.
If influenza is indeed communicable why would it follow a preferred direction of travel?
Can You Catch A Cold? - Out Now!
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
In 1951, the Royal Society held another committee on influenza. In relation to the East to West phenomenon, Dr. Edgar Hope Simpson said, “The spread of influenza is roughly geographical, and not as one would expect along the lines of communication”.
If influenza is contagious, then the pattern of spread should reflect human social behaviour. That is, pandemics should have an epicenter and spread outwards in all directions. Curiously, every major pandemic in history has dispersed in an East to West direction. This environmental trend is incompatible with the theory of contagion.
If influenza is indeed communicable why would it follow a preferred direction of travel?
Can You Catch A Cold? - Out Now!
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍69🔥11❤5😁4🤯2
eBook Out Now!
Just a few short months ago, the paperback and hardcover versions of "Can You Catch A Cold?" were released on Amazon. The book quickly shot up the charts, peaking at #1 across all three categories (virology, viral diseases, and communicable diseases), as well as reaching the top 1,000 on Amazon U.S and the top 100 on Amazon Australia. It's incredibly heartening to know there are so many people out there who are searching for an answer to this age old question.
Due to popular demand, "Can You Catch A Cold?" is now available worldwide as a Kindle eBook on Amazon.
Amazon U.S
Amazon UK
Amazon Canada
Amazon Australia
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
The paperback, hardcover, and eBook versions book will be available through Lulu soon. This is taking much longer than expected, but it is coming!
Thank you to everyone for your continued support.
Dan
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Just a few short months ago, the paperback and hardcover versions of "Can You Catch A Cold?" were released on Amazon. The book quickly shot up the charts, peaking at #1 across all three categories (virology, viral diseases, and communicable diseases), as well as reaching the top 1,000 on Amazon U.S and the top 100 on Amazon Australia. It's incredibly heartening to know there are so many people out there who are searching for an answer to this age old question.
Due to popular demand, "Can You Catch A Cold?" is now available worldwide as a Kindle eBook on Amazon.
Amazon U.S
Amazon UK
Amazon Canada
Amazon Australia
Amazon Germany
Amazon France
The paperback, hardcover, and eBook versions book will be available through Lulu soon. This is taking much longer than expected, but it is coming!
Thank you to everyone for your continued support.
Dan
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
❤63👍35👏9
Here's a recent podcast I did with Jason and Victoria from Jab Rehab where we talk about viruses, contagion, the placebo and nocebo effect, what disease really is, what causes it, and how we can heal ourselves.
https://rumble.com/v4x9j4w-jab-rehab-014-can-you-catch-a-cold-with-daniel-roytas.html
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
https://rumble.com/v4x9j4w-jab-rehab-014-can-you-catch-a-cold-with-daniel-roytas.html
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Rumble
Jab Rehab 014 - Can you Catch a Cold? With Daniel Roytas
Dive into our latest episode with leading health expert Daniel Roytas, and uncover the profound significance of reclaiming your personal power and bodily health amidst a society teeming with misleadin
❤34👍17🔥3