Chicken pox parties, eat your heart out!

Part 1 of 2.

Between 1912-14, Dr Frederick Thomson & Dr Clifford Price conducted human experiments in a hospital setting to assess the contagious nature of chicken pox. They conducted 54 experiments which involved putting children with chicken pox into wards with 'healthy' children. They were not allowed any direct contact with each other. Of the 521 'healthy' children, 210 were considered ‘immune’ (40.3%) because they had contracted the disease previously, and 311 were considered non-immune (59.6%).

In just seven of the 54 experiments (12.9%) did a child become sick. Across these seven experiments, just 15 of the 521 children (2.8%) developed chicken pox. Of these, six were ‘non-immune’ (40%), one was ‘immune’ (6.6%), and the immune status of the remaining eight cases was not reported (53.3%).

Source1,2

Part 2 continued in the next post.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Chicken pox parties, eat your heart out!

Part 2 of 2.

In a second series of seven experiments, children with chicken pox were put into wards with healthy children. They were allowed direct contact with each other. Of the 130 healthy children, 61 were ‘immune’ (46.9%) and 69 were ‘non-immune’ (53%). None of the children (0%) developed chicken pox.

The results of these experiments are a major problem for the idea that chicken pox is a highly infectious and contagious childhood illness.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Imagine a world where scoundrels poison people's food. When the people become sick they are convinced by the very ones who tainted their food, that the food itself, not the poison, is to blame.

This is precisely what's happening every single day to billions of human beings. Our fruits and vegetables are being sprayed with poison (i.e. pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides). The maniacs who are poisoning us absolve themselves of guilt by blaming naturally occurring plant compounds like gluten, fructose, lectins, lignins, phytates, tannins, oxalates, histamines, and goitrogens.

The craziest thing about all of this is that most people believe the scoundrels twisted lies. Rather than dealing with the poison and the psychopaths, they wage war against their own food supply.

Wild.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Think about it.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

What You Were Never Told About Disease.

Most people are under the impression that disease is just ‘a part of life’, but nothing could be further from the truth. There is considerable historical and anthropological evidence that suggests at one point in time, humans lived out their lives completely free of disease.

In 1902, Lieutenant William Safford noted that the Chamorro people of Guam “were remarkably free from disease and physical defects, and lived to a great age”.

Anthropologist Charles Hill-tout stated in 1904, that before European contact, the Chehalis and Scowlitz natives of British Columbia had “sound and strong bodies, free from disease”.

In his 1839 report, John Seely Stone detailed the health of the inhabitants of the Pacific Islands, stating “These islands, like others in the Pacific, were inhabited, at the time of their discovery, by a people of loose and licentious manners, but free from disease”.

Colonist, William Wood, wrote in 1635, that the native Indians of New England “reached 50 years of age before a wrinkle or grey hair appeared”. They had “lusty and healthful bodies” and did not experience health-wasting diseases. It was not uncommon for them to live to a hundred years of age.

When the first fleet landed in Australia, the colonists documented that the native people were in good health and ‘free from disease’.

Given that native people across the world were in exceptional states of physical health, their diets could not have possibly been causing disease. So what were they eating? Their diets were determined by what was available in their environment and what was edible (which they had worked out through many centuries of trial and error). They consumed a wide variety of fresh plant and animal foods. They ate locally, seasonally, organically, sustainably, and mindfully.

There are many people out there who want to point towards this food or that food and claim that it is the cause of disease. However, what this evidence tells us, is that it’s not the food in our environment that is making us sick, but rather the adulteration of our food (i.e. monocrop farming, pesticide use, processing, refining, improper storage, food additives, etc), and the deviation away from traditional dietary practices (i.e. eating locally, seasonally, sustainably, mindfully, etc).

It's time to get back to basics.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Episode 75: Dr Jordan Grant & Jad Atik - Modern Day Witchcraft

https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode75

Is chemistry a true scientific discipline? Dr Jordan Grant & Jad Atik join me to take a deep dive into the issues plaguing the field of chemistry and science. What's really going on when chemists are mixing things together in laboratories? Are the foundations of chemistry based in science, or is it all smoke and mirrors? Is the discipline of chemistry scientific, or modern day witchcraft?

Dr Jordan Grant is a medical doctor who has specialised in urology. He has a keen interest in epistemology and critically appraising the discipline of science. Jad Atik has undergraduate and postgraduate qualifications in chemistry and worked in laboratories for many years. He now runs a school in the Dominican Republic called the Future Academy of Critical Thinking.

Visit the Future Academy of Critical Thinking website: https://www.factlasterrenas.com/

Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley

New Book Out Now - Can You Catch A Cold?: Untold History & Human Experiments

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Everything we have ever been told about disease, is a lie. It's time to reevaluate everything we think we know.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44256197

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Is that air you're breathing?

As I was coming into land in a major city in Southeast Asia the other day, I took some footage to show people just how bad the air quality is here. The PM2.5 level was approximately 130-150 ug/m3 (more than 20x the safe recommended level of 5 ug/m3).

Note that despite being just a few hundred meters up, the pollution is so thick, you can barely see the ground.

People breathe this toxic polluted soup day in day out, yet when they get a cold or flu, they blame their illness on a "virus" floating through the air, totally oblivious to what's right in front of their faces.

In early 2020, when people started complaining of respiratory distress in China, the PM2.5 was over 700 ug/m3. For context, breathing this air is like smoking two packs of cigarettes per day. Yet the health authorities totally disregarded this as a cause, opting to blame an airborne pathogen instead.

People can go months here without ever seeing a blue sky.

Wild.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Episode 76: Damien Richardson - Reconstructing Reality

https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode76

Australian actor Damien Richardson has been an outspoken critic of the pandemic response since 2020. In this podcast, we talk about Damien's perspectives on the current political climate in Australia, his personal experience during the pandemic, and his current speaking tour "Reconstructing Reality".

Visit Damien's website: https://damienrichardson.online

Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Secrets of the Microbiome

If you tested the bacterial profile of each of these five piles of compost, they would all be different. Why? Because the inputs (i.e. the environment or 'terrain') are different.

Each pile contains different types of organic matter, and has been exposed to different amounts of sunlight, air, and water. These inputs determine the microbial profile. The soil is not healthy or sick because of the bacteria. The bacteria are simply a reflection (i.e. consequence) of the inputs.

Similarly, your gut microbiome is determined entirely by inputs. The food you eat, the water you drink, the thoughts you think, the air you breathe, the exercise you do, and the sleep you get, all determine your bacterial profile.

It's a futile exercise to test the microbiome to work out why you are sick or why you are healthy because the bacteria are not the determining factor. The inputs are.

The germ is nothing, the terrain is everything.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Are herbs working because they suppress symptoms?

Some people assert that herbal medicines 'work' because they are toxic and simply suppress symptoms, like a drug.

There are several ways in which this claim can be shown to be incorrect. One such example is ‘wound healing’.

A number of experiments in humans and animals have shown that when used topically and/or internally herbal medicines result in;

1. Wounds healing faster and stronger
2. Improved tissue integrity
3. Reduced tissue death (i.e. necrosis)
4. Minimised 'infection' rates (because of the reduced tissue necrosis)
5. Reduced scar tissue formation

If herbs were simply working by ‘suppressing symptoms’, then they should result in slower and weaker healing, more scar tissue formation, and increased tissue necrosis, but this is not the case.

Plant medicines work by augmenting the body's innate repair mechanisms, not hindering it.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

How do you get away with spraying four billion tons of poison on to peoples food every single year?

Simply tell them them it’s the naturally occurring compounds inside the food making them sick, not the poison.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Nutrition has become so over-complicated, it's absurd.

Keep it simple.

- Eat a variety of whole, real food.
- Eat seasonally, locally, and fresh.
- Eat organic, biodynamic, or spray-free produce.
- Eat food that is grown sustainably, and regeneratively.
- Eat what your ancestors ate and prepare it the way they did.
- Create your meals with time, care, love, and attention.
- Enjoy your food mindfully, with the people you care about.

Everything else is noise.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

There seems to be a growing trend where people claim that 'plants are toxic', and blame them for all of humanity's modern health woes.

This claim is touted as fact, but is there any truth to it?

I was a carnivore for many years and parroted the same nonsense about plants until I started looking at the evidence for myself. I trawled through the literature looking for proof showing the consumption of plants in the diet 'causes disease'. After years of searching, I have found a grand total of nothing. That is, there are no scientific experiments demonstrating a cause-and-effect relationship between plants and disease.

Might there be some plants out there that are 'toxic', sure, but our ancestors worked out how to properly prepare these foods, and consume them as part of their staple diet, for hundreds, if not thousands of years, without consequence. Last time I checked, no one was walking around eating handfuls of raw fava beans.

If you believe that edible plants are toxic, and cause disease, it should be a relatively straightforward thing to prove.

1. Provide evidence showing that the consumption of an isolated compound (i.e. a lectin, lignan, oxalate, etc) causes a specific disease in humans.

Even if this evidence exists, it doesn't reflect natural dietary practices, so additional evidence to support the claim is required.

2. Provide evidence showing the consumption of a plant containing the above-mentioned compound, prepared properly, causes disease in humans.

No one will ever be able to do it? Why, because this evidence doesn't exist. Why doesn't it exist? Because the consumption of plants in the diet does not cause disease.

It would seem that people who spout this rhetoric, are simply telling a story devoid of sound logic and evidence.

It's high time we put an end to this woeful practice of blaming mother nature for our man-made problems. As long as we are spraying our food with poison, growing it in contaminated soil, deviating away from traditional agricultural practices and food preparation techniques, and adulterating the living crap out of our food, no one gets to point the finger at the plant.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Imagine someone goes to a butcher & buys a piece of steak. They take the steak home, cook it up, and feast on it, only to become ill soon after.

Obviously displeased, they go back to the butcher asking for an explanation.

Imagine the butcher admits that they are getting their meat from a new supplier who feeds their cows poison, & pumps the animals full of antibiotics & hormones. To top it off, the butcher sprays the steak with poison just before selling it. The butcher says not to worry because new research claims naturally occurring compounds in the meat, not the poison, are making people sick.

Would anyone in their right mind accept this explanation from the butcher? Would anyone believe this fantastical tale, or would they be outraged, demanding the butcher finds a new supplier & stops spraying poison on their food?

No one would accept this non-sensical story when it comes to meat, yet so many are willing to swallow it when it comes to plants.

We live in wild times.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Remember when science claimed eggs and red meat caused disease because of the cholesterol, saturated fat, and protein content?

Well no one believes that anymore...Why? It's not because those claims were ever disproven, but because they were never proven to begin with. A cause-and-effect relationship was never established. So-called 'scientists' simply parroted non-sense and the mindless masses gobbled it up.

It's now become trendy to blame plants as the cause of disease. But a critical thinker can see the exact same thing that happened to eggs and red meat is currently happening to plants. No cause-and-effect relationship has ever been established, yet people regurgitate this tripe as though it's a proven fact.

When are people going to realise nature is being used as a scapegoat for the true cause of disease?

Next year plants will fall out of the limelight, only to be replaced by something else, whilst the true causes of disease continue flying under the radar.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

When Paul Zimmer-Harwood volunteered to be intentionally infected with SARS-CoV-2, he wasn’t sure what to expect. He was ready for a repeat of his first brush with COVID-19, through a naturally acquired infection that gave him influenza-like symptoms. But he hoped his immunity would help him feel well enough to use the indoor bicycle trainer that he had brought into quarantine.

It turned out that Zimmer-Harwood, a PhD student at University of Oxford, UK, had nothing to worry about. Neither he nor any of the 35 other people who participated in the ‘challenge’ trial actually got COVID-19.

When nobody developed a sustained infection, the researchers increased the dose by more and more in subsequent groups of participants, until they reached a level 10,000 times the initial dose.

I wonder why nobody got sick....

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01284-1

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

What doesn't cause disease;

- Inflammation
- Oxidative stress
- Cholesterol
- Saturated fat
- Eating real food
- Elevated blood sugar
- Elevated blood pressure
- Leaky gut
- Dysbiosis
- Obesity
- Antibodies
- Hormonal imbalances
- Neurochemical imbalances
- Signs & symptoms
- Bad genes
- Mould
- Parasites
- Bacteria
- Viruses

What does cause disease;

- Toxins
- Poisons
- Emotional trauma
- Physical trauma
- Junk food
- Chronic dehydration
- Being disconnected from nature
- Being sedentary
- Living in fear
- Living without purpose

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

French philosopher Jean-Jacque Rousseau wrote this back in 1755.

When living in harmony with nature, humans are largely free of disease.

Nature doesn't do disease, Western society does.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

When humans live in harmony with nature, they are free from disease. This means disease is a consequence of modern society.

"The people live a very long time here, they do not become ill; they never catch plague; nor suffer from respiratory disorders; they die just for natural reasons".

Amerigo Vespucci (Explorer) – 1502

“It is rare to hear of a sick person, they never saw any of the natives, either paralytic, bleareyed, toothless, or crooked with age”.

Michel de Montaigne (Philosopher) – 1580

“Before foreigners came, there were no fatal diseases, no epidemics, no contagious diseases, no diseases that eat away at the body, and no venereal diseases".

Sameul Kamakau (Historian) – 1870

“Native American people simply did not very often die from illness before the Europeans came”.

Henry Dobyns (Anthropologist) – 1983

“The North American natives were remarkably free of serious diseases before the Europeans and Africans arrived”.

Russel Thornton (Anthropologist) - 1987

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley