Dr Sam and Mark Bailey have been instrumental in the development of my book Can You Catch A Cold? As many people are aware, Sam wrote an exceptional foreword and reviewed my work to ensure the accuracy of the information being presented. What many people might not be aware of though, are the countless hours Mark spent critiquing and editing the manuscript behind the scenes. I am forever grateful for their support and guidance. None of this would have been possible without them.
Their new book, The Final Pandemic, is out now.
Get your copy of Can You Catch A Cold? on Amazon.
Their new book, The Final Pandemic, is out now.
Get your copy of Can You Catch A Cold? on Amazon.
❤50👍20🔥6
Forwarded from Dr. Sam Bailey Official (Sam Bailey)
Dan Roytas: Can You Catch A Cold?
In 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 era, Daniel started questioning much of what he thought were scientific facts and embarked on a new phase of private research. He launched the Humanley platform and has featured discussions with many of the world's foremost heterodox thinkers in health and science.
As part of this journey he has just published an incredible new book titled "Can you catch a cold?". It is the culmination of several years of focussed research and takes its place as the most comprehensive account of human contagion experiments ever seen. This one-of-a-kind book is a must read and reveals many of the buried and inconvenient clinical experiments that go against germ theory and the mainstream claims.
👉 To watch my interview with Dan, click HERE.
In 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 era, Daniel started questioning much of what he thought were scientific facts and embarked on a new phase of private research. He launched the Humanley platform and has featured discussions with many of the world's foremost heterodox thinkers in health and science.
As part of this journey he has just published an incredible new book titled "Can you catch a cold?". It is the culmination of several years of focussed research and takes its place as the most comprehensive account of human contagion experiments ever seen. This one-of-a-kind book is a must read and reveals many of the buried and inconvenient clinical experiments that go against germ theory and the mainstream claims.
👉 To watch my interview with Dan, click HERE.
❤54👍23🔥7👏4
Reviews matter.
If you have purchased a copy of Can You Catch A Cold? and would like to leave a review on Amazon, simply click this link.
Reviews are important because they;
1. Allow readers to leave honest and constructive feedback.
2. Improve the visibility and reach of the book.
3. Inspire trust and confidence in potential readers
4. Improve and build a level of trust around the book.
5. Support authors and their work.
If you have a few minutes to spare, please consider reviewing Can You Catch A Cold? Your feedback is incredibly important.
Thank you to everyone who has ordered a copy. Your support means so much.
Dan
t.me/humanley
If you have purchased a copy of Can You Catch A Cold? and would like to leave a review on Amazon, simply click this link.
Reviews are important because they;
1. Allow readers to leave honest and constructive feedback.
2. Improve the visibility and reach of the book.
3. Inspire trust and confidence in potential readers
4. Improve and build a level of trust around the book.
5. Support authors and their work.
If you have a few minutes to spare, please consider reviewing Can You Catch A Cold? Your feedback is incredibly important.
Thank you to everyone who has ordered a copy. Your support means so much.
Dan
t.me/humanley
👍27❤8👎1
It seems like people really want an answer to the question, "Can You Catch A Cold?" The paperback continues to move up the charts on Amazon. As of this evening, it's sitting at #50 of all books on Amazon Australia and #1 in all three categories.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
❤76👍33🔥11👏7
Last night, Dr Tom Cowan gave a live presentation on his YouTube channel where he reviewed Can You Catch A Cold? He read through some of his favourite parts of the book and provided his thoughts on the points being discussed.
According to Dr Cowan, "This book is the most important work that I know of to put the nail in the coffin of the germ theory". He went on to say that he would "Love to read this in front of a group of 100,000 physicians and ask how many of them have ever heard this story in any of their medical training? Because he never did (hear this story), and it's clear evidence that the whole story of the germ theory has been disproven".
You can watch Dr Cowan's extensive review here.
Can You Catch A Cold? Out now on Amazon.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
According to Dr Cowan, "This book is the most important work that I know of to put the nail in the coffin of the germ theory". He went on to say that he would "Love to read this in front of a group of 100,000 physicians and ask how many of them have ever heard this story in any of their medical training? Because he never did (hear this story), and it's clear evidence that the whole story of the germ theory has been disproven".
You can watch Dr Cowan's extensive review here.
Can You Catch A Cold? Out now on Amazon.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
❤67👍21🔥18👏7
Safe & Effective.
Hot off the press from the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners website.
https://www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2024/april/long-covid-sufferers-can-take-heart
t.me/humanley
Hot off the press from the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners website.
https://www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2024/april/long-covid-sufferers-can-take-heart
t.me/humanley
🔥35👍13🤯2❤1
Why so much hate for oxalate?
People claim that plants are bad for health because they contain oxalates, however, this assertion is full of pitfalls.
Here are 10 reasons why it's time to rethink our relationship with oxalates.
1. There are no scientific papers published anywhere in the literature showing oxalates in foods cause disease.
2. Animal products like milk, eggs, and meat contain amino acids such as tyrosine, tryptophan, phenylalanine, glycine, and hydroxyproline. All of these yield oxalates when metabolised by the human body.
3. The majority of the total body concentration of oxalates (60-80%) is produced endogenously by the liver and gastrointestinal tract.
4. Metabolism of tissue derived amino acids account for up to 40% of the total body oxalate concentration, whilst metabolism of tissue derived carbohydrates and fat account for the other 20-40%.
5. Just 20-40% of the total body oxalate concentrations come directly from exogenous sources (i.e. the diet, air inhalation, skin absorption).
6. Dietary sources of oxalates have a limited impact on total body concentrations. Only 10-15% of ingested oxalates are absorbed by the gut.
7. Gut bacteria break down and reduce dietary oxalate absorption by 40%.
8. Your genetic material (i.e. RNA) requires oxalates for its formation.
9. Plants produce oxalates in response to poisoning from synthetic chemical fertilisers and heavy metals. Oxalates also assist with phytoremediation of the soil from these toxic substances.
10. Man-made air pollution produces oxalic acid, which is absorbed via the skin and lungs. Large quantities of oxalic acid are also believed to be released into the atmosphere by the world ocean's.
Given this information, why are we pointing our finger at plants?
Sources1,2,3,4
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
People claim that plants are bad for health because they contain oxalates, however, this assertion is full of pitfalls.
Here are 10 reasons why it's time to rethink our relationship with oxalates.
1. There are no scientific papers published anywhere in the literature showing oxalates in foods cause disease.
2. Animal products like milk, eggs, and meat contain amino acids such as tyrosine, tryptophan, phenylalanine, glycine, and hydroxyproline. All of these yield oxalates when metabolised by the human body.
3. The majority of the total body concentration of oxalates (60-80%) is produced endogenously by the liver and gastrointestinal tract.
4. Metabolism of tissue derived amino acids account for up to 40% of the total body oxalate concentration, whilst metabolism of tissue derived carbohydrates and fat account for the other 20-40%.
5. Just 20-40% of the total body oxalate concentrations come directly from exogenous sources (i.e. the diet, air inhalation, skin absorption).
6. Dietary sources of oxalates have a limited impact on total body concentrations. Only 10-15% of ingested oxalates are absorbed by the gut.
7. Gut bacteria break down and reduce dietary oxalate absorption by 40%.
8. Your genetic material (i.e. RNA) requires oxalates for its formation.
9. Plants produce oxalates in response to poisoning from synthetic chemical fertilisers and heavy metals. Oxalates also assist with phytoremediation of the soil from these toxic substances.
10. Man-made air pollution produces oxalic acid, which is absorbed via the skin and lungs. Large quantities of oxalic acid are also believed to be released into the atmosphere by the world ocean's.
Given this information, why are we pointing our finger at plants?
Sources1,2,3,4
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
MDPI
Oxalate Homeostasis in Non-Stone-Forming Chronic Kidney Disease: A Review of Key Findings and Perspectives
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant global public health concern associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The maintenance of oxalate homeostasis plays a critical role in preserving kidney health, particularly in the context of CKD. Although…
❤34👍28🔥17👎2
Chicken pox parties, eat your heart out!
Part 1 of 2.
Between 1912-14, Dr Frederick Thomson & Dr Clifford Price conducted human experiments in a hospital setting to assess the contagious nature of chicken pox. They conducted 54 experiments which involved putting children with chicken pox into wards with 'healthy' children. They were not allowed any direct contact with each other. Of the 521 'healthy' children, 210 were considered ‘immune’ (40.3%) because they had contracted the disease previously, and 311 were considered non-immune (59.6%).
In just seven of the 54 experiments (12.9%) did a child become sick. Across these seven experiments, just 15 of the 521 children (2.8%) developed chicken pox. Of these, six were ‘non-immune’ (40%), one was ‘immune’ (6.6%), and the immune status of the remaining eight cases was not reported (53.3%).
Source1,2
Part 2 continued in the next post.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Part 1 of 2.
Between 1912-14, Dr Frederick Thomson & Dr Clifford Price conducted human experiments in a hospital setting to assess the contagious nature of chicken pox. They conducted 54 experiments which involved putting children with chicken pox into wards with 'healthy' children. They were not allowed any direct contact with each other. Of the 521 'healthy' children, 210 were considered ‘immune’ (40.3%) because they had contracted the disease previously, and 311 were considered non-immune (59.6%).
In just seven of the 54 experiments (12.9%) did a child become sick. Across these seven experiments, just 15 of the 521 children (2.8%) developed chicken pox. Of these, six were ‘non-immune’ (40%), one was ‘immune’ (6.6%), and the immune status of the remaining eight cases was not reported (53.3%).
Source1,2
Part 2 continued in the next post.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
❤40👍12🔥10👎2
Chicken pox parties, eat your heart out!
Part 2 of 2.
In a second series of seven experiments, children with chicken pox were put into wards with healthy children. They were allowed direct contact with each other. Of the 130 healthy children, 61 were ‘immune’ (46.9%) and 69 were ‘non-immune’ (53%). None of the children (0%) developed chicken pox.
The results of these experiments are a major problem for the idea that chicken pox is a highly infectious and contagious childhood illness.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Part 2 of 2.
In a second series of seven experiments, children with chicken pox were put into wards with healthy children. They were allowed direct contact with each other. Of the 130 healthy children, 61 were ‘immune’ (46.9%) and 69 were ‘non-immune’ (53%). None of the children (0%) developed chicken pox.
The results of these experiments are a major problem for the idea that chicken pox is a highly infectious and contagious childhood illness.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
❤47🔥28👍24👎2
Imagine a world where scoundrels poison people's food. When the people become sick they are convinced by the very ones who tainted their food, that the food itself, not the poison, is to blame.
This is precisely what's happening every single day to billions of human beings. Our fruits and vegetables are being sprayed with poison (i.e. pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides). The maniacs who are poisoning us absolve themselves of guilt by blaming naturally occurring plant compounds like gluten, fructose, lectins, lignins, phytates, tannins, oxalates, histamines, and goitrogens.
The craziest thing about all of this is that most people believe the scoundrels twisted lies. Rather than dealing with the poison and the psychopaths, they wage war against their own food supply.
Wild.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
This is precisely what's happening every single day to billions of human beings. Our fruits and vegetables are being sprayed with poison (i.e. pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides). The maniacs who are poisoning us absolve themselves of guilt by blaming naturally occurring plant compounds like gluten, fructose, lectins, lignins, phytates, tannins, oxalates, histamines, and goitrogens.
The craziest thing about all of this is that most people believe the scoundrels twisted lies. Rather than dealing with the poison and the psychopaths, they wage war against their own food supply.
Wild.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
🔥81👍46❤10👏4👎2😁1
What You Were Never Told About Disease.
Most people are under the impression that disease is just ‘a part of life’, but nothing could be further from the truth. There is considerable historical and anthropological evidence that suggests at one point in time, humans lived out their lives completely free of disease.
In 1902, Lieutenant William Safford noted that the Chamorro people of Guam “were remarkably free from disease and physical defects, and lived to a great age”.
Anthropologist Charles Hill-tout stated in 1904, that before European contact, the Chehalis and Scowlitz natives of British Columbia had “sound and strong bodies, free from disease”.
In his 1839 report, John Seely Stone detailed the health of the inhabitants of the Pacific Islands, stating “These islands, like others in the Pacific, were inhabited, at the time of their discovery, by a people of loose and licentious manners, but free from disease”.
Colonist, William Wood, wrote in 1635, that the native Indians of New England “reached 50 years of age before a wrinkle or grey hair appeared”. They had “lusty and healthful bodies” and did not experience health-wasting diseases. It was not uncommon for them to live to a hundred years of age.
When the first fleet landed in Australia, the colonists documented that the native people were in good health and ‘free from disease’.
Given that native people across the world were in exceptional states of physical health, their diets could not have possibly been causing disease. So what were they eating? Their diets were determined by what was available in their environment and what was edible (which they had worked out through many centuries of trial and error). They consumed a wide variety of fresh plant and animal foods. They ate locally, seasonally, organically, sustainably, and mindfully.
There are many people out there who want to point towards this food or that food and claim that it is the cause of disease. However, what this evidence tells us, is that it’s not the food in our environment that is making us sick, but rather the adulteration of our food (i.e. monocrop farming, pesticide use, processing, refining, improper storage, food additives, etc), and the deviation away from traditional dietary practices (i.e. eating locally, seasonally, sustainably, mindfully, etc).
It's time to get back to basics.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Most people are under the impression that disease is just ‘a part of life’, but nothing could be further from the truth. There is considerable historical and anthropological evidence that suggests at one point in time, humans lived out their lives completely free of disease.
In 1902, Lieutenant William Safford noted that the Chamorro people of Guam “were remarkably free from disease and physical defects, and lived to a great age”.
Anthropologist Charles Hill-tout stated in 1904, that before European contact, the Chehalis and Scowlitz natives of British Columbia had “sound and strong bodies, free from disease”.
In his 1839 report, John Seely Stone detailed the health of the inhabitants of the Pacific Islands, stating “These islands, like others in the Pacific, were inhabited, at the time of their discovery, by a people of loose and licentious manners, but free from disease”.
Colonist, William Wood, wrote in 1635, that the native Indians of New England “reached 50 years of age before a wrinkle or grey hair appeared”. They had “lusty and healthful bodies” and did not experience health-wasting diseases. It was not uncommon for them to live to a hundred years of age.
When the first fleet landed in Australia, the colonists documented that the native people were in good health and ‘free from disease’.
Given that native people across the world were in exceptional states of physical health, their diets could not have possibly been causing disease. So what were they eating? Their diets were determined by what was available in their environment and what was edible (which they had worked out through many centuries of trial and error). They consumed a wide variety of fresh plant and animal foods. They ate locally, seasonally, organically, sustainably, and mindfully.
There are many people out there who want to point towards this food or that food and claim that it is the cause of disease. However, what this evidence tells us, is that it’s not the food in our environment that is making us sick, but rather the adulteration of our food (i.e. monocrop farming, pesticide use, processing, refining, improper storage, food additives, etc), and the deviation away from traditional dietary practices (i.e. eating locally, seasonally, sustainably, mindfully, etc).
It's time to get back to basics.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
www.jstor.org
Guam and Its People on JSTOR
W. E. Safford, Guam and Its People, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1902), pp. 707-729
❤94👍40🔥22👏7🥰1
Episode 75: Dr Jordan Grant & Jad Atik - Modern Day Witchcraft
https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode75
Is chemistry a true scientific discipline? Dr Jordan Grant & Jad Atik join me to take a deep dive into the issues plaguing the field of chemistry and science. What's really going on when chemists are mixing things together in laboratories? Are the foundations of chemistry based in science, or is it all smoke and mirrors? Is the discipline of chemistry scientific, or modern day witchcraft?
Dr Jordan Grant is a medical doctor who has specialised in urology. He has a keen interest in epistemology and critically appraising the discipline of science. Jad Atik has undergraduate and postgraduate qualifications in chemistry and worked in laboratories for many years. He now runs a school in the Dominican Republic called the Future Academy of Critical Thinking.
Visit the Future Academy of Critical Thinking website: https://www.factlasterrenas.com/
Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley
New Book Out Now - Can You Catch A Cold?: Untold History & Human Experiments
https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode75
Is chemistry a true scientific discipline? Dr Jordan Grant & Jad Atik join me to take a deep dive into the issues plaguing the field of chemistry and science. What's really going on when chemists are mixing things together in laboratories? Are the foundations of chemistry based in science, or is it all smoke and mirrors? Is the discipline of chemistry scientific, or modern day witchcraft?
Dr Jordan Grant is a medical doctor who has specialised in urology. He has a keen interest in epistemology and critically appraising the discipline of science. Jad Atik has undergraduate and postgraduate qualifications in chemistry and worked in laboratories for many years. He now runs a school in the Dominican Republic called the Future Academy of Critical Thinking.
Visit the Future Academy of Critical Thinking website: https://www.factlasterrenas.com/
Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley
New Book Out Now - Can You Catch A Cold?: Untold History & Human Experiments
Humanley
Welcome to Humanley. Simplifying Health.
Humanley is revolutionising health by getting back to basics. Learn about health & wellness via our blog, podcast, webinars & short courses.
👍39❤24🔥1👏1
Everything we have ever been told about disease, is a lie. It's time to reevaluate everything we think we know.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44256197
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44256197
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍58❤29🔥18
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Is that air you're breathing?
As I was coming into land in a major city in Southeast Asia the other day, I took some footage to show people just how bad the air quality is here. The PM2.5 level was approximately 130-150 ug/m3 (more than 20x the safe recommended level of 5 ug/m3).
Note that despite being just a few hundred meters up, the pollution is so thick, you can barely see the ground.
People breathe this toxic polluted soup day in day out, yet when they get a cold or flu, they blame their illness on a "virus" floating through the air, totally oblivious to what's right in front of their faces.
In early 2020, when people started complaining of respiratory distress in China, the PM2.5 was over 700 ug/m3. For context, breathing this air is like smoking two packs of cigarettes per day. Yet the health authorities totally disregarded this as a cause, opting to blame an airborne pathogen instead.
People can go months here without ever seeing a blue sky.
Wild.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
As I was coming into land in a major city in Southeast Asia the other day, I took some footage to show people just how bad the air quality is here. The PM2.5 level was approximately 130-150 ug/m3 (more than 20x the safe recommended level of 5 ug/m3).
Note that despite being just a few hundred meters up, the pollution is so thick, you can barely see the ground.
People breathe this toxic polluted soup day in day out, yet when they get a cold or flu, they blame their illness on a "virus" floating through the air, totally oblivious to what's right in front of their faces.
In early 2020, when people started complaining of respiratory distress in China, the PM2.5 was over 700 ug/m3. For context, breathing this air is like smoking two packs of cigarettes per day. Yet the health authorities totally disregarded this as a cause, opting to blame an airborne pathogen instead.
People can go months here without ever seeing a blue sky.
Wild.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
🔥42👍26🤯20❤11
Episode 76: Damien Richardson - Reconstructing Reality
https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode76
Australian actor Damien Richardson has been an outspoken critic of the pandemic response since 2020. In this podcast, we talk about Damien's perspectives on the current political climate in Australia, his personal experience during the pandemic, and his current speaking tour "Reconstructing Reality".
Visit Damien's website: https://damienrichardson.online
Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley
https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode76
Australian actor Damien Richardson has been an outspoken critic of the pandemic response since 2020. In this podcast, we talk about Damien's perspectives on the current political climate in Australia, his personal experience during the pandemic, and his current speaking tour "Reconstructing Reality".
Visit Damien's website: https://damienrichardson.online
Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley
Humanley
Welcome to Humanley. Simplifying Health.
Humanley is revolutionising health by getting back to basics. Learn about health & wellness via our blog, podcast, webinars & short courses.
👍22❤5🔥3
Secrets of the Microbiome
If you tested the bacterial profile of each of these five piles of compost, they would all be different. Why? Because the inputs (i.e. the environment or 'terrain') are different.
Each pile contains different types of organic matter, and has been exposed to different amounts of sunlight, air, and water. These inputs determine the microbial profile. The soil is not healthy or sick because of the bacteria. The bacteria are simply a reflection (i.e. consequence) of the inputs.
Similarly, your gut microbiome is determined entirely by inputs. The food you eat, the water you drink, the thoughts you think, the air you breathe, the exercise you do, and the sleep you get, all determine your bacterial profile.
It's a futile exercise to test the microbiome to work out why you are sick or why you are healthy because the bacteria are not the determining factor. The inputs are.
The germ is nothing, the terrain is everything.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
If you tested the bacterial profile of each of these five piles of compost, they would all be different. Why? Because the inputs (i.e. the environment or 'terrain') are different.
Each pile contains different types of organic matter, and has been exposed to different amounts of sunlight, air, and water. These inputs determine the microbial profile. The soil is not healthy or sick because of the bacteria. The bacteria are simply a reflection (i.e. consequence) of the inputs.
Similarly, your gut microbiome is determined entirely by inputs. The food you eat, the water you drink, the thoughts you think, the air you breathe, the exercise you do, and the sleep you get, all determine your bacterial profile.
It's a futile exercise to test the microbiome to work out why you are sick or why you are healthy because the bacteria are not the determining factor. The inputs are.
The germ is nothing, the terrain is everything.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
❤99👍45🔥23👏11🤔2
Are herbs working because they suppress symptoms?
Some people assert that herbal medicines 'work' because they are toxic and simply suppress symptoms, like a drug.
There are several ways in which this claim can be shown to be incorrect. One such example is ‘wound healing’.
A number of experiments in humans and animals have shown that when used topically and/or internally herbal medicines result in;
1. Wounds healing faster and stronger
2. Improved tissue integrity
3. Reduced tissue death (i.e. necrosis)
4. Minimised 'infection' rates (because of the reduced tissue necrosis)
5. Reduced scar tissue formation
If herbs were simply working by ‘suppressing symptoms’, then they should result in slower and weaker healing, more scar tissue formation, and increased tissue necrosis, but this is not the case.
Plant medicines work by augmenting the body's innate repair mechanisms, not hindering it.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Some people assert that herbal medicines 'work' because they are toxic and simply suppress symptoms, like a drug.
There are several ways in which this claim can be shown to be incorrect. One such example is ‘wound healing’.
A number of experiments in humans and animals have shown that when used topically and/or internally herbal medicines result in;
1. Wounds healing faster and stronger
2. Improved tissue integrity
3. Reduced tissue death (i.e. necrosis)
4. Minimised 'infection' rates (because of the reduced tissue necrosis)
5. Reduced scar tissue formation
If herbs were simply working by ‘suppressing symptoms’, then they should result in slower and weaker healing, more scar tissue formation, and increased tissue necrosis, but this is not the case.
Plant medicines work by augmenting the body's innate repair mechanisms, not hindering it.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
❤86👍40🔥12👏2🤩1
How do you get away with spraying four billion tons of poison on to peoples food every single year?
Simply tell them them it’s the naturally occurring compounds inside the food making them sick, not the poison.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Simply tell them them it’s the naturally occurring compounds inside the food making them sick, not the poison.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
🔥63👍27🤯8😁4