Is sepsis caused by bacteria?

It seems as though there were medical experiments undertaken in the late 1800's which demonstrated sepsis could be caused via the injection of sterile solutions - disproving the theory that sepsis is caused by bacteria.

Is this true, or were these doctors mistaken? If they're mistaken, please refer me to the scientific paper demonstrating sepsis is caused by bacteria.

Thank you.

Source

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Published in the British Medical Journal in 1861, around the time of the inception of germ theory.

Source

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Did you know Humanley has a free webinar library?

There are 7 video presentations and almost 20 hours of content.

Sign up for free to get access to all of this information.

https://www.humanley.com/free-library

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Have you heard people talking about the germ theory + terrain theory duality? There is this notion there are pathogenic microorganisms that can cause disease if your 'terrain isn't healthy'.

What do you think? Are both terrain and the germ theory valid, or is it just one or the other?

*Note* I do not agree with most of the points in this table, it has been forwarded from another page.

Follow Humanley t.me/humanley

Mustard gas medicine!

In World War I, doctors noticed mustard gas destroyed the lymphatic tissue and bone marrow of soldiers after they were poisoned with the chemical warfare agent on the battlefield.

Doctors thought it would be a fantastic idea to re-invent mustard gas as a medicine. They rebranded it chemotherapy and to this day, it is still injected into peoples veins to 'treat' various forms of cancer.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325736/

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Was the Spanish flu just the seasonal flu in disguise?

At the height of the Spanish Influenza pandemic in 1918, medicine manufacturers like Vick's VapoRub stated that the Spanish flu was simply the seasonal flu. Why would they make such claims when it was supposedly the most deadly pandemic the world has ever seen?

In a series of advertisements they said Spanish Influenza was "Nothing new, simply the same old flu masquerading under a new name", "Just grippe camouflaged under a new name", and "A new name for an old familiar disease".

Source

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

This guy gets it. His approach to life holds the answer to many of the societal problems plaguing humanity.

He has such a great perspective and approach to life.

More power to him and others like him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ir3eJ1t13fk

10 Programmed Behaviors That Knock Your Life In The Dirt

1. Going to a poison expert who wears a white butcher coat, asking them to poison you and then wondering why you don't get healthy.

2. Not recognizing that the only test the person in the white butcher coat won't run on you is what you're putting in your mouth. They also don't test for the contents of your fridge, your cupboards, or your daily habits.

3. Believing that disease is genetic, even though you've had the same genes your entire life and knowing that you only got sick in your 30's, 40's or 50's, If your genes cause your disease and you have the same genes your entire life, it means should have those "genetic diseases" when you're born.......but you don't.......so it's not your genes.......it's you, your habits, and your programmed behaviors.

4. Believing a person who only gets paid when you're sick will do everything they can to make you healthy and put themselves out of business, bankrupt themselves and ruin their own high standards of living.

5. Believing poison is best for general sickness and that radiation and mutilating surgery is best when you're really sick.

6. Believing that using your mouth as a garbage compactor has no impact on your health.

7. Seeing that the person who's always healthy never goes to visit the person in the white butcher coat and takes personal responsibility for their health status.....but you never connect the dots or you believe that those healthy people are just missing out on all the massive benefits of poisoning themselves.

8. Believing that injecting poison under the skin is the surefire way to boost immunity and maintain health. When it comes down to eating poison or injecting it (based on the advice of the person in the white butcher coat who only makes money when you're sick), obviously injecting poison is the top-level health strategy really smart people move toward. THANK YOU SCIENCE.

9. Believing that you're too smart to be placed under mind control while simultaneously holding any of these beliefs or programmed behaviors....which are actually the opposite of logical analysis and rational thought, which in turn means you're under mind control.

10. Believing that someone who doesn't hold these beliefs (and who are never sick) are crazy conspiracy theorists. Ignoring truths, observed with someone's own two eyes, means that person is indeed under mind control. It's that simple. In the past, people could get by and survive (not thrive but survive) if they were under the mind control of the day. Now, they won't survive. We've reached critical mass mind control levels and people believing any of this simply won't survive moving forward. People now have 2 options. They can change or they prearrange their funeral. That's it. There's no door #3.

For anyone interested in Dr. Sam Bailey's trial across the ditch in New Zealand.

Dr. Bailey has been a voice of reason and a beacon of hope for many people across the world during the pandemic.

Dr. Bailey has my complete support and I applaud her for continuing to stand her ground.

Source

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

If you believe diseases are transmitted from one person to another, then that is all your opinion is based upon - belief.

Source

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

I will be interviewed live by Toni Weel on her podcast in just under 1 hour. Details below.

Do you take vitamins, like D, B12, C, etc...?
Would you like to know more about it?
We are so pleased to have Daniel Roytas with us to explain more about the big Vitamin Fraud... Thing you didn't know, but should know...
Thursday 8/17/23 at NOON EDT LIVE
Ask you questions LIVE (Zoom link will be provided in the chat).
https://youtube.com/live/_gxQ5qDc5jg?feature=share

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Public service announcement.

The food is sprayed with poison.

Food is stored in containers made of poison.

The water supply is contaminated with poison.

Water is stored in containers made out of poison.

Building materials are made with poison.

Personal care products are made with poison.

Supplements are made with poison.

Drugs are made with poison.

Clothing is made with poison.

Motor vehicles emit poison.

Yet people want to blame a germ on all of their health issues.

Seems logical.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Whilst sitting down at a cafe next to a large pond this morning, I noticed a number of dead fish floating in the water.

Did the fish die because there was some mysterious waterborne virus infecting the aquatic life?

Or did the fish die because the water is stagnant and heavily polluted?

Does it make more sense that an invisible virus floating in the air is making people sick, or is it the toxic, heavily polluted air?

What does your common sense tell you?

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Once upon a time, the British Medical Journal used to publish data about the effectiveness of various clinical treatments. They no longer publish this data, which is hardly surprising. One of the last reports from back in 2007 found that just 11% of 3000 different interventions were beneficial. About 15% of treatments had no effect, were ineffective, or were likely to cause harm. Nearly 25% were 'likely' to be beneficial, but they couldn't be sure because there wasn't enough evidence.

Here's the kicker, 50% of all clinical treatments had unknown effectiveness. Why? Because there wasn't sufficient evidence.

People are under this illusion that every little aspect of medicine is based on 'scientific evidence'. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Next time someone wants to talk about 'evidence based medicine'.....just remember, only 11% of what is done in medicine has sufficient evidence to be defined as 'beneficial'.

Source

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

What's in the meaning of a word?

If you believe in germ 'theory' that's okay. As long as you understand it's not supported by any scientific evidence. It is merely a belief.

Call germ theory whatever you want, but do not call it science.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

A Farewell To Virology - Part one of a three part series with Spacebusters.

"A Farewell to Virology" is a 29,000 word essay debunking virus theory and virology, written by Dr Mark Bailey, MBChB, PGDipMSM, MHeaLSc. It has yet to be contested and the purpose of this film is to explain why.

This film version walks the layperson through the paper and scientific evidence in an easy, simple and understandable way, so that they may better understand and be able to easily explain to others the great hoax of the last few centuries and certainly last three years, that fictional particles called "viruses" exist, cause illness and are reasons to lock down and destroy societies and economies and cause lifelong disease and misery through needless and useless vaccination programs. They don't.

To watch it now, go HERE.

IMPORTANT MESSAGE

We will never contact you via private message in Telegram or any other social media platform.

If you receive a private message from an account claiming to be Humanley, block, delete and report them.

If you have not signed up to the free Humanley webinar library, head on over to https://www.humanley.com/free-library

There are a number of informative webinars available to watch for free.

If you have any questions or comments, send an email to hello@humanley.com

We are told the common cold is caused exclusively by viruses. Yet by their own admission, virologists state bacteria are the cause in many cases.

What ever happened to "one germ, one disease"?

When are they going to get their story straight?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC104573/

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Doctors knew germs didn't cause disease over 100 years ago. They knew germs were the consequence of disease, not the cause. They knew germs decomposed dead and dying tissue and did not 'attack' healthy tissue. This fact was published in some of the worlds leading medical journals like the British Medical Journal time and time again.

The below example was written by Dr. Lawson Tait, Chief surgeon of the Birmingham and Midlands Hospital, published in the British Medical Journal in 1887.

Source

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

In recent times, the terrain theory has gained considerable attention, however, there seems to be some confusion around what it actually is. Most peoples understanding is incomplete, and therefore terrain theory is often misrepresented.

There are two competing trains of thought about what causes disease. The first is the germ theory, which postulates that germs floating through the air infect healthy people, animals, or plants, and make them sick. The essential premise is that germs cause disease.

The other train of thought is terrain theory, which proposes that external inputs like poisons, toxins, malnutrition, and the like, damage living tissue. Germs proliferate to break down compromised and devitalised tissue. The essential premise is that germs are not the cause but the consequence of disease.

Watch the video below. It shows how a farmer turned a desert into an abundant, thriving, lush, ecosystem. The farmer started with terrain that was dry and degraded. The only vegetation that grew was some juniper, knapweed, and sage brush. If you did a soil test, there would be a certain microbiome present. No one would suggest the bacteria in the soil caused the land to become desert. The bacteria that were growing in this soil were the ones good at decomposing organic matter from desert plants in dry conditions.

By digging swales to retain water, and introducing livestock, the land became lush and fertile. Through rotational grazing, and increasing the water content of the land, the plants that thrived in desert conditions started to die off. As the water table rose, it infringed upon the root systems of the dryland trees. Consequently, the dryland plants became compromised as the conditions of the terrain were not conducive to their survival. The plants sent out signals to insects like worms, to come and eat their seeds so that they didn’t grow next season. This process allowed for plants that thrive in soil with a higher moisture content to grow.

If you tested the soil microbiome in this lush, regenerated, fertile land, it would be completely different to when it was a desert. People might mistakenly think these bacteria are ‘good’ bacteria, but they are nothing of the sought. The bacteria are simply the ones that are good at decomposing organic matter from livestock, grasses, and fruit trees. They didn't make the soil healthy, they are the consequence of health promoting inputs.

If the bacteria were the cause of the effect, then all the farmer would need to do is take a germ theory approach. He could simply take some bacteria from fertile land and add it into the desert soil. By rights, this should transform the desert into a paradise. But he didn’t do that. Instead he used the terrain theory approach. Rather than worrying about the bacteria, he focused on the inputs. The bacteria in the soil then changed in response to the inputs. The fact of the matter is, the bacteria didn't make the land healthy, the water, and organic matter from animals, and decomposing desert shrubs did.

The moral of the story is simple. Bacteria are just an indicator of the inputs that made the soil healthy, nothing more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJZIdEsg5AU

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley