Are they openly admitting that there is no virus?

This is all over mainstream news. "Leaked" WhatsApp messages sent by the UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, show him asking when to "roll pitch" and "deploy details" of a new strain to scare people in to complying with lock down rules.

Of course it's all a stage show, but is this their way of admitting that there never was a virus and it was just a media and government driven fear campaign?

https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/mar/05/matt-hancock-wanted-to-frighten-everyone-into-following-covid-rules

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Imagine if someone told you they can prove water contains sugar by doing the following experiment. They put cordial into a pan, heat it to 100 degrees and begin to boil off the water. As they are heating it they add in some jelly. Once the water is boiled off all that remains is a sticky sugar syrup substance in the bottom of the pan. They conclude water contains sugar.

You would think they are nuts...but this is precisely the flawed methodology virologists use to claim they isolate a v1rus.

Cordial and jelly contains sugar and water. We know that. In order to prove water contains sugar you would have to have a pure sample of water (independent variable), boil it at 100 degrees (dependent variable) and observe the effect.

Virologists take snot (cordial) from a sick person and add it to a cell culture of green monkey kidney cells. They add in (jelly) antibiotics, phenol red, trypsin, foetal bovine calf serum and minimal nutrient medium. When the kidney cells die (syrup in the pan) they claim a v1rus did it (water contains sugar). Voila! V1rus isolation.

There's so much stuff in snot. It is not an independent variable. There's proteins, cytokines, cellular debris, blood, mucous, all kinds of stuff in it. How do they know none of these things present in the snot had an effect? For it to be science, they would have to add only a purified sample of the v1rus to the cell culture, not snot.

They also claim we have a virome and our snot is teeming with different v1ruses (even though they have never seen a v1rus in snot). How do they know which v1ruses are in the snot before they put it in the cell culture?

How do they know the things they put in the cell culture (antibiotics, foetal calf serum etc) didn't kill the kidney cells? They would have to do a proper control experiment, but they don't do that either.

When you don't use an independent variable and don't use the proper controls, it is no longer science but pseudoscience.

Virology is one big magic trick.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Ever wondered how they proved influenza is caused by a virus?

Follow these simple steps.

1. Take some snot from a sick person
2. Filter the snot
3. Assume a virus is in there
4. Inject the snot subcutaneously and squirt large volumes into humans noses
5. When they don't get sick proceed to try the same steps with Apes
6. When that doesn't work try it with monkeys
7. When that fails try it with;

- Horses (fail)
- Pigs (fail)
- Dogs (fail)
- Rabbits (fail)
- Guinea pigs (fail)
- Rats (fail)
- Mice (fail)

8. When you have no other animals left, try it on a couple of ferrets that get a bit of a sniffle
9. Conclude the flu is caused by a contagious virus
10. Stop asking questions

I love science!

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673600785412

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

This is a friendly reminder - Can everyone please keep the chat related directly to health and health related topics? There are many other channels for people to discuss their beliefs about cosmology etc.

Whilst I encourage thought provoking discussion and truly value everyone's input, please keep it on topic. I don't want the chat to get railroaded, stray too far from health and turn into a slinging match.

It would be ideal if I don't have to censor people, however if the discussion strays too far away from health or health related topics then I am going to be forced to remove off-topic messages from the chat.

This is a place for everyone to learn and come together, not argue, bicker and divide.

Let's all grow and learn together. Let's challenge what we think we know about health and the human body. Let's enrich each others lives in a safe and enjoyable forum.

Thank you everyone for understanding.

Live right now. Patrick Gunnels and Matt Trump - Do viruses even exist?

https://rumble.com/v2c6mo4-spellbreakers-ep-10-do-viruses-even-exist-wed-730-pm-et-.html?mref=v6mdk&mc=74e3j

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

What does a virus, yoghurt and an omelette have in common? They are all man made things.

No one thinks yoghurt comes from a cow. No human has ever seen yoghurt in a cow or coming directly out of a cow. Milk comes from a cow. Yoghurt is made from milk after humans have adulterated it.

No one thinks an omelette comes from a chicken. No one has ever seen an omelette in a chicken or coming directly out of a chicken. Eggs come from a chicken. An omelette is made from eggs after humans have adulterated it.

We are told viruses come from humans. No one has ever seen a virus in a human or seen a virus come out of a human in any bodily fluid. What are claimed to be virus particles are only ever seen in a cell culture after humans have adulterated it.

There will never be any scientific proof that yoghurt comes out of cows, omelettes come out of chickens or viruses out of humans because it simply does not happen. It is not reality no matter how anyone tries to twist it.

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Attention!

There are many accounts impersonating Humanley posting links in the chat.

We will NEVER message you directly. We will NEVER advertise cryptocurrency, get rich quick schemes, ask for personal details etc through Telegram.

If you see a suspicious post from a Humanley account with a link, please do not click on it. These messages will be deleted as quickly as possible.

Cheers,

Dan

Is this the reason why RFK Jr and Children's Health Defence refuse to give any attention to the no virus camp? Is it possible that giving air time to this movement could destroy any possible chance he has at presidency?

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

"Moderna never had a real live virus, it was all a software problem".

Why did they never have a sample of the live virus? Because you can't be in possession of something that doesn't exist. The virus is simply an "in-silico" fantasy.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

In 2018, one of the most comprehensive reviews on the transmission of respiratory viruses was published in a leading virology journal.

Their conclusion? Even after a century of investigation, we still have no idea how any respiratory virus is transmitted.

Why is it that despite all of the time, resources, money, energy, man power and research that has been put into investigating respiratory viruses, virologists are still scratching their heads about how these so called 'infections' are transmitted?

Maybe it's because virologists have been investigating a false paradigm? Maybe it's because respiratory infections aren't transmissible?

There is NO scientific evidence showing a respiratory infection is spread from person to person in a cough or a sneeze. If you 'believe' that it is spread that way, that's all it is, 'belief'.

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Dr. Maryanne Demasi recently published a substack article recounting her interview with Dr. Tom Jefferson.

Jefferson who is Senior Associate Tutor at Oxford University is also the lead author of a recent Cochrane Review showing masks do little to nothing.

Jefferson says "It’s predicated on us knowing exactly how these respiratory viruses transmit, and that, I can tell you, we don't know. There isn't a single mode of transmission, it is probably mixed."

He goes on to say "The idea that the covid virus is transmitted via aerosols has been repeated over and over as if its 'truth' but the evidence is as thin as air."

Why do they have no idea? They have been researching the cold and flu for 120 years and are still none the wiser.

The day science can prove that the cold or flu is transmitted by a virus contained in a sneeze or a cough is the day pigs fly.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Maybe Robert Koch's hand was cold in this photograph?

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Maybe Louis Pasteur's hand was cold in this photograph?

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

What is Terrain Theory?

Some people think that terrain theory is some hodge-podge piecemeal idea that has just come about in the last few years.

The 'terrain theory' is a component of holistic healing modalities like naturopathy & homeopathy. It's a fundamental component that forms part of the core underlying principles of these modalities. It helps define a complete system healing, whilst providing an intricate understanding of nature, holism, disease, & how the human body operates & functions.

There is an idea floating around within the so called 'terrain community' that 'germs' can cause disease, but only when a hosts defences are down. This concept is not terrain theory. It is a rescue device invented by germ theorists to explain asymptomatic infection.

The terrain theory is very specific & well defined. Unfortunately it seems that people are just bastardising it in any way they see fit. The above image is a good starting point, but only the tip of the ice-berg.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

This is kryptonite for germ theory.

We are told that bacteria have basic life cycles, when in fact they have complex life cycles.

We are told that bacteria are monomorphic, when in fact they are pleomorphic (can morph into different kinds of bacteria).

Bacteria arise from base units called somatids or microzyma. The microzyma can develop into any kind of bacteria depending on the environmental conditions they are growing in (ie the terrain).

“Anyone who will patiently study with the microscope his own cultures which he knows to be pure can quickly confirm the general observation that rod forms may appear in cultures of cocci, spherical forms in cultures of bacilli, lateral buds and branches and internal globular bodies" Arthur Henrici, MD - 1895

https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/30990#page/7/mode/1up

Countless papers have been published showing that bacteria have complex life cycles and are not monomorphic.

The United States Dept. of Agriculture demonstrated that bacteria could change into other bacteria back in 1916 and 1923, as did the United States Health Dept. in 1932.

1916 - https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/IND43965684
1923 - https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/catalog/IND43966525
1932 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1996182

Quote from the US Health Dept (1932) - "They found that one type of bacteria could present itself in over a dozen different forms, so different from each other that they have to be accepted as separate species belonging to half a dozen different genera."

There are countless papers published in the scientific literature documenting extreme pleomorphism and the complex bacterial life cycle.

Everything we think we know about bacteria is probably wrong.

Germs don't cause disease.
Disease causes germs.

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

1. Enderlein E. Bacteria Cyclogeny. Prescott: Enderlein Enterprises Inc; 1925.
2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082257
3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2167589/
4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3859916
5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC379023/
6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC533658/
7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16560237/
8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC440979/
9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16560823/
10. https://www.bmj.com/content/1/2940/571
11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC375132/
12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC374850/
13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4130434
14. https://www.nature.com/articles/2221285a0
15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5522357
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7250327/
17. https://www.nature.com/articles/215936a0
18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2084495
19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16559356/
20. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.75.1935.121

Slowly but surely mainstream medicine are realising the glaringly obvious issues plaguing germ theory. The theory can't and won't last forever.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128175767000080

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

An interesting paper written by Alexander Wilder MD in 1875.

Quote - "Dr. Epps, director for twenty-five years of the Jenner Institute, says: The vaccine virus is poison. As such, it penetrates all organic systems, and infects them in such way as to act repressively on the pox. It is neither antidote nor corrigent; nor does it neutralise the small-pox, but only paralyses the expansive power of good constitution, so that the disease falls back upon the mucous membranes. Nobody has the right to transplant such mischievous poison into the life of a child.”

Full text in the link below.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Full text article by Alexander Wilder MD.

The bacteria that make up your microbiome are not separate to you, they are you. In fact, they are as much a part of you as your white blood cells.

Think of bacteria like white blood cells. White blood cells are the micro-organisms on the inside of your body and the bacteria are the micro-organisms on the outside of your body.

Your skin and mucous membranes (gastrointestinal tract, respiratory tract, urinary tract, reproductive tract etc) are the 'outside' of your body and are covered in 'germs'.

Everything else is the 'inside' of your body and is full of white blood cells.

Bacteria do not cause disease, just like white blood cells do not cause disease. Bacteria and white blood cells respond to inputs.

They are the firemen at the fire; the detective at the scene of the crime; the flies on the poo. Firemen didn't start the fire; detectives didn't commit the crime; and flies didn't make the poo....they are responding to these things, not causing them.

Bacteria are your body's adaptive interface with the world around you.

Bacteria are the manufacturing plants of the body. They break down food and produce new substances essential to your survival.

Bacteria are the recycling plants of the body. They take waste products excreted by your body and turn it into new substances that can be re-used.

Bacteria are the garbage disposal units of the body; they are saprophytic (eat dead and dying tissue). If part of your tissue is dead or dying, they will break it down and assist with the production of new healthy tissue. They did not cause the tissue damage, they are responding to it.

Your microbiome responds to inputs from the environment; ie the food you eat, the things you drink, the thoughts you think, the air you breathe.

There are no such thing as good or bad bacteria. They are simply responding to inputs.

We are told that good bacteria in our gut make us healthy and bad bacteria make us sick. This is not the case. There are no such thing as good or bad bacteria.

Imagine there are two people. One who eats lots of fruits and vegetables and the other who eats chips and chocolate.

The microbiome of the person eating the fruit and veg will respond by increasing the bacteria optimised for digesting fruit and veg. We call these 'good bacteria'. The bacteria aren't the things causing the good health, the fruit and veg are.

The microbiome of the person eating the chips and chocolate will respond by increasing the bacteria optimised for digesting chips and chocolate. We call these 'bad bacteria'. They aren't bad for your health at all. The thing causing ill health is the diet of chips and chocolate.

Bacteria are not separate to us. They are us. Stop blaming your body as the cause of the problem.

It's time to re-think our relationship with 'germs'.

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Dr. Barre Lando recently spoke with Josh and Adam Bigelsen about Bio-Terrain Medicine.

If you are still on the fence about whether or not bacteria causes disease, or you would like to expand your knowledge on the terrain, I highly recommend watching this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InQ-ilC4hwo

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley