Science is a method where an independent variable (the cause) is manipulated to observe the changes that occur to dependent variables (the effect).
This method, despite its downfalls, is the best thing we have to try and explain observed phenomenon in the world around us.
To claim X causes Y, X must be shown to exist in nature first. An indirect experiment that produces X through man made means, cannot be used to explain natural phenomenon. Additionally, observing Y (the effect) cannot be used as proof of X.
This is precisely what has been done to try and justify the existence and function of things like vitamins, viruses, proteins, DNA, genes, cellular organelles etc.
All of these things are based on pseudoscience dressed up as science to fool and manipulate a gullible public.
This podcast with Dr. Jordan Grant, Dr. Jerneja Tomsic and Dawn Lester is a must watch for anyone trying to get a better grasp on what science is and what it is not.
Click here to watch now.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
This method, despite its downfalls, is the best thing we have to try and explain observed phenomenon in the world around us.
To claim X causes Y, X must be shown to exist in nature first. An indirect experiment that produces X through man made means, cannot be used to explain natural phenomenon. Additionally, observing Y (the effect) cannot be used as proof of X.
This is precisely what has been done to try and justify the existence and function of things like vitamins, viruses, proteins, DNA, genes, cellular organelles etc.
All of these things are based on pseudoscience dressed up as science to fool and manipulate a gullible public.
This podcast with Dr. Jordan Grant, Dr. Jerneja Tomsic and Dawn Lester is a must watch for anyone trying to get a better grasp on what science is and what it is not.
Click here to watch now.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Odysee
Science Scientism & Pseudoscience: Where Did It All Go Wrong?
In this conversation, Jerneja Tomsic PhD, Jordan Grant MD, and Dawn Lester discuss the problems with ‘science’ to find the answer to the question: Where did it all go wrong?
👍32❤10👏3
Do vitamin deficiencies really cause disease, or is something else going on?
It is generally accepted that when people become deficient in a vitamin, disease arises because the cells can't perform their normal metabolic functions. But is this really the case?
Let's look at beriberi, the disease said to arise from a deficiency of vitamin B1. When people ate a diet consisting mainly of polished refined white rice for prolonged periods of time, they developed neurological and cardiovascular symptoms. When they ate the bran layer of whole grain unprocessed rice, their symptoms went away.
In the early 1900's, doctors and scientists claimed this was because there was an essential vitamin (B1) lacking in the polished rice, resulting in the deficiency disease, beriberi. However, many scientists and doctors around the same time such as Nobel prize winner Christjaan Eijkman disagreed. He discovered polished rice caused beriberi and said it was not a deficiency disease, but rather a toxicity disease, arising from a build up of toxins present in the polished rice, the antidote to which, was contained in the bran layer.
Breastfed infants developed infantile beriberi when their mothers ate a diet of polished rice. It was claimed this was because the milk was deficient in vitamin B1, however many others suggested it was due to a toxin present in the milk. When mothers stopped breast feeding their children and fed them other foods also deficient in B1 like sweetened condensed milk, the beriberi rapidly resolved.
This finding is incredibly important because it proves that infantile beriberi is not caused by a deficiency, but rather a toxin present in the milk.
Between the 1930s and 50's dozens upon dozens of papers were published by scientists and medical doctors in Japan about infantile beriberi being caused by a toxin and not by a vitamin deficiency. The following quotes provide a clear example of their position on the matter.
Quote "Beriberi seems to be generally accepted in America and Europe simply as the equivalent for avitaminosis B, just as scurvy is for avitaminosis C. In this country we, especially pediatricians, who deal with different forms of avitaminosis B, cannot accept this view".
Quote "What is the best treatment for fatal infantile beriberi? Even a massive dose of thiamine (B1) may fail to cure it. Some cases could be cured, if they were weaned immediately and fed a very diluted gruel of polished or thiamine free rice; because they had been transferred from poisonous milk to non-poisonous food. Infantile beriberi is not so much a thiamine-deficient disease, as the result of acute poisoning".
Many medical doctors in the West also shared this view. These papers provide further insight 1, 2, 3.
Long story short, when a food is processed components (let's call them "vitamins") are removed from the food, resulting in incomplete metabolism. This results in a build up of intermediate metabolites which cause toxicity and disease. The "vitamin" is the antidote to the poison so to speak, by facilitating complete metabolism of the food.
In the case of polished rice, the toxic metabolite is known as methyl glyoxal. When this toxin was injected into animals, it resulted in symptoms characteristic of beriberi.
Vitamin deficiency does not cause disease, toxicity does. If deficiency caused disease, then why don't people who fast for 30, 60, 100, 200 days develop scurvy, beriberi and pellagra?
This is just one example. There are countless papers published on other deficiency diseases being caused by toxicity, not deficiency. It's time to rethink our understanding about nutrition.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
It is generally accepted that when people become deficient in a vitamin, disease arises because the cells can't perform their normal metabolic functions. But is this really the case?
Let's look at beriberi, the disease said to arise from a deficiency of vitamin B1. When people ate a diet consisting mainly of polished refined white rice for prolonged periods of time, they developed neurological and cardiovascular symptoms. When they ate the bran layer of whole grain unprocessed rice, their symptoms went away.
In the early 1900's, doctors and scientists claimed this was because there was an essential vitamin (B1) lacking in the polished rice, resulting in the deficiency disease, beriberi. However, many scientists and doctors around the same time such as Nobel prize winner Christjaan Eijkman disagreed. He discovered polished rice caused beriberi and said it was not a deficiency disease, but rather a toxicity disease, arising from a build up of toxins present in the polished rice, the antidote to which, was contained in the bran layer.
Breastfed infants developed infantile beriberi when their mothers ate a diet of polished rice. It was claimed this was because the milk was deficient in vitamin B1, however many others suggested it was due to a toxin present in the milk. When mothers stopped breast feeding their children and fed them other foods also deficient in B1 like sweetened condensed milk, the beriberi rapidly resolved.
This finding is incredibly important because it proves that infantile beriberi is not caused by a deficiency, but rather a toxin present in the milk.
Between the 1930s and 50's dozens upon dozens of papers were published by scientists and medical doctors in Japan about infantile beriberi being caused by a toxin and not by a vitamin deficiency. The following quotes provide a clear example of their position on the matter.
Quote "Beriberi seems to be generally accepted in America and Europe simply as the equivalent for avitaminosis B, just as scurvy is for avitaminosis C. In this country we, especially pediatricians, who deal with different forms of avitaminosis B, cannot accept this view".
Quote "What is the best treatment for fatal infantile beriberi? Even a massive dose of thiamine (B1) may fail to cure it. Some cases could be cured, if they were weaned immediately and fed a very diluted gruel of polished or thiamine free rice; because they had been transferred from poisonous milk to non-poisonous food. Infantile beriberi is not so much a thiamine-deficient disease, as the result of acute poisoning".
Many medical doctors in the West also shared this view. These papers provide further insight 1, 2, 3.
Long story short, when a food is processed components (let's call them "vitamins") are removed from the food, resulting in incomplete metabolism. This results in a build up of intermediate metabolites which cause toxicity and disease. The "vitamin" is the antidote to the poison so to speak, by facilitating complete metabolism of the food.
In the case of polished rice, the toxic metabolite is known as methyl glyoxal. When this toxin was injected into animals, it resulted in symptoms characteristic of beriberi.
Vitamin deficiency does not cause disease, toxicity does. If deficiency caused disease, then why don't people who fast for 30, 60, 100, 200 days develop scurvy, beriberi and pellagra?
This is just one example. There are countless papers published on other deficiency diseases being caused by toxicity, not deficiency. It's time to rethink our understanding about nutrition.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Christjaan Eijkman (1858–1930)
Eijkman was awarded the Nobel Prize for his discovery of the role polished rice played in causing polyneuritis in chickens. This work led to the first real understanding of a possible cure for beriberi and was the starting point of the field of vitamin research.…
👍69🔥11❤8🤔2
Episode 70: Dr. Lawrence Palevsky - Childhood Infectious Diseases
https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode70
Dr. Lawrence Palevsky is a New York State licensed pediatrician, who utilizes a holistic approach to children’s wellness and illness. In this podcast, Dr. Palevsky discusses why infectious diseases in children like influenza, chickenpox, measles etc are not contagious. He provides insight into what these diseases are, what causes them, and why they seem to "spread" throughout the community. He also explains how vaccinations might actually be working to prevent these diseases being expressed in children.
Dr. Palevsky received his medical degree from the New York University School of Medicine in 1987, completed a three-year pediatric residency at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City in 1990, and served as a pediatric fellow in the ambulatory care out-patient department at Bellevue Hospital, New York City, from 1990-1991. Since 1991, his clinical experience includes working in pediatric emergency and intensive care medicine, in-patient, and out-patient pediatric medicine, neonatal intensive care medicine, newborn and delivery room medicine, and conventional, holistic and integrative pediatric private practice. Dr. Palevsky is a diplomate of the American Board of Integrative Holistic Medicine, and Past–President of the American Holistic Medical Association. He received his pediatric board certification in 1990, and passed his pediatric board recertification exams in 1997, 2004, and 2011.
You can hear Dr. Palevsky on his weekly podcast, Critically Thinking with Dr. T & Dr. P on Thursday evenings at 7 pm eastern time, and can listen to more of his podcasts and interviews by visiting, www.drpalevsky.com
Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley
https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode70
Dr. Lawrence Palevsky is a New York State licensed pediatrician, who utilizes a holistic approach to children’s wellness and illness. In this podcast, Dr. Palevsky discusses why infectious diseases in children like influenza, chickenpox, measles etc are not contagious. He provides insight into what these diseases are, what causes them, and why they seem to "spread" throughout the community. He also explains how vaccinations might actually be working to prevent these diseases being expressed in children.
Dr. Palevsky received his medical degree from the New York University School of Medicine in 1987, completed a three-year pediatric residency at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City in 1990, and served as a pediatric fellow in the ambulatory care out-patient department at Bellevue Hospital, New York City, from 1990-1991. Since 1991, his clinical experience includes working in pediatric emergency and intensive care medicine, in-patient, and out-patient pediatric medicine, neonatal intensive care medicine, newborn and delivery room medicine, and conventional, holistic and integrative pediatric private practice. Dr. Palevsky is a diplomate of the American Board of Integrative Holistic Medicine, and Past–President of the American Holistic Medical Association. He received his pediatric board certification in 1990, and passed his pediatric board recertification exams in 1997, 2004, and 2011.
You can hear Dr. Palevsky on his weekly podcast, Critically Thinking with Dr. T & Dr. P on Thursday evenings at 7 pm eastern time, and can listen to more of his podcasts and interviews by visiting, www.drpalevsky.com
Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley
Humanley
Welcome to Humanley. Simplifying Health.
Humanley is revolutionising health by getting back to basics. Learn about health & wellness via our blog, podcast, webinars & short courses.
👍23🔥8❤2
This is a chart of just some of the supposed nutritional biochemical pathways in the body. I remember being fascinated learning about this stuff in my undergraduate degree. I memorised these pathways and then taught subjects on it at universities and colleges. I thought it was all "scientifically proven".
Little did I realise that no one has ever seen these pathways, nor proven their existence. They are just a construct, a model, a "best guess", and that's okay. What's not okay is to pass this stuff off as proven fact. Are these things really happening in the body or is it just a belief system humans invented to explain what they think is going on?
I'm not saying these cartoon drawings aren't useful to try and make sense of human physiology, but how closely do they reflect reality?
I'm not so sure "science" can ever tell us what's really going on inside the human body. It's one of the many mysteries of the universe and maybe, just maybe, it's not meant for us to ever know.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Little did I realise that no one has ever seen these pathways, nor proven their existence. They are just a construct, a model, a "best guess", and that's okay. What's not okay is to pass this stuff off as proven fact. Are these things really happening in the body or is it just a belief system humans invented to explain what they think is going on?
I'm not saying these cartoon drawings aren't useful to try and make sense of human physiology, but how closely do they reflect reality?
I'm not so sure "science" can ever tell us what's really going on inside the human body. It's one of the many mysteries of the universe and maybe, just maybe, it's not meant for us to ever know.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍62❤24🔥8👏4🤯4
A Japanese Hotel has made international headlines after Legionella bacteria was detected in the water of its onsen. The bacteria present in the water was 3700 times the legal limit.
The article states that the water was only changed twice per year but should have been changed weekly.
Legionella is said to be the cause of Legionnaires disease, a serious form of bacterial pneumonia. It is claimed people become infected after inhaling water vapour containing the bacteria.
If you have ever been to an onsen, you are constantly inhaling water vapour. I couldnt think of conditions more ideal to be exposed to this so called "pathogen". If Legionella causes disease when inhaled, why weren't people bathing in the onsen developing Legionnaires disease?
The owner of the hotel said "I thought that legionella bacteria was a common bacterium that could be found anywhere. I used the baths myself, even after the bacteria were detected".
Despite this, the owner never got sick and there are no reports of any of the guests who bathed in the water teeming with such a highly "pathogenic bacteria" ever becoming sick.
How does germ theory explain this away?
https://www.9news.com.au/national/japanese-hotel-boss-apologises-for-only-changing-water-in-spa-bath-twice-a-year/9b11ed6f-79ec-471c-8867-71ac820a4bed
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
The article states that the water was only changed twice per year but should have been changed weekly.
Legionella is said to be the cause of Legionnaires disease, a serious form of bacterial pneumonia. It is claimed people become infected after inhaling water vapour containing the bacteria.
If you have ever been to an onsen, you are constantly inhaling water vapour. I couldnt think of conditions more ideal to be exposed to this so called "pathogen". If Legionella causes disease when inhaled, why weren't people bathing in the onsen developing Legionnaires disease?
The owner of the hotel said "I thought that legionella bacteria was a common bacterium that could be found anywhere. I used the baths myself, even after the bacteria were detected".
Despite this, the owner never got sick and there are no reports of any of the guests who bathed in the water teeming with such a highly "pathogenic bacteria" ever becoming sick.
How does germ theory explain this away?
https://www.9news.com.au/national/japanese-hotel-boss-apologises-for-only-changing-water-in-spa-bath-twice-a-year/9b11ed6f-79ec-471c-8867-71ac820a4bed
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
9News
Japanese hotel boss apologises for only changing water in spa bath twice a year
The boss of a 158-year-old Japanese guesthouse has apologised for only changing the water in its spa bath twice a year, after it was found to be teeming with potentially deadly bacteria.
👍32🔥6❤2
This morning my partner and I conducted a little experiment. We decided to see how much sweat we lost after spending just 20 minutes in the onsen. We weighed ourselves immediately before and after.
You might be surprised to learn just how much sweat we actually lost in such a small amount of time. I lost 600 ml, she lost 300 ml.
I've been having at least one onsen every day, sometimes two for the last 10 days and I have noticed a dramatic difference in my overall health and wellbeing.
How could this be working? When we sweat, in a sauna, an onsen or whilst exercising, our body excretes highly toxic water soluble chemicals like organophosphates and pyrethroids. Our skin is after all, the largest organ of elimination.
Dr. Marc Cohen, who has appeared on the Humanley podcast, recently published a paper showing high levels of toxic chemicals being excreted in the sweat of people in an infrared sauna and during exercise. This was the first study of its kind.
Results like this really make you think twice about what's going on when we get a fever. Is our body really trying to raise its core temperature to "kill germs" when we are sick with a cold or flu, or is it trying to augment the detoxification process?
You can read the study here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1438463922001742?via%3Dihub
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
You might be surprised to learn just how much sweat we actually lost in such a small amount of time. I lost 600 ml, she lost 300 ml.
I've been having at least one onsen every day, sometimes two for the last 10 days and I have noticed a dramatic difference in my overall health and wellbeing.
How could this be working? When we sweat, in a sauna, an onsen or whilst exercising, our body excretes highly toxic water soluble chemicals like organophosphates and pyrethroids. Our skin is after all, the largest organ of elimination.
Dr. Marc Cohen, who has appeared on the Humanley podcast, recently published a paper showing high levels of toxic chemicals being excreted in the sweat of people in an infrared sauna and during exercise. This was the first study of its kind.
Results like this really make you think twice about what's going on when we get a fever. Is our body really trying to raise its core temperature to "kill germs" when we are sick with a cold or flu, or is it trying to augment the detoxification process?
You can read the study here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1438463922001742?via%3Dihub
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Telegram
Humanley
Helping people heal themselves. Good health is a journey not a destination. Humanley challenges the status quo of all things health and wellness.
Can You Catch A Cold?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1763504409
Podcast, blogs & more
https://www.humanley.com/
Can You Catch A Cold?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1763504409
Podcast, blogs & more
https://www.humanley.com/
👍60❤15🔥2👏2
A great discussion on viruses, germ theory, lab leaks, DNA, genetics and more with Patrick Timpone, Dr. Sam and Dr. Mark Bailey.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HkE2t6xRsTOa/
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HkE2t6xRsTOa/
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Bitchute
Drs. Mark & Sam Bailey | Evidence Shows There Was No Lab Leak Because There’s No Virus
The politicians latest gambit is to promote they have proven COVID came from a lab leak in China.
It is simply not possible to put a virus in the air that is contagious.
We ask Mark and Sam Baily if there are parasites trying to kill us?
To download…
It is simply not possible to put a virus in the air that is contagious.
We ask Mark and Sam Baily if there are parasites trying to kill us?
To download…
❤28👍16
Are they openly admitting that there is no virus?
This is all over mainstream news. "Leaked" WhatsApp messages sent by the UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, show him asking when to "roll pitch" and "deploy details" of a new strain to scare people in to complying with lock down rules.
Of course it's all a stage show, but is this their way of admitting that there never was a virus and it was just a media and government driven fear campaign?
https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/mar/05/matt-hancock-wanted-to-frighten-everyone-into-following-covid-rules
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
This is all over mainstream news. "Leaked" WhatsApp messages sent by the UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, show him asking when to "roll pitch" and "deploy details" of a new strain to scare people in to complying with lock down rules.
Of course it's all a stage show, but is this their way of admitting that there never was a virus and it was just a media and government driven fear campaign?
https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/mar/05/matt-hancock-wanted-to-frighten-everyone-into-following-covid-rules
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
the Guardian
Matt Hancock wanted to ‘frighten everyone’ into following Covid rules
Latest batch of WhatsApp messages reveal discussions over when to ‘deploy’ details of new strain
👍16🔥7🤔2❤1
Imagine if someone told you they can prove water contains sugar by doing the following experiment. They put cordial into a pan, heat it to 100 degrees and begin to boil off the water. As they are heating it they add in some jelly. Once the water is boiled off all that remains is a sticky sugar syrup substance in the bottom of the pan. They conclude water contains sugar.
You would think they are nuts...but this is precisely the flawed methodology virologists use to claim they isolate a v1rus.
Cordial and jelly contains sugar and water. We know that. In order to prove water contains sugar you would have to have a pure sample of water (independent variable), boil it at 100 degrees (dependent variable) and observe the effect.
Virologists take snot (cordial) from a sick person and add it to a cell culture of green monkey kidney cells. They add in (jelly) antibiotics, phenol red, trypsin, foetal bovine calf serum and minimal nutrient medium. When the kidney cells die (syrup in the pan) they claim a v1rus did it (water contains sugar). Voila! V1rus isolation.
There's so much stuff in snot. It is not an independent variable. There's proteins, cytokines, cellular debris, blood, mucous, all kinds of stuff in it. How do they know none of these things present in the snot had an effect? For it to be science, they would have to add only a purified sample of the v1rus to the cell culture, not snot.
They also claim we have a virome and our snot is teeming with different v1ruses (even though they have never seen a v1rus in snot). How do they know which v1ruses are in the snot before they put it in the cell culture?
How do they know the things they put in the cell culture (antibiotics, foetal calf serum etc) didn't kill the kidney cells? They would have to do a proper control experiment, but they don't do that either.
When you don't use an independent variable and don't use the proper controls, it is no longer science but pseudoscience.
Virology is one big magic trick.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
You would think they are nuts...but this is precisely the flawed methodology virologists use to claim they isolate a v1rus.
Cordial and jelly contains sugar and water. We know that. In order to prove water contains sugar you would have to have a pure sample of water (independent variable), boil it at 100 degrees (dependent variable) and observe the effect.
Virologists take snot (cordial) from a sick person and add it to a cell culture of green monkey kidney cells. They add in (jelly) antibiotics, phenol red, trypsin, foetal bovine calf serum and minimal nutrient medium. When the kidney cells die (syrup in the pan) they claim a v1rus did it (water contains sugar). Voila! V1rus isolation.
There's so much stuff in snot. It is not an independent variable. There's proteins, cytokines, cellular debris, blood, mucous, all kinds of stuff in it. How do they know none of these things present in the snot had an effect? For it to be science, they would have to add only a purified sample of the v1rus to the cell culture, not snot.
They also claim we have a virome and our snot is teeming with different v1ruses (even though they have never seen a v1rus in snot). How do they know which v1ruses are in the snot before they put it in the cell culture?
How do they know the things they put in the cell culture (antibiotics, foetal calf serum etc) didn't kill the kidney cells? They would have to do a proper control experiment, but they don't do that either.
When you don't use an independent variable and don't use the proper controls, it is no longer science but pseudoscience.
Virology is one big magic trick.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Telegram
Humanley
Helping people heal themselves. Good health is a journey not a destination. Humanley challenges the status quo of all things health and wellness.
Can You Catch A Cold?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1763504409
Podcast, blogs & more
https://www.humanley.com/
Can You Catch A Cold?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1763504409
Podcast, blogs & more
https://www.humanley.com/
👍56👏21❤14🤯1
Ever wondered how they proved influenza is caused by a virus?
Follow these simple steps.
1. Take some snot from a sick person
2. Filter the snot
3. Assume a virus is in there
4. Inject the snot subcutaneously and squirt large volumes into humans noses
5. When they don't get sick proceed to try the same steps with Apes
6. When that doesn't work try it with monkeys
7. When that fails try it with;
- Horses (fail)
- Pigs (fail)
- Dogs (fail)
- Rabbits (fail)
- Guinea pigs (fail)
- Rats (fail)
- Mice (fail)
8. When you have no other animals left, try it on a couple of ferrets that get a bit of a sniffle
9. Conclude the flu is caused by a contagious virus
10. Stop asking questions
I love science!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673600785412
Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley
Follow these simple steps.
1. Take some snot from a sick person
2. Filter the snot
3. Assume a virus is in there
4. Inject the snot subcutaneously and squirt large volumes into humans noses
5. When they don't get sick proceed to try the same steps with Apes
6. When that doesn't work try it with monkeys
7. When that fails try it with;
- Horses (fail)
- Pigs (fail)
- Dogs (fail)
- Rabbits (fail)
- Guinea pigs (fail)
- Rats (fail)
- Mice (fail)
8. When you have no other animals left, try it on a couple of ferrets that get a bit of a sniffle
9. Conclude the flu is caused by a contagious virus
10. Stop asking questions
I love science!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673600785412
Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley
👍49😁23❤11
This is a friendly reminder - Can everyone please keep the chat related directly to health and health related topics? There are many other channels for people to discuss their beliefs about cosmology etc.
Whilst I encourage thought provoking discussion and truly value everyone's input, please keep it on topic. I don't want the chat to get railroaded, stray too far from health and turn into a slinging match.
It would be ideal if I don't have to censor people, however if the discussion strays too far away from health or health related topics then I am going to be forced to remove off-topic messages from the chat.
This is a place for everyone to learn and come together, not argue, bicker and divide.
Let's all grow and learn together. Let's challenge what we think we know about health and the human body. Let's enrich each others lives in a safe and enjoyable forum.
Thank you everyone for understanding.
Whilst I encourage thought provoking discussion and truly value everyone's input, please keep it on topic. I don't want the chat to get railroaded, stray too far from health and turn into a slinging match.
It would be ideal if I don't have to censor people, however if the discussion strays too far away from health or health related topics then I am going to be forced to remove off-topic messages from the chat.
This is a place for everyone to learn and come together, not argue, bicker and divide.
Let's all grow and learn together. Let's challenge what we think we know about health and the human body. Let's enrich each others lives in a safe and enjoyable forum.
Thank you everyone for understanding.
👍76❤26👏6
Live right now. Patrick Gunnels and Matt Trump - Do viruses even exist?
https://rumble.com/v2c6mo4-spellbreakers-ep-10-do-viruses-even-exist-wed-730-pm-et-.html?mref=v6mdk&mc=74e3j
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
https://rumble.com/v2c6mo4-spellbreakers-ep-10-do-viruses-even-exist-wed-730-pm-et-.html?mref=v6mdk&mc=74e3j
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Rumble
Spellbreakers Ep 10: Do Viruses Even Exist?
Patrick Gunnels and Matt Trump expose flimflam and pseudoscience all over the media and academia. _ • Angel Paste Miracle Cream https://AngelPaste.com • Free Gold/Silver Consultation https://kirkellio
👍12
Quiz time.
What do you think would happen to a 74-year-old man in a poor state of health, who drank millions of pure cholera bacteria?
What do you think would happen to a 74-year-old man in a poor state of health, who drank millions of pure cholera bacteria?
Anonymous Quiz
20%
He would obviously get cholera (nausea, vomiting, profuse watery diarrhoea, dehydration, etc)
31%
Mild diarrhea for a few days but otherwise remain completely unaffected
34%
Nothing would happen
15%
None of the above
👍13❤4
What does a virus, yoghurt and an omelette have in common? They are all man made things.
No one thinks yoghurt comes from a cow. No human has ever seen yoghurt in a cow or coming directly out of a cow. Milk comes from a cow. Yoghurt is made from milk after humans have adulterated it.
No one thinks an omelette comes from a chicken. No one has ever seen an omelette in a chicken or coming directly out of a chicken. Eggs come from a chicken. An omelette is made from eggs after humans have adulterated it.
We are told viruses come from humans. No one has ever seen a virus in a human or seen a virus come out of a human in any bodily fluid. What are claimed to be virus particles are only ever seen in a cell culture after humans have adulterated it.
There will never be any scientific proof that yoghurt comes out of cows, omelettes come out of chickens or viruses out of humans because it simply does not happen. It is not reality no matter how anyone tries to twist it.
Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley
No one thinks yoghurt comes from a cow. No human has ever seen yoghurt in a cow or coming directly out of a cow. Milk comes from a cow. Yoghurt is made from milk after humans have adulterated it.
No one thinks an omelette comes from a chicken. No one has ever seen an omelette in a chicken or coming directly out of a chicken. Eggs come from a chicken. An omelette is made from eggs after humans have adulterated it.
We are told viruses come from humans. No one has ever seen a virus in a human or seen a virus come out of a human in any bodily fluid. What are claimed to be virus particles are only ever seen in a cell culture after humans have adulterated it.
There will never be any scientific proof that yoghurt comes out of cows, omelettes come out of chickens or viruses out of humans because it simply does not happen. It is not reality no matter how anyone tries to twist it.
Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley
👍72🔥20👏16❤14😁3
Attention!
There are many accounts impersonating Humanley posting links in the chat.
We will NEVER message you directly. We will NEVER advertise cryptocurrency, get rich quick schemes, ask for personal details etc through Telegram.
If you see a suspicious post from a Humanley account with a link, please do not click on it. These messages will be deleted as quickly as possible.
Cheers,
Dan
There are many accounts impersonating Humanley posting links in the chat.
We will NEVER message you directly. We will NEVER advertise cryptocurrency, get rich quick schemes, ask for personal details etc through Telegram.
If you see a suspicious post from a Humanley account with a link, please do not click on it. These messages will be deleted as quickly as possible.
Cheers,
Dan
👍64❤4
Is this the reason why RFK Jr and Children's Health Defence refuse to give any attention to the no virus camp? Is it possible that giving air time to this movement could destroy any possible chance he has at presidency?
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍49🤔12👎4❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"Moderna never had a real live virus, it was all a software problem".
Why did they never have a sample of the live virus? Because you can't be in possession of something that doesn't exist. The virus is simply an "in-silico" fantasy.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Why did they never have a sample of the live virus? Because you can't be in possession of something that doesn't exist. The virus is simply an "in-silico" fantasy.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍61🔥8
In 2018, one of the most comprehensive reviews on the transmission of respiratory viruses was published in a leading virology journal.
Their conclusion? Even after a century of investigation, we still have no idea how any respiratory virus is transmitted.
Why is it that despite all of the time, resources, money, energy, man power and research that has been put into investigating respiratory viruses, virologists are still scratching their heads about how these so called 'infections' are transmitted?
Maybe it's because virologists have been investigating a false paradigm? Maybe it's because respiratory infections aren't transmissible?
There is NO scientific evidence showing a respiratory infection is spread from person to person in a cough or a sneeze. If you 'believe' that it is spread that way, that's all it is, 'belief'.
Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley
Their conclusion? Even after a century of investigation, we still have no idea how any respiratory virus is transmitted.
Why is it that despite all of the time, resources, money, energy, man power and research that has been put into investigating respiratory viruses, virologists are still scratching their heads about how these so called 'infections' are transmitted?
Maybe it's because virologists have been investigating a false paradigm? Maybe it's because respiratory infections aren't transmissible?
There is NO scientific evidence showing a respiratory infection is spread from person to person in a cough or a sneeze. If you 'believe' that it is spread that way, that's all it is, 'belief'.
Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley
👍61🔥16❤12🤔1🤯1
Dr. Maryanne Demasi recently published a substack article recounting her interview with Dr. Tom Jefferson.
Jefferson who is Senior Associate Tutor at Oxford University is also the lead author of a recent Cochrane Review showing masks do little to nothing.
Jefferson says "It’s predicated on us knowing exactly how these respiratory viruses transmit, and that, I can tell you, we don't know. There isn't a single mode of transmission, it is probably mixed."
He goes on to say "The idea that the covid virus is transmitted via aerosols has been repeated over and over as if its 'truth' but the evidence is as thin as air."
Why do they have no idea? They have been researching the cold and flu for 120 years and are still none the wiser.
The day science can prove that the cold or flu is transmitted by a virus contained in a sneeze or a cough is the day pigs fly.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
Jefferson who is Senior Associate Tutor at Oxford University is also the lead author of a recent Cochrane Review showing masks do little to nothing.
Jefferson says "It’s predicated on us knowing exactly how these respiratory viruses transmit, and that, I can tell you, we don't know. There isn't a single mode of transmission, it is probably mixed."
He goes on to say "The idea that the covid virus is transmitted via aerosols has been repeated over and over as if its 'truth' but the evidence is as thin as air."
Why do they have no idea? They have been researching the cold and flu for 120 years and are still none the wiser.
The day science can prove that the cold or flu is transmitted by a virus contained in a sneeze or a cough is the day pigs fly.
Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley
👍67🔥15❤6😁2