I have a question.

There are many countries where butchers sell meat unrefrigerated.

Why aren't people getting sick when buying from these markets?

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Thailand legalised cannabis on June 9th, 2022, a move which has been largely embraced by many Thai people.

Cannabis is available almost everywhere, from dedicated dispensaries and mobile street vendors to stalls in shopping centres like the one pictured.

There are many positives to come out of this unexpected decision to legalise cannabis (a plant which has been used traditionally for hundreds of years by the Thai's). Tourism is booming, tens of thousands of jobs have been created and people can get access to this herbal medicine without fear of spending decades in prison.

What do you think about cannabis being legalised in countries like Thailand? Do you think other countries should follow suit or should it remain a controlled substance?

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Germ Theory VS Terrain Theory VS Venom Theory.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan debate Dr. Bryan Ardis and Dr. Alphonzo Monzo.

Watch here

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Never jabbed.
Never masked.
Never sanitised.
Never distanced.
Never tested.
Never isolated.
Never locked down.
Never checked in.
Never complied.
Never medicated.
Never infected.

The deadliest and most highly contagious pandemic the world has ever seen and I've never had "it".

I would consider myself a "high risk" individual.

I had pneumonia as a child and multiple times throughout my late teens and early 20's.

In my mid 20's, I lived in Melbourne for almost 4 years. During that time I had pneumonia three times and multiple bouts of influenza every year without fail.

In 2018 I had a snowboarding accident and damaged my lungs.

If there was a highly infectious particle floating around, I should have been one of the first people to get struck down. Yet somehow over the last 3 years, I've been fine.

For more than 10 years, I was constantly sick. Not once in that time did I "give" anything to my partner.

Why? Because illness isn't contagious. No one "catches" anything from anybody.

Why was I so sick for all those years? I smoked, I drank heavily, I didn't exercise and I ate shit every night. My body was toxic so it mounted recurrent detoxification processes to purge the toxins out of my body.

I now eat organic, exercise, meditate and spend time in nature. I haven't smoked or drank in almost 6 years. I don't get "sick" like I used to. This isnt because my immune system is strong (that concept is a complete fallacy). I'm healthy because I don't poison myself anymore.

You can't catch a cold or flu, but you can certainly earn one.

Follow me: t.me/humanley

Everyone in Japan wears a mask, everywhere, all the time. I'm not sure if it's out of fear of catching something, or fear of authority.

They can't be scared of catching anything (which you can't by the way) because they take their masks off as soon as they sit down in packed restaurants.

I've also noticed no one wears a mask in the onsen, where dozens of naked men are packed together shoulder to shoulder in the same room.

I wonder how many cases of transmission have been "claimed" to occur in onsens around the country?

A fearful and scared population is an easy one to demoralise, control and oppress.

Japan is just not the same anymore, its sad to witness.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Masks do nothing. Why? Simply because you can't protect against something that isn't transmissible.

https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/truth-about-face-masks-and-covid-revealed/news-story/ccaefaecc2de8ecfba359c817dc2fad7

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

A recent cochrane review, the gold standard of medical science found that masks do nothing. What a surprise!

Does this mean that those who have been wearing a mask over the last three years are science denying conspiracy theorists? Maybe so.

I've copped so much shit for not wearing a mask. I was verbally abused on many occasions, ostracised and made to feel like an outcast in my work place, had the police called on me whilst walking my dog in the park and a range of other reprehensible acts.

I wonder what all of my "colleagues" who have been walking around in a face nappy since this shit show began are thinking now? Are they going to double down and defend masks or admit they were wrong and apologise?

I have been nothing less than disgusted over people's behaviour around masks, thinking they were following the science and "doing the right thing". They had this air of arrogance and superiority about themselves. I've never seen such exhibits of childlike behaviour from grown adults.

This whole time all mask wearers have been doing is virtue signaling, demoralising themselves and society and throwing away their self respect.

There never was any science about masks, and this was evident from day one. If you chose to push this agenda, you did so because people in authority told you to, despite there being no evidence to support it.

It's truly frightening to see what people will do without question simply because they were ordered to.

I guess mask-holes must be feeling pretty embarrassed right about now.

How any health professional who pushed this garbage is going to regain the respect of the general public is beyond me. If they couldnt correctly interpret the data on masks, then how can they be trusted to interpret data on any other health related intervention?

Link to Cochrane Review Paper

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Science is a method where an independent variable (the cause) is manipulated to observe the changes that occur to dependent variables (the effect).

This method, despite its downfalls, is the best thing we have to try and explain observed phenomenon in the world around us.

To claim X causes Y, X must be shown to exist in nature first. An indirect experiment that produces X through man made means, cannot be used to explain natural phenomenon. Additionally, observing Y (the effect) cannot be used as proof of X.

This is precisely what has been done to try and justify the existence and function of things like vitamins, viruses, proteins, DNA, genes, cellular organelles etc.

All of these things are based on pseudoscience dressed up as science to fool and manipulate a gullible public.

This podcast with Dr. Jordan Grant, Dr. Jerneja Tomsic and Dawn Lester is a must watch for anyone trying to get a better grasp on what science is and what it is not.

Click here to watch now.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Do vitamin deficiencies really cause disease, or is something else going on?

It is generally accepted that when people become deficient in a vitamin, disease arises because the cells can't perform their normal metabolic functions. But is this really the case?

Let's look at beriberi, the disease said to arise from a deficiency of vitamin B1. When people ate a diet consisting mainly of polished refined white rice for prolonged periods of time, they developed neurological and cardiovascular symptoms. When they ate the bran layer of whole grain unprocessed rice, their symptoms went away.

In the early 1900's, doctors and scientists claimed this was because there was an essential vitamin (B1) lacking in the polished rice, resulting in the deficiency disease, beriberi. However, many scientists and doctors around the same time such as Nobel prize winner Christjaan Eijkman disagreed. He discovered polished rice caused beriberi and said it was not a deficiency disease, but rather a toxicity disease, arising from a build up of toxins present in the polished rice, the antidote to which, was contained in the bran layer. 

Breastfed infants developed infantile beriberi when their mothers ate a diet of polished rice. It was claimed this was because the milk was deficient in vitamin B1, however many others suggested it was due to a toxin present in the milk. When mothers stopped breast feeding their children and fed them other foods also deficient in B1 like sweetened condensed milk, the beriberi rapidly resolved.

This finding is incredibly important because it proves that infantile beriberi is not caused by a deficiency, but rather a toxin present in the milk.

Between the 1930s and 50's dozens upon dozens of papers were published by scientists and medical doctors in Japan about infantile beriberi being caused by a toxin and not by a vitamin deficiency. The following quotes provide a clear example of their position on the matter. 

Quote "Beriberi seems to be generally accepted in America and Europe simply as the equivalent for avitaminosis B, just as scurvy is for avitaminosis C. In this country we, especially pediatricians, who deal with different forms of avitaminosis B, cannot accept this view".

Quote "What is the best treatment for fatal infantile beriberi? Even a massive dose of thiamine (B1) may fail to cure it. Some cases could be cured, if they were weaned immediately and fed a very diluted gruel of polished or thiamine free rice; because they had been transferred from poisonous milk to non-poisonous food. Infantile beriberi is not so much a thiamine-deficient disease, as the result of acute poisoning".

Many medical doctors in the West also shared this view. These papers provide further insight 1, 2, 3.

Long story short, when a food is processed components (let's call them "vitamins") are removed from the food, resulting in incomplete metabolism. This results in a build up of intermediate metabolites which cause toxicity and disease. The "vitamin" is the antidote to the poison so to speak, by facilitating complete metabolism of the food.

In the case of polished rice, the toxic metabolite is known as methyl glyoxal. When this toxin was injected into animals, it resulted in symptoms characteristic of beriberi.

Vitamin deficiency does not cause disease, toxicity does. If deficiency caused disease, then why don't people who fast for 30, 60, 100, 200 days develop scurvy, beriberi and pellagra?

This is just one example. There are countless papers published on other deficiency diseases being caused by toxicity, not deficiency. It's time to rethink our understanding about nutrition.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Episode 70: Dr. Lawrence Palevsky - Childhood Infectious Diseases

https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode70

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky is a New York State licensed pediatrician, who utilizes a holistic approach to children’s wellness and illness. In this podcast, Dr. Palevsky discusses why infectious diseases in children like influenza, chickenpox, measles etc are not contagious. He provides insight into what these diseases are, what causes them, and why they seem to "spread" throughout the community. He also explains how vaccinations might actually be working to prevent these diseases being expressed in children. 

Dr. Palevsky received his medical degree from the New York University School of Medicine in 1987, completed a three-year pediatric residency at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City in 1990, and served as a pediatric fellow in the ambulatory care out-patient department at Bellevue Hospital, New York City, from 1990-1991. Since 1991, his clinical experience includes working in pediatric emergency and intensive care medicine, in-patient, and out-patient pediatric medicine, neonatal intensive care medicine, newborn and delivery room medicine, and conventional, holistic and integrative pediatric private practice. Dr. Palevsky is a diplomate of the American Board of Integrative Holistic Medicine, and Past–President of the American Holistic Medical Association. He received his pediatric board certification in 1990, and passed his pediatric board recertification exams in 1997, 2004, and 2011.

You can hear Dr. Palevsky on his weekly podcast, Critically Thinking with Dr. T & Dr. P on Thursday evenings at 7 pm eastern time, and can listen to more of his podcasts and interviews by visiting, www.drpalevsky.com

Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley

This is a chart of just some of the supposed nutritional biochemical pathways in the body. I remember being fascinated learning about this stuff in my undergraduate degree. I memorised these pathways and then taught subjects on it at universities and colleges. I thought it was all "scientifically proven".

Little did I realise that no one has ever seen these pathways, nor proven their existence. They are just a construct, a model, a "best guess", and that's okay. What's not okay is to pass this stuff off as proven fact. Are these things really happening in the body or is it just a belief system humans invented to explain what they think is going on?

I'm not saying these cartoon drawings aren't useful to try and make sense of human physiology, but how closely do they reflect reality?

I'm not so sure "science" can ever tell us what's really going on inside the human body. It's one of the many mysteries of the universe and maybe, just maybe, it's not meant for us to ever know.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

A Japanese Hotel has made international headlines after Legionella bacteria was detected in the water of its onsen. The bacteria present in the water was 3700 times the legal limit.

The article states that the water was only changed twice per year but should have been changed weekly.

Legionella is said to be the cause of Legionnaires disease, a serious form of bacterial pneumonia. It is claimed people become infected after inhaling water vapour containing the bacteria.

If you have ever been to an onsen, you are constantly inhaling water vapour. I couldnt think of conditions more ideal to be exposed to this so called "pathogen". If Legionella causes disease when inhaled, why weren't people bathing in the onsen developing Legionnaires disease?

The owner of the hotel said "I thought that legionella bacteria was a common bacterium that could be found anywhere. I used the baths myself, even after the bacteria were detected".

Despite this, the owner never got sick and there are no reports of any of the guests who bathed in the water teeming with such a highly "pathogenic bacteria" ever becoming sick.

How does germ theory explain this away?

https://www.9news.com.au/national/japanese-hotel-boss-apologises-for-only-changing-water-in-spa-bath-twice-a-year/9b11ed6f-79ec-471c-8867-71ac820a4bed

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

This morning my partner and I conducted a little experiment. We decided to see how much sweat we lost after spending just 20 minutes in the onsen. We weighed ourselves immediately before and after.

You might be surprised to learn just how much sweat we actually lost in such a small amount of time. I lost 600 ml, she lost 300 ml.

I've been having at least one onsen every day, sometimes two for the last 10 days and I have noticed a dramatic difference in my overall health and wellbeing.

How could this be working? When we sweat, in a sauna, an onsen or whilst exercising, our body excretes highly toxic water soluble chemicals like organophosphates and pyrethroids. Our skin is after all, the largest organ of elimination.

Dr. Marc Cohen, who has appeared on the Humanley podcast, recently published a paper showing high levels of toxic chemicals being excreted in the sweat of people in an infrared sauna and during exercise. This was the first study of its kind.

Results like this really make you think twice about what's going on when we get a fever. Is our body really trying to raise its core temperature to "kill germs" when we are sick with a cold or flu, or is it trying to augment the detoxification process?

You can read the study here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1438463922001742?via%3Dihub

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

A great discussion on viruses, germ theory, lab leaks, DNA, genetics and more with Patrick Timpone, Dr. Sam and Dr. Mark Bailey.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HkE2t6xRsTOa/

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Are they openly admitting that there is no virus?

This is all over mainstream news. "Leaked" WhatsApp messages sent by the UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, show him asking when to "roll pitch" and "deploy details" of a new strain to scare people in to complying with lock down rules.

Of course it's all a stage show, but is this their way of admitting that there never was a virus and it was just a media and government driven fear campaign?

https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/mar/05/matt-hancock-wanted-to-frighten-everyone-into-following-covid-rules

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Imagine if someone told you they can prove water contains sugar by doing the following experiment. They put cordial into a pan, heat it to 100 degrees and begin to boil off the water. As they are heating it they add in some jelly. Once the water is boiled off all that remains is a sticky sugar syrup substance in the bottom of the pan. They conclude water contains sugar.

You would think they are nuts...but this is precisely the flawed methodology virologists use to claim they isolate a v1rus.

Cordial and jelly contains sugar and water. We know that. In order to prove water contains sugar you would have to have a pure sample of water (independent variable), boil it at 100 degrees (dependent variable) and observe the effect.

Virologists take snot (cordial) from a sick person and add it to a cell culture of green monkey kidney cells. They add in (jelly) antibiotics, phenol red, trypsin, foetal bovine calf serum and minimal nutrient medium. When the kidney cells die (syrup in the pan) they claim a v1rus did it (water contains sugar). Voila! V1rus isolation.

There's so much stuff in snot. It is not an independent variable. There's proteins, cytokines, cellular debris, blood, mucous, all kinds of stuff in it. How do they know none of these things present in the snot had an effect? For it to be science, they would have to add only a purified sample of the v1rus to the cell culture, not snot.

They also claim we have a virome and our snot is teeming with different v1ruses (even though they have never seen a v1rus in snot). How do they know which v1ruses are in the snot before they put it in the cell culture?

How do they know the things they put in the cell culture (antibiotics, foetal calf serum etc) didn't kill the kidney cells? They would have to do a proper control experiment, but they don't do that either.

When you don't use an independent variable and don't use the proper controls, it is no longer science but pseudoscience.

Virology is one big magic trick.

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

Ever wondered how they proved influenza is caused by a virus?

Follow these simple steps.

1. Take some snot from a sick person
2. Filter the snot
3. Assume a virus is in there
4. Inject the snot subcutaneously and squirt large volumes into humans noses
5. When they don't get sick proceed to try the same steps with Apes
6. When that doesn't work try it with monkeys
7. When that fails try it with;

- Horses (fail)
- Pigs (fail)
- Dogs (fail)
- Rabbits (fail)
- Guinea pigs (fail)
- Rats (fail)
- Mice (fail)

8. When you have no other animals left, try it on a couple of ferrets that get a bit of a sniffle
9. Conclude the flu is caused by a contagious virus
10. Stop asking questions

I love science!

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673600785412

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

This is a friendly reminder - Can everyone please keep the chat related directly to health and health related topics? There are many other channels for people to discuss their beliefs about cosmology etc.

Whilst I encourage thought provoking discussion and truly value everyone's input, please keep it on topic. I don't want the chat to get railroaded, stray too far from health and turn into a slinging match.

It would be ideal if I don't have to censor people, however if the discussion strays too far away from health or health related topics then I am going to be forced to remove off-topic messages from the chat.

This is a place for everyone to learn and come together, not argue, bicker and divide.

Let's all grow and learn together. Let's challenge what we think we know about health and the human body. Let's enrich each others lives in a safe and enjoyable forum.

Thank you everyone for understanding.

Live right now. Patrick Gunnels and Matt Trump - Do viruses even exist?

https://rumble.com/v2c6mo4-spellbreakers-ep-10-do-viruses-even-exist-wed-730-pm-et-.html?mref=v6mdk&mc=74e3j

Follow Humanley: t.me/humanley

What does a virus, yoghurt and an omelette have in common? They are all man made things.

No one thinks yoghurt comes from a cow. No human has ever seen yoghurt in a cow or coming directly out of a cow. Milk comes from a cow. Yoghurt is made from milk after humans have adulterated it.

No one thinks an omelette comes from a chicken. No one has ever seen an omelette in a chicken or coming directly out of a chicken. Eggs come from a chicken. An omelette is made from eggs after humans have adulterated it.

We are told viruses come from humans. No one has ever seen a virus in a human or seen a virus come out of a human in any bodily fluid. What are claimed to be virus particles are only ever seen in a cell culture after humans have adulterated it.

There will never be any scientific proof that yoghurt comes out of cows, omelettes come out of chickens or viruses out of humans because it simply does not happen. It is not reality no matter how anyone tries to twist it.

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley