I sent this one back to him, lots of juicy stuff in here on germ theory too!

Enjoy!

My friend Dr. Jordan Grant recently appeared on the brilliant Sol Luckman podcast.

Check it out!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9bdHKhbQlxrK/

https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode59

Amandha Dawn Vollmer is the published author of Healing with DMSO, a science-backed guide that will help readers understand how DMSO works, why it works, and the many ways we can harness its power to heal aches, pains, and other ailments, all in an easy-to-read and friendly way.

In the first half of this podcast Amandha talks about supplements and the synergy of nutrients and how she uses DMSO in the management of a wide range of conditions. In the second half, Amandha answers questions from my audience about coffee enemas, molecular hydrogen therapy, as well as dry and wet fasting.

Check out Amandha's websites below;

http://yumnaturals.store/

http://yummy.doctor/

http://healingwithdmso.com/

https://www.patreon.com/yumnaturals

https://dmso.store/

Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley

I wonder why there is no evidence that mould causes disease? Maybe because it doesn't cause disease? Maybe because it's not the mould making people sick, but rather the toxic chemicals off-gassed in to air from building material when it gets damp and humid?

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31608429/

Germ theory logic:

Fire fighters are seen at a house fire, therefore they started the fire.

Detectives are seen at a crime scene, therefore they committed the crime.

Store clerks closed off aisle three, which is full of spilled milk, therefore they spilled the milk.

Terrain theory logic:

Fire fighters are there to put out the fire.

Detectives are there to solve the crime.

The store clerk is there to clean up the milk.

Germs are not the cause of disease, they are the consequence of it. Just because a "germ" is found at the site of diseased tissue, does not mean it CAUSED the disease. Just like fire fighters, detectives or store clerks, germs aren't there to cause the problem, they are there to FIX it.

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Asymptomatic infections disprove germ theory.

Germ theory originally claimed that the mere presence of a "germ" in a sick person was sufficient evidence to prove germs caused disease.

When doctors started finding germs in healthy people, they claimed these people didn't get sick because they had "strong immune systems".

The very young and the very old have "weak immune systems".

How is it possible up to 90% of healthy newborn children (1) & 50% of institutionalised elderly people (2) have asymptomatic Clostridium difficile infections of the gastro-intestinal tract?

How is it possible up to 80% of healthy children in daycare have asymptomatic infections with at least one pathogenic germ and 35% have asymptomatic infections of up to 6 different pathogenic germs? (3)

How is it possible more than 60% of frail, institutionalised elderly women with dementia, aged 80+, have asymptomatic E. coli urinary tract infections? (4)

Follow Humanley on telegram: t.me/humanley

I think we would all agree the cholesterol-cardiovascular-disease hypothesis has been disproven sufficiently.

The scientific evidence is overwhelming against cholesterol being the cause of disease.

Elevated cholesterol does not increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, rather it might REDUCE the risk.

Cholesterol is there to protect tissue against inflammation and oxidative stress. Every single "cell" in the human body is made of cholesterol, the brain, the nervous system, the endocrine system and hormones, digestive secretions, all made of cholesterol.

Why have we been pointing to the effect and labeling it as the cause for so long?

Despite overwhelming scientific evidence, the false paradigm and war against cholesterol is continually perpetuated.

If they were wrong about something as basic as cholesterol and heart disease, what other theories are they wrong about?

Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25672965/

Interesting.

"The environment guided how the cells behaved".

The environment (ie the terrain), is the determining factor.

https://www.science.org/content/article/new-reason-why-newborns-cant-fight-colds

Staphylococcus aureus has always been blamed as the cause of skin infections.

Why? Well, when a swab is taken of a wound, Staph is found. Therefore Staph must be the cause of the problem, right?

Wrong.

Not only is Staph found on the skin of healthy people, new research published in the journal Cell Reports, in October 2020, shows that the "toxin" produced by Staph actually helps to HEAL wounds.

What if the bacteria isn't there to damage our skin? What if it's there to heal the skin when it becomes damaged?

When are we going to get over this unhealthy obsession of blaming germs for our ills?

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Just so everyone is aware, there are bots trying to impersonate my channel.

Humanley will never contact you privately on Telegram. We will never ask for personal information from you.

If you are contacted by a channel or a person claiming to be 'Humanley', please ignore all communication from them.

On the bright side, we are creating our own online platform on the Humanley website, so that our community can converse without having to worry about these kinds of things happening.

Thank you once again everyone for your support!

Enjoy your weekend!

This week, the health and medical industry has been rocked after the main stream media reported that the chemical imbalance theory of depression is incorrect. They're a bit slow to catch on, as this was known almost three decades ago.

Here are a dozen more things that should be making headlines;

1. Anxiety is not caused by a chemical imbalance
2. The sun probably isn't the cause of skin cancer
3. Cholesterol doesn't cause cardiovascular disease
4. B-amyloid plaques don't cause Alzheimer's disease
5. Diabetes isn't caused by sugar or saturated fat
6. Inflammation & oxidative stress doesn't cause disease
7. Obesity is not primarily caused by excessive calories
8. Auto-immunity is not the body attacking itself
9. Dysbiosis & SIBO don't cause disease
10. Reproductive issues aren't caused by a hormonal imbalance
11. Mould doesn't cause disease
12. Germ theory is nothing more than dogma

Follow me on Telegram; t.me/humanley

We met a lady yesterday at the farmers market. She was telling us this was the first time at the market in over half a year, because she had a bicycle accident. She broke her pelvis, spine, skull, an arm and leg. This lady was unvaccinated and said she refused to be vaccinated numerous times during her hospital stay.

Many significant surgeries were required to save her life. She was in ICU for many months The hospital wanted to feed her junk food three times per day, but she demanded to be fed proper, healthy food, to assist her recovery.

From a 'main-stream' perspective, this lady obviously had a compromised 'immune system' from being in a critical condition. How is it possible, given her poor state of health and vaccination status, she didn't get infected?

She proudly boasted that she never got sick, not once since the beginning of the pandemic, despite spending 6 months in a hospital.

How does germ theory explain this away?

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Image link

A brilliant presentation on Debunking the Non-sense of germ theory with Dr. Jordan Grant, Mike Donio, Mike Stone, Jacob Diaz and the HF4H Host, Alec Zeck.

Enjoy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPSViaPCGrM

There are three causes of disease;

1. Deficiency - of nutrients, water, sun, sleep, exercise, love etc
2. Toxicity - from junk food, chemicals, poisons, alcohol, drugs etc
3. Trauma - a physical trauma or emotional trauma

There aren't thousands of different diseases, there's only one. It's called allostasis. Allostasis is the process of being in an active state of returning to homeostasis.

The symptoms are not the problem, they are the answer to the problem. The symptoms are not the disease, they are the body's healing response.

The human body is a self healing entity, it does not do anything wrong. The body has a remarkable capacity to heal itself, when you give it what it needs, remove what it doesn't need, and then get out of the way and let it do its thing.

Nature doesn't do disease. It's a consequence of a toxic, Western, modern, digital lifestyle.

Good health doesn't need to be over-complicated.

Get back to basics.

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Image c/o Archives New Zealand

https://www.humanley.com/mould-webinar

Does mould cause disease?

I’ve spent the last decade educating students and clinicians at universities and colleges around Australia, that it does. Since the floods that affected the East coast of Australia in early 2022, I have spent a lot of time investigating mould related illness. After really looking in to this topic, I have to admit that I was wrong.

This may come as a surprise, but mould is not there to cause disease, it’s there to remedy the problem. I’m not saying people living or working in a water-damaged building don’t get sick, it’s clear that they do, however the mould isn’t to blame. There is a perfectly rational, logical alternative explanation.

Join me on Wednesday the 24th of August, 2022 at 6 PM AEST for a live webinar titled ‘Does Mould Cause Disease?’.

Get 25% off by using the code MOULD25OFF at the checkout when purchasing your ticket.

This offer will end on Wednesday the 3rd of August, 2022.

The webinar will be recorded and CPE points are available.

I’m really looking forward to seeing you there.

Thank you for your support because it means I can continue putting out high quality information about health and wellness.

Daniel Roytas

Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer, has finally seen the light and is now questioning the field of virology. Once you see that all virologists are doing is poisoning cells in a petri dish and claiming it's a virus, you can't un-see it.

The below is a quote by Dr. Yeadon.

"I’m aware this two page backgrounder & experimental proposal aims to show whether or not viruses exist, focussing on SARS-CoV-2. I’m a signatory because, having given a lot of thought to the entire proposition, I now believe it’s yet another of the lies to which we’ve been subject. In the case of scientists, even those in commercial drug discovery, have taken as fact that viruses exist without ever reviewing the original papers.

When you read the earliest such paper, you may get that hollow feeling in your abdomen (as I did) when you realise that what’s being described does not conform to “the scientific method”.

One of the facts that I remember caused me serious problems, early in 2020 (though I confess I simply forgot about it, I think because I naturally assumed the problem was mine) was that no one could get the alleged virus to grow in lining cells from human lungs.
Now, we have to accept, surely, that if there is a transmissible agent that’s spread by release into exhaled breath, droplets etc & causes among other things respiratory illnesses, it MUST freely infect these lining cells.

These are called “normal human bronchial epithelial cells” (HNBE) & though not easy to do, with practise it’s possible to culture these in a very standard manner. When I was in R&D, leading lung / respiratory / allergy research for many years, we routinely employed NHBE as test systems, for example to look at the effect of experimental medicines & other stimuli on airway lining cells.

How it could be possible that NHBE don’t easily support replication of an alleged respiratory virus is severely problematic in my view.
I don’t treat this as a religious matter. I couldn’t care less one way or another whether viruses as a class exist. That’s not the problem.
The problem is that essentially the entire world is hostage to the testable but untested assumption that SARS-CoV-2 is a bona fide infective agent of human airways.

But, telling us that this alleged virus simply won’t grow in NHBE, that’s OK, is it?

Many cell types used in labs are transformed / immortalized cell lines. They often bear no resemblance to the type of tissue they came from. Changes often occur such that they are unlike the natural situation.

But NHBE are PRIMARY cells, taken often from living people & quickly grown in cell culture, using air/liquid interface apparatus. Because their apical surfaces face the air & their basolateral aspect in under water, they retain morphology & behaviour that is, as far as we can tell, identical to the situation in your own airways.

They respond well to several therapeutic drugs like corticosteroids, to pro-inflammatory stimuli like allergens, bacterial toxins, cigarette smoke & condensate, ozone & the like, the are well accepted as a good model for human airway lining cells.

I therefore believe if it’s true that scientists cannot get SARS-CoV-2 will not infect NHBE, that observation alone is extremely problematic.

Anyway, if you’re not already familiar with this controversy, please have a read of the statement & research proposition.

Many thanks
Mike"

https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/

Dr. Kaufman, Dr. Cowan, Mike Stone and Mike Donio on the virus challenge.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rekrHZ52IKZy/

https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode60

Episode 60: Dr. Thomas Dykstra - Entomologist Explains Why Insects Don't Attack Healthy Plants

Dr. Dykstra, eloquently explains terrain theory, but from the perspective of plants and insects.

Most people assume that insects randomly attack any and all plants, and that their main focus in life, is to make farmers and gardeners lives hard, by wreaking havoc amongst crops and gardens, but this couldn't be further from the truth. In this podcast, Entomologist, Dr. Thomas Dykstra explains why insects aren't there to cause problems, but are actually the answer to the problem.

In simple terms, plants become unhealthy first, then insects come along to return the unhealthy plant back to the earth, because the plant is no longer viable. Insects also consume toxic pesticides, herbicides and fungicides and convert them in to less toxic substances that other organisms in nature can utilise for their survival.

Parallel's can be drawn between insects and plants and germs and the human body. That is, the body's tissue becomes diseased first and then the germs come along to clean up the mess.

Dr. Dykstra received his B.S. in entomology from Cornell University in 1990. He traveled down to the University of Florida and received his M.S. in entomology (1994) and investigated the neurophysiology of pheromone production in moths. Continuing at the University of Florida, he received a Ph.D. in insect bioelectromagnetics under Dr. Philip S. Callahan in 1997.

Immediately following his degree, Dr. Dykstra started his own laboratory (Dykstra Laboratories, Inc.) in 1997 which more broadly investigates bioelectromagnetics ranging from bacteria to humans. Predominantly, he studies insect olfaction (how insects smell) from the standpoint of bioelectromagnetics and has developed a new theory based on the fusion of biophysics and neurophysiology.

Dr. Dykstra has traveled all over the United States as well as Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom giving scientific presentations and/or attending scientific conferences. He also gives presentations to local schools and has been the honorary speaker at three science museums.

Visit Dr. Dykstra's website here: http://dykstralabs.com/about-us/

Follow Humanley on Telegram: t.me/humanley

Hi everyone,

I hope you had a great weekend.

This is just a quick reminder to let you know the 25% early bird discount for the upcoming webinar 'Does Mould Cause Disease?' ends this Wednesday, the 3rd of August at 11:59 pm AEST.

Don't miss out on this great offer. Simply use the discount code MOULD25OFF to receive a 25% discount at the checkout when purchasing your ticket.

This webinar will be recorded and CPE points are available.

For more information, or to get your ticket, click on the link below.

https://www.humanley.com/mould-webinar

Thanks once again for your support. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact us via email hello@humanley.com

Kind regards,

Daniel Roytas

Is Sting a conspiracy theorist?

At a concert on Saturday night, he said to his live audience;

"Democracy is under attack. It's under attack in every country in the world. It's in grave danger of being lost unless we defend it."

"The alternative to democracy is a nightmare, a prison, of the mind. That alternative is tyranny. All tyranny is based on a lie. The greater the tyranny, the bigger the lie."

"Disagree with the tyrant and you risk imprisonment, torture and death. Yet that is what we must do, all of us. We must protect our right to speak the truth."

"The war in the Ukraine is an absurdity, based upon a lie. If we swallow that lie, the lie will eat us. The lie is terrified of the truth."

"We must not lose this battle".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDy5VmUML9o