Dr. Paul Thomas published a paper back in 2020 comparing the health of vaccinated children versus the unvaccinated children he saw in his clinic.

Here's a 6 minute video of Dr. Thomas explaining his findings: https://rumble.com/v11khg5-dr.-paul-thomas-blows-up-the-conventional-vaccine-narrative-incredible-stat.html?fbclid=IwAR2WfNa1o-Fu2XvPg6-Etl6uSDUbieGndvXGbeJYohV1ao2Tx2nKwypNfDk

Here's the "retracted" paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709050/

You be the judge.

Another brilliant presentation by none other than Dr. Jordan Grant. We need more good men and doctors like him in this world.

The Philosophy of Modern Medicine - Dr. Jordan Grant (2022 Conference) - What really makes us ill and what can we do to optimise our health?

https://rumble.com/v13d7or-2022-conference-jordan-grant-the-philosophy-of-modern-medicine.html

Entomologist Dr. Thomas Dykstra gave a thought provoking presentation last year titled "Why insects do not (and cannot) attack healthy plants".

What we see happening in nature, is what happens inside the human body, because we are a part of nature. Insects don't cause disease in plants, just like germs don't cause disease in humans. When a plant becomes nutrient deficient, toxic, or the environment changes in such a way that it's no longer conducive for the survival of the plant, nature intends to return the plant back to the earth. In order to return the plant to the soil, bugs / insects come along to break the plant down, returning the plants organic matter back to the soil, for other "healthy" plants nearby, to utilise.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnNOvA3diDU

More wise words from Amandha Vollmer on the Humanley podcast Episode 25 - https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode25

Amanda is coming back on the podcast. I'll be interviewing her this weekend. If there's anything you want me to ask her, post your question in the comments section.

When you finally see what's going on with germ theory, you can't unsee it.

https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8

Is vitamin D messing with our hormones?

I've been critical of vitamin D supplementation for a long time now. People fiercely defend it, despite a lack of evidence proving any meaningful beneficial health effect from supplementation. The evidence clearly shows that serum vitamin D is nothing more than a marker of sun exposure.

On 25 October 2021, France notified the Commission and Member States of a draft decree in which the main form of vitamin D, cholecalciferol, is included in the list substances of very high concern (SVHC) as an endocrine disruptor.

It's time to seriously re-think our use of vitamin D supplementation.

Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley

A Dozen Reasons To Kick Caffeine

1. Negatively affects sperm production and function https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482951/

2. Impairs glucose tolerance
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2277186/

3. Accelerates the rate of bone loss
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11684540/

4. Increases serum cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22713771/

5. Amplifies the fight or flight response
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8935513/

6. Makes you more easily persuadable & suggestible
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02098.x

7. Increases false memories
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20445911.2011.647905

8. Reduces blood flow to the brain by up to 30%
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2748160/

9. May cause insomnia, anxiety and depression
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826990/

10. Impairs cognition
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2726998/

11. The perceived physical and cognitive 'benefits' from your morning mug of joe, might just be due to the reversal of withdrawal symptoms from the previous days cup.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6292246/

(Point 12 covered in the next post)

Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley

Continued from previous post...

12. Finally, check out what happened to the web building capacity of spiders fed caffeine compared to a bunch of other drugs…

Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley

Why do we blame mould as the cause of disease? There are countless experiments showing that "toxic mould” only grows & produces mycotoxins under certain conditions.

Both petri dishes contain the toxic mould S. chartarum, but different growth media.

The culture on the left favours growth & mycotoxin production, whereas the culture on the right doesn’t.

Same mould species + different conditions = different growth and different rate of mycotoxin production.

It's not the mould causing the problem. It's the toxic environmental conditions and toxic chemicals the mould uses as a fuel source, which is the problem.

How else do we think mother nature is going to clean up the mess humans have created?

Stop blaming the garbage man for the mess at the garbage dump!

Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley

It's the mould making me sick! Or is it?

These are just some of the toxic chemicals in building material.

When building material gets wet, these toxic chemicals begin leaching into the air. For example, leaching of formaldehyde increases by up to 1000% when building material gets wet.

The symptoms of breathing in these chemicals are identical to those of "mould related illness".

There's not a single controlled experiment showing mould inhalation causes symptoms in humans, but there's countless experiments where people get sick from inhaling these toxic chemicals.

It's well established that mould biodegrades these toxins into non-toxic substances. For example, mould converts formaldehyde, into non-toxic organic acids, which can be recycled back into the environment and used by other micro-organisms as an energy source.

Mother nature is cleaning up our mess and then we blame the problem on the mould!

Follow me: t.me/humanley

Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389421025425

What does the "real" scientific evidence about mould exposure tell us?

In 2004, a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial was conducted to see what happens when mould-sensitive people inhaled spores from the pathogenic moulds, P. chrysogenum & T. harzianum. They inhaled spores for 6 minutes per day, over 3 days.

None of the participants experienced any adverse effects.

This was the first experiment ever conducted exposing people to mould (via inhalation), & there doesn't seem to be any experiments like it since.

If this is the only human challenge experiment, it means that the current weight of scientific evidence suggests inhalation of spores, does not cause illness.

This isn't meant to detract from people who become ill when living in mould infested homes. What it is meant to do is get people thinking that maybe there is another cause. Toxic fumes off-gassing from damp and humid building material perhaps?

Follow me: t.me/humanley

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15926947/

Sol Luckman with Dr. Tom Cowan.

Keep your eyes peeled as I will be releasing a podcast very soon with Dr. Cowan.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/7qaYWCykI1mbG5E60hSLtw?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Why are we taking synthetic vitamin pills?

Part 1 of 2.

Let's think about synthetic vitamin C (ascorbic acid) compared to natural vitamin C. We are told they are exactly the same, because the chemical structures are the same. The chemical structure is determined by spectroscopy. We assume that there is nothing more to a "vitamin" than its chemical structure.

This would be like showing someone two pictures of identical fridges. They can tell me it's a fridge by looking at it. They are the same.

But can they tell me what's inside each fridge by looking at the outside of it? No. They have to open the fridge and look inside. One fridge might be full of soft-drink and cake, whilst the other might be full of beautiful fresh produce.

When we look at vitamins using other visualization techniques, like those in the chromatography experiments (see image below) conducted by the scientist Ehrenfried E. Pfeiffer, we begin to see massive differences between synthetic and natural vitamins. Using other visualization techniques like chromatograms is analogous to looking inside the fridge.

To think that a vitamin synthesized in a lab somewhere and shoved into a pill with a bunch of excipients is just as good as eating a beautiful fresh strawberry is beyond ignorant.

When we start synthesizing vitamins and minerals in laboratories and putting them into the body, we assume they work in the body the same way. After all, a vitamin is a vitamin, whether its from food or from a lab, right?

Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley

Why are we taking synthetic vitamin pills?

Part 2 of 2.

If you take a supplement with iron and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) together for example, a reaction occurs in the gastro-intestinal tract called the Fenton reaction. This reaction produces a highly damaging free radical which can damage intestinal tissue, cause inflammation, ulceration and possibly cancer (1).

But this effect doesn't happen when you eat foods containing iron and vitamin C. Why? Because mother nature is incredibly intelligent and has included hundreds of other compounds in foods to stop this damaging effect from occurring. For example, if you eat a piece of fruit (which contains vitamin C) and a piece of meat (which contains iron), the Fenton reaction is likely to be prevented by the antioxidants and polyphenols in the fruit(2) and substances in the meat like hydroxyproline(3).

Is it time to re-think our obsession with "supplements"?

Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley

References:

Ref 1

Ref 2

Ref 3

You Can't Say That!

Peter Christoph has just released his new book titled "You Can't Say That - How Society Influences Our Perception".

Peter approached me at the beginning of the year and asked if I would write a foreword for his new book, which explores human behaviour, more specifically if society can influence the way we think and how we form our opinions.

This is a great read for those that are struggling to understand why their friends and family may think differently on certain issues. If you have tried opening the minds of those around you but they aren't interested, this book might help them realise that everything may not be as it seems.

This is a great read and is something that you can finish in just a few hours!

If you would like to support Peter's work, head on over to https://welcomecuriousminds.com/ and get your copy of his new e-book. All proceeds go to Peter, so that he can continue publishing more engaging and thought provoking content!

Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley

Is it really mould making people sick?

There are other plausible explanations. Building material contains countless harmful toxins. When the material gets water damaged in damp humid conditions, these harmful chemicals are off-gassed into the air. Inhalation of these toxic chemicals has been shown in dozens of human controlled trials to induce symptoms identical to "mould related illness".

No controlled experiment has ever shown inhalation of mould spores or mycotoxins from mould infested buildings to cause illness.

Are we mistaking "multiple chemical sensitivity" for "mould related illness"?

Follow me on telegram: t.me/humanley

Source: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/10915810490265423

https://www.humanley.com/blog/episode57

Episode 57: Dr. Saeed Qureshi - Non-sense non-science

Dr. Qureshi is an internationally recognized scientist. For the past 40 years, including 30 years with Health Canada, he has been involved in the isolation, characterization, and testing of food and pharmaceutical substances.

Dr. Qureshi obtained his Ph.D. under the guidance of (late) Prof. M. Verzele (University of Ghent, Belgium), a world-renowned scientist in separation and isolation science using techniques such as counter-current distribution (CCD) technique and modern techniques of chromatography (gas and liquid) coupled with mass spectrometry.

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic episode, he has been educating and guiding people about the unfortunate use of false, in fact, fraudulent science in virus isolation, testing, and vaccine development.

In this podcast, Dr. Qureshi gives a thought provoking presentation about the science, or lack thereof, in regards to virus isolation, v*ccin*e efficacy and the issues plaguing PCR testing.

Check out Dr. Qureshi's website here: https://bioanalyticx.com/

Make sure to follow Humanley on telegram: t.me/humanley

Vitamin supplements contain ascorbic acid, not vitamin C.

Vitamin C is an entire complex in whole foods, consisting of ascorbic acid & P, K & J factors.

Ascorbic acid in supplements is synthesised in a laboratory from the Reichstein process by;

1. Converting D-glucose from GMO corn to D-sorbitol by a hydrogenation reaction catalysed by nickel.

2. D-sorbitol is fermented by acetobacter to L-sorbose.

3. L-sorbose is converted to diacetone-L-sorbose with acetone (nail polish remover) & an acid.

4. Diacetone-L-sorbose is converted to diprogulic acid with potassium permangenate.

5. Diprogulic acid is converted to gulonic acid with heat & water.

6. Gulonic acid is converted to ascorbic acid with a reaction catalysed by platinum.

7. Ascorbic acid is combined with excipients to make "vitamin C" powders & tablets.

Vitamin C from foods, behaves differently in the body than synthetic "ascorbic acid".

The best way to get vitamin C is to just eat real food.

Follow Humanley on telegram: t.me/humanley

I've been listening to Mark Devlin for a number of years. He has a podcast called 'Good Vibrations'.

If you haven't come across Mark's work before, his stuff is absolutely brilliant.

In this podcast, he speaks with Iain Clifford & Dr. Sam White.

Dr. White was a GP for 18 years in the UK, who made international headlines during the pandemic for challenging the current allopathic model of modern medicine and questioning the validity of the science around the isolation of the "virus". He also speaks with Iain White about sovereinty and breaking free of the the financial system.

Enjoy.

https://matrixfreedom.life/mark-devlin-interviewing-iain-clifford-and-dr-sam-white-matrixfreedom/

Time to hypothesise. How do we know we are made of cells? Has anyone ever observed a "cell" containing all of the organelles we are shown in the diagrams of text books, inside a living human being?

How do we know that when we cut tissue out of a living organism, that compartments within the tissue aren't produced? Is it possible the "cells" and "organelles" we are looking at under a microscope are nothing more than artifacts?

If only Prof. Hillman was still around today. I would love to interview him.

Follow me: t.me/humanley

There are no "cell membrane pumps" like the sodium potassium pump.

First and foremost, there are more than 2500 pumps proposed to exist, yet not a single one has ever been observed with a microscope.

Secondly, the sodium potassium pump is just one of these pumps and would require between 1500%- 3500% more energy than a cell is capable of producing.

Thirdly, sodium, calcium and magnesium pumps would require 350% more energy than a cell is capable of producing.

Finally, simple calculations prove that there would not be enough space for 2500 different pumps to exist within the cell membrane.

It's time to start rethinking cell biology.

Follow me on Telegram: t.me/humanley

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9654772/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4899603/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2225747/