Forwarded from Anticapitalist Surrealism π©π¦Ύπ» (Francesco Tankready)
Forwarded from Anticapitalist Surrealism π©π¦Ύπ» (Francesco Tankready)
This is a member of the Norwegian royal family. This is the kind of person rightoids want to subsidise with the money of their country and of the wealth extracted from the global south.
Should monarchy be allowed to go on for much longer?
Should monarchy be allowed to go on for much longer?
π1
friendly reminder that some monarchs still exist and their heads haven't been cut off yet
Forwarded from Π₯Π»ΡΠ±Π΅ΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ π₯ (Π₯lib [ZackMudak])
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from La pirateria Γ¨ figa (Alecs)
Forwarded from Antiwork
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
which one is the real lyrics
Forwarded from The Communist Horizon
It's very funny that communists are constantly accused of advocating income distribution, currently largely because of left-wing liberals who advocate it, and now it's trendy to advocate a new kind, which is Universal Basic Income. This is basically a way of strengthening the private sector and tying the working class even more to dependence on private services to the detriment of public services, which are already very precarious under capitalism, by the way (and obviously within the capitalist system this will never change).
But do both the liberals who accuse the communists of advocating income distribution and the liberals who advocate Universal Basic Income know that many neoliberal economists have long supported Universal Basic Income, including one of the most prominent exponents of neoliberalism, Milton Friedman?
What's more, do those who accuse communists of advocating income distribution know that the central issue for Marx regarding the problems of capitalism doesn't rely on distribution, but on PRODUCTION, i.e. the functioning of the capitalist mode of production? So Marx would never have agreed with this proposed βsolutionβ. It's a liberal proposal that barely touches on the issue of production, on the real issue that is the exploitation of the working class, on the product of our labor that is ripped off from us.
But do both the liberals who accuse the communists of advocating income distribution and the liberals who advocate Universal Basic Income know that many neoliberal economists have long supported Universal Basic Income, including one of the most prominent exponents of neoliberalism, Milton Friedman?
What's more, do those who accuse communists of advocating income distribution know that the central issue for Marx regarding the problems of capitalism doesn't rely on distribution, but on PRODUCTION, i.e. the functioning of the capitalist mode of production? So Marx would never have agreed with this proposed βsolutionβ. It's a liberal proposal that barely touches on the issue of production, on the real issue that is the exploitation of the working class, on the product of our labor that is ripped off from us.
the zucc with the lizard is peak tbh
"noooo with these deepfakes we won't be able to distinguish between what's real information and what's not πππ" mfers really don't know what a digital signature is
Forwarded from LON - I Memes di Benjamin (ΡΠΌΡ§nuΡlΡ ε¨δΉζ§ βοΈ)
Forwarded from Ascelle goonclub (Dottor. Culocane |β€οΈβπ©Ή|βΜ·|β| [nome incompleto|...])
(btw until we won't have nuclear fusion we should use renewables as much as possible instead of nuclear fission and fossil fuels)
π1