New opinion from Ray Pistol calling on the mainstream right to make more noise about next week's High Court challenge, which will determine whether the Australian government can ban rival political parties.

"Labor is attempting to abolish democracy"

https://www.noticer.news/white-australia-party-high-court-case-silence/

Follow: @NoticerNews

James Mason informs the other Elders of White Supremacy about the White Australia Party’s High Court challenge in Australia.

It is unsurprising to see this species hanging around this crop, given that it used to be known as ‘rapeseed’.

https://t.me/NoticerNews/4041

New South Wales is a disgusting police and prison state

Hundreds of black-clad anti-immigration protesters have descended on Dover, Britain's busiest port, shutting it down for hours and overwhelming police.

https://www.noticer.news/dover-anti-immigration-protest-port/

Follow: @NoticerNews

New opinion from Mitch Sutton analysing the "blatantly unconstitutional" hate group laws that are being challenged by the White Australia Party in the High Court next week.

"Australia's future as a free, democratic country rests on the court's decision"

https://www.noticer.news/australia-hate-group-laws-worse/

Follow: @NoticerNews

Finnish patriots march for remigration

These are the three main reasons why some retarded right-wingers are naysaying the High Court challenge against the Prohibited Hate Group laws.

1. They have no idea what these laws actually mean in practice.

2. They hate the NSN so much that they’re happy to accept the destruction of Australia’s political freedoms and representative democracy because it’s being done to the Nazis first.

3. They are tough-guy Twitter Nazis who think being a revolutionary means simply accepting when the government represses you, taking it like a good little boy and refusing to criticise the government for its repression.

The power of family is the same power as that of race

Lucy Carter didn't get the memo from ASIO and Home Affairs to keep her mouth shut about the case.

The article is actually quite balanced when compared with the slop that mainstream media companies usually churn out.

The article ends with a high-ranking Jew asking the government to legislate another law banning Hizb ut-Tahrir and the White Australia Party if the Prohibited Hate Groups laws are ruled unconstitutional. And these people wonder why they are hated.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-07/will-high-court-let-neo-nazis-form-political-party/107103792

Personally I think the system is highly anticipating a loss and this is preemptive damage control.

“Mr Hyams said if the White Australia Party was victorious, it should not be interpreted as any kind of endorsement by the High Court.”

Plus lots of talk in there about free speech being available for even views that are seemingly offensive or disliked.

Constitutional Professor Anne Twomey has written an article for The Conversation about the WAP High Court case.

In it, she explains the arguments of the legal challenge, and the potential ramifications.

“This decision may be vital in preventing the misuse of such powers by a future authoritarian government as a means of banning opposition groups or parties.”

https://theconversation.com/could-the-white-australia-party-succeed-in-challenging-its-ban-291352