A Machiavellian government would enforce the law impartially.

But the two-tier injustice is so deep in the hearts of system functionaries that they dare not lay a finger on grandma-bashers and teenagers calling for the murder of a politician — as long as they are on the left, of course. Keep in mind that nationalists in Australia have been jailed for merely yelling at leftist grandmas, making jokes about political violence, and giving the Roman salute.

They are more concerned with protecting some violent anti-Fascists and some stupid kids rather than the legitimacy of a state governing 28 million. Well, good luck to them — they will need it as they continue to go down this path.

https://t.me/NoticerNews/3939

Stochastic terrorism is just a rebranding of the retarded leftist line “words are violence” – a line that nobody can bring themselves to say anymore for fear of being mocked and humiliated.

But rebranding it with academic jargon doesn’t make the underlying concept any less retarded. When the obscurity eventually dissipates and the common man becomes familiar with what the jargon means, these academics will be mocked and humiliated with even more fervour.

If we took this concept seriously, then a party system or any sort of government accountability would be impossible. You couldn’t criticise anyone or any policy or any group – after all, some loon might go out and kill the target of the criticism.

https://t.me/SwindonArchive/1994

Unless Fascists are certain of our conditions for victory, interlopers will misuse the movement for their own pet issues

I don’t think one should throw it in their face in earnest. It would be like being in a fight to the death and picking up a water gun because one’s enemy is using it.

Of course, you’re right in that we should point out how retarded the concept is and how they only selectively apply it to their political enemies. This is an exercise in pointing out their wickedness, incompetence and hypocrisy.

But nationalists should not whine about how the media demonises us and how that demonisation makes anti-Fascists try to bash us. The journalists are evil for what they have actually done: their slander, their omission, their activism. They are not evil because they are magically responsible for the violence of random anti-Fascists.

The media is only responsible for violence when they are actively and deliberately inciting it with paid provocateurs and providing information that facilitates an attack — like what ASIO and Channel 9 did at Cathedral Ranges.

I don’t think anti-Fascists beat up grandmas because the media told them Pauline Hanson is evil. They lack the instinct that tells normal people to not attack children and the elderly; and the police and magistrates refuse to punish them sufficiently. That’s why it happens.

https://t.me/SwindonArchive/1995

“You’ll be a millionaire if you’re a builder or plumber or electrician. You’re better off going and doing that because you get to go home to your wife and your kids and your family every night. Because the government will send you overseas, they’ll allow you to do your job that you’ve been training for for decades, and then when you do your job you get dragged through the coals and face potential life imprisonment when you come home – for doing your job which has come down from the highest levels of government.”
- Dean Burgess, a former Australian Special Forces operator

Join the Australian Defence Force and risk losing your life to the enemy or to Commonwealth prosecutors. Don’t fight a war on two fronts when you don’t have to.

James Mason reads and reacts to my latest article on the Australian Government citing a Communist spy as an authority, and the Commonwealths constitutional arguments being secondary to emotional arguments about the Holocaust.

The system cannot change what you feel in your soul unless you let them

They want to ban your beliefs and lock you up, or worse. It’s time we stop pretending it’s all fun games and get serious. We need a constitutional right to free speech before they take away what’s left of it, and Australia is defenceless.

From AUSPILL (X)

New opinion from Ray Pistol on how Australia's "hate speech" and "hate group" laws are the result of a multigenerational communist plot to make nationalism illegal.

"March for Australia on August 30, or submit to communism, there is no third option"

https://www.noticer.news/march-free-speech-submit-communism/

Follow: @NoticerNews

One Nation are aiding and abetting the ever-encroaching police state. This amendment is so pointless; it beggars belief.

Historians in a hundred years' time will be writing paragraphs about how every week a news article would come out explaining that native Britons were receiving prison sentences double the length of the sentences received by the foreign rapists they were protesting, and that the British establishment refused to course-correct. The book will be titled The British Civil War and the paragraph will be in the Prelude to the War chapter.

https://t.me/NoticerNews/3951

There are rules governing the cosmos and there is an ideal way to conduct oneself according to those rules

NSW Premier Chris Minns squirms as Libertarian MLC John Ruddick grills him on whether multiculturalism and free speech are compatible, and whether Minns would support a plebiscite (vote) from the NSW public on free speech.

Ruddick presses him to explain why he has stated 4 times that “free speech and multiculturalism aren’t compatible”

Minns also attempts to justify his “nazi conduct” laws and other hate speech laws on the Bondi terror attack, which was committed by Indian Muslims

A danger inherent in the creative capacity of humanity is that we can start believing false likenesses accurately represent reality

The assimilation process in the mind of the boomer

New X Article, summarising the arguments put forward by each of the states in the White Australia Party High Court case.

Explores each state briefly at a time, and how their arguments are largely technical attempts to distinguish the prohibited hate group organisation from existing case law precedents.

Notably, Queensland has intervened neutrally, in support of neither party, and argues concerns about the nationhood power that the Commonwealth is relying on, could later be used to erode state powers under federalism as a result of loosely used "national emergency" situations, however supported the other elements of the legislation.

Read time: 6 -7 minutes, there was a lot of filed material to have to condense and summarise.

You can view without leaving telegram at this link below:
https://fixupx.com/LonePatriot14/status/2090970111914250391?s=20

Presumably, if the White Australia Party gained a majority in the Australian Parliament, it could enter into the God Bless Adolf Hitler International Treaty and suspend elections thereafter. After all, the treaty requires signatories to suspend elections as they are Jewish and cause great spiritual and physical harm to Aryan peoples.

The external affairs power allows you to ignore the rest of the Constitution when it’s convenient, so say the lawyers of the Commonwealth and the States.

In Britain, they managed to get a video of the elusive social cohesion. As you can see, the social is cohering really well.

Even I didn’t foresee that a citizenship questionnaire wouldn’t be strong enough to stop Islamists from beating transvestites with cudgels. Maybe British elites need to add a few extra questions?

The West may be wealthy, but we are losing our ability to maintain that wealth

Australia is a Third-World banana republic in all but name – with a Third-World economy, Third-World laws and an increasingly Third-World population.

Take a look at the reasoning of King’s Counsel who are paid millions of dollars to think and argue about laws.

Popular sovereignty can stop popular sovereignty so we need to stop popular sovereignty when popular sovereignty stops popular sovereignty.

Sometimes A stops A, so we need to stop A before A stops A.

These are apparently our nation’s most gifted legal minds.

But of course, popular sovereignty to these people just means a popular sovereignty that reflects the politics of the current government. What they are talking about here is not popular sovereignty, but multiculturalism.

Sometimes popular sovereignty stops multiculturalism, so we need to stop popular sovereignty before popular sovereignty stops multiculturalism.

Sometimes A stops B, so we need to stop A before A stops B.

This is what the laws amount to. The government is just too dishonest to admit that they believe that liberal-democracy is over now and it has been replaced with police-state multiculturalism.

If the Zionists want the Australian Government to be able to ban political parties that oppose Zionism and multiculturalism, then they should hold a referendum and ask the population if they want to change the Constitution from a liberal-democratic document into a police-state multiculturalist one. As it stands today, that is the process that the Constitution outlines.

If the High Court rules in favour of the Commonwealth in this case, it will only prove that the Constitution isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.