Picking up garbage is useless activism

The White Australia submissions and legal arguments are objectively very good, by all analysis. They have 2 experienced barristers working on it and a solicitor.

The WAP were limited to 20 pages of submissions, so of course could only reserve 5 pages to each ground of argument.

He spent half the time on his podcast calling Nazis "attention seekers" for challenging this insane legislation, and all this other cucked nonsense. He could've just said nothing and talked about defending free speech.

These people are just the biggest cucks and will use any opportunity to try promote themselves, even falsely slandering others to do so. He also immediately follows up his retarded claims by asking for money, so theres an incentive there too

https://t.me/hersantite/523

To legitimise ideological grievances and to justify acts of violence are two different things. But the paid liars and torturers of the counter-terrorism industry refuse to accept this.

This obstinate conflating of political advocacy and mass murder is why the industry will only effectuate more terrorism.

The enemies of free speech are the enemies of Australia.

The radical left plan to counter protest our free speech rally on August 30..
Whether its Pauline Hanson or Thomas Sewell, an online post or a t-shirt, March for Australia will defend of the free speech of all Australian patriots. "Hate speech" is a genocidal concept made up by communists as a pretext to silence resistance against Australian replacement and the increasingly unpopular Albanese regime. We will not be intimidated out of standing up for free speech.

The ANZACs fought for a free Australia and a free Australia we will have.

Catholic cuckservatism is when you raise the mongrel spawn of your daughter’s murderer and say “don’t give in to hate” and “I forgive him” for the newspapers.

Where’s Phinehas when you need him?

https://t.me/NoticerNews/3912

I never led Antipodean Resistance, though I was an enthusiastic member. That’s why AR looks different from the NSN, which I founded and led.

Antipodean Resistance was already defunct by the time Tarrant shot up the mosque and by the time The Base did some phone interviews with some guys in Western Australia. I don’t know a single person who was in AR that did a phone interview with The Base. And if it could be proved that they glorified Tarrant, then they would have been charged and probably would have done jail sentences for it.

If Sherryn Groch wants to write fiction, why doesn’t she apply to write briefs for Victoria Police?

Most of the information about Australian neo-Nazism online is hearsay. Honest journalists can contact me if they want to verify information about the last decade of the Australian movement. If I don't know it, I know someone who does.

A parliamentary committee made up of members of both major parties has completed a review of the listing of the White Australia Party as a prohibited hate group, and found that the ban was justified.

https://www.noticer.news/white-australia-party-ban-parliamentary-review/

Follow: @NoticerNews

There is an ideal metaphysical and moral system in the cosmos, which Fascists should try to discover and accord with

“We will not allow hate to be dressed up as political debate.”

I think the High Court will most likely rule that these laws are constitutionally invalid. But that doesn’t change the fact that liberal democracy is dead because the majority of parliamentarians agree with disenfranchising those whom they consider haters and believe it is somehow consistent with liberal democracy.

Disenfranchising movements on the pretext of a universal human emotion means that anybody can be disenfranchised. It’s arbitrary. The politicians are either too stupid to see that or they are so vicious that they just pretend not to.

I am glad Pauline is repeating the talking points that I said in a previous video. What is being done to Ben Roberts-Smith is a disgrace.

But there is something that Pauline has left out of this. One Nation voted for this amendment. They should not have.

Labor didn’t make a retrospective change to the law; more accurately, the amended law is being applied to conduct that took place before the amendment was enacted, that is to say, the amended law is being used retrospectively.

Pauline cannot foist the blame onto Labor for changing the law considering One Nation voted for it as well. She can blame Labor for using the amended law retrospectively though. She needs to be more precise in her speech.

Retroactive law is the new norm for Australia

Least disingenuous leftist

“IT’S A TRANNY”

This is so funny. South Australian parliamentarian says what we’re all thinking.

An Indian woman who tried to hack a toddler to death with a meat cleaver in New Zealand has been jailed for just five years thanks to a mental health sentencing discount.

She claimed she carried out the attack because of the "stresses and strains" of leaving her home country.

https://www.noticer.news/hamilton-new-zealand-woman-jailed-meat-cleaver-attack/

Follow: @NoticerNews

New Zealand is a strange country — where barristers are comedians and foreigners who butcher toddlers with a meat cleaver are eligible for parole in less than two years.

Some nationalists falsely believe Hitler planned a holocaust of Slavs

Fascists should fight for their respective nations rather than fleeing to the first Fascist state that arises in the 21st century

The Commonwealth posted their final defence document yesterday, and its just more of what I already wrote about in my article on the topic.

Invocations of the "evils of Nazi Germany" in the first pages, attempts to influence the atmosphere of the court and emotionalise the case.

And some assertions that Nazis dont deserve free speech and the right to political communication.

Then more weak engagement on Constitutionality of their legislating (because there is none), they attempt to rely on the CERD treaties, which obviously some UN treaties don't overrule our Constitution.

Plus, they already conceded in the Special Case agreed facts, that the party is a legitimate party under the law, and planned to contest elections, so their attempted framing it as an illegitimate party is already defunct by their own agreement.

You can read it yourself on the DLS
https://dls.hcourt.gov.au/static/PublicSearch

Heres another insane point made by the Commonwealth.

Apparently Nazi Ideology isn't legitimate political speech to them.

Their reasoning? History has shown us why.

"Just be a hecking good person", "haven't you heard of the HOLOCAUST" soyjak defence.

Incredible how they can continue just propagandising in our favour, that the system doesn't care about free speech for certain ideologies or individuals that the system hates.

Will the Commonwealth be bringing Mr. History onto the stand to testify?

Why does the Commonwealth have leftist Twitch streamers writing their constitutional arguments?

How they were writing "History has shown us why", and saying "space shouldn't be made for Neo-Nazis"