In central and most of Eastern Europe, there are very few blacks. So they dont know much about them and their destructive potential first hand, even though a good number might be racist. By making it a "American" thing, more than a "black" thing, they are basically putting central Europeans in a position to accept blacks more readily than they normally would,

If your average American conservatives were more inclined to share their political views on their vehicles, you’d see vehicles covered in stickers like this far more often.

Even regular American conservatives have to hide their power level at times. I’m not saying Raymond here is a normie conservative, but he probably couldn’t even have pro-2A stickers on his car. The point here is that the average conservative American is more right leaning and aware than people on Telegram realize — Telegram movement folks just don’t see it because conservatives in real life typically hide their power level too, for obvious reasons.

You know most "pro-gun" politicians are full of it because you never hear them rally around abolishing the National Firearms Act or legalizing so-called "short-barrelled rifles."

I just want to legally put an 11.5" upper on my existing "rifle" receiver without having to put it on the ATF's NFA registry. Is that really so much to ask? That I shouldn't need some glowie's permission to own a piece of property for lawful purposes?

This is like the most obvious thing in the world. There's no real evidence that any of these gay hall monitor rules do anything to reduce violent crime, and plenty of evidence that they serve only to annoy the law-abiding.

Is Imperium Press even pro-White? I’m confused. Here’s some quotes from his recent blog post:

“Liberalism hurts us, but it also hurts non-whites and that is also a tragedy. If we look at the data, we have every reason to think that European peoples will enjoy a demographic comparative advantage soon. Great news for us, but it would be a shame to lose the richness of the different peoples of the world, and by working to blot out liberalism everywhere, we help everyone. This is a powerful framing, so keep it in mind as you read on.”

“We have given the smallpox blanket of democracy, rule of law, and human rights to the third world.”

“Our ethnic competitors are going up in a puff of smoke. This is not something to be celebrated, it is a tragedy. Multiculturalism, liberalism, universalism, and other viral, entropic belief systems will kill off cultures that, although they have taken advantage of our hospitality, are in some cases still noble and deserve a place on this earth—in their own backyard.”

This whole idea that all of the earth’s diversity is worth preserving comes off as naive and pathologically altruistic at best — it’s not even a useful frame for getting other races on board with respecting White Nationalism. Objectively, the world would be much better and much cleaner if more of the global population were racially White.

https://imperiumpress.substack.com/p/the-third-world-is-going-to-cop-it-b9e

Dare I say it: our planet of finite living space and resources doesn’t need 1.4 billion Chinese people, it doesn’t need 1.4 billion Indians, it doesn’t need 1.2 billion Sub Saharan blacks, nor does it need a billion of any of the other brown races. Sounds mean, but it’s the god damn truth.

Preserving global human diversity isn’t a worthy cause, it’s absolutely detrimental when considering that the White race — a major branch off of the human tree — is estimated to be less than 8% of the total world population. Also, most Whites live on a small continent called Europe, and it’s already completely full. Whites can’t afford to give up an inch of land anywhere, or else we’ll all be wiped out by a brown planet. Imagine if Whites were only 5% to 2% of the total global population — if White Europeans didn’t do colonialism, that’s the percentages we’d have right now. Thank goodness for colonialism!

Look at this map and ask yourself: was it really a mistake for Whites to leave Europe and populate other areas of the world? Imagine if Whites had never left Europe, would that have been better? Think strategically here.

To the people that think Whites should have never left Europe: what percentage of the earth’s population do you think should be White?

People also seem to forget that at several points in history, large parts of Europe were conquered by non-Whites. There’s nothing guaranteeing that can’t happen again. So why should Whites, a major branch off of the human tree, be limited to such a small continent (Europe)? To think “we should have never left” isn’t just silly, it gives credit to a way of think that facilitates placing hard limits on your race, which is a survival risk.

People just don't understand how important the Second Amendment really is — and no, our rights don't come from a piece of paper, but the 2A is a critical legal roadblock against a powerful system that hates us. Even within our supposedly Right Wing movement, too many people still belittle the concept of a right to keep and bear arms; they act like it doesn't matter because they think protesting in the streets will always suffice. Do they ever stop and think about all the great men of the past that we revere today on the Right, that our people built statues of, were they just protestors? Did they just demonstrate and hold up signs against their enemies? NO, they were absolute warriors, warriors with weapons of war that defended their people and redrew borders on maps. That's what it means to be a great man (especially in the Right Wing context, you'd think) and gun control is nothing more than an attempt to castrate that whole phenomenon.

https://t.me/TheTitanist/1415

Ohio is setting a good example for other states to follow.

https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/columbus/ohio-board-of-education-approves-anti-lgbtq-resolution

As long as it’s constitutional monarchy with the right to keep and bear arms protected in the new constitutional, I’m down with this.

https://t.me/TheCourseofEmpire/19844

That being said, just having a monarchy to have a monarchy wouldn’t solve any of our problems, and it could even make them much worse. There’s quite a few countries that are still technically a monarchy, Canada is one of them. Whatever form of government our people accept going into the future, there needs to be harder constitutional limits placed on it in order to ensure it doesn’t work against our people again. The legitimacy of any government should be conditional, with an armed population given a more explicit license to do armed revolt as the insurance policy against it should it fail to keep its end of the contract.

https://t.me/hapaperspective/8749

This could actually be a great way for him to fund his campaign for POTUS, which is actually a depressing thought: our people funding a negro’s bid for POTUS for a mere N-word pass. I could see it happening, we live in clown world atm.

https://t.me/nixjeelvy/3149

People really need to read Kevin MacDonald's Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition. So-called "Liberalism" isn't some ideological product that spontaneously emerged from the void during a recent 18th century revolution. Of course, that was an important event, but it wasn't primordial.

Liberalism is perhaps better seen as a spectrum of personality traits that exist primarily in Europe. It's largely genetic and traces as far back as the Western Hunter Gatherers. No, the WHGs were not modern shitlibs, but we're not dealing with some relatively modern fad or bad habit we can discard. We are dealing with deeply ingrained genetic predispositions.

https://t.me/ImperiumPressOfficial/1739

Although this discussion between Thuletide and Imperium Press has been interesting, I agree here with American Krogan.

The idea that all cultures and peoples have equal value and a right to exist is a symptom of the individualist personality and Liberalism inherent to Europeans, as outlined by Kevin MacDonald. Rome conquered nations but allowed them to continue their native traditions, whereas razing them to the ground and erasing their memory is more typical of Semitic and Levantine peoples. One may argue that even National Socialism is downstream of European Liberalism.

The 'Folkish' view of cultural pluralism, prevalent in non-universalist paganism, is life-affirming, but it is important to note that it, ironically, is a result of 'White supremacy,' not its alternative. Other races would not extend us the same grace or hang our accomplishments in museums. The preservation of native tribes in Africa and South America from destruction extends from the liberal generosity of the European mind and folksoul.

I would disagree with Imperium Press when he says that "Liberalism is anti-White"; as Kevin MacDonald argues, Liberalism is more an innate personality type than an ideology. Most conflict between us and non-Whites is that there is incompatible dissymmetry in our personality types, we are trusting and generous to an in-group because this is how we have long survived, but this cannot ever function among an outgroup of such biological and cultural dissimilarity. Anti-Whitism is caused by allowing non-Whites to participate in 'Liberal' societies that generally fit our personality types.

Even anti-Liberals in nationalist circles are eager to go out of their way to take up the cause of non-Whites when it comes to defending Palestine or arguing how Liberalism harms non-Whites, while I myself have even argued above that it is a problem that globalism will destroy all other races and cultures when it has removed Whites from the map. All this is a result of Liberalism, that is, a personality type in Europeans, rather than an ideology.

I have formerly argued that Christianity is Jewish in origin and a result of the Semitic soul, as well as the foundation of both Communism and Globalism, but this is only partly true. It was indeed founded by Jews, specifically Hellenised Jews immersed in Platonic philosophy, but it resonated with, and is reinforced by, something which already existed in Europeans, and this is what has made it so difficult to shake off. Those same universalist elements found in Platonism are comparable to the White Man's Burden which underlies Liberalism, and we are unable to separate these elements, trapped in a foreign framework that appeals to our native sensibilities like a mind-parasite.

It is therefore very curious that when Mike says "Liberalism hurts us, but it also hurts non-whites and that is also a tragedy" and "We have given the smallpox blanket of democracy, rule of law, and human rights to the third world," he criticises Liberalism (ideology), but does so because of Liberalism (innate European mindset). Any criticism of Liberalism (politics) must either come from a perspective independent of Liberalism (mindset; impossible to take a 'view from nihil'), or it must recognise Liberalism as something innate to our psychology and worldview which must be personally restrained to prevent the manipulation of our own natures against us by external and malicious forces.