When it comes to foreign policy, Libertarians have also been of the mentality that we should mind our own business — no foreign wars at all, which is what the founders intended.

For example, In 2012, the Republican Party blocked the Libertarian leaning Republican candidate Ron Paul, the most popular choice among White voter at the time, from being nominated at the Republican National Convention, and instead we saw Mitt Romney (a person with no popular appeal among White voters) go up against Obama and inevitably lose — the Republicans knew Ron would have won the debates. They did this simply because Ron Paul was seen as an “isolationist” for not wanting more endless wars for in the Middle East. Ron Paul never even called out the jews or said “no more wars for Israel,” he just said we should stay out of the Middle East.

I’m not saying Libertarians are completely based, but we would have been much better off with someone ideologically Libertarian in the White House than someone like Trump. And if we had more Libertarians in all positions of political leadership, that would objectively be better for White Nationalists than what we have now.

Which would you rather have in more positions of power: Democrats, Republicans or Libertarians?

If you could only pick from one of these three factions, which is best?

Would you rather have shitlib leftists, Christian zionists or Libertarians that believe you have just as much right to be an unapologetic White Nationalist as someone else has the right to be a tranny, and no more foreign wars?

My point is this: for the near future at least, one of these 3 political factions may be our only viable option. Hitler 2.0 isn’t getting into the White House and we’re probably not going to get many White Nationalists into senate/house seats.

You people don’t understand what I’m trying to say. All I’m saying is that Libertarians as a faction are the lesser evil. They won’t come after you, they won’t attack you and they want less of your money.

I think we’re at a point where it’s far more prudent to support political factions and politicians based on what we know they won’t do rather than whatever they promise they will do. That’s why I think Libertarians are better than Republicans and Democrats. American Libertarians fundamentally cannot be Zionists, and they fundamentally cannot come after you because you’re a White Nationalist if we’re minding own business. They won’t enact hate speech laws, and they won’t expand a government that’s being used against us. That last point is critical.

This unfunny sketch is unironically what libs believe about 2A.

https://youtu.be/3njKKrcNOCU

"When blacks and Hispanics commit violence, whites are their most frequent victims, followed by their own race, and then the other race. So, it’s all very well to worry about black-on-black violence, for example, but according to the NCVS, there were actually 121,000 more cases of black-on-white than black-on-black violence. Hispanics attacked about 2,400 more whites than they attacked fellow Hispanics."

https://www.amren.com/videos/2022/11/latest-interracial-crime-stats/

When I'm saying we should temporarily support Libertarians, I'm saying we should support leaders that won't expand the government and won't tax us for foreign wars. Other things, like building a wall, take effort, and we have to assume anyone that promises to do such a thing is probably lying to us.

Libertarians do live in the world of theoretical idealism, of course they do, but I think I trust them more than I trust Republicans or Democrats.

Libertarians aren’t realistic, but they are more trustworthy in as far as not doing what they say they won’t do, and they actually have principles they have to live up to — they can be held accountable — unlike Republicans and Democrats that really don’t have any principles, just a mere posture.

Never forget.

https://t.me/snorkelog/916

Living in a society that was only recently converted to Christianity in a far away exotic land helped me to see that Christianity was the original globalism. ☀️

For a lot of people “ancient and timeless” means simply “dating back to the 17th century.” You can especially see this in people considering the very brief and unstable period of absolutist monarchies as the golden standard of human political organization.

And there we have it... Russian missile hits NATO soil, killing two Poles.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russian-missile-poland-nato-ukraine-przewodow-b2225824.html

Two Russian stray missiles have just hit a farm in Przewodów on the Polish side of the Polish-Ukrainian border, killing 2 Poles.

This is how they are going to take away your freedom, this is another step toward controlling what you can purchase and monitoring all transactions. Cryptocurrency was just a ploy to pave the way for centralized digital currency. If we ever see UBI, it will most likely be a centralized digital currency.

https://t.me/disclosetv/9927

Note he used a taser and still almost lost his life. Yes, cops are sometimes the worst, but some of these guys really do deserve our support and sympathy. The political correctness they contend with sometimes costs them their lives.

EDIT: Cop was shot in the head, but he lived.

For over a decade, MSM like the Daily Mail have been pushing this idea that it's far healthier for women to cheat than men, because they know that adultery, promiscuity and damaged relationships in general are actually far more detrimental to women and to family formation — and that's their real goal. They also promote cuckoldry for men, their whole message is always consistently something like: "she'll be happy if she cheats, and maybe you'll like it too! But if you cheat you'll feel like shit, because all White goys like you are natural cuckolds that should know their place."

https://t.me/DevonStack/2276