That’s not me.

I just had an idea: we should make those Let’s Go Brandon shirts that boomer normie-conservatives love to wear, but with faded Sonnenrads in the background and then sell it to clueless normiecons. Let me know if you sell any, it might be a good side hustle.

If your rights aren’t guaranteed with the right wording in a strong Bill of Rights, you inevitably lose them. Yes, it’s just a piece of paper, but it also isn’t if it’s worded properly. Think of the Bill of Rights as a contract: there’s good contracts and there’s bad contracts, and they’re usually legally binding in ways you can’t escape without getting into trouble, so it’s really not just a piece of paper.

https://youtu.be/hNYgNL9TVtc

Elon buying Twitter was never about restoring free speech. It’s about the data and power. He now has 15 years and petabytes of data to power his AI and brain chips. He now has access to manipulate what trends and news about his businesses.

Project Dindu mod: official Trailer.

We're looking for people to help us playtest and develop the Project Dindu mod for Project Zomboid. If you're interested in playing the game, please comment here and we'll message you.

"Retreating and regrouping is a standard military strategy in combat when you’re facing overwhelming odds. We don’t even have a side now in mainstream society, and all those in power are blindly carrying out the will of those who want us destroyed. I’d say it’s a fine justification for those who want to relocate or go offgrid."

Excellent comment by Mate Matingson I saw today in a chat group.

Dissidents like Woodlander, Golden Age Man, myself and many others who propose working (fast) towards a state of detachment from the System are often inaccurately criticised for 'running away'. 'Regrouping' is a much more accurate word. The point is that we need to build a position from which to fight, so it's quite the opposite to 'running away'. Remaining dependent upon a system which seeks to enslave or destroy you is strategic idiocy, and I can't help but wonder whether those who propose that course of action are either addicted to the System or so hopeless that they want to be put out of their misery.

As Jared Kushner is to Trump, Yoel Roth is to Elon.

https://t.me/thuletide/3873

If you only knew how bad things really are. https://t.me/internetpuke/30608

White Lives Matter: "One of the most racist phrases in America"

(Source)

It's almost like the AFT is the least responsible (and least accountable as well) FFL holder in America...

"ATF, Enforcer of Gun Laws, Lost 'Thousands of Firearms, Firearm Parts' to Thieves"

https://mrgunsngear.org/3fn5RjG

#FastAndFurious #PartDeux

A study has found that hundreds of former agents of the notorious israeli spying organization, Unit 8200, have attained positions of influence in many of the world’s biggest tech companies, including Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Amazon.

The IDF Unit 8200 is infamous for surveilling the Palestinian population and gathering compromising information on people for extortion and blackmail.

source

White liberal cuck mentality: take a beating and pretend nothing happened.

To form the new terms of service on twitter, Elon Musk will consult:
1. The ADL
2. Color Of Change
3. The NAACP
4. The Asian American Foundation
5. The George W. Bush Center

Outstanding work by Marc Malone and his associates. I am still sceptical about the same tactic being successful in places like Britain where we don't have vast swathes of likeminded, traditional people, and seemingly don't have any truly traditionally-minded, sane people in offices of authority.

Be sure to watch Marc Malone’s excellent video, he’s an example of a real America First activist, and he’s from England!

https://t.me/marcmalone/1296

Something gun related that interests me is the caliber debate. Disclaimer here: I have no actual combat experience and I've never been in the military, BUT I shoot regularly (more than just paper targets) and I've done my research, and I think 5.56 M193 is the general-purpose-king of all rifle rounds, but only as long as you have the appropriate barrel length and the target is within 600 meters/yards.

I think the reason why some combat veterans had bad experiences with 556 is because they were using 556 out of the M4 — with its 14.5 inch barrel — at longer ranges against skinny third-worlders. First of all, the 556 M193 round was designed by Eugene Stoner for a 20 inch barrel (the M16). Modern AR15s, which typically have 16 inch barrels, are at the acceptable minimum barrel length before the 556 round really starts to significantly lose velocity out of the muzzle — velocity is what makes the 5.56 round effective over other rounds, but if you cut the velocity enough its just a more expensive 22lr round. The other reason why it seemed weak to some combat veterans is because, again, their targets were too skinny/small for 556. Since it was originally known as a high velocity round out of the "high velocity rifle" (AR/M16s), it was designed to be small, lightweight and fast, with velocity alone giving it all of it's terminal ballistics or stopping power. However, if the target is too skinny or small, the damage potential against bad guys is like that of shooting paper targets — you just make a small hole as the little 556 icepicks through and over penetrates the target.

If you went hunting with an AR15, the 556 round would have more stopping power (better terminal ballistics) against a grizzly bear or a large moose over a raccoon or coyote because it would just icepick through the latter — apparently however, this is too counterintuitive for some gun people. The 556 round was designed to dump its energy in the target, that's what allows it to fragment, tumble and cause severe secondary cavitation, which it sometimes failed to do overseas because of what I mentioned above. But anyone that thinks the 556 round is weak is basically saying that Eugene Stoner was an idiot, and he was not!

https://t.me/TheTitanist/1022

I think people in the dissident right spend a little too much time debating whether one form of government is better than another. No form of government works when you have too much diversity.

EDIT: the "this is how we got here" argument is silly to me, because all Western countries have been infiltrated, undermined and/or compromised by diversity and the globalist tribe. What matters far more than what form of government you're under is having constitutionally protect rights against your occupied government.

Constitutionally protected rights > form of government.