There’s an old adage: if you want something done right, do it yourself. In our context it means we shouldn’t expect anyone (nor any gov institution) to save us, and we should be highly skeptical of any new elites in the future that pay lip service to our concerns for our support (Trump).

Another reason why I’m skeptical of the fruitfulness of trying to influence some new set of elites (the goal of both NRX types and liberals) is the reality that elites are usually always more interested in themselves and their own political power rather than serving the interests of their own people or even their most loyal supports, and this is why the most powerful globalist elites can control them. We all should have learned this lesson with Trump. When you think about new elites, think about Trump.

I think the only way to get the elites we want is by having power ourselves: that could be economic power, cultural power, and of course physical power.

When it comes to power, our people have to learn to stop being cheerleaders and start kicking the ball themselves — sorry for the sportsball metaphor.

According to official government documents you are now considered a potential terrorist if you: oppose abortion, globalism, communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order. So basically everyone reading this is considered a potential terrorist by the United States government and that is their official position. https://activeprp.law.blog/2021/01/23/72-types-of-americans-that-are-considered-potential-terrorists-in-official-government-documents-you-can-now-be-considered-a-potential-terrorist-just-because-of-you/

Another criticism I have of some factions within the dissident right is that they unwittingly identify with weakness, which is revealed through their end-goal of having new elites as their saviors. I think the general decline of testosterone among Western males has had its effect on this generation of rightwing men too, it’s just not as immediately obvious or advanced as it has been among the soylent-leftist-cuck variety of Western males.

A truly masculine man doesn’t want another man to save him, he wants to be able handle himself and be the one that people turn to for their survival. But the general decline in testosterone among Western males has made them more interested in appealing to the power of government and elites (essentially other men) to save them.

Why is the establishment worried about civilians owning “assault weapons” when that same establishment is constantly telling us that civilians could never use them to successfully resist tyranny anyway? Obviously it isn’t about “public safety” and it never was. So that should tell us what the establishment actually sees as a viable threat, despite all their demoralization-propaganda.

https://youtu.be/7YTO2UBLvkg

The lesson here is, don't say dumb shit on the internet, even sarcastically.

Details are very sparse, and that's on purpose. Because the real story is probably incredibly stupid.

"The 28-year-old was arrested on Friday. According to investigators, Blevins' plan became known to officials after he sent a message confirming his plans to execute the mass shooting."

Really great reporting there. Who the fuck did he send that message to? How did he send it? What did it actually say?

This kind of reporting is deliberately vague, but it's also really stupid. There is no reason to not reveal those details unless they show what a farce the whole thing is.

We all know the message was sent to whatever Fed was in the chatroom trying to get him to say dumb shit.

https://abc13.com/man-plans-mass-shooting-attempted-walmart-target-gun-violence/10720231/

This mass shooting story is completely fake.

I don't know who this Blevins guy is, but I can guarantee there was no actual terror plot here.

99.99999% chance this is another case of an FBI informant inciting a guy to say dumb shit on the internet.

The total lack of White Nationalist mass shootings was becoming very embarrassing for the FBI. They needed something to bolster the totally fake racial narrative they've been pushing.

At this point they're like a crackhead searching under the couch cushions for loose change.

Meanwhile, black militias like the NFAC are already organizing and openly calling for White Genocide. This actually happened, and it’s only a matter of time before there’s another black supremacist shooter that targets Whites.

https://www.publicradiotulsa.org/post/armed-demonstrators-march-through-tulsa-part-national-black-power-convention#stream/0

Oy Vey.

I’m as pro-2A as can be, I think it’s the absolute most important concept we have, but the founding fathers of the United States never envisioned an America as racially diverse and anti-White as it is now. Many states prohibited blacks from own firearms altogether until later in our country’s history. The current establishment looks the other way or even congratulates these openly hostile black militias for exercising a right (that was recognized by Whites for Whites); and this same establishment has weaponized agencies like the ATF to disarm White heritage Americans, all while there’s open calls for White genocide from armed BIPOC militias.

And this is precisely why the founding fathers wrote the Second Amendment recognizing our God given right — so that we can defend ourselves from this shit. Imagine if only these people could legally possess arms, we’d be absolutely fucked as a nation.

https://youtu.be/W0Xl4nglXPM

Our original Bill of Rights would have stood unopposed, as something everyone would have envied, without criticism, in a normatively White America. But now it’s all going to hell because of the millions of low IQ, violent BIPOC races that have basically appropriated our rights, using them to threaten and attack us (and each other) daily, which makes our country (especially our rights) look like an absolute joke to the rest of the world.

And of course, the rest of the world will look at all of this insanity and blame our rights to avoid the race factor.

The establishment probably knew this decades ago: that the international public would simply attach itself to the most simple, politically correct one dimensional explanation (its guns not race) because they’re always so happy to condemn America and its rights — but unwittingly, they condemn those same rights anywhere and everywhere else.

Trad thot logic: “yeah, I didn’t make all those other guys wait for sex with me, but you get to wait until marriage because you’re so special.”

I bet that’ll make him feel like a real winner.

https://youtu.be/juEpCUvVMWs

Here’s an analogy.

Imagine a retail store that sells whatever. For all the previous men that shopped there in the past, everything was discounted, some items were even free. All of the items that were available to them were either brand new or at least excellent condition, with a generous return policy. And to top it off, they didn’t even have to wait in the check out line.

But when the day arrives that you find yourself there, browsing the shelves, the store attendant informs you that every item available to you is in heavily used or “acceptable” condition and that you’ll be paying the full retail price with no return policy. You also have to wait in the check out line because the old cashier is slow. To make matters worse, you’re their last customer. You ask the manager while waiting in line, “why am I waiting for this used, over priced stuff?” The manager replies, “we want you to value our business.”

This is analogous to what modern women are doing to men that genuinely want a relationship when they make them wait for sex. Somehow these women are actually led to believe that this makes men value them (and the relationship) more.