Neither hyper-atomized Neoliberalism nor Oriental Despotism. Choose the third way of Anglo Saxonism. Well-ordered individual and collective freedom. Practiced by the American founders, the Confederacy, John A MacDonald, Billy Hughes, and even the early progressives all in their own peculiar ways.

When I think about why Ukrainians fight so hard to resist Russian occupation, I imagine that, for many of them, it comes down to something more immediate and tangible than lines on a map or particular events from the previous century. Sure, they are fighting because their country was invaded by the Russian military in 2022, but why did they put up such a resistance in the first place? Was it simply to maintain their sovereignty as an independent country? I can imagine that’s part of it, but there’s clearly more to their motivation.

When I try to put myself in Ukrainian shoes, I imagine seeing Russia primarily as a system that does not govern with the everyday wellbeing of its own people as its central concern—one in which enormous resources are devoted to military power, state prestige, and the appearance of national strength while many ordinary Russian citizens, particularly outside the wealthiest major cities, live amid comparatively poor infrastructure, limited public investment, squalid living conditions and economic stagnation. In that sense, the Potemkin village seems like an apt metaphor for the entire country: a state intensely concerned with projecting strength and prosperity, while the lived reality for many of its citizens is far less impressive and often abysmal.

If I were a Ukrainian, I would fight so that my country wouldn’t once again become another impoverished part of the Soviet Union Russian world.

https://t.me/LegionEuropa/30871

Boomers are always trying to convince everyone that hard work is a virtue in and of itself, that’s how they convince themselves that squatemalans and pajeets are just so wonderful. It never seems to dawn on them that no one else really cares how hard anyone actually works. What matters is the value you produce and how much money you make. That’s it.

I don’t have too much to say about the Connell 7 rape case, because I don’t know all the facts yet, but I want to give you all my 2 cents. When I was in college, there were only two types of girls going to fraternity houses: sorority girls (usually sluts) and just regular sluts unaffiliated with Greek life. Every girl on campus knew that setting foot inside of a frat house, especially at night during a party or “get together”, was already consenting to something... It was always a stain on a girl’s reputation if she had frequented a frat house. Drugs, sex and parties are just business as usual in any frat house. Everyone knows this, especially the femoids going to these stupid frat parties.

Almost everyone that has been a student on a college or university campus (in the USA at least) just knows this, even the ones that never partied or never set foot inside a frat house. It’s just a known thing.

The only important takeaway from all of this: don’t send your daughters to college/university, or at least don’t let them live on campus.

https://t.me/thuletide/8642

Some people like to depict Greek life (fraternities and sororities) on US college/university campuses as an example of peak American Whiteness, and there’s definitely some truth to it—it’s typically very White American. Most all people that participate in Greek life are young White people. But as an institution, along with living on campus, it’s just not healthy. These young White people should be getting married and having children instead of joining these fraternities and sororities just to party their youth away, cheapen their existence, and destroy their ability to pair bond; thus delaying real adulthood.

Anyone invading Ukraine is just committing suicide at this point. It’s now AI assisted suicide for the invaders.

https://t.me/frontier_conflict1/20126

As a daughter dad myself, these simp fathers that think females can do no wrong are the worst daughter dads ever. No wonder their daughters grow up to be stupid sluts with no sense of personal responsibility—they didn’t raise them to be good, discerning women that can make the right choices. Behind every slut there’s a shit father.

https://t.me/SimpsUnleashed/1821

If liberals MUST blame an entire category of men for anything bad that befalls women like that slut femoid at Cornell, blame shitty fathers for not teaching their daughters how to conduct themselves around men, especially around young men on a college campus. And blame shitty fathers for not teaching their daughters about the reputational damage that often follows drug use and, to put it mildly, sleeping around.

I now understand why White liberal femoids and negroes are natural allies: they’re both dindu nuffins.

I think it’s a mistake to use one extreme here—guys obsessing over absolute 100% virginity in our era—to try to argue for another extreme—having a relationship with someone that has a very high body count. As you said, we are all entitled to our preferences. Some of this is down to personal limits and is relative to what we are used to.

But it’s just a fact that most men will always find women with higher body counts as a far less attractive candidate for marriage, and there are solid evolutionary reasons for that aversion. I shouldn’t have to explain why it’s biologically critical for a man to avoid starting a family with a woman that has a high body count. Being cuckolded is one of the worst things that can befall any man, along with pair boding issues that are ever present with anyone, male or female, that has had many sexual partners. All the science on this stuff says avoid having a relationship with anyone that has a high body count.

If you still want to defend the idea of turning sluts into housewives, by all means, you can marry one if you want. Just don’t get upset if your children’s biological father isn’t actually you. Beyond a certain body count, it becomes a buyer beware issue.

And back to the Cornell 7 context that the OP was responding to. The lesson for women (and men too) is that if they want to exercise their sexual freedom, they should be aware of all the consequences, such as reputational damage—this is what parents should be teaching their young adult children. With great freedom comes greater accountability, and they must accept being ostracized instead of blaming others or fabricating false rape accusations. A woman that voluntarily does drugs and sleeps around has to understand that she is already putting herself at risk and will naturally (and rightfully) have less credibility if she goes to the authorities about any sexual misconduct. It’s like playing on train tracks and then trying to sue the train conductor because you finally got hit by the train, when you just shouldn’t have been playing on the train tracks to begin with.

I don’t think that’s accurate, and it’s certainly not that simple. How do even quantify this? The real question is who is having less sex and who is having more.

The reality in the West is that the top 20% of men are shagging 80% of the women—the 80/20 rule is usually the best guess. Therefore, it’s that roughly 80% of men that are having less sex (or no sex) that drive the overall numbers of people having sex way down.

In reality, there’s a serious hypergamy problem exacerbated by a bad economy, social media, dating apps, smart phones and women with sky high egos that won’t date sub 8 men unless they’re rich.

The fact remains that in the modern West, the average woman is doing far better in every almost arena than the average male, from dating to employment to educational achievement… Not because women are better than men, but because we live in the age of Onlyfans paypigs, endless simps and institutionalized Feminism, where women can claim all the freedom and status traditionally held my men, but with only a fraction of the actual accountability—if something goes wrong, women can cry and blame misogyny or toxic masculinity. Meanwhile men are still held to a higher standard, always on the hook for any misconduct, and still expected to shut their mouth and suck it up. There are certainly no social safety nets for men.

That’s why a lot of men are just dropping out of society. Most cases of misogyny are just these forgotten sub-8 men saying mean words on the internet, because society is oblivious to their plight. Sure, a lot of the things they say are mean and dumb, but that’s what happens when society (and its female population) abandons its men, the average male population.

Looksmaxxers and Chads are doing fine though, in fact they’re killing it; pumping and dumping the majority of “empowered” women that keeping coming back to them. Women aren’t going to call them misogynistic assholes until they’re no longer on Chads’ radars. But society will just continue attacking the average males that are just keeping their heads down and occasionally saying mean things on the internet, because that’s all that really matters these days.

The Looksmaxxing phenomenon alone is smoking gun proof that we are living under a feminist culture. Why should any male ever have to be a Looksmaxxer to get a decent girlfriend in a healthy civilization? That whole trend is downstream from women having a disproportionate amount of power over men.

If men even think they have to be a 10 to get a 7, your civilization is circling the drain.

Hoping the Carney government doesnt allow this moron and his family back into the country. Enjoy you family values and the draft zigger.

The last thing a penis at Cornell sees before having ketamine snorted off it

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

I think it’s already very safe to say that this slut retroactively withdrew her consent from the Cornell 7 when she realized it damaged her reputation so badly that the fraternity president banned her from frat parties for her own good. She cried rape to absolve herself of any wrongdoing.

This is also exactly the sort of woman that will never admit she ever did anything wrong. How often do you hear a woman own her mistakes? How often will you hear a woman say “crap, that was my fault?”

Not very often. That’s another reason why I don’t think most women should have the same rights, occupations and status traditionally held by men. Without accountability and self awareness, they are unfit for so much freedom and power.

And to all the feminists and people complaining about misogyny out there, the fact remains that men still cannot retroactively withdraw consent and accuse the women they’ve slept with of rape—and take them to court over it. So until you specifically support that, I don’t want to hear you advocating for “gender equality.”