AfD politician from Saxony-Anhalt, Hans-Thomas Tillschneider, was noticed having a Russian army mug in his office. He is one of the most rabidly pro-Russian members of the AfD.

For Russia-supporters, either on the political Right or Left, it was never really about peace and diplomacy. This was a smoke-screen all the way.

At the beginning, they argued against helping Ukraine claiming that Ukraine has no chance and that it's a pawn, a client-state of Western powers. Since Ukraine doesn't stand a chance against Russia, the argument went, Ukraine and the West need to make concessions to alleviate the suffering of Ukrainians. Their overarching claim was that Ukraine didn't have an agency.

But then, as Ukraine started hitting back. Over time, Ukraine's responses have become stronger and stronger to an extent that one could reasonably conclude that Ukraine managed to change the tide of this war.

And here is when peaceniks and other Russia-sympathizers revealed their true face. A conspicuous moment came when Ukraine implemented the Operation Spiderweb last year. Suddenly, the same voices that until then were arguing that Ukraine has no agency and is helpless, began screaming that Ukraine is escalating the situation and dragging the world into a conflagration. The same voices began calling the West, above all US, to actively prevent Ukraine from fighting!

Later on, as Ukraine's drone strikes against Russian refineries and marketplaces increased in quality and quantity, members of AfD, among them Alice Weidel, openly claimed that such strikes are "against German interests" and that Ukraine must be prevented from carrying out such attacks.

So which is it? Is Ukraine a pawn of the West that has no chance against Russia? Or is it a formidable military force with its own agency that needs to be stopped? Suddenly the roles were reversed: if at the beginning Ukraine was the "hapless pawn" of the West, now the West became Ukraine's "pawn".

This change of rhetoric of Russia-sympathizers, in fact a 180-degree change, reveals that they were arguing in bad faith from the very beginning. Their concern wasn't really that Ukraine is weak and therefore helping it prolongs its agony - a specious argument in itself, but that's beside the point. Their goal is not peace or diplomacy. What they truly want is Russian victory! They want that Russia prevails over Ukraine, and by extension over the West.

They hate Ukraine, not because it is a pawn, but because it is powerful enough to successfully resist their beloved Russia. They are not concerned about the prolongation of the war as such. What they are worried about is that their beloved Russia might lose.

Anyone who expresses any kind of sympathy towards Russia, anyone who even slightly doubts and "contextualizes" Ukraine's cause should be named for what he is - a scumbag, a traitor and an enemy of the civilized world. Because, as the case of Hans-Thomas Tillschneider reveals, deep inside what these people want is not peace as such, but "peace" on Russia's terms - i.e., Russian victory. Such people need to be not only shunned but actively prosecuted. Such people should not be allowed to participate in the public life of Western societies.

https://t.me/nixjeelvy/13115?single

This retarded ass meme is literally what a lot of normies think. “They’re just dividing us over skin color so they can keep robbing us!”

https://t.me/The_Course_of_Empire/50711

Diversity is division.

The right to keep and bear arms is a real “tragedy” for leftists and their precious dindus.

✍️ The Anti-Defamation League and a host of major Jewish groups are lobbying California to pass a bill to classify Jews as a race/ethnicity and "not just a faith."

These groups for decades have been insisting that race doesn't exist and is just a social construct, but now they're leading the charge for Jews to be classified as a race to secure "the right amount of resources" for their people.
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=65130

I see people sharing this picture, and it accurately depicts the Russian government’s overall position, but I think people should include more context and the full translation.

Maria Zakharova is a senior Russian diplomat and the principal spokesperson for Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. She has held the spokesperson role since 2015 and is also the director of the Foreign Ministry’s Department of Information and Press.

The full translation of the quote:

“Don’t you see what we are fighting for? Don’t you see that our guys are giving their lives? … With their lives they are defending the right not only of the African continent, but of all people on our planet to be free.”

The Russian government is pro-African, partially for resources, but also because they’re opening up their country to African (and Indian) men to fill their manpower shortages.

Also, I’m sick of hearing some dissident righters act like it’s “based” that Russia is enlisting foreign non-White men to participate in their unwarranted invasion of Ukraine. In what fucking world is that based? Would it be “based” if that non-White invader destroys Ukrainian property or kills a Ukrainian soldier? Is it also “based” if he can then go back to Russia—now as a new Russian citizen—to then rape, kill, fuck and replace ethnic Russians too?

The war in Ukraine is a meat grinder for sure, especially for the Russian side, but that doesn’t mean it’s suddenly based if hordes of Africans and Indians are invaders on behalf of the Russian system. Many of them will survive and become Russian citizens.

The Russian government is as anti-ethnic-Russian as it is anti-Ukrainian, because it is supremely anti-White.

This is the most punchable face I’ve seen in a long time.

https://t.me/gramscianradio/8965

Foid explains foids and why they should be in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant

It would be funny if somehow, someone was able to replace the Rocky statue in Philadelphia with GypsyCrusader.

Selective outrage with the #elbowsup crowd

Most brown people can’t have a lengthy or deep conversation about anything. Go ahead and try to talk to a few of them, if it even gets to the conversation stage, it’ll be some trivial shit about how they got drunk last weekend or like watching soccer. It never gets deeper than that.

https://t.me/gramscianradio/8985

Even with the most ordinary, sub-100 IQ White normie, I can expect to have a basic, non-academic conversation about politics, economics, philosophy, psychology and culture; and often with a dash of humor. They can talk about Trump, they can talk about cuisine, they can talk about anything on at least a basic level and contribute to the conversation.

With negroes, the conversation is often just entertaining buffoonery and amusing bullshit, but at least that’s something. A low IQ fool is at least entertaining!

With brown people it’s often just a blank stare and literal vapidness. They barely have an ego. There is just nothing.