Of course I want all non-Whites to leave, but some of the White people too, the ones that want to leave because “America is too racist!” or “I don’t like all the guns here.” Yes, please get out, you are not an asset.

And then of course you have Whites from other countries that like heritage American culture, the Constitution (Bill of Rights), that understand what it’s all about. They are always welcome here.

I’m not talking about White people that leave the country for reasons unrelated to how they feel about America. I can understand if an American becomes a permanent resident or citizen of another country for work or love, and being near helpful in-laws, or some other reason like that.

I feel no joy in seeing them leave. I’m talking about people that hate America and what it’s all about — those are the people that I want to leave. We should even pay them to leave.

Once you get rid of the illegal immigrants and strengthen the borders, paying people (who are already legal citizens) to leave your country and revoke their citizenship has got to be one of the ultimate Nationalist policies. Because then, eventually, you’re left with only the people that really want to be in your country and part of your nation, and aren’t going to quit it all for a lump sum of cash. I think a lot of the communist/antifa types would certainly leave for the right amount of money.

No, this policy would apply after we kick out the non-Whites. I’m talking about White people that hate America for whatever reason — we pay them to leave. The pajeets are mostly recent immigrants that have no legitimate claim to this country. Most of them probably aren’t even legally citizens.

You’re not going to convince White normies that some racism is good, natural and necessary just because you’re a looksmaxxer or whatever nonsense you think would work. You’re the one trying to rewrite the definition of a word that’s deeply embedded and at the core of their current reality.

The only thing that works is getting them to question and doubt that racism itself is a legitimate concept.

A big part of the normie problem is that most people don’t contemplate how their own vocabulary shapes, limits and directs their ability to think about and process reality.

But Jews intuitively grasp that language is a form of magic that can be used against other races; especially against a race that operates off of abstract ideas and moral principles (White people).

What normies think is actually quite relevant to power, otherwise why would these “elites” (often Jews) spend billions of dollars every day trying to influence normies? Why would Elon Musk buy Twitter? Why does TikTok matter to them so much? Even after investing billions, it doesn’t always work out well for them, but they will just spend even more money trying to influence normies.

Yes, what normies think does matter. Even if your argument is that normies don’t think, whatever is inside their head still matters a lot! These “elites” are spending billions on a daily basis to make sure they control what is inside normies skulls. If it didn’t matter, the ruling class (Jews) wouldn’t care about the media at all.

They’re not investing in media just to make money, they want to shape what the masses think, and they are willing to risk their fortunes to do that.

If what normies think didn’t matter, then who owns the media also wouldn’t matter. But clearly it does.

Getting normies on our side and understanding our message matters, because you always benefit from having a larger base of support. Having more people on your side exponentially increases your ability to influence politics and get into power.

It also matters if there’s a war.

This checks out. It’s the Asian parent that would admit this to their hapa kid. They typically have no moral qualms regarding race realism.

More people should be paying attention to the Karmelo Anthony case that is going on right now, not just for the obvious reasons related to race, but more so because it’s enlightening regarding the legal standards for self-defense.

Karmelo’s defense and his supporters have been trying to claim that he defended himself against Metcalf (the White murder victim) but of course that turned out to be bullshit. His claim to self-defense fell apart because he provoked the encounter — he was the initial aggressor— which parallels the legal situation with Travis and Gregory McMichael in the Ahmad Arbery case from 2020. A lot of folks in the Dissident Right ignorantly claimed that the McMichael’s defended themselves and that their conviction was somehow proof that you can’t legally defend yourself if you’re White — well, no, you legally can’t be the aggressor if you’re going to claim self-defense afterwards. That’s why I’m pointing out that Karmelo Anthony’s legal situation is very similar to the McMichael’s. And funny enough, negroes are also claiming that they aren’t legally allowed to defend themselves against White people.

The point is, you need to understand the laws in your area: what constitutes self-defense. There is legally a thin line between self-defense and murder, and that line is very thin if you don’t understand how the legal system makes that determination. For legal self-defense, some good basic rules to follow: never be the aggressor, never provoke the encounter, and never chase or entrap someone that is no longer an immediate threat to you or anyone else.

In other words, much like with the McMichael’s in the Ahmaud Arbery case, Karmelo Anthony’s legal situation appears similar in that his self-defense claim fell apart, for somewhat similar reasons, and this time the races were reversed.

In cases where the victim fought back at all, every murderer could claim they killed their victim in self-defense, if being the aggressor or the one that provoked the encounter wasn’t a negative factor in the legal standard for self-defense.

This is an excellent video that’s answer the question “why do Americans have guns but do little with them, beyond personal self defense.” The Second Amendment is still critically important and essential, but it’s not enough. Unfortunately for some people, that answer is too nuanced and complex — a solution is rarely one thing in isolation, but rather multiple things in the right combination.

https://youtu.be/ehlsJVREMSk?si=0

Another important aspect of this video is how the dissolution of militias facilitated the rise of a standing professional army (the US military) which is an essential characteristic of empire — the global US empire that so many of us despise.

Historians in the future will look at that point as the point at which the US became an empire.

I can’t overstate how subversive the word racist actually is, I’m listening to right leaning YouTubers all saying “these anti-Whites are the real racists, that’s why they’re a problem!”

If White Nationalists don’t understand how the term racism itself is entirely subversive and problematic, then White Nationalism will become a losers’ movement once again.

Karmelo Anthony has been found guilty and is being sentenced to 35 years in prison. That’s better than I expected.

So the real message here is that citizens having firearms is actually important for revolution and protecting sovereignty against a tyrannical, traitorous anti-White government. I couldn’t agree more!

But what about training and experience with firearms?

What’s unfortunate for any population that has to break into armories to gain access to arms is that, if they’re not shot dead on sight by the military — that would absolutely have armed guards around a military base or police station — whatever people snag from an armory might be the first guns they’ve ever touched.

Think about what an uphill battle that is for people that don’t have the luxury of having a constitution that would protect their right to keep and bear arms.

“If we aren’t allowed to carry knives, Sikhs shouldn’t be allowed to either” is the wrong mindset — just wanting the traitorous-government to apply the laws equally, and begging for greater equality.

A better mindset: “We should be the ones carrying the weapons, guns included.”

GTA: UK

h/t: Cognative Omission

@AltSkull48

If I were a Brit, I’d put together some Anglo-Saxon-Pagan religion that required people to carry knives (Seaxes) like the Sikhs do. I think it would become very popular among Whites in Britain.

The Saxons were named after the long knives they traditionally carried, so the tradition is already there.