Forwarded from Shitposting is a human right
Indians are celebrating the murder of Henry Nowak
๐15๐ฑ11๐คฌ6
The Gramscian Radio
The recent case of Rocco Kirkpatrick, impaled by Britain's finest
We just canโt hate British police enough. Theyโre vile beyond all measure. They make American police look like saints, and thatโs saying quite a lot.
๐ฏ22
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
๐ฎ๐ณ ๐ India's Fertility Rate Drops Below Replacement Level for First Time, Reveals Government Report
India, the world's most populous country, is currently experiencing one of the sharpest declines in fertility rates in the world. From 4.5 children per woman in the 1970s, it has now fallen to 1.9, below the replacement rate of 2.1. In more than two-thirds of countries, population growth is now below 2.1. - "India's Fertility Rate Drops Below Replacement Level for First Time, Reveals Government Report"
While the national average indicates a slowdown in population growth, the report highlights stark regional contrasts. Bihar recorded the highest fertility rate in the country at 2.9, followed by Uttar Pradesh at 2.6, Madhya Pradesh at 2.4 and Rajasthan at 2.3 - the only major states still above the replacement level. In contrast, Delhi reported the country's lowest TFR at 1.2. Southern and western states continue to show significantly lower fertility rates. Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal each recorded a TFR of 1.3, while Andhra Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Maharashtra and Punjab stood at 1.4. Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka and Telangana each reported a TFR of 1.5.
The report also underlined the persistent rural-urban divide. India's rural TFR remained higher at 2.1 compared to 1.5 in urban areas. This trend was visible across almost all major states and Union Territories, except Kerala, where urban fertility was marginally higher, and Tamil Nadu, where fertility rates remained identical in both rural and urban regions.
https://www.ndtv.com/health/indias-fertility-rate-drops-below-replacement-level-for-first-time-reveals-government-report-11565147
India, the world's most populous country, is currently experiencing one of the sharpest declines in fertility rates in the world. From 4.5 children per woman in the 1970s, it has now fallen to 1.9, below the replacement rate of 2.1. In more than two-thirds of countries, population growth is now below 2.1. - "India's Fertility Rate Drops Below Replacement Level for First Time, Reveals Government Report"
While the national average indicates a slowdown in population growth, the report highlights stark regional contrasts. Bihar recorded the highest fertility rate in the country at 2.9, followed by Uttar Pradesh at 2.6, Madhya Pradesh at 2.4 and Rajasthan at 2.3 - the only major states still above the replacement level. In contrast, Delhi reported the country's lowest TFR at 1.2. Southern and western states continue to show significantly lower fertility rates. Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal each recorded a TFR of 1.3, while Andhra Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Maharashtra and Punjab stood at 1.4. Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka and Telangana each reported a TFR of 1.5.
The report also underlined the persistent rural-urban divide. India's rural TFR remained higher at 2.1 compared to 1.5 in urban areas. This trend was visible across almost all major states and Union Territories, except Kerala, where urban fertility was marginally higher, and Tamil Nadu, where fertility rates remained identical in both rural and urban regions.
https://www.ndtv.com/health/indias-fertility-rate-drops-below-replacement-level-for-first-time-reveals-government-report-11565147
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NDTV Lifeline
India's Fertility Rate Drops Below Replacement Level for First Time, Reveals Government Report
India's fertility decline has been dramatic over the past five decades. The TFR dropped from 5.2 during 1971-1981 to 4.5, and further from 3.6 in 1991 to 1.9 in 2024.
๐10๐3โก2๐คฌ1
Forwarded from @ConservativesUnited (Dottie)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐๐๐๐
๐4
A better way to think about the Bill of Rights is that it is a set of constitutional limits (laws) on what the government may do to you, punish you for, or force you to obey.
Calling the amendments โrightsโ in themselves can create confusion. People will criticize the Bill of Rights by saying our rights do not come from a piece of paper, and in that sense they are technically right. The Bill of Rights does not create our rights. It recognizes them and restrains the government from violating them. The problem it is meant to address is simple: governments do not truly grant rights. They more often take them away, restrict them, or sell them back to people as privileges.
Another major misunderstanding is the idea that the Bill of Rights always protects you instantly, on the spot, in real time. It does not always work that way. A police officer can still arrest you unlawfully, search you unlawfully, or otherwise violate your rights. Like other laws, the ultimate force of the Bill of Rights often appears in a courtroom, after the violation has already happened. But that does not make it worthless. We do not say laws against theft are meaningless just because theft still happens. We understand that laws can be broken, and that their purpose is to provide a standard for judgment and accountability.
The same is true here. Sometimes the government breaks the law. The Bill of Rights gives us the constitutional standard by which those violations can be challenged.
Calling the amendments โrightsโ in themselves can create confusion. People will criticize the Bill of Rights by saying our rights do not come from a piece of paper, and in that sense they are technically right. The Bill of Rights does not create our rights. It recognizes them and restrains the government from violating them. The problem it is meant to address is simple: governments do not truly grant rights. They more often take them away, restrict them, or sell them back to people as privileges.
Another major misunderstanding is the idea that the Bill of Rights always protects you instantly, on the spot, in real time. It does not always work that way. A police officer can still arrest you unlawfully, search you unlawfully, or otherwise violate your rights. Like other laws, the ultimate force of the Bill of Rights often appears in a courtroom, after the violation has already happened. But that does not make it worthless. We do not say laws against theft are meaningless just because theft still happens. We understand that laws can be broken, and that their purpose is to provide a standard for judgment and accountability.
The same is true here. Sometimes the government breaks the law. The Bill of Rights gives us the constitutional standard by which those violations can be challenged.
๐7
HapaPerspective ๐บ๐ธ
A better way to think about the Bill of Rights is that it is a set of constitutional limits (laws) on what the government may do to you, punish you for, or force you to obey. Calling the amendments โrightsโ in themselves can create confusion. People willโฆ
In other words, the amendments in the Bill of Rights are not a list of granted rights, they are laws protecting rights.
๐11
Forwarded from The Gramscian Radio
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Posting this satire woild land you in prison in Great Britian.
๐คฌ8
Forwarded from The Gramscian Radio
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Zul Mohammed showed up and was confronted by more Americans than the new arrivals who he invited to the "rally".
Notice how the police arent jumping at the throats of the Americans, if this was happening in Great Britian everyone in the frame other than Zul Mohmmed would be shoved to the floor and handcuffed due to Speech Crimes.
Notice how the police arent jumping at the throats of the Americans, if this was happening in Great Britian everyone in the frame other than Zul Mohmmed would be shoved to the floor and handcuffed due to Speech Crimes.
โก10
Keep your home defense weapons close and ready to go. Your home could be next.
https://t.me/realblaircottrell/7170
https://t.me/realblaircottrell/7170
Telegram
Blair Cottrell ๐ฆ๐บ
This is footage of a 2025 aggravated home invasion in Gladstone Park, Melbourne at 1:30am.
A 60-year-old man was stabbed countless times, shot in the arm & bashed repeatedly with a hammer by 4 Africans.
Itโs unpleasant to watch but Iโm glad to have theโฆ
A 60-year-old man was stabbed countless times, shot in the arm & bashed repeatedly with a hammer by 4 Africans.
Itโs unpleasant to watch but Iโm glad to have theโฆ